On Sat, Jan 13, 2024 at 02:27:11PM +0100, Christian Kral wrote:
> 1. My username "christiankral" and the related password are not recognized
> and cause an error:
Sent update privately. P
--
lyx-devel mailing list
lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org
http://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo/lyx-devel
Dear support team,
I would like to create two bug reports, but I am currently not able to
create any Trac tickets for the following reasons:
1. My username "christiankral" and the related password are not
recognized and cause an error:
So I cannot login, even though I created tickets prev
On Tue, Nov 07, 2023 at 07:37:09AM +0100, David Senabre wrote:
> Hello, everyone.
> I tried to create a new account to report a couple of bugs, but the system
> told me to ask on the mailling list.
Sent privately. P
--
lyx-devel mailing list
lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org
http://lists.lyx.org/mailman/li
Hello, everyone.
I tried to create a new account to report a couple of bugs, but the system
told me to ask on the mailling list.
Regards.
Ardhan.
--
lyx-devel mailing list
lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org
http://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo/lyx-devel
For mysterious reasons, it would seem that the file containing people's
passwords for accounts on trac got deleted, or overwritten, or
something, on our server. As a result, if you try to log in, you will
find yourself unable to do so (unless you've already done what I'm about
to describe).
On Mon, 30 Jan 2006, Georg Baum wrote:
> http://moinmoin.wikiwikiweb.de/PmWikiMoinMoinConverter
I forgot to say thank you for the tip, thanks. I'm adding it to the PmWiki
documentation.
/C
--
Christian Ridderström, +46-8-768 39 44 http://www.md.kth.se/~chr
On Mon, 30 Jan 2006, Georg Baum wrote:
> Am Montag, 30. Januar 2006 11:57 schrieb [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> > Uhm... I don't get anything?
> >
> >
> http://www.google.com/search?hs=w8V&hl=en&lr=&client=opera&rls=en&q=pmwiki2moinmoin&btnG=Search
Very weird... my original link still doesn't work b
Am Montag, 30. Januar 2006 11:57 schrieb [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> Uhm... I don't get anything?
>
>
http://www.google.com/search?hs=w8V&hl=en&lr=&client=opera&rls=en&q=pmwiki2moinmoin&btnG=Search
It seems like google does not like you ;-)
> could you send me the link?
http://moinmoin.wikiwiki
On Mon, 30 Jan 2006, Michael Gerz wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> >Importing the wiki is a *lot* of work (the markup isn't the same, and most
> >likely the features aren't the same either).
> >
> >
> If there are less than 50 wiki pages, it should be doable even manually.
> It would take
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Importing the wiki is a *lot* of work (the markup isn't the same, and most
likely the features aren't the same either).
If there are less than 50 wiki pages, it should be doable even manually.
It would take a few days but definitely a limited amount of time.
I am w
On Mon, 30 Jan 2006, Georg Baum wrote:
> Juergen Spitzmueller wrote:
>
> > I read that there are some conversion scripts availabe. There is one ffrom
> > mediawiki to trac's wiki. Maybe someone has done something similar for
> > pmwiki?
>
> See the first (and only hit) of a search for pmwiki2moi
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes a écrit :
"Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Lars> Note that with subversion (yes, I have my scripts ready and
Lars> warmed up for conversion), moving things around in the tree or
Lars> duplicating them is a breeze. So unless the build system is
Lars>
> "John" == John Spray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
John> Am Montag, den 30.01.2006, 10:04 +0100 schrieb Jean-Marc
John> Lasgouttes:
>> Abdel, does it seem reasonable? Once qt4 is officially in the 1.4
>> tree, I am going to be conservative about further changes anyway.
>> And before you ask, i
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Can Trac import bugzilla information? (I'm guessing that's an important
> criterion)
It claims so:
http://projects.edgewall.com/trac/wiki/TracFaq#can-i-migrate-my-bugs-from-bugzilla
Jürgen
On 29 Jan 2006, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>
> | On 29 Jan 2006, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> |
> | > But I'd like you to think about trac as well. To me it is a system that
> | > is quite simple and gives us viewcvs, bugzilla and wiki functionality in
> | > one easy
Juergen Spitzmueller wrote:
> I read that there are some conversion scripts availabe. There is one ffrom
> mediawiki to trac's wiki. Maybe someone has done something similar for
> pmwiki?
See the first (and only hit) of a search for pmwiki2moinmoin.
Georg
On Mon, 30 Jan 2006, Juergen Spitzmueller wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Importing the wiki is a *lot* of work (the markup isn't the same, and most
> > likely the features aren't the same either).
>
> I read that there are some conversion scripts availabe. There is one
> ffrom mediawiki to
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| > "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
|
| Lars> Note that with subversion (yes, I have my scripts ready and
| Lars> warmed up for conversion), moving things around in the tree or
| Lars> duplicating them is a breeze. So
Am Montag, den 30.01.2006, 10:04 +0100 schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes:
> Abdel, does it seem reasonable? Once qt4 is officially in the 1.4
> tree, I am going to be conservative about further changes anyway. And
> before you ask, it will be the same for gtk :)
Do you mean you want to be conservative
> "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Lars> Note that with subversion (yes, I have my scripts ready and
Lars> warmed up for conversion), moving things around in the tree or
Lars> duplicating them is a breeze. So unless the build system is
Lars> re-vamped in the first seco
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Importing the wiki is a *lot* of work (the markup isn't the same, and most
> likely the features aren't the same either).
I read that there are some conversion scripts availabe. There is one ffrom
mediawiki to trac's wiki. Maybe someone has done something similar for
p
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| On 29 Jan 2006, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
|
| > But I'd like you to think about trac as well. To me it is a system that
| > is quite simple and gives us viewcvs, bugzilla and wiki functionality in
| > one easy to maintain and administer package. So I'd like comments o
On Sun, 29 Jan 2006, Georg Baum wrote:
> Am Sonntag, 29. Januar 2006 15:48 schrieb Lars Gullik Bjønnes:
> > But I'd like you to think about trac as well.
> > To me it is a system that is quite simple and gives us viewcvs,
> > bugzilla and wiki functionality in one easy to maintain and administer
>
On 29 Jan 2006, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> But I'd like you to think about trac as well. To me it is a system that
> is quite simple and gives us viewcvs, bugzilla and wiki functionality in
> one easy to maintain and administer package. So I'd like comments on
> that from everybody.
Are you thi
Am Sonntag, 29. Januar 2006 15:48 schrieb Lars Gullik Bjønnes:
> But I'd like you to think about trac as well.
> To me it is a system that is quite simple and gives us viewcvs,
> bugzilla and wiki functionality in one easy to maintain and administer
> package. So I'd like comments on that from ever
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| On 28 Jan 2006, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
|
| > Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| >
| > | > "Georg" == Georg Baum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| > |
| > | Georg> Am Samstag, 28. Januar 2006 09:55 schrieb Abdelrazak Younes:
| > | >> Let's put it t
On 28 Jan 2006, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> | > "Georg" == Georg Baum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> |
> | Georg> Am Samstag, 28. Januar 2006 09:55 schrieb Abdelrazak Younes:
> | >> Let's put it this way: My priority is to have something i
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| > "Georg" == Georg Baum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
|
| Georg> Am Samstag, 28. Januar 2006 09:55 schrieb Abdelrazak Younes:
| >> Let's put it this way: My priority is to have something in CVS (or
| >> SVN) so that others could help me (I am k
> "Georg" == Georg Baum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Georg> Am Samstag, 28. Januar 2006 09:55 schrieb Abdelrazak Younes:
>> Let's put it this way: My priority is to have something in CVS (or
>> SVN) so that others could help me (I am kind of stalled now). So,
>> if the 1.5.0 branch is created b
Am Samstag, 28. Januar 2006 09:55 schrieb Abdelrazak Younes:
> Let's put it this way: My priority is to have something in CVS (or SVN)
> so that others could help me (I am kind of stalled now). So, if the
> 1.5.0 branch is created before the 1.4.3 one I would prefer to go with
> 1.5. Then, if so
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes a écrit :
"Abdelrazak" == Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Abdelrazak> Hum... It's not that I am jealous but the GTK frontend
Abdelrazak> does not appear complete and it ships with 1.4.x already.
Come on, admit it: you _are_ jealous !
OK, I admit it...
Abd
> "Abdelrazak" == Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Abdelrazak> Hum... It's not that I am jealous but the GTK frontend
Abdelrazak> does not appear complete and it ships with 1.4.x already.
Come on, admit it: you _are_ jealous !
Abdelrazak> I agree that it is too late for 1.4.0 bu
On Mon, 2006-01-23 at 10:16 +0100, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes a écrit :
> >> "Abdelrazak" == Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> > Abdelrazak> I see that you and Angus have a lot of Qt4 expertise. It
> > Abdelrazak> would be a pity for LyX to loose that IMO
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes a écrit :
"Abdelrazak" == Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Abdelrazak> I see that you and Angus have a lot of Qt4 expertise. It
Abdelrazak> would be a pity for LyX to loose that IMO. Lars,
Abdelrazak> Jean-Marc, when do you think it would be possible to allow
A
> "Abdelrazak" == Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Abdelrazak> For one it inherits QObject so it is more. The thing is
Abdelrazak> that it stores all useful properties of menu items and
Abdelrazak> toolbar buttons without being limited to that of course.
Abdelrazak> So the content
> "Abdelrazak" == Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Abdelrazak> I see that you and Angus have a lot of Qt4 expertise. It
Abdelrazak> would be a pity for LyX to loose that IMO. Lars,
Abdelrazak> Jean-Marc, when do you think it would be possible to allow
Abdelrazak> me to commit what
On Sun, Jan 22, 2006 at 12:38:32PM +0100, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
> Martin Vermeer a écrit :
> >On Sun, Jan 22, 2006 at 12:20:23PM +0100, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
> >>Andre Poenitz a écrit :
> >>>On Sat, Jan 21, 2006 at 05:03:40PM +0100, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
> >
> >...
> >
> >>Of course there
Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
| > There is one feature I am missing a lot: the
| > ability to make a reference to a figure or a section without having to
| > put a label first. Is this on your TODO list?
|
| Not on mine. Maybe on yours ;-)
It is somewhere o
Martin Vermeer a écrit :
On Sun, Jan 22, 2006 at 12:20:23PM +0100, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Andre Poenitz a écrit :
On Sat, Jan 21, 2006 at 05:03:40PM +0100, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
...
Of course there are still problems:
- the Document->Settings dialog crashes lyx but does not crash it wi
On Sun, Jan 22, 2006 at 12:20:23PM +0100, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
> Andre Poenitz a écrit :
> >On Sat, Jan 21, 2006 at 05:03:40PM +0100, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
...
> Of course there are still problems:
> - the Document->Settings dialog crashes lyx but does not crash it within
> gdb...
> - the
Andre Poenitz a écrit :
On Sat, Jan 21, 2006 at 05:03:40PM +0100, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Just kidding of course... 1.4 has at least two very good new features:
Branches and Track Change. There is one feature I am missing a lot: the
ability to make a reference to a figure or a section without
Andre Poenitz wrote:
Andre', who got rid of his TODO list two years and three days ago.
N Wow! Time is just flying by.
Happy Birthday, Bruno!
Angus (feeling very old)
On Sat, Jan 21, 2006 at 01:29:07PM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> > "Andre" == Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Andre> On Wed, Jan 18, 2006 at 12:50:59PM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> Andre> wrote:
> >> While this is not a good example, I do think that unification of
> >> me
On Sat, Jan 21, 2006 at 01:36:44PM +, Angus Leeming wrote:
> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> >>> While this is not a good example, I do think that unification of
> >>> menubar and toolbar would be useful. But of course, I would do it
> >>> in the existing backend framework...
> >
> > Andre> 'QAc
On Sat, Jan 21, 2006 at 05:03:40PM +0100, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
> Just kidding of course... 1.4 has at least two very good new features:
> Branches and Track Change. There is one feature I am missing a lot: the
> ability to make a reference to a figure or a section without having to
> put a l
Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
> There is one feature I am missing a lot: the
> ability to make a reference to a figure or a section without having to
> put a label first. Is this on your TODO list?
Not on mine. Maybe on yours ;-)
--
Angus
Angus Leeming a écrit :
Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Side note: Is there a reason why lyxaction is a global variable? (I
_don't_ like global variable). Well, I have noticed that this is not the
only case of a global variable in the source code. IMHO, we should get
rid of all these and put them in a
Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
> Side note: Is there a reason why lyxaction is a global variable? (I
> _don't_ like global variable). Well, I have noticed that this is not the
> only case of a global variable in the source code. IMHO, we should get
> rid of all these and put them in a core class, call it
Angus Leeming a écrit :
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
While this is not a good example, I do think that unification of
menubar and toolbar would be useful. But of course, I would do it
in the existing backend framework...
Andre> 'QAction'...
What' so great about QAction? Just that the whole qt G
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes a écrit :
"Andre" == Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Andre> On Wed, Jan 18, 2006 at 12:50:59PM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
Andre> wrote:
While this is not a good example, I do think that unification of
menubar and toolbar would be useful. But of course, I would d
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>>> While this is not a good example, I do think that unification of
>>> menubar and toolbar would be useful. But of course, I would do it
>>> in the existing backend framework...
>
> Andre> 'QAction'...
>
> What' so great about QAction? Just that the whole qt GUI uses
> "Andre" == Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Andre> On Wed, Jan 18, 2006 at 12:50:59PM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
Andre> wrote:
>> While this is not a good example, I do think that unification of
>> menubar and toolbar would be useful. But of course, I would do it
>> in the existing
On Wed, Jan 18, 2006 at 12:50:59PM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> While this is not a good example, I do think that unification of
> menubar and toolbar would be useful. But of course, I would do it in
> the existing backend framework...
'QAction'...
Andre'
On Wed, 2006-01-18 at 14:42 +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> > "Martin" == Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Martin> It doesn't only happen to SELFINSERT. It happens to
> Martin> BREAKPARAGRAPH, BACKSPACE and DELETE too. Try for yourself!
>
> You are absolutely right!
>
> He
> "Jean-Marc" == Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Jean-Marc> Anyway, the fixes below are essentially right, and if you
Jean-Marc> cannot find other problems, I propose to apply the patch.
I applied it.
JMarc
> "Martin" == Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Martin> It doesn't only happen to SELFINSERT. It happens to
Martin> BREAKPARAGRAPH, BACKSPACE and DELETE too. Try for yourself!
You are absolutely right!
Here is an updated patch, which catches another case. I am afraid some
other case
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I just meant that he shouldn't be afraid of later accidentally creating a
> duplicate bug, e.g. if he's uncertain the first report got in properly and
> later wants to report it again.
Sure.
Georg
On Wed, 2006-01-18 at 12:04 +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> > "Martin" == Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Martin> Bug confirmed, patch attached. OK to commit?
>
> No, you are fixing the symptom and not the cause. Ever wondered why
> this only happens to SELFINSERT?
>
> He
> "Abdelrazak" == Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Abdelrazak> I think this is not possible because menu-items and
Abdelrazak> tool-bar buttons use completely separated back-ends. Now I
Abdelrazak> see that there is another dynamic menu-item. Is there a
Abdelrazak> list of these s
On Wed, 18 Jan 2006, Georg Baum wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > However, don't be afraid of reporting the bug twice.
>
> That does not make sense unless the space problem is solved.
I just meant that he shouldn't be afraid of later accidentally creating a
duplicate bug, e.g. if he's unc
Sorry again, I miss this one too. I should maybe inscribe lyx-devel
instead of using gmane...
Abdel.
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes a écrit :
"Abdelrazak" == Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Abdelrazak> I think this is not possible because menu-items and
Abdelrazak> tool-bar buttons use c
Martin Vermeer a écrit :
[bug report]
A (hopefully) possible fix would be to let the icon have the same
trigger as the menu-item.
I think this is not possible because menu-items and tool-bar buttons use
completely separated back-ends.
Now I see that there is another dynamic menu-item. Is th
> "Martin" == Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Martin> Bug confirmed, patch attached. OK to commit?
No, you are fixing the symptom and not the cause. Ever wondered why
this only happens to SELFINSERT?
Here is what I believe to be the right patch.
JMarc
Index: src/ChangeLog
==
That was fast!
I'm impressed!
Anders
On 18 jan 2006, at 11.15, Martin Vermeer wrote:
On Wed, 2006-01-18 at 09:27 +0100, Anders Ekberg wrote:
I just tried to submit the following bug:
The highlightning of the "Increase depth" and "Decrease depth" icons
is not consistent with the menu (on
1.4p
On Wed, 2006-01-18 at 09:27 +0100, Anders Ekberg wrote:
> I just tried to submit the following bug:
>
> The highlightning of the "Increase depth" and "Decrease depth" icons
> is not consistent with the menu (on
> 1.4pre3, MacOSX 10.4.4):
> - open an empty document (article)
> - Choose Itemize pa
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> However, don't be afraid of reporting the bug twice.
That does not make sense unless the space problem is solved.
Georg
On Wed, 18 Jan 2006, Anders Ekberg wrote:
> and then recieved a Bug 2221 has been added to the database followed by
> a gigantic error message starting with: Insufficient disk space; try
> again later.
Juergen just reported a problem with a full partition on the server so
there is a problem wit
I just tried to submit the following bug:
The highlightning of the "Increase depth" and "Decrease depth" icons
is not consistent with the menu (on
1.4pre3, MacOSX 10.4.4):
- open an empty document (article)
- Choose Itemize paragraph style
- Type the first line and enter: Increase list depth i
> "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Lars> Where can I find bugzilla?
Here:
http://www.mozilla.org/bugs/source.html
Basically, it requires MySQL and a few Perl modules.
JMarc
John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Thu, 25 Jan 2001, Asger K. Alstrup Nielsen wrote:
|
| > > Preferable full email access to the database.
| > >
| > > I think bugzilla can handle all these (any others ?)
| >
| > I think Bugzilla should easily satisfy these requirements, except
| > the
On Thu, 25 Jan 2001, Asger K. Alstrup Nielsen wrote:
> > Preferable full email access to the database.
> >
> > I think bugzilla can handle all these (any others ?)
>
> I think Bugzilla should easily satisfy these requirements, except
> the e-mail access requirement, which it AFAIK does not have
On Thu, 25 Jan 2001, John Levon wrote:
> On 25 Jan 2001, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>
> > What could this "decent bug tracker" be, according to you? bugzilla?
>
> I'm not sure. The features I would like to see are :
>
> Attachment of files
> Auto CC: ing (and removal thereof :)
> "tags" so we
On 25 Jan 2001, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> > "John" == John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> John> Yes, it is badly lacking. My offer still stands, if a decent bug
> John> tracker can be set up at lyx.org, I will do the heavy lifting of
> John> transferring the bugs.
>
> What could
> "John" == John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
John> Yes, it is badly lacking. My offer still stands, if a decent bug
John> tracker can be set up at lyx.org, I will do the heavy lifting of
John> transferring the bugs.
What could this "decent bug tracker" be, according to you? bugzilla?
On 22 Jan 2001, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> > "John" == John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> John> me, jmarc, and others are spending a lot of time duplicating bug
> John> emails sent to the lists on sourceforge.
>
> John> So the question is, should we direct users to use the
> John
> "John" == John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
John> me, jmarc, and others are spending a lot of time duplicating bug
John> emails sent to the lists on sourceforge.
John> So the question is, should we direct users to use the
John> sourceforge bug tracker first ? If they log in, they can
me, jmarc, and others are spending a lot of time duplicating bug emails
sent to the lists on sourceforge.
So the question is, should we direct users to use the sourceforge bug
tracker first ? If they log in, they can still participate by email in
follow ups.
It would mean a higher rate of dupli
77 matches
Mail list logo
