Gmane recently ceased its service such that all Gmane websites are dead.
Thus it would be great to remove any reference from the lyx website to avoid
any confusion for users.
I hope that this is the correct list to drop this message, please forward to
the better place otherwise.
Thanks,
J.
On Tue, 1 Apr 2008, Pavel Sanda wrote:
on a different note: what about this header?
http://195.113.31.123/~sanda/junk/header.gif
If it's for wiki.lyx.org,
no i meant it for www.lyx.org
Ok, I'll bounce that ball to Joost... Joost?
/C
--
Christian Ridderström, +46-8-768 39 44
>> on a different note: what about this header?
>> http://195.113.31.123/~sanda/junk/header.gif
>
> If it's for wiki.lyx.org,
no i meant it for www.lyx.org
pavel
On Tue, 1 Apr 2008, Pavel Sanda wrote:
on a different note: what about this header?
http://195.113.31.123/~sanda/junk/header.gif
If it's for wiki.lyx.org, I'd like to wait with messing around with it
until we've sorted out a released www.lyx.org.
After that, the room for improving wiki.lyx.
Joost Verburg wrote:
In my opinion that logo looks just too unprofessional, especially when
combined with the mascot. The colors are already back because of your
request :)
Joost
What if we had some shadow or other contrast behind the letters of that
"LyX" logo that's currently on www.lyx.or
> combined with the mascot. The colors are already back because of your
> request :)
i really can't help it :D
pavel
Pavel Sanda wrote:
Are we sure that all
development pages should be in the wiki part (do we need some 'official'
devel pages?).
Hmm... not sure why we'd need that to be honest...
- clear distinction of devel pages we care and we do not
- its good to have some basic info for development newcomer
Are we sure that all
development pages should be in the wiki part (do we need some 'official'
devel pages?).
>>>
>>> Hmm... not sure why we'd need that to be honest...
>>
>> - clear distinction of devel pages we care and we do not
>> - its good to have some basic info for development
On Mon, 31 Mar 2008, Pavel Sanda wrote:
Are we sure that all
development pages should be in the wiki part (do we need some 'official'
devel pages?).
Hmm... not sure why we'd need that to be honest...
- clear distinction of devel pages we care and we do not
- its good to have some basic info
On Mon, 31 Mar 2008, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
This is definitely the outcome I would prefer. Are we sure that all
development pages should be in the wiki part (do we need some
official' devel pages?).
Ok, it sounds like most agree that it's ok to use a single wiki, assuming
we have the fo
>> Are we sure that all
>> development pages should be in the wiki part (do we need some 'official'
>> devel pages?).
>
> Hmm... not sure why we'd need that to be honest...
- clear distinction of devel pages we care and we do not
- its good to have some basic info for development newcomers, you
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> What do you mean with two servers? (I want to make sure we understand
> each other here... www.lyx.org/ would be used to retrieve the official
> web pages even if a single wiki is used).
Yes.
> It's trivial[*] to use different skins for different groups. In fact,
> a
On Mon, 31 Mar 2008, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
OK sorry I thought this was not needed anymore. I'll dig out your mail
and see what I can do.
It's the post I sent yesterday, or maybe on Saturday, not the earlier one.
It's some rewriting of the URI that needs to be done.
Please note that we
> > * www.lyx.org/-> ../Main/
> > * wiki.lyx.org/LyX/ -> The group LyX/
> > * wiki.lyx.org/Devel/ -> .../Devel/
>
> This is definitely the outcome I would prefer. Are we sure that all
> development pages should be in the wiki part (do we need some
> 'official' devel pages?).
on contrary
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> You, Jean-Marc, can make the web server rewrite URIs as follows:
>
> www.lyx.org/XXX --> www.lyx.org/index.php/Main/XXX
>
> Users would then never need to see 'index.php/Main' - I've emailed you
> about this, it's related to changing some config in
> /etc/httpd/vi
On Mon, 31 Mar 2008, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
"Rex C. Eastbourne" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Glad you like it Rich! Christian, Joost, Jean-Marc, Pavel, and others
were all instrumental in putting this all together.
I do not think I deserve any credit here...
BTW, is it possible to hide
On Friday 14 September 2007 09:04:28 Uwe Stöhr wrote:
> Opinions?
I agree. I would like to see the background with the colour and without the
logo. :-)
--
José Abílio
Opinions?
Original-Message
From: David Krebs
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi there,
it's just a little thing I have to mention: Could you *please* change the background of the Lyx
website? It hurts my eyes. ;)
No, it's not the color. I really like green. But: It&#
> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
> Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Gesendet: 27.11.06 14:38:25
> An: lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org
> Betreff: Lyx website and Docbook XML
>
>
> Hi
>
Hi,
> When browsing, came to conclusion that lyx
> website is very hard to read.
Hi
Never been really an Lyx user, but again, was
studying it, if it would fill the needs of sw
I'm looking for.
When browsing, came to conclusion that lyx
website is very hard to read. Somehow the
background is way too strong and text's
contrast doesn't show up enough.
I f
José Matos wrote:
css is some kind of dark voodoo due to browsers bugs, the worst offender is
IE. :-(
No left position is set in the pinmenu div. I fixed it.
Joost
On Saturday 04 November 2006 11:29 pm, Joost Verburg wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The main LyX website (www.lyx.org) does not work correctly in Internet
> Explorer 7. The navigation bar is displayed above the texts, so you
> can't read anything.
Joost, the culprit should be the incorr
Joost Verburg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Hi,
|
| The main LyX website (www.lyx.org) does not work correctly in Internet
| Explorer 7. The navigation bar is displayed above the texts, so you
| can't read anything.
File an explorer 7 bug?
I belive we conform to the standards.
--
Lgb
Hi,
The main LyX website (www.lyx.org) does not work correctly in Internet
Explorer 7. The navigation bar is displayed above the texts, so you
can't read anything.
Regards,
Joost
Bernhard Reiter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Am Dienstag, den 23.05.2006, 08:00 +0200 schrieb Lars Gullik Bjønnes:
|
| > So far I have learned that our website is:
| > - hard to locate downloads
| > - not modern
| >
|
| btw, since the move to svn, there hasn't been a we
Am Dienstag, den 23.05.2006, 08:00 +0200 schrieb Lars Gullik Bjønnes:
> So far I have learned that our website is:
> - hard to locate downloads
> - not modern
>
btw, since the move to svn, there hasn't been a web frontend to it (as
formerly to cvs) -- or is it just me not
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> checking out the website into public_htmk otoh and experimenting there
> should be quite a bit easier, especially for other to have a look as
> well.
Of course, that makes a lot of sense. In fact, now that you've pointed out
this strategy to me, I recall that I used t
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
OTOH, it would not be fair to let Joost hack away on the branch, and
then say "Oh, is this what you had in mind? Sorry, we don't like it".
True :) My idea is a complete overhaul of both design and content. In my
opinion, the current website makes simple things too d
Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| > Is one or two sentences about what should change on the website to
| > much to ask for?
|
| No, probably not ;-)
|
| > So far I have learned that our website is:
| > - hard to locate download
> "Angus" == Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Angus> Well, that's two points even if it's not two sentences. Isn't
Angus> it enough? However, even if you disagree with him over these
Angus> two issues, I don't think that you should prevent him from
Angus> experimenting in a branch. Th
Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Is one or two sentences about what should change on the website to
> much to ask for?
No, probably not ;-)
> So far I have learned that our website is:
> - hard to locate downloads
> - not modern
Well, that's two points even if it
On Mon, 22 May 2006, Michael Gerz wrote:
Lars,
didn't you plan to set up Trac?
I think a combined wiki/svn/bug tracking/roadmap environment would be
beneficial. I use Trac at my office and it is really simple to install and
simple to use.
Personally, I think there is no need to have a stat
Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Lars Gullik Bjønnes writes:
| > | Rather than get bogged down in implementation details, why not give Joost
his
| > | branch and allow him to demonstrate what substance he'd like to present?
|
| > I would be nice if we got an overview of what he'd lik
Lars Gullik Bjønnes writes:
> | Rather than get bogged down in implementation details, why not give Joost
> his
> | branch and allow him to demonstrate what substance he'd like to present?
> I would be nice if we got an overview of what he'd like to change
> first.
LOL! You make all these state
Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| José> I have study several solutions for other
| José> projects and I have concluded that our
| José> current hand made php solution is not ideal.
| José> There are other frameworks like plone (python)
| José> or tuenda, xaraya (sp?) or drupal (php)
José> I have study several solutions for other
José> projects and I have concluded that our
José> current hand made php solution is not ideal.
José> There are other frameworks like plone (python)
José> or tuenda, xaraya (sp?) or drupal (php), that
José> would ease a lot the maintenance.
Lars> I'd
"Michael Gerz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Lars,
|
| didn't you plan to set up Trac?
Yes. I am just slow as h**l.
--
Lgb
time.
Michael
- Original Message -
From: "Joost Verburg" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Jean-Marc Lasgouttes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "LyX Developers List"
Sent: Saturday, May 20, 2006 10:28 AM
Subject: Re: LyX Website
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote
On Sat, 20 May 2006, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
"Joost" == Joost Verburg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Joost> Hi, The current LyX website looks outdated, both in terms of
Joost> design and content. Especially now LyX is available for Windows
Joost> users as well,
Joost Verburg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
| > Yes you are right. Windows people are singletons and requires us to
| > rework the website just for them. (Find better reson please.)
|
| I mean a non-technical audience. The current site does not have a
| modern and user-
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
Yes you are right. Windows people are singletons and requires us to
rework the website just for them. (Find better reson please.)
I mean a non-technical audience. The current site does not have a modern
and user-friendly design for end-users. For example, see how muc
Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Sat, May 20, 2006 at 10:56:09AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
| > Joost Verburg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| >
| > | Hi,
| > |
| > | The current LyX website looks outdated, both in terms of design and
| > |
On Sat, May 20, 2006 at 10:56:09AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Joost Verburg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> | Hi,
> |
> | The current LyX website looks outdated, both in terms of design and
> | content. Especially now LyX is available for Windows users as well,
Jose' Matos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| I have study several solutions for other projects and I have concluded that
| our current hand made php solution is not ideal. There are other frameworks
| like plone (python) or tuenda, xaraya (sp?) or drupal (php), that would ease
| a lot the maintena
On Saturday 20 May 2006 00:30, Joost Verburg wrote:
> Especially now LyX is available for Windows users as well, a
> modern and easy-to-use website is an important thing.
With all the respect (you are lucky we are not on Friday ;-) but I almost
feel insulted with this comment (don't worry nothi
Joost Verburg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Hi,
|
| The current LyX website looks outdated, both in terms of design and
| content. Especially now LyX is available for Windows users as well, a
| modern and easy-to-use website is an important thing.
Yes you are right. Windows peop
> "Joost" == Joost Verburg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Joost> Compared to the time that goes into development, this is a
Joost> simple thing. It is however very important for end-users.
Joost> If I can upload a new site to a branch, you can all give
Joost> comments and then move it to the www
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
As far as I am concerned, this would be very welcome. There have also
been talks of using a wiki for the site, but I am not sure it is
relevant to static text like what we have.
I think it's better to keep the wiki as separate community site where
people can share t
>>>>> "Joost" == Joost Verburg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Joost> Hi, The current LyX website looks outdated, both in terms of
Joost> design and content. Especially now LyX is available for Windows
Joost> users as well, a modern and easy-to-use website is
Hi,
The current LyX website looks outdated, both in terms of design and
content. Especially now LyX is available for Windows users as well, a
modern and easy-to-use website is an important thing. Is there any
reason why the website has not had any major updates during the last years?
I&#
> The emporers new clothes are awaiting your perusal and (hopefully)
> your approval at:
>
> http://www.lyx.org/
>
> XHTML1-Strict and CSS2 are the order of the day.
I want the old background back.
Andre'
PS: Konni too. And people should know by now that this weights more...
--
André
On Fri, 29 Jun 2001, Marcello Nuccio wrote:
> > Low Graphics Usage -- just the sponsors logo and W3C icons
>
> as anyone noticed that http://www.it.lyx.org/news.php3
> does not validate as valid XHTML1.0?
D'oh that was a major boo boo on my part. Now fixed.
Thanks for pointing this out.
Allan
> Low Graphics Usage -- just the sponsors logo and W3C icons
as anyone noticed that http://www.it.lyx.org/news.php3
does not validate as valid XHTML1.0?
ciao,
marcenuc
On Thu, 28 Jun 2001, Allan Rae wrote:
> BTW, as I said before I can also place a banner (not a green embossed one
> but a real one) below the sidemenu (of the new look). This is easy and
> the code already exists in cvs -- commented out -- although the old banner
> is currently used for test pur
On Thu, 28 Jun 2001, Allan Rae wrote:
> If I leave the body definition in lyx.css then only that takes effect.
> Maybe we need two css files and switch between the two instead?
I switched to using two css files. If you add ?traditional=1 to your
command line when viewing:
http://www.de
On 27 Jun 2001, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> > "Juergen" == Juergen Vigna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Juergen> On 27-Jun-2001 Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> >> | It made them difficult to read.
> >>
> >> Hmm, I never thought my eyes particulary superior...
> >>
>
> Juergen> Me too, but may
On Wed, 27 Jun 2001, Zvezdan Petkovic wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 27, 2001 at 01:58:23PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> > > "Juergen" == Juergen Vigna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> > Juergen> On 27-Jun-2001 Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> > >> | It made them difficult to read.
> > >>
> > >> H
On Wed, Jun 27, 2001 at 01:58:23PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> > "Juergen" == Juergen Vigna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Juergen> On 27-Jun-2001 Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> >> | It made them difficult to read.
> >>
> >> Hmm, I never thought my eyes particulary superior...
> >>
> "Juergen" == Juergen Vigna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Juergen> On 27-Jun-2001 Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>> | It made them difficult to read.
>>
>> Hmm, I never thought my eyes particulary superior...
>>
Juergen> Me too, but maybe our glasses make us to be superior...
I do not wear gla
On 27-Jun-2001 Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>| It made them difficult to read.
>
> Hmm, I never thought my eyes particulary superior...
>
Me too, but maybe our glasses make us to be superior...
Jürgen
--
-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._
Dr. Jürgen
Allan Rae <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| > It made the LyX pages unique...
|
| It made them difficult to read.
Hmm, I never thought my eyes particulary superior...
--
Lgb
On 27 Jun 2001, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Allan Rae <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> | On 26 Jun 2001, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> |
> | > Allan Rae <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> | >
> | > | The emporers new clothes are awaiting your perusal and (hopefully)
> | > | your approval at:
> | > |
>
Allan Rae <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On 26 Jun 2001, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
|
| > Allan Rae <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| >
| > | The emporers new clothes are awaiting your perusal and (hopefully)
| > | your approval at:
| > |
| > | http://www.lyx.org/
| >
| > where is my background?
|
On 26 Jun 2001, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Allan Rae <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> | The emporers new clothes are awaiting your perusal and (hopefully)
> | your approval at:
> |
> | http://www.lyx.org/
>
> where is my background?
Archived.
Allan. (ARRae)
Allan Rae <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| The emporers new clothes are awaiting your perusal and (hopefully)
| your approval at:
|
| http://www.lyx.org/
where is my background?
--
Lgb
%% Zvezdan Petkovic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> That was the first thing I tried, and it doesn't work for me.
zp> You must be using Netscape 4.x.
Yeah. After I sent my email I tried with lynx and got it OK. Thanks!
>> Netscape 4.77 on a Debian GNU/Linux box.
zp> I knew it. :-)
On Tue, Jun 26, 2001 at 02:34:44PM -0400, Paul D. Smith wrote:
> %% Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> mv> You can directly access them in your browser...
>
> mv> http://www.lyx.org/pinmenu.css
> mv> http://www.lyx.org/lyx.css
>
> That was the first thing I tried, and it doesn
%% Zvezdan Petkovic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
zp> I'm just curious if that _local_ site is a personal/non-profit org
zp> or a company site.
It's the homepages of one of our internal open source projects, hosted on
our internal implementation of SourceForge.
So, the upshot is that it's an
"Paul D. Smith" wrote:
>
> %% Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> mv> You can directly access them in your browser...
>
> mv> http://www.lyx.org/pinmenu.css
> mv> http://www.lyx.org/lyx.css
put the cursor on one these links, click right mouse button
and than "save link as ..."
%% Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
mv> You can directly access them in your browser...
mv> http://www.lyx.org/pinmenu.css
mv> http://www.lyx.org/lyx.css
That was the first thing I tried, and it doesn't work for me.
It seems to download the file but it doesn't actually display
On Tue, Jun 26, 2001 at 08:54:52PM +0300, Martin Vermeer wrote:
> >
> > I just finished setting up a framework for a local site, and while I
> > used CSS for style-type stuff (fonts/sizes/etc.) I couldn't figure out
> > any way to use them to create the navbar, etc. Instead, I'm using SSI
> > fo
to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Delivered-To: mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> To: LyX Developers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: New LyX website released
> Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> From: "Paul D. Smith" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROT
On Tue, Jun 26, 2001 at 05:57:35PM +0200, Asger K. Alstrup Nielsen wrote:
> The link to tkbibtex on http://www.lyx.org/download/related.php3 appears
> to be outdated.
fixed.
john
--
"Euler's equation contains the five most important numbers in mathematics."
garst gabbed,
> Unless a site has something that I absolutely need, using Java script is
> sufficient reason for me not to bookmark it.
nah, just not functioning properly without it is where I draw the line.
besides, lynx doesn't support javascript . . .
--
Prof. Richard E. Hawkins, Esq.
-- Forwarded message --
Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2001 10:02:28 +0200
From: Bas Spitters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: LyX Website
I like the new lay-out!
The link to tkbibtex on http://www.lyx.org/download/related.php3 appears
to be outdated.
Best,
Bas Spitters
On Tue, Jun 26, 2001 at 10:04:47AM -0400, Paul D. Smith wrote:
> This it totally OT, but are the sources for the website available
> anywhere (in anon CVS or wherever)?
Get the www-user module from CVS
(see http://www.devel.lyx.org/cvs.php3)
This it totally OT, but are the sources for the website available
anywhere (in anon CVS or wherever)?
I just finished setting up a framework for a local site, and while I
used CSS for style-type stuff (fonts/sizes/etc.) I couldn't figure out
any way to use them to create the navbar, etc. Instead
Once upon a time, I heard Allan Rae say
> On Tue, 26 Jun 2001, Chanop Silpa-Anan wrote:
>
> > It looks cool. However, would you consider making a bookmark icons? It
> > does work with IE and konqueror. I think it does no harm to other web
> > browser though.
>
> I'm not sure what you mean. Whe
On Tue, 26 Jun 2001, Baruch Even wrote:
> This is usually done by placing the file favicon.ico in the root of the
> web site.
If that is all it takes then sure we can add that.
Allan. (ARRae)
* Allan Rae <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010626 09:13]:
> On Tue, 26 Jun 2001, Chanop Silpa-Anan wrote:
>
> > It looks cool. However, would you consider making a bookmark icons? It
> > does work with IE and konqueror. I think it does no harm to other web
> > browser though.
>
> I'm not sure what you mea
On Tue, 26 Jun 2001, Chanop Silpa-Anan wrote:
> It looks cool. However, would you consider making a bookmark icons? It
> does work with IE and konqueror. I think it does no harm to other web
> browser though.
I'm not sure what you mean. Where/How is this used/coded in a webpage?
> I can create
aiting your perusal and (hopefully)
> your approval at:
>
> http://www.lyx.org/
>
> XHTML1-Strict and CSS2 are the order of the day.
>
> The content still needs some more work but at least it looks really pretty
> now. For the first time in a long time (ever?)
On Mon, 25 Jun 2001, Zvezdan Petkovic wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 25, 2001 at 09:56:45AM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Look pretty good, but why is everything double spaced?
> >
>
> Because currently paragraph spacing is defined as:
>
> p {
> line-height: 1.4em;
> }
>
> Changing that to smalle
On Tue, 26 Jun 2001, Kathryn Andersen wrote:
> This may sound silly, but I miss the embossed LyX logo in the
> background... can you bring it back? (-8
Well the short answer is yes very easily -- two lines of CSS or there
abouts -- in fact it could be a configurable option. But why?
Something
There's absolutely _NO_ JavaScript there. Just Netscape is so stupid
that it can't show CSS unless JavaScript is on. It looks the same as if
CSS is switched off. That's Netscape bug. I just checked in Konqueror
and Mozilla with JavaScript off. Works quite fine.
--
Zvezdan Petkovic <[EMAIL PROTEC
On Mon, Jun 25, 2001 at 10:00:01PM -0300, Garst R. Reese wrote:
> Zvezdan Petkovic wrote:
>
> > Ah, well...
> >
> Unless a site has something that I absolutely need, using Java script is
> sufficient reason for me not to bookmark it.
> Garst
It doesn't use JavaScript.
john
--
"Euler's equat
Zvezdan Petkovic wrote:
> Ah, well...
>
Unless a site has something that I absolutely need, using Java script is
sufficient reason for me not to bookmark it.
Garst
On Tue, Jun 26, 2001 at 02:34:34AM +0200, Paul Seelig wrote:
> Just a minor nitpick: Too bad that for rendering it using stylesheets
> within Netscape one has to enable JavaScript to make it work. :-(
>
> Cheers, P. *8^)
I'm flabbergasted. You're quite right.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Allan Rae) writes:
> The emporers new clothes are awaiting your perusal and (hopefully)
> your approval at:
>
> http://www.lyx.org/
>
> XHTML1-Strict and CSS2 are the order of the day.
>
Just a minor nitpick: Too bad that for rendering it using stylesheets
within Netsc
On Mon, Jun 25, 2001 at 07:25:33PM +0200, Sasa Janiska wrote:
>
> Here I see just a big stripe over main menu (running SuSE 7.1 &
> Konqueror 1.9.8).
>
> But I appreciate your effort to follow the W3C's standards.
>
Thanks Sasa. As I explained in the previous message, I hope you
understand tha
On Mon, Jun 25, 2001 at 09:56:45AM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Look pretty good, but why is everything double spaced?
>
Because currently paragraph spacing is defined as:
p {
line-height: 1.4em;
}
Changing that to smaller value or just commenting out that rule in a CSS
file would ret
We have made all possible effort to make this thing work on all
important browsers. I personally test it first in Konqueror, but, yes, I
do have Konqueror 2.1.1 on KDE 2.1.2.
I believe you are aware that Konqueror below 2.x version was a rather
buggy browser, especially in regard to CSS. Since yo
he order of the day.
> > > The content still needs some more work but at least it looks really pretty
> > > now. For the first time in a long time (ever?) the LyX website conforms
> > > to recognised standards for web publishing.
Here I see just a big stripe over main
> > your approval at:
> >
> > http://www.lyx.org/
> >
> > XHTML1-Strict and CSS2 are the order of the day.
> >
> > The content still needs some more work but at least it looks really pretty
> > now. For the first time in a long time (ever?) th
the order of the day.
>
> The content still needs some more work but at least it looks really pretty
> now. For the first time in a long time (ever?) the LyX website conforms
> to recognised standards for web publishing.
>
> Allan. (ARRae)
I think it looks good but unfortunately my konqueror (1.9.8 under kde
2.0.1) fails to display it - the menu bar appears as a stripe
overlaying the middle of the page.
F
ooks really pretty
> now. For the first time in a long time (ever?) the LyX website conforms
> to recognised standards for web publishing.
Actually, you may experience a small delay of about 20-30 minutes before
the new website replaces the old due to the delayed updates of the main
site.
Allan. (ARRae)
no <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Lyx website feature request: one-click mailing list access
Hi --
Thanks for maintaining the Lyx website. I wonder whether you would consider moving the
Mailing Lists link up to the top-level. When I first started using Lyx, I frequently
98 matches
Mail list logo
