On Wed, Aug 20, 2003 at 01:30:50AM +0200, Christian Ridderstr?m wrote:
> On Wed, 20 Aug 2003, Angus Leeming wrote:
>
> > Christian Ridderstr?m wrote:
> >
> > Try http://wiki.dotgnu.org/
>
> Thanks. I only checked sites using the PmWiki wiki engine before... but
> this site works beatifully. Is
On Mon, Nov 11, 2002 at 05:39:35PM +, Angus Leeming wrote:
> It's getting a little tedious hitting the "ignore" button every time "rms"
> comes up...
Anyone else see the (unintentional) humour here?
;-P
Jules
piled with
> > Paul> libforms_1.0-RC4.1 are available here:
> >
> > Do you want them to go on ftp.lyx.org?
> >
> I'd need the approval of Jules Bean, the official Debian maintainer
> for this package. But unfortunately he doesn't seem to be reachable.
> So be
[Apologies for replying to a long-dead thread]
On Tue, Aug 13, 2002 at 12:54:42PM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 13, 2002 at 12:20:39PM +0200, David Kastrup wrote:
> > > Don't know what one uses with an installed version of LyX. I always
> > > run it from the build dir and put /path/to
On Mon, Jul 22, 2002 at 03:11:19PM +0200, David Kastrup wrote:
> For example, depending on the line length of preceding lines, TeX
> either adds \abovedisplayshortskip or \abovedisplayskip. It does not
> make sense to reproduce this difference when the line above is not
> part of the preview.
In
On Thu, Jun 27, 2002 at 12:59:27PM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 27, 2002 at 01:54:59PM +0300, Dekel Tsur wrote:
> > > But then there is always stuff defined in local .sty files...
> >
> > LyX should support defining macros in a different .lyx files.
>
> I know.
>
> But even that's
On Thu, Jun 27, 2002 at 01:36:50PM +0300, Dekel Tsur wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 27, 2002 at 10:57:18AM +0100, Jules Bean wrote:
> > On Thu, Jun 27, 2002 at 12:26:17PM +0300, Dekel Tsur wrote:
> > >
> > > The math editor already gives a good approximation on hour your formu
On Thu, Jun 27, 2002 at 12:26:17PM +0300, Dekel Tsur wrote:
>
> The math editor already gives a good approximation on hour your formulae
> will look, so the need for a preview is much less needed than in emacs.
> In fact, in my opinion, the change in display that is performed when
> opening a for
On Tue, Jun 25, 2002 at 12:39:41PM +0200, David Kastrup wrote:
>
> On http://preview-latex.sourceforge.net/others.html> I outline
> several WYSIWYG-related software pieces in connection with LaTeX.
> Among others, I mention LyX.
>
> Would you say that I have missed out features that would warran
On Mon, Jun 24, 2002 at 10:46:19PM +0200, bernhard wrote:
> Hello,
> I'm a fan of Lyx, usually running on Linux. But now Ihave OSX and miss
> Lyx so much. I know there is a version on X on X, but will there be a
> port to native OSX? I think this will be a nice thing for Tex users on
> OSX, and
On Tue, May 28, 2002 at 12:36:43PM +0100, Jos? Ab?lio Oliveira Matos wrote:
> I would like to work to attain such goal but you should notice that the
> internal structure of such a block can change between versions so your plan
> isn't bullet proof.
Yes, there's no such thing as a free lunch.
OK. Well, seeing the problems being debated in that thread, I have a
proposal to make.
I can't over-emphasise how important the bitrot thing is: it really
*must* be possible to read 3,5,7, 10 year old documents in LyX.
Consider that in many jurisdictions there is some requirement to keep
financ
On Mon, May 27, 2002 at 01:04:12PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bj?nnes wrote:
>
> By requiring that 1.3.0 must be compatible with 1.1.6 we effetively
> stops all fileformat cleanup and changes. And it was a real
> bee-hive... not nice code at all.
Please at least ship a utility which can read 1.1.6 fil
On Fri, Apr 26, 2002 at 02:03:04PM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 26, 2002 at 01:40:02PM +0200, C. van Wijk wrote:
> > A big visual improvement, a small effort?
>
> I don't know, I thought we once had some technically discussion that turned
> up cases where this approach was not fe
On Thu, Apr 11, 2002 at 10:46:38AM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> Yes, but I don't think I want implement this. We would need a 'stateful
> cursor' again to distiguish between '{' pressed or not, and editing
> probably would get a mess again. How should editing work when you want to
> change a_i
On Thu, Apr 11, 2002 at 10:29:52AM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Anyway, I thought about a different thing this morning (for later :).
> In mathed you have some macros which only have a scope of one
> character (like font changes), while most of them create a box, from
> which you have to e
On Tue, Mar 26, 2002 at 02:46:15PM +, Angus Leeming wrote:
> Can you tell me what I'm doing wrong?
Yes, you can't use \verb in an argument. (it's to do with the way
category codes work).
I fear backslashing everything is the right approach :-(
Jules
On Thu, Mar 21, 2002 at 06:16:40PM +0100, Andre Poenitz wrote:
>
> Can anybody help?
Yes, but I don't quite understand the question.
>
>
> - Forwarded message from ... --
> Would you know what the Tex equivs are for the fonts in the
> Layout -> Document font drop-down? If not is the
On Tue, Mar 19, 2002 at 11:05:31PM +, Duncan Simpson wrote:
> A feature you might not be aware of is using M-q is for formatting
> multiple line comments. I guess a lot of people have also discovered
> VC mode too. Given all the above it is any suprise I am hopelessly
> addicted to emacs for
On Thu, Mar 14, 2002 at 10:16:10AM +0100, Andre Poenitz wrote:
>
> Does anybody know a symbol like \Vert, but with three lines?
You want symbols-a4.ps from CTAN
http://www.ctan.org/tex-archive/info/symbols/comprehensive/
Short answer:
Stmaryrd appears to include one to be used as an operator,
On Tue, Mar 05, 2002 at 03:40:08PM +0100, Helmut Lichtenberg wrote:
> Anyway, it helps me in solving one more problem but it also shows me
> that using LyX is (currently) not a full alternative for people who
> use common office suites. It needs too much knowledge for everyday
> users.
..but mayb
On Wed, Feb 27, 2002 at 04:05:41PM +, John Levon wrote:
> This needs to be done automatically in a "revision" mode. A delete
> operation would not delete text, but make it strikethrough. The
> containing paragraph can have a flag which is translated into the
> begin/end needed for the latex
On Wed, Feb 27, 2002 at 01:38:20PM +0200, Martin Vermeer wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 27, 2002 at 11:26:57AM +0000, Jules Bean wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Feb 27, 2002 at 11:18:10AM +, Angus Leeming wrote:
> > > string id;
> > > for (int i = 0; i < image.cpp; ++i)
On Wed, Feb 27, 2002 at 11:18:10AM +, Angus Leeming wrote:
> string id;
> for (int i = 0; i < image.cpp; ++i) {
> id.push_back('A');
> }
>
> It's a bit clunky. Is there a better way of initialising a string, with length
>image.cpp?
According to my copy of Str
Dear LyX Developers:
Here's a teaser for you to think about.
I've never totally understood the right way to put paragraphs inside
lists in LaTeX, although I could investigate if it will help. But
maybe you'll recognise this problem.
Jules
On Fri, Feb 22, 2002 at 05:14:43PM +1100, Brian May w
On Tue, Feb 19, 2002 at 04:28:39PM +, Angus Leeming wrote:
> On Tuesday 19 February 2002 4:18 pm, John Levon wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 19, 2002 at 03:59:09PM +, Angus Leeming wrote:
> >
> > > I'd like to commit the attached patch.
> >
> > are you trying to confuse :)
> >
> > +
On Fri, Feb 15, 2002 at 12:08:45PM +1000, Allan Rae wrote:
> On Thu, 14 Feb 2002, John Levon wrote:
> > : inset external CANNOT and DOES NOT do what Jules was asking for.
> >
> > That's all I'm saying.
>
> Nothing does what Jules is asking for.
That's what I thought. That's why I asked for it.
On Wed, Feb 13, 2002 at 04:26:16PM +0100, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 13, 2002 at 04:50:46PM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> > Interesting thread... at least for the amount of gratuitous
> > agressivity LyX can get :)
>
> But the two of you spoiled all the fun ;-}
How? What did we d
On Wed, Feb 13, 2002 at 04:50:46PM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> >>>>> "Jules" == Jules Bean <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Jules> Those of you who don't read newsgroups might nonetheless like
> Jules> to scan the following thread, wh
Those of you who don't read newsgroups might nonetheless like to scan
the following thread, which mentions LyX (Andre and Lars and I defend
it to the death ;)
http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=en&threadm=3C681D71.8E9BF939%40active-tex.demon.co.uk
Actually, google is not very up-to-date at all o
On Wed, Feb 13, 2002 at 10:52:28AM +0100, Otto Tronarp wrote:
> On Wed, 2002-02-13 at 09:07, Jules Bean wrote:
> > 1) Because if I use LaTeX, the labels at the points, and on the
> > arrows, can be arbitrary math objects. Can Dia do a blackboard bold R
> > to the power o
On Wed, Feb 13, 2002 at 12:16:09PM +1000, Allan Rae wrote:
> On Mon, 4 Feb 2002, Jules Bean wrote:
>
> > Unless dia is *far* better than it was when I last looked, it's still
> > essentially a graphical tool. WYSIWYG, in other words. I search for
> > a more form
On Tue, Feb 12, 2002 at 02:18:24PM +0100, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 12, 2002 at 01:10:12PM +0000, Jules Bean wrote:
> > I wonder if you could shell out to the 'file' command, on systems
> > which support it.
>
> That is certainly an option, but the point
On Tue, Feb 12, 2002 at 01:03:03PM +, Angus Leeming wrote:
> This is a well made point. Here's an idea: why don't we throw out (or rather
> use it only on old format LyX files) the clever code that interrogates the
> contents of the file. It's a lot of special code that could be replaced by
On Wed, Feb 06, 2002 at 04:54:51PM +0100, Yves Bastide wrote:
> Maybe something to document: (some versions of?) XSetFontPath don't like
> (some version of?) nfs mounted directories...
>
> chellas:~/build/lyx-devel/lib% xset fp+ `pwd`/fonts
> xset: bad font path element (#38), possible causes a
On Tue, Feb 05, 2002 at 10:10:40PM +0200, Dekel Tsur wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 05, 2002 at 08:26:21PM +0100, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 05, 2002 at 08:40:46PM +0200, Dekel Tsur wrote:
> > > Comments ? (and can I do this before 1.2.0 ?)
> >
> > It would be nice if it worked. The new symbols a
On Mon, Feb 04, 2002 at 06:33:20PM +0100, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 04, 2002 at 04:28:45PM +0000, Jules Bean wrote:
> > The hardest bit of exposing an API is factoring your application into
> > commands. Thanks to LFUNs, LyX is already factored!
>
> Not everything
On Mon, Feb 04, 2002 at 06:30:45PM +0100, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 04, 2002 at 04:14:53PM +0000, Jules Bean wrote:
> > But there *is* no external program to draw commutative diagrams that
> > we could call. And even if there were, the poor external program
> > wo
On Mon, Feb 04, 2002 at 04:55:07PM +0100, Asger K. Alstrup Nielsen wrote:
> Furthermore, I think we should draw another bold conclusion: Nobody would
> really make full use of a complete document API either. People might
> say that they would, but in reality, it would still be simpler just to
> ha
On Mon, Feb 04, 2002 at 09:06:13AM +0100, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 02, 2002 at 09:58:16AM +0000, Jules Bean wrote:
> > As an example of the kind of thing I'm thinking of, categorists and
> > topologists often want to draw commutative diagrams. I'm neither,
On Mon, Feb 04, 2002 at 09:15:03AM +0100, Herbert Voss wrote:
> Andre Poenitz wrote:
>
> > On Sat, Feb 02, 2002 at 09:58:16AM +, Jules Bean wrote:
> >
> >>As an example of the kind of thing I'm thinking of, categorists and
> >>topologists ofte
On Mon, Feb 04, 2002 at 04:55:07PM +0100, Asger K. Alstrup Nielsen wrote:
>
> 2) In a distant future, the entire LyX document data-structure is
>inspectable and manipulatable via an API. I.e. LyX becomes
>a component in the sense of COM technology on Windows, or
>KParts in KDE. An ext
On Sat, Feb 02, 2002 at 07:30:16AM -0800, Kayvan A. Sylvan wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 02, 2002 at 09:58:16AM +0000, Jules Bean wrote:
> > As an example of the kind of thing I'm thinking of, categorists and
> > topologists often want to draw commutative diagrams. I'm neither,
This message is not at all apropos of getting 1.2 released, so read it
when you're in a dreamy mood.
Something which I think would really be a *killer* feature for LyX
would be the ability to write plug-ins to handle custom environments.
As an example of the kind of thing I'm thinking of, catego
On Sat, Feb 02, 2002 at 11:22:46AM +0200, Martin Vermeer wrote:
> (BTW what about a "units" panel? cm, kg, m^3, lb in^{-2}, what not ;-)
Units should use the 'units' package really.
Jules
On Fri, Feb 01, 2002 at 04:35:15PM +0100, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 01, 2002 at 05:32:12PM +0200, Martin Vermeer wrote:
> > There isn't anything else that I am aware of and that you can get
> > rendered by LaTeX. It just refuses in math mode. Of couse \ddot is
> > double differentiation
On Tue, Jan 29, 2002 at 04:50:07PM +0100, Peter Suetterlin wrote:
> Hm, my screen setup should be OK. I.e., with long texts the bug can be
> triggered even with correct settings. OTOH, by just changing the font used
> for the dialogs I couldn't exceed the available space, so probably in
> the cur
Note that the config/ directory has very old config.{guess,sub} files.
I am updating this for the debian package; this hopefully means that
lyx will be compiled for the debian S390 port.
Possibly the first time LyX has been compiled for an S390 ;-)
Jules
On Fri, Jan 18, 2002 at 06:42:45AM -0600, Daniel Joyce wrote:
> On Friday 18 January 2002 05:19 am, you wrote:
> > On Fri, Jan 18, 2002 at 05:07:19AM -0600, Daniel Joyce wrote:
> > > I've messed with Lyx, and LaTeX, trying to get more control.
> >
> > [snip slightly over-the-top praise of ConTeX
On Fri, Jan 18, 2002 at 05:07:19AM -0600, Daniel Joyce wrote:
> I've messed with Lyx, and LaTeX, trying to get more control.
[snip slightly over-the-top praise of ConTeXT and complaints about
LaTeX]
OTOH, ConTeXT math isn't up to much, and it doesn't support
bibliographies well.
For an in
On Thu, Jan 17, 2002 at 06:47:50AM +, John Levon wrote:
>
> > command echo "LYXCMD:lyxopen:file-open:$fullpath" \
>
> hmm do we require fullpath then ?
Even you you don't, the current working directory of the LyX program
is unlikely to be that of the shell script...
Jules
On Wed, Jan 16, 2002 at 03:14:28PM +0200, Dekel Tsur wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 16, 2002 at 11:52:29AM +0000, Jules Bean wrote:
> > > Actually, imagemagick uses Ghostscript, and Ghostscript doesn't do a good
> > > work at low res rendering.
> >
> > Even wi
On Wed, Jan 16, 2002 at 01:15:42PM +0100, Juergen Vigna wrote:
> \begin{document}
> \texttt{\begin{tabular}{|p{6cm}|c|}
> \hline
> \texttt{dfasdfasdf sdf asdf}
>
> \texttt{sdf asdfasdf asdf}
>
> \texttt{sdf asdfasdfasdf}&
> \\
> \hline
> \hline
> &
> \\
> \hline
> \end{tabular}}
> \end{documen
On Wed, Jan 16, 2002 at 12:19:02PM +0100, Juergen Vigna wrote:
> There is a problem when using multiple paragraphs inside a multicolumn cell.
> Is this not permitted? Or how is the right LaTeX code to do this?
> Well I investigated a bit and it seems that latex produces errors only if
> we have th
On Wed, Jan 16, 2002 at 12:42:40PM +0200, Dekel Tsur wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 16, 2002 at 08:57:32AM +0200, Martin Vermeer wrote:
> > > Using ps2epsi+imagemagick, you can convert directly from Postscript to a
> > > bitmap format with anti-aliasing, with no need for manual fix.
> >
> > Thanks! I'll tr
On Thu, Jan 10, 2002 at 01:39:36PM +0200, Dekel Tsur wrote:
> Most font commands should not be used directly.
> For example, if you want to use bold to denote vectors,
> you should not write \mathbf{x} but \vec{x} where \vec is a macro:
> \newcommand{\vec}[1]{\mathbf{#1}}
Writing bare LaTeX, yo
On Wed, Jan 09, 2002 at 05:55:54PM +0100, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 09, 2002 at 06:48:24PM +0200, Dekel Tsur wrote:
> > But what if I want to keep my preferred behaviour ?
>
> Just to get it right: Your prefered behaviour is
>
>' L '
>
> to enter \mathcal{L}? What make this super
On Wed, Dec 12, 2001 at 09:22:40AM +, John Levon wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 12, 2001 at 09:19:35AM +0000, Jules Bean wrote:
>
> > Or just allow lyxfunc grouping. In emacs, it would look something
> > like this:
> >
> > ( (paragraph-general-set-alignment left
On Wed, Dec 12, 2001 at 10:17:16AM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> | On Wed, Dec 12, 2001 at 08:50:04AM +0000, Jules Bean wrote:
> >
> >> IMO every dialog should, when OK or Apply has been clicked, call
> >>
On Tue, Dec 11, 2001 at 12:57:57PM +0100, Andre Poenitz wrote:
>
> How do I get a black board bold '1' with mathbb?
>
> \mathbbm{1} works, but \mathbb{1} gives some symbol I've never needed so
> far...
*If* I remember correctly, you can't, and that's one of the reasons
\mathbbm may be more usef
On Wed, Dec 12, 2001 at 12:44:07AM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>
> | the problem is that it is taking increasing amounts of user effort to
> | use lyx, and htis is a trend that has been continuing for some time. I
> | understand that UI and maintainability are
On Fri, Nov 30, 2001 at 05:00:51PM +0100, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 30, 2001 at 05:00:01PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> > | That is my belief. Although, when you care about these things, I've
> > | always thought a naming scheme like u32int is better style.
> >
> > So how many mm
On Fri, Nov 30, 2001 at 04:16:40PM +0100, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 30, 2001 at 03:12:02PM +0000, Jules Bean wrote:
> > There is a standardised 64 bit integer type: long long int is standard.
>
> It's in C99 as far as I know, but in C++98?
I don't know.
It&#
On Fri, Nov 30, 2001 at 04:04:03PM +0100, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 30, 2001 at 02:59:50PM +0000, Jules Bean wrote:
> > And the difference between 'multiple of some small value' and 'some
> > fixed point thingy' is what, exactly?
>
> I'd sti
On Fri, Nov 30, 2001 at 03:48:27PM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> > "Andre" == Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Andre> LaTeX stores length as multiple of some small value if I got
> Andre> this right, and we should do likewise.
The 'scaled point' which is 2^(-32) of a poi
I *think* I've asked this before, but I don't remember an answer.
When a new version of LyX is released, I often have to run the
'Reconfigure' menu item to make it notice my latex install properly,
and suchlike.
Is there any way I can make the lyx debian package somehow have the
effect of runnin
On Thu, Nov 22, 2001 at 03:06:10PM +0100, Juergen Spitzmueller wrote:
> E..g.: People talking a lot about ,War against Terrorism`these days.
> (irritating, isn't it? ;-)
They're called scare quotes in English. Overuse is frowned up by the
powers that be, I think.
Jules
On Wed, Nov 21, 2001 at 11:05:24AM +, Angus Leeming wrote:
> On Wednesday 21 November 2001 10:38 am, Jules Bean wrote:
> > http://bugs.debian.org/120450
> >
> > I haven't tried to reproduce it yet, any comments?
> >
> > Jules
>
> Trust him, it
http://bugs.debian.org/120450
I haven't tried to reproduce it yet, any comments?
Jules
On Tue, Nov 20, 2001 at 07:18:48PM +0100, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> This replaces an #include by a forward declaration.
(Sorry. Pretend it's Friday).
Good work. Reminds me of my early days in C++: I had no idea about
forward declarations, so every single class had to #include the header
for every
On Fri, Nov 16, 2001 at 01:04:19PM +0100, Juergen Vigna wrote:
>
> On 16-Nov-2001 Jules Bean wrote:
>
> > So configure your mailer to add the following header:
> >
> > Mail-Followup-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> > ...and (more) people won't.
>
&g
On Fri, Nov 16, 2001 at 11:07:26AM +, Jose Abilio Oliveira Matos wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 16, 2001 at 10:46:46AM +0000, Jules Bean wrote:
> >
> > Mail-Followup-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Better yet, educate people to behave politely.
>
> I will I increase the
On Fri, Nov 16, 2001 at 11:43:43AM +0100, Juergen Vigna wrote:
> P.S.: I REALLY get your mail from lyx-devel you don't have to Cc: me all mail
> separately.
So configure your mailer to add the following header:
Mail-Followup-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
...and (more) people won't.
Jules
Anyone have any experience of LyX with a dual-headed (:0.0 and :0.1)
context?
The following bug claims there is an XForms problem here:
http://bugs.debian.org/119413
..and we'd appreciate any evidence you might have either way.
Jules
On Thu, Nov 15, 2001 at 08:24:04AM +0100, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 14, 2001 at 01:38:11PM -0400, Garst R. Reese wrote:
> > math-extern octave simplify
>
> No, octave can't simplify. But Maple can:
Would be cool to have the interface for some free software algebra, if
anything exists.
On Tue, Oct 30, 2001 at 08:59:03PM -0400, Garst R. Reese wrote:
> "Asger K. Alstrup Nielsen" wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, 30 Oct 2001, Joerg Anders wrote:
> >
> > > ... you know: A presupposition is the KDE-environmant is correctly set ...
> >
> > Yes, I know. This is acceptable: If the user wants to
On Fri, Oct 05, 2001 at 01:33:49AM +0100, John Levon wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 04, 2001 at 04:05:55PM -0400, Richard E. Hawkins wrote:
>
> > custom export as ps, with command "psnup -2 | less" (should have been
> > lpr).
>
> I agree it's stupid, but it's not lyx's fault :)
I don't understand. I ha
On Wed, Sep 05, 2001 at 11:57:43AM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 05, 2001 at 10:45:35AM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
> > André, this may well be a dumn question, but WHY do we "swallow" the "\" when
> > displaying math commands, eg \Diamond. Would it not make your life easier as
> > w
On Tue, Sep 04, 2001 at 05:15:44PM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote:
>
> I think it is easier for me to go through it myself if I get such specific
> hints like "Appendix G", if possible with the opening sentence or
> something similar easy to find ;-)
Try 'Generating boxes from Formulas' or 'People
On Tue, Sep 04, 2001 at 04:17:03PM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 04, 2001 at 03:12:24PM +0100, Jules Bean wrote:
> > I might know what TeX is doing, but I don't know what you're asking ;-)
> >
> > TeX, when it typesets a subscript, goes back and look
On Tue, Sep 04, 2001 at 03:41:28PM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 04, 2001 at 04:22:55PM +0300, Dekel Tsur wrote:
> > > Moreover, I think the depth or height of subscripts or superscripts is too
> > > large.
> >
> > Confirmed.
> > In fact, if the subscript is empty, then the empty box
On Fri, Aug 31, 2001 at 05:10:06PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> | On Fri, Aug 31, 2001 at 03:18:15PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
> |
> | > Maybe this info should go in the INSTALL?
> |
> | Probably ;-}
>
> I am getting more and more reluctan
On Thu, Aug 30, 2001 at 05:32:38PM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 30, 2001 at 11:18:51AM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Essentially, there would be some kind of meta-command, which rather
> > than issuing commands for immediate execution, instead pushes them
> > onto a stack.
>
On Wed, Aug 29, 2001 at 03:21:44PM -0300, Garst R. Reese wrote:
> Andre Poenitz wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Aug 29, 2001 at 11:51:24AM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > > Ugh. I need to type a lot of greek symbols this afternoon, too . . .
> >
> > Ah.. have you tried that in math modus?
> >
> So
On Wed, Aug 29, 2001 at 06:06:00PM +0200, Michael Schmitt wrote:
> Hi,
>
> why are characters with sans serif font bigger (on screen) than "normal"
> characters even though their actual size is equal? Is this a problem with
> missing X11 fonts? I checked the problem both on SUN Sparc Solaris and
On Thu, Aug 23, 2001 at 11:37:16AM +0300, Dekel Tsur wrote:
>
> It is not hard to generate the information we need for all latex symbols
> from the latex files (fontmath.ltx and amssymb.sty).
> Therefore, I don't see the need for the mechanism you described for parsing
> unknown macros.
For user
On Wed, Aug 22, 2001 at 09:40:57PM +0300, Dekel Tsur wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 22, 2001 at 07:07:35PM +0100, Jules Bean wrote:
> > (Lars: your name looks funny in my email now, although it used to work
> > fine. The character between the 'Bj' and the 'nnes' is a
On Wed, Aug 22, 2001 at 08:58:37PM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> > I didn't have one handy when I wrote the first mail.
> >
> > I have now located it:
> >
> > http://www.mail-archive.com/lyx-devel%40lists.lyx.org/msg21960.html
>
> We are doing something resembling this "macro interpretatioN" on
On Wed, Aug 22, 2001 at 08:15:16PM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 22, 2001 at 07:04:14PM +0100, Jules Bean wrote:
> > I recall demonstrating how we could use LaTeX itself to generate the
> > required information.
>
> I don't recall this. Maybe you have a p
On Wed, Aug 22, 2001 at 07:13:28PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> | The attached patch extends yesterday's by some kind of "graceful failing"
> | in case of missing symbol fonts. Math symbols for which we can't find a
> | font simply get displaye
On Wed, Aug 22, 2001 at 02:47:43PM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> This means we'd need to expand the latexkeys structure to hold information
> about two fonts (X and TeX). No problem, but a lot of work for 300 symbols
> or so...
I recall demonstrating how we could use LaTeX itself to generate the
On Tue, Aug 21, 2001 at 10:29:04AM -0700, Mike Ressler wrote:
> On Tue, 21 Aug 2001, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> > I wonder at what time TeX's input routeine transforms "incoming chars" into
> > tokens. This obviously is not something like a preprocessing phase, since
> > this would not allow for catco
On Sat, Jul 28, 2001 at 07:25:52PM +0100, Jules Bean wrote:
> Secondly, probably less important, make distclean doesn't quite get
> you back to 'square one'. In my rules file I've added:
>
> EXTRA_CLEAN=development/lyx.spec sigc++/slot.h sigc++/object_slot.h
Just quickly, because I'm on my way out, some observations:
The building of the 'listerrors' binary is dependent on already having
installed and reconfigured a lyx binary, it seems. It tries to use
the lyx binary in the source tree (../src/lyx) but that binary doesn't
know about the fact that n
On Sat, Jul 28, 2001 at 03:32:12PM +0100, John Levon wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 28, 2001 at 01:28:01PM +0100, Jules Bean wrote:
>
> > I'm about to try to build official debian packages of lyx.
> >
> > Any thoughts on gcc/g++/libstdc++ versions? 2.95? 3.0?
>
> i
On Sat, Jul 28, 2001 at 02:30:41PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Jules Bean <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> | I'm about to try to build official debian packages of lyx.
> |
> | Any thoughts on gcc/g++/libstdc++ versions? 2.95? 3.0?
>
> Do you really have
I'm about to try to build official debian packages of lyx.
Any thoughts on gcc/g++/libstdc++ versions? 2.95? 3.0?
Jules
On Thu, Jul 26, 2001 at 05:55:23PM +0200, Michael Schmitt wrote:
> Learning by example:
>
> Correct output by LyX-1.1.6fix1:
>
> \caption{My math\protect\( _{i}\protect \)test}\end{figure}%
>
> Incorrect output by LyX cvs:
>
> caption{My math\(_{i}\)test}\end{figure}%
>
> LyX-1.1.
On Thu, Jul 26, 2001 at 05:21:18PM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> > adding some math code in a figure caption breaks LyX' latex output if your
> > documents includes a table of figures (see tiny example file). Note: This
> > worked about three weeks ago - AFAIK it's not a limitation of Latex.
>
>
On Fri, Jul 20, 2001 at 01:05:06PM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> > What I do not know is whether mathed supports showing the
> > same symbol for several macros. If it does, other things
> > defined with \let in fontdefs.dtx should be aliased too.
>
> There is no such file on my harddisk.
That's
1 - 100 of 195 matches
Mail list logo
