I have an inconsistent issue where MOST times I cannot fully boot with
radeondrm enabled.
When the booting kernel switches to a driver supported display with
higher resolution I lose the display. I have a Radeon HD 5770
installed, and the dmesg seems to say CYPRESS. This doesn't seem
correct. When
Do any of you find that when dealing with sd1 and greater in bsd.rd you
must explicitly create these devices?
I've been following this habit for years, and did not see anyone offer the
advice in this thread.
Basically:
cd /dev
sh MAKEDEV sd1
On Sun, Apr 17, 2016 at 2:04 PM, Sean Howard wrote
Consider the following structs. The first struct uses 1 bit wide unsigned
integers
for two flags set by the user during runtime. The second struct performs
the same
function, but used a regular signed integer instead of an unsigned integer
with
a defined bit width.
typedef struct {
On Sat, Jun 18, 2011 at 8:42 AM, Ted Unangst wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 18, 2011 at 8:56 AM, Jan Stary wrote:
>> Does this depend on support from the hardware
>> (the CD drive remembering the eject request)?
>
> If I'm not mistaken, this is dependent on the drive. When a CD is
> mounted, the drive is
On Sat, Jun 18, 2011 at 12:00 AM, Amit Kulkarni wrote:
>>> Try a more recent snap, various things related to interrupt handling
>>> have been volatile these days.
> compile from source and report back to list then, or wait for a
> ...new snapshot.
>
I can verify high interrupts on a Macb
On Mon, May 9, 2011 at 2:49 PM, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> Why?
>
I posted it to misc for general archival.
When creating diskless systems that do not use pxeboot, I use mfs
mount points to construct userland in memory from a bsd.rd kernel.
I can do this with a modified rdroot with shadow paths
This patch enables MFS in RAMDISK_CD, adds the MFS flag to
distrib/special/newfs binary and creates the sbin/mount_mfs link for instbin.
ted dot roby at gmail dot com
Index: distrib/amd64/common/list
===
RCS file: /cvs/src/distrib/am
On Sun, Apr 10, 2011 at 4:20 AM, irix wrote:
> Try to use dd with dev/zero on wd0d and wd1d it was successed. But bioctl
> return same error invalid metadata format.
>
Make sure you have enough devices.
# cd dev
# sh MAKEDEV sd1
# sh MAKEDEV sd2
# sh MAKEDEV sd3
Make sure you are very familiar
On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 4:34 PM, James Hozier wrote:
> I have to learn ASM anyway (to learn about buffer overflows and other related
> topics in the family of memory-related security). Would there be any
> advantage to learning Assembly first or would that just be an unneccessary
> headache?
>
On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 1:11 AM, Landry Breuil wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 12:53 AM, Ted Roby wrote:
>> This is from most recent snapshot, and with infrastructure/libtool fix
>> in past 24 hours, 16:45 PST.
>>
>> gmake[4]: /usr/ports/infrastructure/bin/libtool: Co
This is from most recent snapshot, and with infrastructure/libtool fix
in past 24 hours, 16:45 PST.
gmake[4]: /usr/ports/infrastructure/bin/libtool: Command not found
/etc/mk.conf says this:
PORTSDIR=/home/ports
ACCEPT_JRL_LICENSE=Yes
output follows:
/home/ports/x11/xfce4 # make
===> x11/xfce4/e
On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 3:06 PM, Stuart Henderson
wrote:
> On 2010-06-21, Ted Roby wrote:
>> On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 1:28 PM, Marco Peereboom
wrote:
>>> This is not useful. acpidump -o macbook3_1
>>> is.
>>>
>>
>> And condensed. Here's the
On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 1:28 PM, Marco Peereboom wrote:
> This is not useful. acpidump -o macbook3_1
> is.
>
And condensed. Here's the result:
/*
RSD PTR: Checksum=197, OEMID=APPLE, RsdtAddress=0xb0fc
*/
/*
RSDT: Length=84, Revision=1, Checksum=143,
OEMID=APPLE, OEM Table ID=Apple0
x11/gnome/byzanz fails with x11/gnome 'make install'
This is on amd64, 10 June snapshot with ports.tar.gz from 17 June.
I have successfully run 'make' and 'make package' within x11/gnome,
but I cannot get 'make install' to run.
===> Installing byzanz-0.2.2 from /home/ports/packages/amd64/all/
C
I'm still trying to build gnome on amd64.
emulators/sdlmame fails like this:
In file included from /usr/local/include/SDL/SDL_opengl.h:44,
from src/osd/sdl/osd_opengl.h:21,
from src/osd/sdl/window.h:20,
from src/osd/sdl/input.h:15,
On Wed, Jun 16, 2010 at 7:15 AM, Ted Roby wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 7:07 PM, Stuart Henderson
> wrote:
>
>>> The build fails because gstreamer-plugins-base does not supposedly
>>> contain the 'videoscale' plugin.
>>
>> update liboil.
On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 7:07 PM, Stuart Henderson wrote:
>> The build fails because gstreamer-plugins-base does not supposedly
>> contain the 'videoscale' plugin.
>
> update liboil.
>
>
No change. Same results.
I've been unsuccessful over the past 5 days in building x11/gnome on amd64.
I am running openbsd-current snapshot from June 10th.
I have downloaded ports.tar.gz snapshots over the past few days with
the same results.
The build fails because gstreamer-plugins-base does not supposedly
contain the '
On Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 2:29 AM, Paul M wrote:
> On 14/06/2010, at 6:54 PM, Jan Stary wrote:
>
>> It would be my guess that this is the audio chip that's integrated
>> with the Asus P5QPL-AM motherboard. If you are really after "best
>> transfer quality", you might want to use something else in
On Sun, May 23, 2010 at 10:19 AM, Owain Ainsworth wrote:
>
> to my knowledge the kernel should always have build during that range.
> This means that you have done something wrong.
>
> cvs up -D "" in sys/dev/pci/drm should be
> sufficient.
>
>
I was over-complicating things with stupid pet tricks
On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 4:28 PM, L. V. Lammert wrote:
>
> OTOH, *directing* the muddled masses to HIS machine [even if by mistake]
> would give pause, would it not? Doesn't seem like a good policy security
> to me, ..
>
>Lee
>
>
Uhh. Security through Obscurity is no Security.
Is http:/
Hi. I am losing uhci4 shortly after reboot.
May 6 12:00:01 kramer newsyslog[8688]: logfile turned over
May 6 12:00:01 kramer syslogd: restart
May 6 12:09:07 kramer /bsd: uhci4: host controller process error
May 6 12:09:07 kramer /bsd: uhci4: host controller halted
This is a Macbook 3,1 with u
On Thu, Apr 29, 2010 at 4:09 PM, Bryan wrote:
>
> > like http://www.kingdomofloathing.com
>
> Great... I just another time sink for work... :)
>
>
Be careful...
On Thu, Apr 29, 2010 at 12:53 PM, Duncan Patton a Campbell <
campb...@neotext.ca> wrote:
>
>
> http://www.physorg.com/news191765285.html
>
>
My initial reading of this causes me to think
these test results are in favor of Decentralization.
How political do you want to get on this board?
In my op
On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 8:36 AM, Brad Tilley wrote:
>
>
> I did not say anything about -stable. Occasionally installing snapshots
> has nothing to do with -stable. Not sure why you bring it up?
>
> Brad
>
>
I was just throwing in my two bits after everything else
that had been said. Basically, ru
On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 8:57 AM, Mark Zimmerman wrote:
>
> Nope, unless they change the way it has always been. The early
> delivered CDs are fun to have, and allow you to do some early goofing
> around ...
>
And we get to put our stickers on things before the rest of you.
On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 7:53 AM, Brad Tilley wrote:
>
> Nor am I, but I do that often with base installs and have not had any
> major issues. There would be security concerns (especially with ports if
> you're using a full blown desktop). You can follow -current if you have
> the time and ability
On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 7:33 PM, Mark Zimmerman wrote:
> Not much to say, except Thanks and WooHoo!
>
>
I'll have mine as soon as priority mail gets it from there to here!
On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 1:09 PM, Owain Ainsworth wrote:
>
> crw-rw 1 root wheel 87, 0 Mar 6 01:37 /dev/drm0
>
> ...
>
> I really should consider changing those default permissions...
>
>
Why?? I may be a retard but even my power user has
been in group wheel from day 0.
On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 8:57 AM, David Coppa wrote:
>
> The diff is ok.
>
> Regarding your problem:
> have you tried all ports?
> Usually it can be /dev/cuaU0 or /dev/cuaU2
>
>
Yes. But thank you for the confirmation.
I will continue troubleshooting my ppp syntax.
My pasting of ppp.conf and peer
Novatel (0x1410) makes an MC760 (0x6002) used by
Virgin Mobile in their BroadBand2Go card.
This card advertises itself as "incompatible" with
"linux" at this time.
After adding the device to usbdevs, rebuilding
usbdevs.h and usbdevs_data.h, and adding to
umsm.c it was finally recognized and mount
On Tue, Apr 20, 2010 at 1:52 PM, Chris Dukes wrote:
>
> Just rethink your deployment strategy to not use 'dd'.
> Even Windows cloning systems stopped trying to copy all bits
> on the disk 6+ years ago.
> 'dd' made some sense when the disk was mostly full and there was
> a huge penalty to keep see
On Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at 2:25 PM, J.C. Roberts wrote:
>
> > If I have clean licensing on everything, can
> > I then ask for addition to the tree?
> >
>
> Of course you can ask, and if the port is both well done and well
> tested, then someone else might have enough interest to take the time
> to co
On Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at 12:20 PM, Jacob Meuser wrote:
> > =
> > >Your analogy doesn't go far enough. Better: guests in a home being
> > >asked for contributions and also being insulted, both by the hosts.
> >
> > Guess it depe
On Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at 10:54 AM, Danny de Bont wrote:
>
>
> All jokes aside
>
> My router is on 10.0.0.2
>
>
Which router? The ADSL router?
Can you configure it as a transparent bridge instead?
Then you can let the OBSD box sit on the same subnet
as the rest of your network, and it can handl
On Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at 8:57 AM, Marc Espie wrote:
>
>
> yeah, you can also find culture in petri dishes, you know... ;-)
>
>
and Theo's counter?
> (still more trolling)
>
*snag*
>
> (how can one take this thread seriously ?)
>
You can't, if you take it correctly!
At least pink noise sound
On Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at 8:26 AM, Marc Espie wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at 04:16:08PM +0800, Artur Grabowski wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 10:52 PM, Donald Allen
> wrote:
> >
> > > Thanks for the compliment, but I'm a *lot* older than nine.
> >
> > Yet you still believe that it's ok for g
On Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at 7:14 AM, Vijay Sankar wrote:
>
>
> Regardless of your standards of etiquette that anyone may have violated, it
> is a shame that you would drop financial support for the OpenBSD project. It
> is especially unfair because there is nothing a developer can do to stop
> unknow
On Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at 2:30 AM, J.C. Roberts wrote:
>
>
>
> Ted,
>
> 1.) A license declaration within a source file takes precedence over a
> license in an accompanying file.
>
So, locality is more important than an air of officiality. Good.
>
> 2.) Even if you could trace how the file got i
On Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at 1:12 AM, Jan Stary wrote:
>
>
> I have experienced similar problems with mplayer when
> aucat was _not_ running. With aucat running, I never had
> that problem.
>
>
I can absolutely confirm I was not running aucat with mplayer.
I was not attempting to allow audio from any
On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 1:40 PM, frantisek holop wrote:
> hi there,
>
> with the april 13 snapshot i get "fluctuations"
> in the volume level and audible cracks and glitches
> when have e.g. a browser (opera) and mplayer open.
>
> i dont see a patern yet, but for example during
> watching the mov
On Sat, Apr 17, 2010 at 2:20 AM, VICTOR TARABOLA CORTIANO <
vt...@c3sl.ufpr.br> wrote:
> > The ISC has one restriction and I never claimed otherwise. The GPL has
> > MORE restrictions. I am not contradicting myself. You just want to
> > change the dictionary to match your little reality.
> >
>
On Sat, Apr 17, 2010 at 1:05 AM, VICTOR TARABOLA CORTIANO <
vt...@c3sl.ufpr.br> wrote:
> >
> > I think the best example is "Free as in Beer."
> >
>
> Which already misses the point.
>
>
That's why the example is so common?
It's in quotes because I didn't originate it.
> > I can brew beer all da
On Sat, Apr 17, 2010 at 1:13 AM, VICTOR TARABOLA CORTIANO <
vt...@c3sl.ufpr.br> wrote:
> >
> > Now this is interesting...
> >
> > Does anything supersede Copyright Law?
> >
> > What if I release my work as Anonymous with
> > no text in regards to licensing?
> >
> > Does anyone wanting to use that
On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 10:14 AM, Henning Brauer wrote:
>
> find all(!) copyright holders and have them agree to a new license. or
> don't use that code.
>
>
There are at least three projects involved here.
1. The Diku project
2. The Merc project
3. The "Forsaken Lands" project
The Diku and Merc
On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 11:35 AM, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
>
>
> Yes, it's a tricky question. As for OpenBSD, we do not include
> anonymous work.
>
> A work can be public domain if the copyright expires. In some
> jurisdictions, a work can be put into the public domain by the author.
>
> If a work is
On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 10:40 AM, Ted Unangst wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 11:47 AM, Ted Roby wrote:
> > So how does that work with OpenBSD? How to I introduce
> > code with shady licensing, and take all the brunt of it?
>
> I don't suppose you've stopped to a
On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 10:27 AM, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
>
>
> You do not seem to understand how copyright works. When published, a
> work is subject to a set of restrictions, laid down by copyright law.
> A license grants rights (under conditions or restrictions) to the
> receiver of a work. No l
On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 9:02 PM, VICTOR TARABOLA CORTIANO <
vt...@c3sl.ufpr.br> wrote:
> > Lets try it.
> >
> > 0 < X < (Y + Z)
> > Y > 0
> > Z > 0
> >
> > ISC = X
> > GPL = X + Y + Z
> >
> > Logical enough for you?
> >
>
> If you assume that the definition of freedom is the number of
> restrictio
On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 8:27 AM, Chris Dukes wrote:
>
> You are the one interested in resurrecting this beast.
> The onus is you to either track down someone with the right to change
> the license, or else be the point of first blame in seeing if the author
> will actually enforce the copyright.
On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 8:27 AM, Chris Dukes wrote:
>
>
> As for the personal attacks, you can print off this email,
> fold it until it's all corners, and shove it up your ass.
>
>
Now that was far longer than your first one-liner smackdown.
Good job.
On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 3:49 AM, wrote:
>
>
> So you think that giving people the freedom to know where the code has come
> from to allow them to not get conned and not use old, possibly insecure
> code
> and giving them the ability to contribute to the original source of the
> code
> and possibl
On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 11:16 PM, Sean Kamath wrote:
> On Apr 14, 2010, at 8:57 PM, Ted Roby wrote:
> > I got more help from the first poster who suggested using
> > Circle Mud instead. The problem is, I was quite attached to
> > to this modified Rom code, and perhaps commi
On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 10:06 PM, Bryan wrote:
>
> I thought "nothing" was "zero", and NUL was the absence of nothing...
>
Wouldn't NULL be the absence of everything, including numerical 0?
Dropping the semantics I'd have to say this thread is NULL, and yet
it is full of... well, whatever tha
On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 4:44 PM, Paul M wrote:
>
> Please clarify what you want from this list.
>
>
Peace, Love and Understanding.
Yeah right..
I got more help from the first poster who suggested using
Circle Mud instead. The problem is, I was quite attached to
to this modified Rom code, and pe
On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 3:01 PM, Jean-Philippe Ouellet <
jean-phili...@ouellet.biz> wrote:
>
> It has been been my experience that if you are willing to read the relevant
> documentation and honestly try to fix your problem on your own but simply
> cannot, the OpenBSD community will be *extremely*
On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 2:32 PM, Sean Kamath wrote:
> On Apr 14, 2010, at 1:16 PM, Ted Roby wrote:
>
>> You blew off on this message board assuming I hadn't even
>> googled, or found our friend Voytek Plawny.
>>
>
> So? Inquiring minds want to know
On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 1:55 PM, Chris wrote:
>
> You're kidding us, right? You can't bother to google something so
> basic, you complain when someone points you in the right direction,
> make a quick detour for a spelling flame, then act like it'd be way
> more work to email a couple of guys ra
On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 1:34 PM, Sean Kamath wrote:
> On Apr 14, 2010, at 12:02 PM, Ted Roby wrote:
>
>> Please tell me what I should do with his permission?
>>
>> At best, he can let me host my own mud with his code.
>> At worst, he must rewrite his entire
On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 12:55 PM, Sean Kamath wrote:
>
> Which is it: you're ticked off the original lmgtfy reply pointed to a pay
> site, or that we tried to point out if you cared *that* much about finding
> the original auther, it shouldn't be that hard?
>
> Sean
I reluctantly reply to the
On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 12:34 PM, Sean Kamath wrote:
> On Apr 14, 2010, at 10:52 AM, Ted Roby wrote:
>
> On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 11:46 AM, Chris Dukes
>> wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 09:21:53AM -0600, Ted Roby wrote:
>>>
>>>> /* u
On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 11:46 AM, Chris Dukes wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 09:21:53AM -0600, Ted Roby wrote:
> > /* umpla...@cc.umanitoba.ca
> */
>
> http://lmgtfy.com/?q=plawny+umanitoba
>
> I think you'll find a good idea of who to write care of which company.
Hi list.
I've spent some time porting one of my favorite dungeon
games (a Rom 2.6 derivative). I've only begun this project,
but have already converted 1700+ lines as such:
strcat -> strlcat
strcpy -> strlcpy
sprintf -> snprintf
Much to my disappointment, I may have to rewrite large portions
befor
On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 5:17 AM, Steve Shockley wrote:
> On 4/14/2010 5:11 AM, Zachary Uram wrote:
>
>> smacks of superiority and even condescension at times. Is this a fair
>>
>
> I don't think they're superior and condescending... I think they're
> superior and busy.
>
>
The OpenBSD culture al
On Thu, Apr 8, 2010 at 8:14 AM, Ted Roby wrote:
> My Macbook can now utilize the new multiprocessor sleep functions.
>
>
Also, I fudged the dmesg output, but the information is still there.
That dmesg paste included the previous build with the current build.
Please ignore the dme
On Thu, Apr 8, 2010 at 8:14 AM, Ted Roby wrote:
> My Macbook can now utilize the new multiprocessor sleep functions.
>
> However, usb fails on wakeup regardless of single or multi processor
> kernel.
> I have tested this with -S and -z with same results.
>
>
Also, I
My Macbook can now utilize the new multiprocessor sleep functions.
However, usb fails on wakeup regardless of single or multi processor kernel.
I have tested this with -S and -z with same results.
I scribbled down these errors as quickly as possible.
Sometimes only uhub3 has failed, other times u
On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 7:53 AM, Stuart Henderson wrote:
>
> >> > packages. Did I break something?
> >>
> >> Probably
> >>
> >>
> > No. I didn't.
>
> not enough information to say either way.
>
> >> > here's what I found relevant:
> >> > Checksumming...Error in package:
> >> > /usr/ports/pobj/cair
On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 12:24 AM, Landry Breuil wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 4:04 AM, Ted Roby wrote:
> > My xfce4 build fails. I have refreshed cvs multiple times, built new
> > release packages, and re-attempted with fresh installs from those
> > packages.
My xfce4 build fails. I have refreshed cvs multiple times, built new
release packages, and re-attempted with fresh installs from those
packages. Did I break something?
here's what I found relevant:
Checksumming...Error in package:
/usr/ports/pobj/cairo-1.8.8p0/fake-i386/usr/local/lib/libcairo.so.9
On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 4:16 PM, Jean-Philippe Ouellet <
jean-phili...@ouellet.biz> wrote:
> On 3/25/10 12:44 PM, Ted Roby wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 3:45 AM, Lars Nooden
>> wrote:
>>
>> On 3/24/10 21:02 , Pau wrote:
>>>
>>> I was
On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 10:44 AM, Ted Roby wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 3:45 AM, Lars Nooden wrote:
>
>> On 3/24/10 21:02 , Pau wrote:
>>
>> I was also wondering whether it is possible to have openbsd on the
>>> laptop as the only OS. I am g
On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 3:45 AM, Lars Nooden wrote:
> On 3/24/10 21:02 , Pau wrote:
>
> I was also wondering whether it is possible to have openbsd on the
>> laptop as the only OS. I am guessing that the EFI could give trouble.
>>
>
> I've done that with the older macbook pros. I'm sure the ope
On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 3:31 PM, Ron McDowell wrote:
>
> I also noticed that even though I loaded the amd64 MP version, it's only
> seeing 2.8/2.9GB of the 4GB in the box:
>
>
I experience the same on my Macbook, and believe that it is normal.
You should also have two lines like this perhaps:
sp
This is just a thread to praise OpenBSD, and give some feedback.
I am running OpenBSD-current on Macbook 3,1 (3rd. revision)
I have been using and supporting MacOS X since 10.1.
Prior to that, I ran OpenBSD 3.0.
My reason for "switching" was simply that of GUI.
Now, I'm happy with Xenocara and
On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 8:23 PM, Owain Ainsworth wrote:
> Hi,
>
> If you are testing pmemrange (you really should be), please also run
> with this diff. It fixes problems with isadma on i386.
>
> This is technically three diffs squashed together (bad oga! I know, but
> I need to do real work and t
On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 5:10 PM, Daniel Ouellet wrote:
>
> What, never eared of Area 51?
>
> It's true I tell you! (;>
>
> They try to cover it up for years.
>
>
That place has been cleared out of the good stuff ever since it became
a mainstream conspiracy.
Get yourself an update guide to consp
On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 3:08 PM, Theo de Raadt wrote:
> > >> Hi all,
> > >> there are bad news about RB600A. As everybody can read on MicroTik's
> > >> website, RB600A has suddenly been discontinued:
> > >>
> > >> http://www.routerboard.com/pricelist.php?showProduct=55
> > >>
> > >> They also remo
On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 11:03 PM, Ron McDowell wrote:
> Everybody here is so friendly!
>
> I know how to use tar, patrick. Having a tarball on that drive that I then
> have to untar to the local [ffs|hfs] seems kind of redundant, inelegant and
> just plain crufty.
>
> --
> Ron McDowell
> San Anto
On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 5:12 PM, bofh wrote:
> Would be hfs porters should also know that snow leopard (10.6) made
> further extensions to hfs+ and there can be data in a file created on
> 10.6 that even 10.5 can't see.
>
>
Yes. This is why my 10.5 system tools broke, and those third party
compa
On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 1:42 PM, Dale Rahn wrote:
>
>
> It should be possible to build the port on i386 with the 'ONLY_FOR' tag
> changed, however I dont recall that the hfsplus code was new enough to
> support case-sensitive filesystems. Testing would need to be done to verify
> what filesystems
On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 11:45 AM, Ted Unangst wrote:
>
> Getting data off a filesystem can be useful on any machine, even if
> you don't intend to boot it. Ports are generally marked "only for"
> because they only work there (read: are not written portably), not out
> of a subjective "useful" ca
On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 11:30 AM, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
>
> I suspect the OP would like to dual boot his intel mac machine and
> still have access from OpenBSD to the files stored on a hfsplus
> partition.
>
>-Otto
>
This is more in line with what I am seeking.
I have a large amount of d
On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 11:07 AM, Bryan Irvine wrote:
>
> I'm sure someone else will correct me if I'm wrong. I believe the
> only reason this is needed on ppc machines is because the openfirmware
> expects an hfs volume to boot from so the bootloader is stored on a
> small hfs partition. If th
I've noticed this environment variable in misc/hfsplus
# this only makes sense on macintosh (powerpc) systems.
ONLY_FOR_ARCHS= powerpc
It used to only make sense on powerpc systems, but Macintosh
hardware now uses i386 architecture. Of course, changing this
variable is not enough to cause a suc
Sorry for the noise.
Is the BCM4321 still unsupported under bwi(4)?
have some data:
2:0:0: Broadcom BCM4321
0x: Vendor ID: 14e4 Product ID: 4328
0x0004: Command: 0006 Status ID: 0010
0x0008: Class: 02 Subclass: 80 Interface: 00 Revision: 03
0x000c: BIST: 00 He
On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 8:21 PM, Andreas Gerdd wrote:
> Hello.
>
> -If i get a system with single cpu but with 2 or 4 core, should i still
> choose
> the bsd.mp kernel at the installation?
>
Most likely, the installation process will recognize your multi-core system
as
being multi-processor and
On Mon, Mar 15, 2010 at 11:39 PM, Jacob Meuser wrote:
>
>
> no need, I've got the patches. glad it finally worked for you :)
>
>
No, thank you!
Date Sat Mar 13 16:36:24 MST 2010
Nope, I still win!
On Sun, Mar 14, 2010 at 4:50 AM, Peter N. M. Hansteen wrote:
> Daniel Ouellet writes:
>
> > But you didn't beat me! (;>
> >
> > Order number 2010/3/13-16:45:14-18205:
>
> Looks like I managed to sneak in before you then
>
> Order number
On Sat, Mar 13, 2010 at 7:42 PM, Jason Dixon wrote:
> https://https.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/order?CD47=1&CD47%2b=Add
>
> --
> Jason Dixon
> DixonGroup Consulting
> http://www.dixongroup.net/
>
>
You're late!
I already put my order in with the USA distributor as soon as I saw Theo's
post.
Their automa
On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 4:13 AM, TS Lura wrote:
> Dear OpenBSD community,
>
> I'm doing a small research paper on Cisco and try to find out if they are
> "evil" or not in relative to open/free source/standards, and business
> practice. Eg. locking people to their product line aka the MS way.
>
>
I'm a mac user who "switched" because of System 10 (10.1).
I like the bsd env, but I have found myself back on my true
security blanket, OpenBSD.
I've read various opinions on EFI, and know what to expect
as a reply from the hard-liners, but I would like to get a
more general opinion of all who co
On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 10:17 AM, Ted Roby wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 6:17 AM, Ozgur Kazancci <
> ozgur.kazan...@info.uvt.ro> wrote:
>
>> Oh, my mistake.. I forgot that it was a jailed httpd.
>>
>> There was a "File Not Found: /usr/lib/apach
On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 6:17 AM, Ozgur Kazancci
wrote:
> Oh, my mistake.. I forgot that it was a jailed httpd.
>
> There was a "File Not Found: /usr/lib/apache/modules/mod_throttle.so"
> message in the error_log, but the file was already there (out of chroot
> path). So, I copied the mod_throttle.
Thanks to the hard work of Jacob Meuser I now have a functional patch
which modifies the azalia driver for Macbook revision 3,1.
This was my first crafted patch in conjunction with a developer.
I sorted out my own ignorance in applying the patch. Once I switched
to using -p1 instead of -p0 I had
On Mon, Mar 8, 2010 at 9:37 AM, Marc Espie wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 08, 2010 at 09:40:30AM -0600, Marco Peereboom wrote:
> > OMG!! running multiple daemons??? Wow why didn't I think of that??
> >
> > I *love* OS overhead on misbehaving hardware emulation because it is
> > what "the industry" prescri
On Mon, Mar 8, 2010 at 1:29 AM, Jacob Meuser wrote:
>
> won't help with this problem. the GPIOs in azalia aren't exposed
> through gpioctl.
>
I've learned something!
>
> it's probably a matter of figuring out what's "special" about the
> headphone jack on the Macs. turning on VRef for outpu
On Mon, Mar 8, 2010 at 5:39 AM, Kenneth R Westerback wrote:
> ...
>
> You switch to 'pretend' servers and try to keep the merry-go-round
> turning. And the spider sucks your juices out.
>
> Of course the bonus is you now have room for all the Project Managers
> needed to coordinate the management
On Sun, Mar 7, 2010 at 9:49 PM, Jacob Meuser wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 07, 2010 at 09:09:27PM -0700, Ted Roby wrote:
> > On Sun, Mar 7, 2010 at 7:31 PM, Jacob Meuser >wrote:
> >
> >
> > > hmm. ok. I think I know what the problem is. that change you made to
>
On Sun, Mar 7, 2010 at 7:31 PM, Jacob Meuser wrote:
> hmm. ok. I think I know what the problem is. that change you made to
> set outputs.hp_source=mix4 makes sense. did you try that with the diff?
>
>
Tested. No change.
> but the real bugger is that you have 'spkr' and 'spkr2'. are there
1 - 100 of 108 matches
Mail list logo
