Jean-Marc Lasgouttes a écrit :
"Abdelrazak" == Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

Abdelrazak> I see that you and Angus have a lot of Qt4 expertise. It
Abdelrazak> would be a pity for LyX to loose that IMO. Lars,
Abdelrazak> Jean-Marc, when do you think it would be possible to allow
Abdelrazak> me to commit what I have done so far? The day after 1.4.0?

I think it will be possible as soon as BRANCH_1_4_X is created, since
this is IMO 1.5 only.

Hum... It's not that I am jealous but the GTK frontend does not appear complete and it ships with 1.4.x already. I agree that it is too late for 1.4.0 but if we agree that qt2 and qt4 frontends would have to be supported at the same time, why not ship both? The qt2 one would of course be the default and qt4 would be marked as "experimental" and "source only". I mean, IIRC, this was what the Toolkit independence project was all about, wasn't it? That being said, if you say that 1.5 would appear in 6 months from now, there is of course no reason to ship with 1.4.x ;-). If you say that 1.5 would completely switch to qt4, this is also another reason to wait.

What I am saying above depends of course on the quality of my code. You are perfectly entitled to reject it.

Abdel.


It is great to have a wroking qt4 frontend.

JMarc


Reply via email to