responding at all though.
Philip
--
Philip Paeps
Senior Reality Engineer
Ministry of Information
___
mailop mailing list
mailop@mailop.org
https://chilli.nosignal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mailop
ownership.
Philip
--
Philip Paeps
Senior Reality Engineer
Ministry of Information
___
mailop mailing list
mailop@mailop.org
https://chilli.nosignal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mailop
your SPF record? The SPF record
should list all the mail servers that send mail on behalf of a domain.
Philip
--
Philip Paeps
Senior Reality Engineer
Ministry of Information
___
mailop mailing list
mailop@mailop.org
https://chilli.nosignal.org/cgi-bin/m
responsive and helpful [or at least
they were, as of February this year!].
Philip
--
Philip Paeps
Senior Reality Engineer
Ministry of Information
___
mailop mailing list
mailop@mailop.org
https://chilli.nosignal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mailop
address space until I'm fairly
confident I've not missed any before outright rejecting the rest.
OVH and Hetzner are tied for second place on my "would love to blacklist
outright but can't" shitlist. Right behind leaseweb NL.
Philip
--
Phili
re
than one or two false positives. They (inexplicably?) have quite a lot
of legitimate customers too. :/
Would be nice if I could just block a /15. That sounds refreshingly
easy and rewarding. :)
Philip
--
Philip Paeps
Senior Reality Engineer
Ministry of Information
___
may
be able to help escalate to a human :)).
First try the webpage.
Philip
--
Philip Paeps
Senior Reality Engineer
Ministry of Information
___
mailop mailing list
mailop@mailop.org
https://chilli.nosignal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mailop
r abuse staff are reading this mailing list and can explain
what they've been doing to oust existing spammers and prevent signing up
new ones. It's obviously not an easy task and few people will accept
their promise that things are improving until they see if with their own
eyes. Mea
On 2017-06-27 10:01:43 (+0200), Philip Paeps wrote:
On 2017-06-26 18:51:12 (-0500), Michael Rathbun wrote:
OVH recently instituted policies that would have drastically reduced
the outgoing flood of bad email;
Do you have a source for this information?
whether they were effective and are
On 2017-07-17 14:28:32 (+0200), Stefano Bagnara wrote:
On 17 July 2017 at 07:01, Philip Paeps wrote:
Following this discussion a couple of weeks ago, I've been keeping
track.
Last week, about 55% of spam I received either came from OVH or
advertised webpages hosted on OVH servers. S
g the volume of spam leaving your
network and responding promptly to abuse notifications. :)
Philip
--
Philip Paeps
Senior Reality Engineer
Ministry of Information
___
mailop mailing list
mailop@mailop.org
https://chilli.nosignal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/lis
lping you as I write this?
;)
Philip
--
Philip Paeps
Senior Reality Engineer
Ministry of Information
___
mailop mailing list
mailop@mailop.org
https://chilli.nosignal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mailop
am me about this, but tell me if my
account has been compromised" e.g.).
And yes, we can sometimes extract an unsub link from the contents of
the message and use that even if there isn't a list-unsub header.
This sounds like the same magic is being used for both purposes.
Aside..
firewalled them.
Philip
--
Philip Paeps
Senior Reality Engineer
Ministry of Information
___
mailop mailing list
mailop@mailop.org
https://chilli.nosignal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mailop
can't change
particularly insecure.
Most of the problems with passwords are because humans can't (or won't)
pick secure (i.e.: long and unmemorable) ones and then go on to use the
same bad passwords everywhere. Pesky humans!
Nothing wrong with "app passwords" though:
mine annually. I use my DNSSEC KSK rollover
reminders to remind me to roll my DKIM keys too (and I've just noticed I
have been forgetting to roll some of them for a while).
I would not be surprised if rolling keys at all puts us firmly in a
statistically insignificant minority. :)
Philip
o months.
I hope the original poster's software checks if the *key* changes and
not the *certificate*.
In the case of letsencrypt.org certificates, they're simply reissued /
resigned every two months. The keys don't change.
If it's actually checking the certificate thou
running a bunch of Windows XP machines. Sigh.)
Philip
--
Philip Paeps
Senior Reality Engineer
Ministry of Information
___
mailop mailing list
mailop@mailop.org
https://chilli.nosignal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mailop
, just sent us a bill for $___ without any
questions. If there is no vetting process I have a hard time seeing how
it would validate any sender as trustworthy.
I consider the presence of `X-CSA-Complaints` header to be a weak
indicator of spam.
Philip
--
Philip Paeps
Senior Reality Engineer
from
one of my listed servers is so much more likely to be a forgery that I
don't care about the few exceptions.
Depending on their users, everyone will have different policies.
Philip
--
Philip Paeps
Senior Reality Engineer
Ministry of Information
___
ntent Filtering.
Asking abuse@ how they'd like to be told about their customers' network
abuse gets bounced with the same error. Great!
Does anyone know any humans there?
They're unfortunately too large to block outright.
Thanks.
Philip
--
Philip Paeps
Senior Reality
On 2018-01-08 09:44:10 (+0100), David Hofstee wrote:
On 6 January 2018 at 15:32, Philip Paeps wrote:
I'm getting repeated spamtrap hits from customers of combell.com.
Forwarding messages (even just headers) to abuse@ gets bounces:
ab...@combell.com
host 217.21.178.56 [217.21.1
On 2018-01-08 14:36:07 (+), Charles McKean wrote:
On Mon, Jan 8, 2018 at 7:15 AM, Philip Paeps
wrote:
Did you try it with a non-"trouble.is" domain?
Yes. I sent these from postmaster@ the several domains where the
spamtraps are hosted and from philip@ in the domains I've
On 2018-01-08 17:54:13 (+), Philip Paeps wrote:
On 2018-01-08 14:36:07 (+), Charles McKean wrote:
I was able to contact them just now and open a ticket with them using
the abuse address.
I've managed to send a message through the web link Ken posted here
(thank you!).
[...]
I
; for being added to Google Groups
mailing lists but that's not the way these things should work.
but the issue is with the unsubscribe URL methods.. Comments at the
bottom of the example..
Last time I tried, the regular email unsubscribe method still worked.
Happily.
Philip
--
Ph
On 2018-02-09 20:46:41 (+0100), Brandon Long wrote:
On Fri, Feb 9, 2018 at 6:13 AM Philip Paeps wrote:
On 2018-02-07 17:05:59 (-0800), Michael Peddemors wrote:
Spammers are abusing Google Groups lists of course, and I am sure
they are working on it
It would be nice if the Google Groups
processing fails).
Oh groan!
I really wish people would stop putting their abuse desks (etc) behind
web forms. The abuse came in via email. Let us complain about it via
email please.
The "everything over HTTP" culture is getting out of hand.
Philip
--
Philip Paeps
Senior Reality
ul. Thank you! I hope others follow your lead.
I wonder if anyone has written comprehensive SpamAssassin rules to score
shortened URLs?
It occurs to me that a milter to expand the shortened URLs would also be
very useful.
Philip
--
Philip Paeps
Senior Reality En
On 2018-02-21 13:46:52 (+0530), Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote:
On 21/02/18, 12:50 PM, Daniele Duca wrote:
On 21/02/2018 06:40, Philip Paeps wrote:
I wonder if anyone has written comprehensive SpamAssassin rules to
score shortened URLs?
It occurs to me that a milter to expand the shortened
On 2018-02-21 11:22:46 (+0100), Stefano Bagnara wrote:
On 21 February 2018 at 09:44, Philip Paeps wrote:
Following JavaScript redirects is probably all but impossible except
for the simplest case because of the halting problem. Unless you want
to execute the JavaScript ... and down that road
but that's the only theory I can come up
with for my emails not arriving on that GSuites list.
Has anyone else seen this? Brandon, can you comment if this is
something to beware of?
Thanks.
Philip
--
Philip Paeps
Senior Reality Engineer
Ministry of Information
__
uites wasn't happy with the APRICOT network space in the
first Received: hop.
Philip
--
Philip Paeps
Senior Reality Engineer
Ministry of Information
___
mailop mailing list
mailop@mailop.org
https://chilli.nosignal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mailop
own mailservers could still
use it. Turns out spf and dkim were never actually set up though.
I will chase that down.
Thanks again for helping debug this.
Philip
--
Philip Paeps
Senior Reality Engineer
Ministry of Information
___
mailop mailing lis
ed thousand people to convince them to stop squatting on the
second-level domain, all without knowingly triggering their mail to be
treated as spam.
I am very interested in seeing how this works out. Do share your
experiences with this list!
Many thanks.
Philip
--
are pretty universally accepted
though. Even real names entirely in scripts that are nothing like
ASCII.
Philip
--
Philip Paeps
Senior Reality Engineer
Ministry of Information
___
mailop mailing list
mailop@mailop.org
https://chilli.nosignal.o
broken software now has a
better chance of being delivered than before. :) Or at least getting as
far as the spam filters rather than being dropped sooner.
Philip
--
Philip Paeps
Senior Reality Engineer
Ministry of Information
___
mailop mailing li
a record?
I use libspf2. It does what the RFC says. That's what standards are
for...
Philip
--
Philip Paeps
Senior Reality Engineer
Ministry of Information
___
mailop mailing list
mailop@mailop.org
https://chilli.nosignal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mailop
uot; (who don't live in SMTP land)
also believe that + is an "invalid character" in email addresses.
Philip
--
Philip Paeps
Senior Reality Engineer
Ministry of Information
___
mailop mailing list
mailop@mailop.org
https://chilli.nosignal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mailop
On 2018-06-20 09:32:40 (+0200), Renaud Allard via mailop wrote:
On 20/06/18 09:17, Philip Paeps wrote:
On 2018-06-19 21:20:49 (+0200), Steve Atkins wrote:
On Jun 19, 2018, at 8:10 PM, Brandon Long via mailop
wrote:
They used to use qmail which uses - instead of the more common +
for
hard is unlikely to do
your reputation much good!
Philip
--
Philip Paeps
Senior Reality Engineer
Ministry of Information
___
mailop mailing list
mailop@mailop.org
https://chilli.nosignal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mailop
nfirm
opt-in, you have no way of knowing if that address wants your email.
Any email you send to an address that hasn't requested it is spam.
* customer doesn't want to do double optin
Get rid of the customer.
Philip
--
Philip Paeps
Senior Reality
click a link they send by email.
Philip
--
Philip Paeps
Senior Reality Engineer
Ministry of Information
___
mailop mailing list
mailop@mailop.org
https://chilli.nosignal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mailop
or contributing, much appreciated!
All of this sounds good.
But have you kicked out that spamming customer whose shoddy practices
are harming your carefully monitored reputation?
Philip
--
Philip Paeps
Senior Reality Engineer
Ministry of Information
___
ective for me. Some unwanted email
still ends up in the inbox but most ends up in Junk where it belongs.
Philip
--
Philip Paeps
Senior Reality Engineer
Ministry of Information
___
mailop mailing list
mailop@mailop.org
https://chilli.nosignal.org/cgi-
query it occasionally.
For my uses, it has mostly been replaced by the abuse contact that is
now at the top of whois data.
With whois becoming decreasingly useful in the post-GDPR era, perhaps
abuse.net will become the first place we look for data...
Philip
--
Philip Paeps
Senior Reality
list?
Philip
--
Philip Paeps
Senior Reality Engineer
Ministry of Information
___
mailop mailing list
mailop@mailop.org
https://chilli.nosignal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mailop
On 2019-03-06 16:40:43 (+0800), Renaud Allard via mailop wrote:
On 3/6/19 8:54 AM, Philip Paeps wrote:
I share my mailserver with several GitHub users. Recently, we've
all been getting recruitment spam to addresses mined from GitHub.
I wonder if GitHub cares about their platform being
l.org.
Any contacts (on- or off-list) would be appreciated.
Many thanks.
Philip
--
Philip Paeps
Senior Reality Engineer
Ministry of Information
___
mailop mailing list
mailop@mailop.org
https://chilli.nosignal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mailop
fore abuse can shut the customer down.
> You can set up a relay on another provider only for the microsoft
> domains and configure your MTA accordingly.
Or simply try another Hetzner netblock/datacentre. I currently have
three machines on different Hetzner netblocks that have no problem
del
r DMARC, the From:
domain also needs to be aligned.
Philip
--
Philip Paeps
Senior Reality Engineer
Ministry of Information
___
mailop mailing list
mailop@mailop.org
https://chilli.nosignal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mailop
On 2017-02-06 12:34:50 (+0100), Philip Paeps wrote:
> Does anyone have a current way of getting in touch with whoever runs
> btinternet.com these days? They have a history of (quasi-)randomly
> blocking mailservers but in the past a friendly email to postmaster@
> always got iss
On 2017-02-09 08:54:09 (-0800), Alan Hodgson wrote:
> On Thursday 09 February 2017 10:15:17 Philip Paeps wrote:
> > Also note that DMARC breaks forwarding like this (or forwarding
> > breaks DMARC, depending on your religious affiliation). You can get
> > around SPF as
supposed to be real-time. Sigh. I have them on a sacrificial IP
and run their mail through SpamAssassin, dropping anything more spammy
than $bignum. I'm actively trying to push them to just point their MX
records at {google,microsoft,foo}.
Phil
tication schemes allow for setting up
what are often called "application passwords" precisely for this kind of
usecase.
Don't say: "just give Google your password" but do say: "please generate
a password for Google".
Security is hard.
Philip
--
Philip P
m spammers trying to relay mail with
spoofed source addresses in the domains the machine is in the SPF
records for.
Obviously I don't allow relaying without authentication but I hadn't
realised spammers were now harvesting SPF records.
Anyone else noticed this?
Philip
--
Philip Paeps
Sen
rected to Postmaster from any other system on the Internet."
I find this list quite helpful in prodding ESPs out of band when abuse@
seems to be defective in some way. If abuse@ isn't so much 'defective'
as 'hopeless' ... tough?
Philip
On 2017-04-10 19:01:34 (+), Michael Wise wrote:
Philip Paeps wrote:
On 2017-04-10 17:15:38 (+), Michael Wise via mailop
wrote:
And a way to establish contacts automatically.
What's wrong with the well-known abuse@ address? Or postmaster@?
You're missing the large
On 2017-04-10 19:24:39 (+), Michael Wise wrote:
Philip Paeps wrote:
On 2017-04-10 19:01:34 (+), Michael Wise wrote:
Philip Paeps wrote:
On 2017-04-10 17:15:38 (+), Michael Wise via mailop
wrote:
And a way to establish contacts automatically.
What's wrong with the
body saying "in 2017, being clueless *IS* actively rogue" in
5..4..3 :)
Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by
incompetence?
Is Hanlon's law (razor) the new Godwin? :)
Philip
--
Philip Paeps
Senior Reali
On 2017-04-10 13:11:51 (-0700), Steve Atkins wrote:
On Apr 10, 2017, at 1:01 PM, Philip Paeps wrote:
On 2017-04-10 21:50:01 (+0200), valdis.kletni...@vt.edu wrote:
On Mon, 10 Apr 2017 12:21:45 -0600, Ryan Harris via mailop said:
It might be helpful to understand why people want to post on
voids
dealing with too many "but I could receive email from them fine before!"
nastygrams.
Philip
--
Philip Paeps
Senior Reality Engineer
Ministry of Information
___
mailop mailing list
mailop@mailop.org
https://chilli.nosignal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mailop
ort 25 open
and/or an MX record. Different discussion.
The correct way to indicate that a domain does not accept email is to
have an explicit null MX record in the DNS, e.g.:
foo MX 0 .
See RFC 7075.
Philip
--
Philip Paeps
Senior Reality Engineer
Ministry of
On 2017-04-19 12:36:23 (+0200), Philip Paeps wrote:
On 2017-04-19 12:15:06 (+0200), David Hofstee
wrote:
It may have to do with squatted/parked domains and/or port 25 being
closed by a firewall. Parked domains generally have A records for
showing ads but often do not have MX records (or an
rmed opt-in :-)) mailing list can't hurt.
Thanks for putting this up.
Philip
--
Philip Paeps
Senior Reality Engineer
Ministry of Information
___
mailop mailing list
mailop@mailop.org
https://chilli.nosignal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mailop
forts of the abuse
desk seem to be paying off.
Of course, there will always be room for improvement and I wouldn't be
surprised if there are still professional spammers at Hetzner. They
just haven't been hitting my spamtraps recently.
Philip
--
Phil
reputation is also a reputation in the
benighted times we live in.
Philip
--
Philip Paeps
Senior Reality Engineer
Alternative Enterprises
___
mailop mailing list
mailop@mailop.org
https://chilli.nosignal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mailop
D. I can
imagine several reasons why signing microsoft.com or outlook.com would
be impractical, but I'm slightly surprised they're not using a new
domain in a well-known generic TLD.
I bet a common misconfiguration will be admins automatically typing .com
after .microsoft. :-)
Phi
grade attacks are
much more likely than fraudulent certificates.
Moral of the story: monitor all the things!
Philip
--
Philip Paeps
Senior Reality Engineer
Alternative Enterprises
___
mailop mailing list
mailop@mailop.org
https://list.mailop.org/lis
On 2023-10-24 10:04:25 (+0800), Ian Kelling via mailop wrote:
> Philip Paeps via mailop writes:
>> On 2023-10-22 14:34:39 (+0530), Slavko via mailop wrote:
>> Indeed: not directly related to mailops. But a very instructive example
>> of why monitoring C-T logs is a good idea
and have dozens of plain forwarding aliases. Our spam filtering
is pretty effective but there will always be some spam.)
Brandon: any insights? Happy to supply more logs.
Best wishes.
Philip
--
Philip Paeps
Senior Reality Engineer
Alternative Enterprises
__
ot;.
And as long as they're only tempfailing, it's not a huge problem.
However, if there's something we need to do differently to prevent these
from suddenly turning into rejects one day, I'm all ears. I can't see
anything applicable in Google's Sender Guideli
On 2023-11-18 18:59:53 (+0800), Alessandro Vesely via mailop wrote:
On Fri 17/Nov/2023 15:37:58 +0100 Philip Paeps via mailop wrote:
We do all the things in the Bulk Sender Guidelines (except DMARC
because we don't want to frustrate our users ability to use
third-party mailing lists that
inning of
September. Since the middle of November, we're consistently seeing 80%+
TempFail.
This is mostly a problem for Google users. We don't mind queueing and
retrying.
Philip [postmas...@freebsd.org]
--
Philip Paeps
Senior Reality En
the root cause.
Philip
--
Philip Paeps
Senior Reality Engineer
Alternative Enterprises
___
mailop mailing list
mailop@mailop.org
https://list.mailop.org/listinfo/mailop
On 2023-11-17 22:37:58 (+0800), Philip Paeps via mailop wrote:
Since about September, we're hitting the rate limiter ~70% of the time
every couple of days. Since ~15 November we're hitting the rate
limiter for almost all mail we send.
Anyone else noticing this?
The problem went
On 2024-01-25 14:10:13 (+0800), Hans-Martin Mosner via mailop wrote:
Tonight we received a huge wave of extortion spams from OVH hosted
domains trying to get bitcoin payments. The senders claim that
recipients watched child porn.
I'm seeing these come in from several places. They get trapped
DNSWL is a popular one.
Abusix has a good one too. There are others.
Check https://multirbl.valli.org
Btw, how do you deal with this big players' blacklist problems?
The same way I deal with other players.
Philip
--
Philip Paeps
Se
On 2024-02-02 23:08:54 (+0800), Mark E. Jeftovic via mailop wrote:
We're having a bit of a theological debate internally on whether to
implement DMARC on our SRS forwarder domains.
The team here says that DMARC means there will never be alignment on
an SRS forwarder domain because the envelope
On 2024-02-03 09:01:40 (+0800), Bill Cole via mailop wrote:
On 2024-02-02 at 10:26:55 UTC-0500 (Fri, 2 Feb 2024 16:26:55 +0100)
Kai Bojens via mailop
is rumored to have said:
Am 02.02.24 um 16:08 schrieb Mark E. Jeftovic via mailop:
We're having a bit of a theological debate internally on whe
On 2024-02-04 23:02:31 (+0800), Matus UHLAR - fantomas via mailop wrote:
Am 02.02.24 um 16:08 schrieb Mark E. Jeftovic via mailop:
We're having a bit of a theological debate internally on whether to
implement DMARC on our SRS forwarder domains.
On 02.02.24 16:26, Kai Bojens via mailop wrote:
S
On 2024-02-08 19:27:55 (+0800), Jaroslaw Rafa via mailop wrote:
Dnia 7.02.2024 o godz. 20:51:15 Jarland Donnell via mailop pisze:
Nearly 100% of
users who forward email do so because they want it in Gmail.
I am always wondering - as Gmail gives so many problems that have been
discussed multip
On 2024-02-09 15:50:36 (+0800), Cyril - ImprovMX via mailop wrote:
But to get circle back at email forwarding and Gmail issues, there is
one
point that bothers me with ARC and I'd like that someone could tell me
that
I'm wrong (with valid arguments, of course).
ARC tells the receiver party tha
On 2024-02-15 02:51:17 (+0800), Gellner, Oliver via mailop wrote:
On 13.02.2024 at 17:05 John Levine via mailop wrote:
It appears that Taavi Eomäe via mailop said:
On 13/02/2024 05:16, John Levine via mailop wrote:
Right now if you get a message from Gmail or Yahoo with a valid
DKIM signatu
t; works the way the poster intends. Neither
the mailing list software nor the recipient has to guess.
Philip
--
Philip Paeps
Senior Reality Engineer
Alternative Enterprises
___
mailop mailing list
mailop@mailop.org
https://list.mailop.org/listinfo/mailop
On 2024-02-25 09:48:23 (+0700), Dave Crocker wrote:
On 2/24/2024 5:25 PM, Philip Paeps via mailop wrote:
On the whole, I think not meddling with the body (and not breaking
DKIM) provides an improved mailing list experience. We don't have
to rewrite the From: header, and "reply"
On 2024-03-05 05:40:46 (+0800), Sebastian Nielsen via mailop wrote:
Anyone that have a general algoritm to filter out emoji from sender
addresses?
How I do in regexp to identify emoji? (its such a stupid thing)..
Today's regular expression will not capture tomorrow's emoji. The nice
people w
On 2024-03-07 20:30:53 (+0800), Sebastian Nielsen via mailop wrote:
Emoji is such a stupid thing. So that’s why I kinda need to delete
all emoji, by parsing the utf8 string and then deleting everything
that is emoji. Not normal UTF8 characters, as they can can be
displayed (like Chinese charact
On 2024-07-09 06:32:17 (+0800), Tony G via mailop wrote:
I'm a small-business owner, running a small number of private domains
for a small number of users. Outbound traffic from all accounts is
currently less than 10 items per day. We don't send any transactions
in bulk, send very few transacti
On 2024-07-09 10:38:51 (+0800), Viktor Dukhovni via mailop wrote:
On Tue, Jul 09, 2024 at 10:17:15AM +0800, Philip Paeps via mailop
wrote:
With such low volume, you will really struggle to get email delivered
to the
larger mailbox providers, whose filtering is largely based on
reputation.
It&#
e handle 3 or 5 spams in their
inbox per day?
While I'm clearly not a representative sample of the average email user,
3 or 5 spam messages per day is two orders of magnitude short of the
mark on a bad day for me.
So ... Yes: we need spam folders.
Philip
--
Philip Paeps
Senior Reality
On 2019-10-14 13:43:18 (-0700), Thomas Walter via mailop wrote:
On 14.10.19 20:39, Philip Paeps via mailop wrote:
While I'm clearly not a representative sample of the average email
user,
3 or 5 spam messages per day is two orders of magnitude short of the
mark on a bad day for me.
So ..
On 2019-12-05 15:36:02 (-0800), Large Hadron Collider via mailop wrote:
The subject says it all.
Okay, I'll bite: what's wrong with Postfix?
I've been using it since before it was called Postfix and "it works for
me".
Philip
--
Philip Paeps
Senior Reality Enginee
I always enjoy tales
from the crypts. :-)
Philip
--
Philip Paeps
Senior Reality Engineer
Alternative Enterprises
___
mailop mailing list
mailop@mailop.org
https://chilli.nosignal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mailop
I have my
mailserver fetch my mail so it's more easily backed up.)
2. February 15, 2021 - Access to LSAs will be turned off for all G
Suite accounts.
Clear deadline at least.
This isn't a bad thing, of course.
I'm not sure I share that particular view...
Philip
--
Ph
On 2019-12-17 17:53:48 (+0800), andris.rein...@gmail.com wrote:
On 17. Dec 2019, at 11:40, Philip Paeps wrote:
On 2019-12-17 03:20:04 (+0800), Al Iverson via mailop wrote:
Google is announcing that in the future, G-Suite accounts will not
support LSA (Less Secure Access) account connection
On 2019-12-17 18:08:03 (+0800), Andrew C Aitchison wrote:
On Tue, 17 Dec 2019, Philip Paeps via mailop wrote:
On 2019-12-17 03:20:04 (+0800), Al Iverson via mailop wrote:
Google is announcing that in the future, G-Suite accounts will not
support LSA (Less Secure Access) account connection
t Davmail... Circuitous to be sure, but it's good to
have options.
Thanks for the suggestion.
Philip
--
Philip Paeps
Senior Reality Engineer
Alternative Enterprises
___
mailop mailing list
mailop@mailop.org
https://chilli.nosignal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mailop
e if "escalation" is what you're looking for as much as
another hosting provider for your email.
Philip
--
Philip Paeps
Senior Reality Engineer
Alternative Enterprises
___
mailop mailing list
mailop@mailop.org
https://chilli.nosignal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mailop
2018.
Philip
--
Philip Paeps
Senior Reality Engineer
Alternative Enterprises
___
mailop mailing list
mailop@mailop.org
https://chilli.nosignal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mailop
(and also web).
Hooray! Thank you for your continued hard work in hosting this
invaluable resource!
Hope you all have a Happy and low-Spam New Year.
Likewise. Best wishes. :-)
Philip
--
Philip Paeps
Senior Reality Engineer
Alternative Enterprises
1 - 100 of 153 matches
Mail list logo
