Re: sending mail with POP

On Tue, May 30, 2000 at 05:24:02PM +0200, Frank Derichsweiler wrote: > > Setting up qmail for a dial-up host is IMHO very easy, there are > excellent documents at the qmail page http://www.qmail.org . My home > box is running perfectly. > In case of problems please ask by sending personal mail,

Re: qmail

On Tue, May 30, 2000 at 08:58:51PM -0700, MacHara wrote: > i have a problem to set mbox type which mutt will send it.. It works for > sendmail w/ mbox but qmail w/ maildir.. In the muttrc: set mbox_type=Maildir will ask mutt to create new mailboxes in Maildir format. > it does not deliver any

Re: sending mail with POP

[EMAIL PROTECTED] proclaimed on mutt-users that: ># "Smart" relay host (may be null) >DSsmtp.worldonline.fr OK so far. >But that's not all. As you have a dialup workstation, each time you connect to your >ISP, your IP address will change. >So, you have to tell Sendmail you official domain na

Re: x-mailer header

clemensF proclaimed on mutt-users that: >> Andreas Wessel: > >> What´s it with these "X"-headers anyway? >> Does there have to be an X before any self entered header? >> RFC? > >the common use for it these days is to includer user-info in the headers >(e.g. my pgp-key#). they coexist peacefully

qmail

Hello.. i have a problem to set mbox type which mutt will send it.. It works for sendmail w/ mbox but qmail w/ maildir.. it does not deliver any mail to qmail server.. Anyone knows how to configure mutt?? "-t" flag looks like configuring mbox type...But I could not find correct flagment... hara

Re: Replying to multiple messages

Bob, et al -- ...and then Bob Bell said... % % Is there any way to specify which message should be used to set % the "References" field? In my limited experience, mutt figures its Refs: and I-R-T: fields from the first message in the tagged list, probably based on the current sort order.

Re: ~l behavior doc bug

Randall -- ...and then Randall Hopper said... % manual.txt % > ~l message is addressed to a known mailing list % % If I mark my lists with "lists" (known) as before, my ~l hooks do not % enage. But if I mark them with "subscribe" (subscribed), then my ~l hooks % "do" engage.

Re: Replying to multiple messages

On Tue, May 30, 2000 at 03:27:11PM -0400, Bob Bell wrote: > My thoughts exactly. I'd tag all relevant messages, and then just > hit ';g' or whatever over the message where I want the followups to > appear. This would be a really nice feature, as my threading is > currently getting messed up

Re: Possible, does it exist already...?

On 2000.05.30, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Say you are replying to 30 messages, for instance. And you don't want to > send each out after you are done with your reply. Could you then create > a macro to send these to outbox and then send say eve

Possible, does it exist already...?

Say you are replying to 30 messages, for instance. And you don't want to send each out after you are done with your reply. Could you then create a macro to send these to outbox and then send say every 5 minutes. Or even a macro to send them. -- /helfman "At any given moment, you may find the

Re: x-mailer header

> Andreas Wessel: > What´s it with these "X"-headers anyway? > Does there have to be an X before any self entered header? > RFC? the common use for it these days is to includer user-info in the headers (e.g. my pgp-key#). they coexist peacefully with the rfc822 headers until religion claims it'

Re: Handling of ^-- $

At 2:21 PM EDT on May 30 Alex Lane sent off: > I'm only just now noticing that one of the mailing lists I'm subscribed > to appears to truncate the "-- " that separates the message from the > message signature to simply "--". > > I've got to believe this is not proper behavior on the part of th

Re: Using multiple mailboxes with Mutt (& procmail filtering).

Jacob Davies <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Tue, 30 May 2000: > Right... I think you want something that acts on tagged messages and saves > them to existing mailboxes using save-hooks if they exist, or otherwise to > the received folder if there's no existing mailbox. You don't need to have this t

Re: Replying to multiple messages

On Tue, May 30, 2000 at 08:55:11PM +0300, Mikko Hnninen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I wonder how something like this could be implemented? It would be > quite unpractical to keep a list of tagging order or anything like that. > Maybe something like "if the current message is tagged, use that as

Re: Using multiple mailboxes with Mutt (& procmail filtering).

> Or, to make it portable and unlimited by current keyboard bindings, use the > function/key names: > macro index YourKeyOfChoiceHere > With this, you could make your "magic key" to be even tab, although I'm > not sure how to make it select either next-new in this folder or > next-new in next f

Re: Handling of ^-- $

Alex, (hey there!) You, Alex Lane, were spotted writing this on Tue, May 30, 2000 at 01:21:32PM -0500: > I'm only just now noticing that one of the mailing lists I'm subscribed > to appears to truncate the "-- " that separates the message from the > message signature to simply "--". It's again

Re: sending mail with POP

clemensF <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Tue, 30 May 2000: > i don't agree. would it not be better to masquerade, i.e. not to define > the hostname given by the isp, but instead to pretend to be a local > user@isp? masquerading also avoids problems arising from reverse dns > lookups, when the given

Re: receive-hook?

Submitted 30 May 2000 by David T-G: | This is something that has been bothering me for a while... If that's | the case, then why does | | send-hook . set pgp_autosign | send-hook (skip|topgunch|guckes)unset pgp_autosign | | work as expected -- t

Re: HTML being filtered?

Thanks to all who answered my question. Gee, mutt is even better than I originally thought! Cheers... -- Alex Lane * Webster, Texas, USA * [EMAIL PROTECTED] * www.galexi.com/alex/ DH/DSS PGP keyID: 0xD94803CD -*- RSA PGP keyID: 0xCABD6FF9 It's a damn poor mind that can only think of one

Handling of ^-- $

I'm only just now noticing that one of the mailing lists I'm subscribed to appears to truncate the "-- " that separates the message from the message signature to simply "--". I've got to believe this is not proper behavior on the part of the mailing list remailer, or am I wrong about that? Chee

Re: Reply-to-all function?

> Chris Woodfield: > It seems mutt's default behavior when replying to a message is to only put > the sender in the To: header. Is there a way to add Cc: recipients as > well? the group-reply, documented in the manual and in the quickref screen launched by '?', is commonly bound to 'g'. just ch

Re: sending mail with POP

> [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > First, you have to set your "smart host" in /etc/sendmail.cf > So, put a line of this kind (in /etc/sendmail.cf) : > > # "Smart" relay host (may be null) > DSsmtp.worldonline.fr yes, this is vital. i had this configured for ages until i found out that the protocol desig

Re: receive-hook?

At 08:07 -0400 30 May 2000, David T-G <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > % Unfortunately, there's no way to execute send-hooks dependent on the > % message you are replying to. > > This is something that has been bothering me for a while... If that's > the case, then why does > > send-hook .

Re: Replying to multiple messages

Bob Bell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Tue, 30 May 2000: > Is there any way to specify which message should be used to set > the "References" field? Not that I know of. I wonder how something like this could be implemented? It would be quite unpractical to keep a list of tagging order or any

Re: [OT-ish] HTML being filtered?

At 11:12 -0500 30 May 2000, Ronny Haryanto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > an RFC (about multipart or MIME, I can't remember exactly) suggests > that the last text/plain part be shown if all of the parts are of the > same type. Please correct me if I'm wrong. Actually, mailers are supposed to prefer

Replying to multiple messages

I really like the ability in mutt to be able to reply to (thereby quoting) multiple messages in a single response. Also, the threading of messages in wonderful. However, when I reply to multiple messages, often it picks up the "References" from a message other than the one I want, and subseq

Re: Reply-to-all function?

> Hall Stevenson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Tue, 30 May 2000: > > Are you using "r" to reply ?? If so, try "R" instead ;-) (look through > > the Muttrc file for "clues" -- "R" is for a "group-reply") > > I don't think "R" is the default binding for group-reply, "g" is. > But the binding can of c

Re: Reply-to-all function?

On Tue, May 30, 2000 at 11:40:10AM -0400, Hall Stevenson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Are you using "r" to reply ?? If so, try "R" instead ;-) (look through > the Muttrc file for "clues" -- "R" is for a "group-reply") Actually, I believe the default key bindings are 'g' for 'group-reply' and

Re: Reply-to-all function?

Hall Stevenson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Tue, 30 May 2000: > Are you using "r" to reply ?? If so, try "R" instead ;-) (look through > the Muttrc file for "clues" -- "R" is for a "group-reply") I don't think "R" is the default binding for group-reply, "g" is. But the binding can of course be co

Re: sending mail with POP

Well it should be lurking in the mail queue /var/spool/mqueue. The "sendmail" or some other MTA should carry it away next time you hook up to the internet. Martin Holland has some good stuff on setting up both fetchmail and sendmail (on RedHat too) http://www.noether.freeserve.co.uk If confi

Re: [OT-ish] HTML being filtered?

On 30-May-2000, Lars Hecking wrote: > > Which get's even more interesting when you have a mailing list > > processor which attaches it's own signature as text/plain in the > > same multipart/alternative. You see only the signature. :-( IIRC, ezmlm does this. The reason you only see the signature

Re: sending mail with POP

On Tue, May 30, 2000 at 10:35:29AM -0400, Hardy Merrill wrote: > Newbie POP question - I've configured my Redhat 6.1 system at home cool :) > to use Mutt 1.2 *with* POP enabled. I have the POP options popluated > with the proper values for my ISP, and the "G" function to > retrieve mail from my I

Re: Removing duplicated messages from mailboxes

> use the good ol procmail rules: (see "man procmail") > > :0 Whc: msgid.lock >| formail -D 8192 msgid.cache > > :0 a: >duplicates > > > Then dump the mailbox through procmail (make sure that nobody will try > to deliver to the mailbox while you're doing this...) > > formail -s proc

Re: Reply-to-all function?

Chris Woodfield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Tue, 30 May 2000: > It seems mutt's default behavior when replying to a message is to only put > the sender in the To: header. Is there a way to add Cc: recipients as > well? Yes, use the group-reply function, by default this is accessed with the "g" k

Re: Reply-to-all function?

>> It seems mutt's default behavior when replying to a message is to only put >> the sender in the To: header. Is there a way to add Cc: recipients as >> well? Are you using "r" to reply ?? If so, try "R" instead ;-) (look through the Muttrc file for "clues" -- "R" is for a "group-reply") Regard

Re: sending mail with POP

> Hardy Merrill: > Mail that I'm sending doesn't seem to get out - I think it's > sitting in my "outbox". What more do I need to do? put ":

Re: sending mail with POP

On Tue, May 30, 2000 at 04:49:29PM +0200, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote: > Configure sendmail, postfix, exim, qmail (the MTA of your choice). Setting up qmail for a dial-up host is IMHO very easy, there are excellent documents at the qmail page http://www.qmail.org . My home box is running perfectly. I

Reply-to-all function?

It seems mutt's default behavior when replying to a message is to only put the sender in the To: header. Is there a way to add Cc: recipients as well? -Chris -- --- Christopher A. Woodfield[EMAIL PROTECTED] Finger for public PGP key 0xB887618B - email fo

Re: Removing duplicated messages from mailboxes

* Jose Romildo Malaquias ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [000530 09:35]: > Is there an easy (and efficient) way of removing duplicated messages from > my mailboxes (keeping only one copy of them)? Note that I am talking > about old messages already saved in the mailboxes, not the new messages > being deliver

Re: sending mail with POP

On Tue, May 30, 2000 at 10:35:29AM -0400, Hardy Merrill wrote: > Newbie POP question - I've configured my Redhat 6.1 system at home > to use Mutt 1.2 *with* POP enabled. I have the POP options popluated > with the proper values for my ISP, and the "G" function to > retrieve mail from my ISP works

sending mail with POP

Newbie POP question - I've configured my Redhat 6.1 system at home to use Mutt 1.2 *with* POP enabled. I have the POP options popluated with the proper values for my ISP, and the "G" function to retrieve mail from my ISP works fine, but how do I send mail? Mail that I'm sending doesn't seem to ge

Removing duplicated messages from mailboxes

Hello. Is there an easy (and efficient) way of removing duplicated messages from my mailboxes (keeping only one copy of them)? Note that I am talking about old messages already saved in the mailboxes, not the new messages being delivered now to the mailboxes. Thanks. Romildo -- Prof. José Rom

~l behavior doc bug

manual.txt > ~l message is addressed to a known mailing list If I mark my lists with "lists" (known) as before, my ~l hooks do not enage. But if I mark them with "subscribe" (subscribed), then my ~l hooks "do" engage. So ~l apparently should be documented as: > ~l

Re: Sending Mail

On Tue, 30 May 2000, Michael Soulier wrote: > On Tue, May 30, 2000 at 11:56:24AM +0200, Antoine Martin wrote: > > In fact, I use solaris 5.7 with vim, vi is aliased to vim ;) > I'm on HP/UX 10.20, and I have the same alias. ;-) as a practical matter, I've found it's best to avoid the aliase

Re: Sending Mail

On Tue, May 30, 2000 at 11:56:24AM +0200, Antoine Martin wrote: > > no - that's vim, not vi. > > vi does nothing with 'q'. > > (in vile, a 'q' starts visual selection ;-) > > Autant pour moi ;) > > In fact, I use solaris 5.7 with vim, vi is aliased to vim ;) I'm on HP/UX 10.20, and I h

Re: procmail rules

Lars Hecking proclaimed on mutt-users that: > You missed my point. I was talking about how mutt treats message folders > after they have been filtered. One example: the bug reports from the > mutt bug tracker are filtered nicely into the incoming mutt-dev folder, > but mutt doesn't know that the

Re: HTML being filtered?

Even majordomo can be configured to allow attachments - and multipart/alternative, however unacceptable, is an attachment and does not violate the RFCs (strictly speaking). Not violating RFCs does not stop html mail from being a pain in the ass ;) -s Lars Hecking proclaimed on mutt-users that:

Re: receive-hook?

Marius, et al -- ...and then Marius Gedminas said... % % Unfortunately, there's no way to execute send-hooks dependent on the % message you are replying to. This is something that has been bothering me for a while... If that's the case, then why does send-hook .

Re: mutt and ssl

Hi! ...and then [EMAIL PROTECTED] said... % Why build with ssl? Well, I assume you're not looking for an answer like "so it's available", so... SSL stands for something like Secure Socket Layer, and it's a method of encryption for your network traffic between you and a server. It's what web br

Re: Sending Mail

On Tue, May 30, 2000 at 03:37:02PM +0530, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote: -> Antoine Martin proclaimed on mutt-users that: -> -> >On Tue, May 30, 2000 at 05:49:19AM -0400, Thomas Dickey wrote: -> >> On Tue, May 30, 2000 at 10:16:10AM +0200, Antoine Martin wrote: -> >> > > works. q causes a record

Re: procmail rules

> Indeed. Didn't we already go over this on the mutt-dev list and > come up with the specs for the way the lists handling *should* work? Yep. I was just too lazy to dig out the references ... > It's just that nobody's done it yet. ;-) > > (Hmm, maybe you're not on mutt-dev...) You should

Re: procmail rules

Lars Hecking <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Tue, 30 May 2000: > You missed my point. I was talking about how mutt treats message folders > after they have been filtered. One example: the bug reports from the > mutt bug tracker are filtered nicely into the incoming mutt-dev folder, > but mutt doe

Re: HTML being filtered?

> Which get's even more interesting when you have a mailing list > processor which attaches it's own signature as text/plain in the > same multipart/alternative. You see only the signature. :-( Such software is obviously broken. But I'd probably consider a mailing list processor broken that le

Re: HTML being filtered?

On 2000-05-30 10:54:47 +0200, Byrial Jensen wrote: > I guess that it was a multipart/alternative post where each of the > body parts (in this case of types text/plain and text/html) is an > alternative version of the same information. > > Mutt will only show you one of the parts of a multipart/al

Re: Sending Mail

On Tue, May 30, 2000 at 03:37:02PM +0530, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote: > Not a bad idea at all ... can anybody point me to a good howto on the > viper mode in emacs? it sort-of comes with one (a lot of messages that tell you to use emacs rather than viper ;-) -- Thomas E. Dickey <[EMAIL PROTEC

Re: procmail rules

Suresh Ramasubramanian writes: > Lars Hecking proclaimed on mutt-users that: > > >[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > >>I've got procmail sorting my messages into folders, so that each > >> mailing list goes to a separate folder. eg: > >> > >> :0: > >> * ^[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >> IN.mutt-users > > >

Re: Bug compiling with ncurses

On Mon, May 29, 2000 at 08:36:20PM -0400, Jeremy wrote: > On Mon, May 29, 2000 at 06:01:39PM -0400, Thomas Dickey wrote: > > /opt/sfw/lib is yet another non-standard location, btw - it seems that > > every year Sun moves applications to a new directory. > > They didn't actually move anything, th

Re: Sending Mail

Antoine Martin proclaimed on mutt-users that: >On Tue, May 30, 2000 at 05:49:19AM -0400, Thomas Dickey wrote: >> On Tue, May 30, 2000 at 10:16:10AM +0200, Antoine Martin wrote: >> > > works. q causes a recording message bottom left of the screen. Is >> > >> > I think you edit your mails with

Re: Sending Mail

On Tue, May 30, 2000 at 05:49:19AM -0400, Thomas Dickey wrote: > On Tue, May 30, 2000 at 10:16:10AM +0200, Antoine Martin wrote: > > > works. q causes a recording message bottom left of the screen. Is > > > > I think you edit your mails with vi (q permits to record a macro with vi) > > no - th

Re: Sending Mail

On Tue, May 30, 2000 at 10:16:10AM +0200, Antoine Martin wrote: > > works. q causes a recording message bottom left of the screen. Is > > I think you edit your mails with vi (q permits to record a macro with vi) no - that's vim, not vi. vi does nothing with 'q'. (in vile, a 'q' starts visual s

Re: f1 mutt help

On Tue, May 30, 2000 at 02:39:38PM +1000, G.Embery wrote: > > you can always make your own (setenv TERMINFO, etc.) > > > > Beauty! > I've (temporarily) set up my own terminfo from your src file and > setenv TERMINFO and now the function keys are being recognized. > Now to make it more permanent

Re: HTML being filtered?

On Mon, May 29, 2000 at 19:55:23 -0500, Alex Lane wrote: > Recently, a gentleman made a post that was so flamed. In reviewing the > post, I find no html code in the thing, no message from mutt that I > oughta press 'v' to view an html-encoded message, nothing. > > One clue that makes no sense to

Re: Sending Mail

On Tue, May 30, 2000 at 02:18:06PM +1000, Dennis Robertson wrote: > Hello, > I am new to mutt as will be quickly apparent. I was attracted to mutt > because I can't get either gpgp or geheimnis to work with Netscape. I > would like to be able to send mail with mutt but when I have finished > c

Re: Sending Mail

Dennis Robertson proclaimed on mutt-users that: >composing there seems to be no way out other than to cancel the screen. >The manual says that after finishing editing (I assume that means >pressing escape?) I will be returned to the compose menu. Y sends No. Assuming you are working with def

Re: HTML being filtered?

On Mon, May 29, 2000 at 07:55:23PM -0500, Alex Lane wrote: > One clue that makes no sense to me is that the offending post on the list > was a multipart post, one part text; the other, html. An examination of > the entire (?) message shows no multiple parts. > > My read of the manual (1.2) fails

Re: Sending Mail

Dennis Robertson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Tue, 30 May 2000: > The manual says that after finishing editing (I assume that means > pressing escape?) I will be returned to the compose menu. Y sends > mail. Well not for me. I am stuck and none of the listed commands > works. q causes a record

Sending Mail

Hello, I am new to mutt as will be quickly apparent. I was attracted to mutt because I can't get either gpgp or geheimnis to work with Netscape. I would like to be able to send mail with mutt but when I have finished composing there seems to be no way out other than to cancel the screen. The ma

HTML being filtered?

The general opinion of HTML posts on one of the lists I subscribe to is pretty low, to the extent that folks who post using HTML get flamed pretty well. Recently, a gentleman made a post that was so flamed. In reviewing the post, I find no html code in the thing, no message from mutt that I ought

Re: Exclusive matching

Andrew W. Nosenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Tue, 30 May 2000: > Right answer is: > > ^(~L alice)|(~L bob)|(~L carol) Doesn't this mean that the ^ operator is only applied to the first of the patterns, not the 2 that follow? I guess it's a question of precedence, but I would've expected i