[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: | On 29 Jan 2006, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: | | > But I'd like you to think about trac as well. To me it is a system that | > is quite simple and gives us viewcvs, bugzilla and wiki functionality in | > one easy to maintain and administer package. So I'd like comments on | > that from everybody. | | Are you thinking about trac for developers as well as for regular users?
well... yes. | Are you thinking of any specific drawbacks with viewcvs and bugzilla, | which is why you'd like them replaced? Or is it the integration that is | the bonus here? The integration is a bonus, as is the rpm packaging. Being close to unable to upgrade bugzilla bothers me. Trac has a nice upgrade path. -- Lgb