>>>>> "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Lars> Note that with subversion (yes, I have my scripts ready and Lars> warmed up for conversion), moving things around in the tree or Lars> duplicating them is a breeze. So unless the build system is Lars> re-vamped in the first seconds after 1.4 branch/release this is Lars> not necessary, and imho the wrong focus. You are right. Actually, I would ask for something different now: since it is obvious that the qt4 frontend is going to have large surgery in 1.5, there is little point to start from a common base in 1.4. What I would like in 1.4 is a qt4 frontend which is as close as reasonable to the qt2 frontend. That would mean no big refactorization of code, optimizations, whatever. I do not care if there are still some Qt3 compatibility classes in there, for example. Abdel, does it seem reasonable? Once qt4 is officially in the 1.4 tree, I am going to be conservative about further changes anyway. And before you ask, it will be the same for gtk :) JMarc
