On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 12:34 PM, Sean Kamath <kam...@geekoids.com> wrote:
> On Apr 14, 2010, at 10:52 AM, Ted Roby <ted.r...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 11:46 AM, Chris Dukes <pak...@pr.neotoma.org> >> wrote: >> >> On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 09:21:53AM -0600, Ted Roby wrote: >>> >>>> /* umpla...@cc.umanitoba.ca >>>> >>> */ >>> >>> http://lmgtfy.com/?q=plawny+umanitoba >>> >>> > http://lmgtfy.com/?q=voytek+plawny > > Yeah, you have to scroll down a little bit can't help you there You're going to propagate the absurdity with your own google search? You assume Voytek Plawny is/was umplawny of cc.umanitoba.ca. Go entertain yourself with google searches of "Theo" and "Software", or other commonalities on the 'net. My posting had nothing to do with locating the person(s) mentioned above. That's the greatest absurdity of all shared by you and Orchid man, Chris Dukes. He has a cat to get rid of, if you need one.... The original issue remains that putting such license wording in your work means that it can never evolve into public domain.
