rise Linux WS release 3 (Taroon Update 7)
Kernel \r on an \m
-
Lyx in in a local install (/home/mdalphin/x86_64/bin/).
Configured:
./configure --prefix=/home/mdalphin/x86_64 --with-frontend=qt
make
make check
make
Hello,
Here is a rather odd bug in 1.4.1 running on Linux (Debian 3.1, i386)
with the qt interface (version 3.0.3 mt). Immediately after
maximizing the lyx window, the font changes to some very large, bold
font. Backspacing over these characters and then typing again returns
one to the original
>>>>> "Roger" == Roger Mc Murtrie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Roger> I'm running the Apple OSX version (downloaded as
Roger> LyX-1.4.1-Mac.dmg) on an Intel Mac under OSX 10.4.6. Lyx
Roger> appears to close OK but generates a failure dialog on exit
Followup on previous message
The full terminal command used was:
/Applications/LyX.app/Contents/MacOS/lyx -dbg any
Usually I start Lyx with LyX.app
Regards
Roger Mc Murtrie
I'm running the Apple OSX version (downloaded as LyX-1.4.1-Mac.dmg)
on an Intel Mac under OSX 10.4.6.
I'm running the Apple OSX version (downloaded as LyX-1.4.1-Mac.dmg)
on an Intel Mac under OSX 10.4.6.
Lyx appears to close OK but generates a failure dialog on exit.
Running from a Terminal window using " lyx -dbg any" the debug
reporting ends with:
Running QuitLyX.
Buffer:
On Wed, May 03, 2006 at 11:22:52PM +0200, Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> On Wed, May 03, 2006 at 08:28:10PM +, Angus Leeming wrote:
> > Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > I have lived without jpg->ps and gif->pdf conversions for the bigger
> > > part of my life and did not really miss
On Wed, May 03, 2006 at 08:28:10PM +, Angus Leeming wrote:
> Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > I have lived without jpg->ps and gif->pdf conversions for the bigger
> > part of my life and did not really miss that functionality.
>
> Ahhh, but that's because you're all of:
> * cleve
Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I have lived without jpg->ps and gif->pdf conversions for the bigger
> part of my life and did not really miss that functionality.
Ahhh, but that's because you're all of:
* clever
* a mathematician
* someone whose æsthetics allow him to use one of the
On Mon, May 01, 2006 at 02:52:49PM +0200, Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> I don't think so, as it is a very particular switch. Here is the
> pertinent comment in src/lyxfunc.C:
>
> void actOnUpdatedPrefs(LyXRC const & lyxrc_orig, LyXRC const & lyxrc_new)
> {
> // Why the switch you might ask. I
On Wed, May 03, 2006 at 05:15:26PM +0200, Uwe Stöhr wrote:
> Angus Leeming wrote:
>
> >You're correct. LyX will function perfectly well without ImageMagick.
>
> How's that working? Without Imagemagick you can't for example use
> JPG-images and export the document to Postscript, you cannot use
>
On Tue, May 02, 2006 at 06:04:09PM +0200, Joost Verburg wrote:
> Correct me if I'm wrong, but as far as I know LyX can be used with
> limited graphic support without ImageMagick.
That's correct.
> It should of course be recommended to let the installer download
> ImageMagick for you if it's not
Bo Peng wrote:
This is perhaps unrelated. The biggest advantages of SWP, according to
one of my friends, is that one can paste windows wmf figures directlry
to SWP. I do not know how SWP is handling that, but from what I
searched last time, there is no usable WMF->whatever converters.
SWP has
Uwe Stöhr wrote:
Right, but the installer is for all users. Only a few users know the
details about graphics. Most of my collegues for example used EPS-images
because they didn't know that PDF can embed JPG, PNG and PDF-images
directly. So the installer must include Imagemagick by default (perh
Btw. It's one of LyX's strengths that you can use every kind of image
formats directly in LyX - there's no other text program who can do this.
When I want to advertise LyX this is a killer argument, because users
don't want to convert images from various sources to a certain format to
be able to u
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes writes:
Uwe> How's that working? Without Imagemagick you can't for example use
Uwe> JPG-images and export the document to Postscript, you cannot use
Uwe> GIF-images and export to PDF, etc. That isn't "function perfectly
Uwe> well" in my opinion.
Some functions do not work,
> "Uwe" == Uwe Stöhr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Uwe> Angus Leeming wrote:
>> You're correct. LyX will function perfectly well without
>> ImageMagick.
Uwe> How's that working? Without Imagemagick you can't for example use
Uwe> JPG-images and export the document to Postscript, you cannot use
U
Angus Leeming wrote:
You're correct. LyX will function perfectly well without ImageMagick.
How's that working? Without Imagemagick you can't for example use
JPG-images and export the document to Postscript, you cannot use
GIF-images and export to PDF, etc.
That isn't "function perfectly wel
Joost Verburg wrote:
Bo Peng wrote:
So at least python.exe, sh.exe etc will be in, right? Installing full
python and msys is unacceptable even if they are downloaded
automatically.
Yes, these very essential GPL-compatible things (LyX won't configure or
run without them), will be bundled. It i
Joost Verburg wrote:
It will also make better use of methods /
Windows API for the detection of external components.
I'm curious about your solution. But also a look at my code to recognize
the programs because there are many specialities. For example older
MiKTeX versions don't remove the P
Uwe Stöhr wrote:
Why that? What's the problem with my installer - the needed admin
permission? If this is the only problem I suggest that you work on this
and send patches to my installer. Because there's no need to do the work
twice.
I spent a lot of time on the installer and it is sad to se
I spent a lot of time on the installer and it is sad to see that
the users like it, but not the developers.
I have proposed long ago that you listen to the developers' concerns
and try to make your installers official. I was almost ready to port
your installers to the official one, untill I hear
Bo Peng wrote:
So at least python.exe, sh.exe etc will be in, right? Installing full
python and msys is unacceptable even if they are downloaded
automatically.
Yes, these very essential GPL-compatible things (LyX won't configure or
run without them), will be bundled. It is indeed nonsense to d
Joost Verburg wrote:
I'm one of the NSIS developers and have a lot of experience with Windows
software distribution, so I indeed decided that it is time to create a
new installer
Why that? What's the problem with my installer - the needed admin
permission? If this is the only problem I sugges
The standard installer will be small, contain only essential
GPL-compatible files and automatically download components like
ImageMagick, Ghostscript and MiKTeX if the users wants to.
So at least python.exe, sh.exe etc will be in, right? Installing full
python and msys is unacceptable even if th
Bo Peng wrote:
Bo> 1. free of license problem (legal) 2. only have the essentials
Bo> (small). 3. try to support a wide range of settings 4. and try not
Bo> to require administrate privilege
This looks good, although there may be a case for a version that
contains everything needed or has code t
> "Bo" == Bo Peng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Bo> As I have said, this patch is strictly cygwin only, and JMarc is
Bo> obviously not an active cygwin user, I (we) have to trust Enrico
Bo> on his patches to move cygwin/lyx forward.
>> I will review the patch tomorrow. And, yes, I prefer to hav
Bo> 1. free of license problem (legal) 2. only have the essentials
Bo> (small). 3. try to support a wide range of settings 4. and try not
Bo> to require administrate privilege
This looks good, although there may be a case for a version that
contains everything needed or has code to grab it automa
> "Bo" == Bo Peng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Bo> Dear all, I still have not heard some agreement on how our
Bo> official installer should look like. What I was proposing is
Bo> something in between the two current installers that
Bo> 1. free of license problem (legal) 2. only have the essent
Bo> As I have said, this patch is strictly cygwin only, and JMarc is
Bo> obviously not an active cygwin user, I (we) have to trust Enrico
Bo> on his patches to move cygwin/lyx forward.
I will review the patch tomorrow. And, yes, I prefer to have the time
to have a look at everything that goes in
> "Bo" == Bo Peng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Bo> As I have said, this patch is strictly cygwin only, and JMarc is
Bo> obviously not an active cygwin user, I (we) have to trust Enrico
Bo> on his patches to move cygwin/lyx forward.
I will review the patch tomorrow. And, yes, I prefer to have t
Jose' Matos wrote:
This has happened to me as well, cutting or deleting leaves those ghosts
behind. I have just tested 1.4.2svn and the problem is still there.
And certainly this falls under the bugs section. :-)
So much for my bugzilla-searching skills. I think this is actually bug
On Sat, Apr 29, 2006 at 07:26:55PM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 28, 2006 at 09:46:14PM +0200, Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> > On Fri, Apr 28, 2006 at 06:43:14PM +, Luis Rivera wrote:
> > case RC_TEX_ALLOWS_SPACES:
> > if (lexrc.next()) {
> >
> > Since this patch is small enough, and it is strictly in your domain
> > (cygwin), I have applied to both 1.4 and 1.5.
>
> Bo, please DO NOT apply ANYTHING to the 1.4 branch without Jean-Marc's
agreement.
I think I have to be blamed for this, not Bo.
Do not feel bad, Enrico. At least I do n
On Fri, Apr 28, 2006 at 09:46:14PM +0200, Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 28, 2006 at 06:43:14PM +, Luis Rivera wrote:
> case RC_TEX_ALLOWS_SPACES:
> if (lexrc.next()) {
> tex_allows_spaces = lexrc.getBool();
> @@ -1342,6
On Mon, May 01, 2006 at 09:09:51AM +, Angus Leeming wrote:
> Bo Peng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Please, can you see if the attached patch can be applied to both trunk
> and branch?
>
> >>> It seems to touch Bo's and Jean-Marc's work so I'll let them comment that.
>
> > Since thi
Bo Peng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Please, can you see if the attached patch can be applied to both trunk
and branch?
>>> It seems to touch Bo's and Jean-Marc's work so I'll let them comment that.
> Since this patch is small enough, and it is strictly in your domain
> (cygwin), I have
On Monday 01 May 2006 08:21, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Does this bug also exist in 1.4.0?
I only remember seeing it after 1.4.1, but I could be wrong.
> --
> Lgb
--
José Abílio
Jose' Matos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Sunday 30 April 2006 22:04, Paul A. Rubin wrote:
| > Hi all,
| >
| > Before submitting this to bugzilla, I wanted to verify it was a bug and
| > not a feature (i.e., not deliberate).
|
| This has happened to me as well, cutting or deleting leaves tho
On Sunday 30 April 2006 22:04, Paul A. Rubin wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Before submitting this to bugzilla, I wanted to verify it was a bug and
> not a feature (i.e., not deliberate).
This has happened to me as well, cutting or deleting leaves those ghosts
behind. I have just tested 1.4.2svn and the
Hi all,
Before submitting this to bugzilla, I wanted to verify it was a bug and
not a feature (i.e., not deliberate).
Create an enumeration or itemization that contains some nesting, e.g.,
1. blahx
2. blah
(a) blah
3. blahy
4. blah.
Now highlight some of it (say from the 'x' to the 'y'
On Sat, Apr 29, 2006 at 08:50:29AM -0500, Bo Peng wrote:
> On 4/29/06, Bo Peng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > Please, can you see if the attached patch can be applied to both trunk
> > > > and branch?
> > >
> > > It seems to touch Bo's and Jean-Marc's work so I'll let them comment that.
>
> S
On Sat, Apr 29, 2006 at 03:32:06PM +0200, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
> And does your patch to configure.py solve the crash of the "open file"
> button?
No, sorry. It is an unrelated problem, only showing up because I used
a cmd.exe to launch your LyX/Qt4. I did so because from a rxvt terminal
I go
On 4/29/06, Bo Peng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Please, can you see if the attached patch can be applied to both trunk
> > and branch?
>
> It seems to touch Bo's and Jean-Marc's work so I'll let them comment that.
Since this patch is small enough, and it is strictly in your domain
(cygwin),
full package.
OK.
I also tried running the native lyx 1.4.1 I build by myself from a
cmd.exe terminal and it worked flawlessly, but the cygwin lyx 1.5 also
hangs on reconfigure when run from cmd.exe. This pointed me to a
problem with configure.py.
After some investigation it turned out that the
ration
> > doesn't stopped and went stright ahead to the end. Still crashes when
> > trying to open a file, though.
>
> If you just copied the exe inside a 1.4.1 directory, I think there is a
> mismatch between configure.sh and configure.py. Please try the full package.
Nope
> Please, can you see if the attached patch can be applied to both trunk
> and branch?
It seems to touch Bo's and Jean-Marc's work so I'll let them comment that.
That is a good detective work! I will apply if JMarc does not object.
I have to trust Enrico on this though, since I can not test the
t copied the exe inside a 1.4.1 directory, I think there is a
mismatch between configure.sh and configure.py. Please try the full package.
I also tried running the native lyx 1.4.1 I build by myself from a
cmd.exe terminal and it worked flawlessly, but the cygwin lyx 1.5 also
hangs on reconfigure
and went stright ahead to the end. Still crashes when
trying to open a file, though.
I also tried running the native lyx 1.4.1 I build by myself from a
cmd.exe terminal and it worked flawlessly, but the cygwin lyx 1.5 also
hangs on reconfigure when run from cmd.exe. This pointed me to a
problem
On Fri, Apr 28, 2006 at 11:15:53PM +, Luis Rivera wrote:
> Having that definition in mind, then none of your exes is a "true native"
> windows app. Sorry! ;-)
I have never claimed they are :-)
> However, I tested both on Win98, and both work pretty much as expected:
>
> 1/ LyX "native" (Qt
Enrico Forestieri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> On Fri, Apr 28, 2006 at 08:30:18PM +, Luis Rivera wrote:
> > Enrico Forestieri ...> writes:
>
> > I think it "looks" native because the interface to the user doesn't go
through
> > the command prompt; however, it is may not a native applic
Dear all,
I still have not heard some agreement on how our official installer
should look like. What I was proposing is something in between the two
current installers that
1. free of license problem (legal)
2. only have the essentials (small).
3. try to support a wide range of settings
4. and t
> If you do not want have trouble compiling it, then you could try
> > ftp://ftp.lyx.org/pub/lyx/bin/1.4.1/lyx-1.4.1-cygwin.tar.gz
> >
>
> Is there some http mirror for this path? My sysadmin is somewhat paranoid,
> and set up proxies blocking access to anything but http or emai
on Win98 as it uses Qt/Win without the cygwin parachute.
I'll give it a shot!
>
> If you do not want have trouble compiling it, then you could try
> ftp://ftp.lyx.org/pub/lyx/bin/1.4.1/lyx-1.4.1-cygwin.tar.gz
>
Is there some http mirror for this path? My sysadmin is somewhat para
Luis Rivera a écrit :
Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Luis Rivera a écrit :
> Where did you get this file?
From the gnuwin32 project. I've put it in my web site
(younes.a.free,fr) I could not post it to the list even after having
changed the extension so it can pass the filt
Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Luis Rivera a écrit :
>
> > Where did you get this file?
>
> From the gnuwin32 project. I've put it in my web site
> (younes.a.free,fr) I could not post it to the list even after having
> changed the extension so it can pass the filters.
>
However, I am not sure that it will work on Win98 as it uses Qt/Win
without the cygwin parachute.
If you do not want have trouble compiling it, then you could try
ftp://ftp.lyx.org/pub/lyx/bin/1.4.1/lyx-1.4.1-cygwin.tar.gz
wehere you can find both LyX/Win and LyX/X11. Be warned that the
patch fo
Luis Rivera a écrit :
> Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>>
>> Louis, could you please try the experimental lyx for windows
described in http://wiki.lyx.org/Windows/LyX150Experimental ?
>>
>
> I downloaded the exe only zip file. Apparently, LyX 15x needs the
library zlib1.dll be
Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>
> Louis, could you please try the experimental lyx for windows described
> in http://wiki.lyx.org/Windows/LyX150Experimental ?
>
I downloaded the exe only zip file. Apparently, LyX 15x needs the library
zlib1.dll besides the files distribute
Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>
> Louis, could you please try the experimental lyx for windows described
> in http://wiki.lyx.org/Windows/LyX150Experimental ?
>
Sure enough! Give me half an hour.
>
> So, if I understand you correctly, all the special code in this boost
>
Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Given that Win95 is dead as a dodo, it may well be that you don't need the
>> NewAPIs.h. The only way to check, however, is to compile (on a WinXP machine,
>> presumably) and then see if it'll run on Win98. That's what the stub magic in
>> NewAPIs.h
Angus Leeming a écrit :
Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Here are the relevant logs and the diff against current svn, please tell
me what I should do
You should drop the stuff that's needed for Win95. LyX on Win95 is broken for
other reasons. That may well mean that all you need i
Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Here are the relevant logs and the diff against current svn, please tell
> me what I should do
You should drop the stuff that's needed for Win95. LyX on Win95 is broken for
other reasons. That may well mean that all you need is the ERROR_ACCESS_DENI
Lars Gullik Bjønnes a écrit :
Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Angus Leeming a écrit :
| > Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| >>> Yes. One of the files in boost/libs/filesystem/src (Sorry, no viewsvn...)
| >>> #includes and uses NewAPIs.h. I can dig out the details if
Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Angus Leeming a écrit :
| > Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| >>> Yes. One of the files in boost/libs/filesystem/src (Sorry, no viewsvn...)
| >>> #includes and uses NewAPIs.h. I can dig out the details if you can't
track the
| >>> chan
Angus Leeming a écrit :
Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Yes. One of the files in boost/libs/filesystem/src (Sorry, no viewsvn...)
#includes and uses NewAPIs.h. I can dig out the details if you can't track the
change down.
Well, I don't have enough disk space to get the 1.4 tree.
Enrico Forestieri wrote:
Cool, could you please send me your dvipng.exe?
>
I have no problem in doing that but it is a cygwin application
which thinks she is dealing with tetex and it only works because
I have a bunch of scripts which make it appear as if I have tetex
when in effect I am using
Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Yes. One of the files in boost/libs/filesystem/src (Sorry, no viewsvn...)
>> #includes and uses NewAPIs.h. I can dig out the details if you can't track
>> the
>> change down.
> Well, I don't have enough disk space to get the 1.4 tree. Bo, Enrico,
Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Angus Leeming a écrit :
| > Angus> The improvement comes, of course, from the switch to Qt4.
| > Angus> Note, however, that your hard work to get LyX working on
| > Angus> Win98 would need a little tweaking because the changes we made
| > Angus> to B
Angus Leeming a écrit :
Angus> The improvement comes, of course, from the switch to Qt4.
Angus> Note, however, that your hard work to get LyX working on
Angus> Win98 would need a little tweaking because the changes we made
Angus> to Boost.Filesystem haven't been propogated formward into
Angus> t
Angus> The improvement comes, of course, from the switch to Qt4.
Angus> Note, however, that your hard work to get LyX working on
Angus> Win98 would need a little tweaking because the changes we made
Angus> to Boost.Filesystem haven't been propogated formward into
Angus> the version of Boost.Filesy
Angus Leeming a écrit :
Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
We had information that lyx-15svn/qt4 works on Win98, maybe also on
Win98. There some info to try it on the Wiki.
I think that Abdel meant to say, "We had information that
lyx-15svn/qt4 works on WinME, ..."
Yep, sorry.
T
Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> We had information that lyx-15svn/qt4 works on Win98, maybe also on
> Win98. There some info to try it on the Wiki.
I think that Abdel meant to say, "We had information that
lyx-15svn/qt4 works on WinME, ..."
The improvement comes, of course, from
Luis> For what is worth, I have to say that the installer for 141 (dots
Luis> abbreviated) actually works on Win98. The problem starts on trying to
Luis> get LyX to run. Crashes badly, without telling you why: only this
Luis> bl**dy "Page" protection error/fault/whatever screen...
Microsoft th
Luis Rivera a écrit :
Luis Rivera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Consequently, and taking the opportunity open by the switch to the
1.4.x series,
I recommend to sign the death certificate for LyX's support on Win95/98.
Following another thread made me realize that I failed to mention that
Cygw
Luis Rivera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Consequently, and taking the opportunity open by the switch to the
> 1.4.x series,
> I recommend to sign the death certificate for LyX's support on Win95/98.
>
Following another thread made me realize that I failed to mention that
Cygwin (Qt|xforms)
Enrico Forestieri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> On Thu, Apr 20, 2006 at 06:30:11PM +, Angus Leeming wrote:
>> Persio Barros ...> writes:
>>
>>> Can LyX-1.4.1 be installed on WinME? I tried the V1 setup program
and after
>>> searching
Hello,
I've been busy, and I'd just like to add two announcements; what follows should
mean what I say.
1/ WinLyX 1.4.1 doesn't seem to work on Win98 (didn't even try on Win95). Aborts
with a "Page Fault" error; doesn't go to the ugly blue screen, but it's certain
that something's wrong very deep
On Thu, Apr 27, 2006 at 06:15:21PM +0200, Uwe Stöhr wrote:
> Enrico Forestieri wrote:
>
> >Thanks Uwe, but I solved the problem my way and compiled a new version
> >of dvipng not having the bug.
>
> Cool, could you please send me your dvipng.exe?
>
> Many thanks in advance and regards
> Uwe
I h
On Wed, Apr 26, 2006 at 11:20:20PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Andre> Isn't is strange the in a conversion between [EMAIL PROTECTED] and
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] it
> Andre> is the former who is claiming to be a frog-eating female?
>
> You mean all frenchies are females?
How could I possibly
On Thu, Apr 27, 2006 at 09:02:27AM +0200, Helge Hafting wrote:
> Good point. Who needs "view->ps" anyway?
Please?
> Sure, some people might like it, but it is not a common need?
> Everybody can use PDF, it is faster than ps even. Well, unless they're
> using pstricks.
Right. pstricks _is_ the
Uwe Stöhr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Who says that dvipng is used only by LyX? That's absolute nonsense.
>> I'd much rather you edited lyxpreview2bitmap.py to always call the
>> "legacy" script.
> I know, I just to stir you up to complain and tell be a better solution
;-)
The "clever" solu
Angus Leeming schrieb:
Who says that dvipng is used only by LyX? That's absolute nonsense.
>
> I'd much rather you edited lyxpreview2bitmap.py to always call the
> "legacy" script.
I know, I just to stir you up to complain and tell be a better solution ;-)
best regards and thanks
Uwe
Enrico Forestieri wrote:
Thanks Uwe, but I solved the problem my way and compiled a new version
of dvipng not having the bug.
Cool, could you please send me your dvipng.exe?
Many thanks in advance and regards
Uwe
On Thu, Apr 27, 2006 at 03:18:15PM +0200, Uwe Stöhr wrote:
> Enrico Forestieri wrote:
>
> >This has bitten me with dvipng. It was
> >not working and I removed it. But I still could not instant-preview
> >because png format was still requested and it was not recognized by
> >the legacy python scrip
Uwe Stöhr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> For information: This dvipng bug has been fixed and the
> MiKTeX developer will provide a new compiled version together
> with the upcoming MiKTeX 2.5. For the meantime LyXWinInstaller
> deletes the dvipng.exe from your MiKTeX system. This doesn't
> harm beca
Enrico Forestieri wrote:
This has bitten me with dvipng. It was
not working and I removed it. But I still could not instant-preview
because png format was still requested and it was not recognized by
the legacy python script. So I patched it to also deal with png images.
For information: This
> "Enrico" == Enrico Forestieri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Enrico> But you need to reconfigure.
Not with viewers and latest patch from Bo.
Enrico> This has bitten me with dvipng. It was not working and I
Enrico> removed it. But I still could not instant-preview because png
Enrico> format w
On Thu, Apr 27, 2006 at 08:57:12AM +0200, Helge Hafting wrote:
> Bo Peng wrote:
>
> >>No it tells the user "please browse you hard disk to find a suitable
> >>application". And it forgets to add "good luck". I do not see how
> >>someone is going to think about installing gsview.
> >>
> >>
> >
>
On Thu, Apr 27, 2006 at 09:02:27AM +0200, Helge Hafting wrote:
> Bo Peng wrote:
>
> >>Bo> Lyx needs Python, imagemagick etc to work, but ghostview can be
> >>Bo> replaced by other gs viewers.
> >>
> >>Which one specifically?
> >>
> >>
> >
> >Maybe a cygwin/gv? I never did like the 'give me mone
Bo Peng wrote:
Bo> Lyx needs Python, imagemagick etc to work, but ghostview can be
Bo> replaced by other gs viewers.
Which one specifically?
Maybe a cygwin/gv? I never did like the 'give me money' dialog when I
open ghostview.
I am not sure I understand your scenario. The user choos
Bo Peng wrote:
No it tells the user "please browse you hard disk to find a suitable
application". And it forgets to add "good luck". I do not see how
someone is going to think about installing gsview.
Windows users may be incompetent, but not stupid. "No viewer found" is
a *common* behavi
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > "Angus" == Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Angus> Après avoir dit cela, le dessin animé en question est canadien!
>
> Imdb says France/Belgium/UK/Canada. Pick the one you prefer... And the
> director is french, I believe.
> "Angus" == Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Angus> Après avoir dit cela, le dessin animé en question est canadien!
Imdb says France/Belgium/UK/Canada. Pick the one you prefer... And the
director is french, I believe.
JMarc
Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Oh, I'm probably one of the three frog-eating sisters. Totally mindless and
>> running on autopilot.
> Isn't is strange the in a conversion between a uk and b fr it is
> the former who is claiming to be a frog-eating female?
N'oubliez pas "probable
> "Andre" == Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Andre> Isn't is strange the in a conversion between [EMAIL PROTECTED] and
[EMAIL PROTECTED] it
Andre> is the former who is claiming to be a frog-eating female?
You mean all frenchies are females?
JMarc
On Wed, Apr 26, 2006 at 10:19:18AM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> >Angus> If you're talking cartoons, I preferred "Belleville
> >Angus> Rendez-vous"; much subtler, cleverer and probably still
> >Angus> appropriate to this conversation ;-)
>
> >Strangely enough, my kids
On Wed, Apr 26, 2006 at 02:59:34PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> > "Angus" == Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Angus> Confusion? Senility? I don't have easy access to the source
> Angus> code from my work machine and there's no "viewsvn" on the LyX
> Angus> web site so you
> "Angus" == Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Angus> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> I think the comment are correct and Enrico's patch is the right
>> one. I just suggested a small improvement on it by removing the
>> unneeded "../Resources".
Angus> Unneeded beca
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I think the comment are correct and Enrico's patch is the right one. I
> just suggested a small improvement on it by removing the unneeded
> "../Resources".
Unneeded because it's redundant because we're
already in the Resources directory?
Anyway
> "Angus" == Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Angus> Confusion? Senility? I don't have easy access to the source
Angus> code from my work machine and there's no "viewsvn" on the LyX
Angus> web site so you have to rely on my fading memory?
I definitely have an advantage over you here,
1 - 100 of 378 matches
Mail list logo
