Suresh Ramasubramanian writes:
> Lars Hecking proclaimed on mutt-users that:
>
> >[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> >> I've got procmail sorting my messages into folders, so that each
> >> mailing list goes to a separate folder. eg:
> >>
> >> :0:
> >> * ^[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> IN.mutt-users
>
> > While this can be solved, as others have shown, it is my opinion that
> > mutt doesn't play very well with procmail in this regard. This can only
>
> Oh yeah? Try this
>
> #mutt
> :0:
> * (^Reply-To:.*|^TO_)mutt-users
> $MAILDIR/mutt
>
> man procmailex for ^TO_ :^)
Drat. How could I have missed that in more than half a decade of
procmail use?
You missed my point. I was talking about how mutt treats message folders
after they have been filtered. One example: the bug reports from the
mutt bug tracker are filtered nicely into the incoming mutt-dev folder,
but mutt doesn't know that these messages are sent by mutt-dev, because
it doesn't use From_ and Sender: for lists.
save-hooks are not a solution.
