On Thursday 14 June 2007 12:50:08 Ares wrote:
> Here I am back with a new, silly question: what is the most favourite
> bibtex editor under GNU/linux? I have been using JabRef under Windows,
> but I realised that it runs under the Java Runtime Environment, and I
> do not want to install new compone
On Fri, Jun 15, 2007 at 07:21:46AM +1000, Typhoon wrote:
> On Thu, 14 Jun 2007 17:50:08 +0200
> Ares <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Here I am back with a new, silly question: what is the most favourite
> > bibtex editor under GNU/linux? I have been using JabRef under Windows,
> > but I realised
Is there maybe someone here in lyx community
who has the knowledge and is interested to
make that work (and probably many scientists happy)?
If it can put a format like \cite{...} to clipboard,
I have a patch to make lyx paste such kind of strings
as a citation. It's not identical as the push, b
Alan G Isaac wrote:
On Thu, 14 Jun 2007, Richard Heck apparently wrote:
BibLaTeX, soon to be the new standard
Can you provide the background for this claim?
It's based upon my sense of the enthusiasm that BibLaTeX has generated
on comp.text.tex. There really are a lot of problems wi
On Thu, 14 Jun 2007, Richard Heck apparently wrote:
> BibLaTeX, soon to be the new standard
Can you provide the background for this claim?
(I am not challenging it.)
Thank you,
Alan Isaac
On Wednesday 13 June 2007 10:10:36 Helge Hafting wrote:
> Most other distributions use the rpm packaging system.
> It is a long time since I used those - one usually had to
> download lots of rpm files and then give a command to install
> them all. The main difference from the "apt" command above w
2007/6/14, Richard Heck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Ares wrote:
> Here I am back with a new, silly question: what is the most favourite
> bibtex editor under GNU/linux? I have been using JabRef under Windows,
> but I realised that it runs under the Java Runtime Environment, and I
> do not want to instal
On Thu, 14 Jun 2007 17:50:08 +0200
Ares <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Here I am back with a new, silly question: what is the most favourite
> bibtex editor under GNU/linux? I have been using JabRef under Windows,
> but I realised that it runs under the Java Runtime Environment, and I
> do not want
I use a combination of Zotero, a firefox plugin (www.zotero.org), and
Jabref. In the future Zotero itself might hopefully be able to directly
push citations to lyx which will probably mean the end for jabref on my
laptop. Until now it has at least a direct copy function (ctrl+alt+c)
which allow
On Thu, 14. June 2007 17:50:08 Ares wrote:
> Here I am back with a new, silly question: what is the most favourite
> bibtex editor under GNU/linux? I have been using JabRef under Windows,
> but I realised that it runs under the Java Runtime Environment, and I
> do not want to install new components
Here I am back with a new, silly question: what is the most favourite
bibtex editor under GNU/linux? I have been using JabRef under Windows,
but I realised that it runs under the Java Runtime Environment, and I
do not want to install new components if I do not really need them...
I am also quite
Ares wrote:
Here I am back with a new, silly question: what is the most favourite
bibtex editor under GNU/linux? I have been using JabRef under Windows,
but I realised that it runs under the Java Runtime Environment, and I
do not want to install new components if I do not really need them...
JabR
Here I am back with a new, silly question: what is the most favourite
bibtex editor under GNU/linux? I have been using JabRef under Windows,
but I realised that it runs under the Java Runtime Environment, and I
do not want to install new components if I do not really need them...
So, let's go wit
2007/6/13, Bob Lounsbury <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
On 6/13/07, killermike <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wednesday 13 June 2007 07:47, Ares wrote:
> >
> > when I was under windows (a long, long time ago), when exporting to
> > pdf from LyX, I was prompted by LyX to install missing packages and,
> > i
On 6/13/07, killermike <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Wednesday 13 June 2007 07:47, Ares wrote:
>
> when I was under windows (a long, long time ago), when exporting to
> pdf from LyX, I was prompted by LyX to install missing packages and,
> if I had an internet connection, everything worked smoot
On Wednesday 13 June 2007 07:47, Ares wrote:
>
> when I was under windows (a long, long time ago), when exporting to
> pdf from LyX, I was prompted by LyX to install missing packages and,
> if I had an internet connection, everything worked smoothly.
> Now under GNU/Linux do I have to install missi
2007/6/13, Helge Hafting <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Ares wrote:
> As announced, I am back with a new, stupid question on LyX under
> GNU/Linux. I will ask it again since the question got lost in the
> previous thread. It concerns tetex package installation. I'll ask it
> as a dummy windows user.
>
> wh
Ares wrote:
As announced, I am back with a new, stupid question on LyX under
GNU/Linux. I will ask it again since the question got lost in the
previous thread. It concerns tetex package installation. I'll ask it
as a dummy windows user.
when I was under windows (a long, long time ago), when expo
As announced, I am back with a new, stupid question on LyX under
GNU/Linux. I will ask it again since the question got lost in the
previous thread. It concerns tetex package installation. I'll ask it
as a dummy windows user.
when I was under windows (a long, long time ago), when exporting to
pdf
you did "apt-get install lyx"). For odd packages that you need generally
ctan is your friend and you can set up a texmf directory under your home
directory for these odd packages. Then run 'sudo texhash' from command line
and reconfigure LyX and all is good in the world.
To install additional pack
Helge Hafting wrote:
> Ares wrote:
>>
>> I thought that pdf, being a "portable document format", didn't need
>> any special setting on the machine you use.
> Now matter how portable - you still need pdf reader software.
> On linux there are several alternatives, some may be better
> than others. S
Ares wrote:
I thought that pdf, being a "portable document format", didn't need
any special setting on the machine you use.
Now matter how portable - you still need pdf reader software.
On linux there are several alternatives, some may be better
than others. Some do a bad job with bitmap fonts,
On 6/8/07, Ares <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
2007/6/8, Bob Lounsbury <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On 6/8/07, Ares <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I have all repositories enabled and I can't see LyX. I have Ubuntu
> > 7.04. I'll try apt-get install lyx instead...
> >
> > --
> > Diego
> > http://www.ares00
2007/6/8, Bob Lounsbury <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
On 6/8/07, Ares <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have all repositories enabled and I can't see LyX. I have Ubuntu
> 7.04. I'll try apt-get install lyx instead...
>
> --
> Diego
> http://www.ares001.altervista.org/
>
You did hit the "Reload" button in S
From: Vaclav Smidl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
*** On ubuntu it should be as easy as typing
$ apt-get install lyx
on the command line, or selecting lyx in synaptic and pressing apply
button. (assuming that you are connected to the internet)
I'll give it a try, but LyX is not on the Synaptic manager
stall LyX first (so I am afraid that the "moving to linux..." will
become a series!)
Thank you all again
--
Diego
http://www.ares001.altervista.org/
On Wednesday 06 June 2007 18:24:57 Richard Heck wrote:
>
> Thanks for the info! This is excellent.
>
> Richard
Richard since I know that you are using Fedora you can install them already:
# yum install liberation-fonts
--
José Abílio
> *** On ubuntu it should be as easy as typing
> $ apt-get install lyx
> on the command line, or selecting lyx in synaptic and pressing apply
> button. (assuming that you are connected to the internet)
>
> I'll give it a try, but LyX is not on the Synaptic manager, as far as
> I can see (on Ub
On Wed, 6 Jun 2007, Steve Litt wrote:
Richard -- what do you think of Century Schoolbook? I've used that for my
last few Ebooks, because onscreen it seems to look black and legible, and
it seems to be available with LyX.
SteveT,
This is another Richard ... and I use Palatino for my LyX docu
On 6/6/07, Ares <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
From: "Paul Smith" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
## I think I understand the problem that Diego reports. The pdf viewers
in Linux are more accurate and if the fonts are not included in the
pdf file, the quality of the document on the screen looks not so god,
Steve Litt wrote:
On Wednesday 06 June 2007 14:52, Richard Heck wrote:
Oisin Feeley wrote:
On 6/6/07, Ares <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[snip]
When I view my old documents (i.e. the pdf files generated by LyX on
Windows) on Linux (Ubuntu 7.04) the quality is very bad. I guess thi
On Wednesday 06 June 2007 14:52, Richard Heck wrote:
> Oisin Feeley wrote:
> > On 6/6/07, Ares <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > [snip]
> >
> >> > When I view my old documents (i.e. the pdf files generated by LyX on
> >> > Windows) on Linux (Ubuntu 7.04) the quality is very bad. I guess this
> >> > is
Oisin Feeley wrote:
On 6/6/07, Ares <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[snip]
> When I view my old documents (i.e. the pdf files generated by LyX on
> Windows) on Linux (Ubuntu 7.04) the quality is very bad. I guess this
> is related to the installed fonts.
[snip]
. Anyway you can view a
sample pdf
On 6/6/07, Ares <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[snip]
> When I view my old documents (i.e. the pdf files generated by LyX on
> Windows) on Linux (Ubuntu 7.04) the quality is very bad. I guess this
> is related to the installed fonts.
[snip]
. Anyway you can view a
sample pdf generated on my machi
From: Vaclav Smidl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
I have been using LyX on windows XP since a while now and i am trying
to move to Linux. I have not tried to install LyX on Linux yet (I am
sorry but i already know that it won't be easy, I already tried once
with no success) but my question is different now
Oisin Feeley wrote:
Forgive me if this is OT, but I was reminded of it it by your post.
Red Hat just released replacements for the common Microsoft
proprietary fonts:
https://www.redhat.com/promo/fonts/
including replacements for TimesNewRoman, Aerial and CourierNew.
Thanks for the info! This
On 6/6/07, Steve Litt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Perhaps some of your fonts weren't embedded, and maybe they were truetype. You
can install Truetype fonts on your Linux computer.
Forgive me if this is OT, but I was reminded of it it by your post.
Red Hat just released replacements for the com
ed? please let me know if you have any
> suggestion...
Congratulations on moving to Linux. IMHO a wise choice indeed.
Perhaps some of your fonts weren't embedded, and maybe they were truetype. You
can install Truetype fonts on your Linux computer. Each distribution has its
own method for
pected? please let me know if you have any
> suggestion...
Congratulations on moving to Linux. IMHO a wise choice indeed.
Perhaps some of your fonts weren't embedded, and maybe they were truetype. You
can install Truetype fonts on your Linux computer. Each distribution has its
own method
On 6/6/07, Vaclav Smidl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have been using LyX on windows XP since a while now and i am trying
> to move to Linux. I have not tried to install LyX on Linux yet (I am
> sorry but i already know that it won't be easy, I already tried once
> with no success) but my questi
Hi,
>
> I have been using LyX on windows XP since a while now and i am trying
> to move to Linux. I have not tried to install LyX on Linux yet (I am
> sorry but i already know that it won't be easy, I already tried once
> with no success) but my question is different now.
On ubuntu it should be as
Hi all,
I have been using LyX on windows XP since a while now and i am trying
to move to Linux. I have not tried to install LyX on Linux yet (I am
sorry but i already know that it won't be easy, I already tried once
with no success) but my question is different now.
When I view my old documents
42 matches
Mail list logo
