[Apologies for replying to a long-dead thread]

On Tue, Aug 13, 2002 at 12:54:42PM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 13, 2002 at 12:20:39PM +0200, David Kastrup wrote:
> > > Don't know what one uses with an installed version of LyX. I always
> > > run it from the build dir and put /path/to/lyxbuild/lib/xfonts in
> > > the font path.
> > 
> > Then perhaps the RPM for RedHat should take care to do something like
> > that.
> 
> It's not always technically feasible as the X server might run on another
> machine than LyX.

Indeed.  But an RPM should certainly do its best to sort out any
integration issues; that is the whole point of having a 'distribution'
of linux, that the integration works.  Certainly I will try to make at
least the most common cases 'just work' in the .deb packages. (Which
presumably includes making sure that the local X server can find the
postscript fonts which are included with Debian's TeTeX packages).

> > No, I am complaining that getting a consistent font scheme with fonts
> > designed for screen use (with a matching size set, and appropriate
> > fonts for italic, slanted, bold and the like) would be the work of a
> > day at least.  Certainly doable if I were interested in using LyX on
> > a permanent base, but certainly quite above the head of the user base
> > LyX tries to appeal to.
> 
> Maybe I am trying to appeal to different people than you think LyX tries.
> Fixing a font path is certainly not above the head of "the user base _I_
> know", even less when given instruction.
> 
> > So what external tool would you recommend for selecting an
> > appropriate font set for screen use with LyX?
> 
> xfontsel

Actually, X fonts are notoriously badly understood, especially by
people from a mixed computer usage background (i.e. using also some
windows or MacOS). I am fairly uncomfortable with xfontsel myself.  I
think LyX should at least strive for a pleasant default.


> > Where have you documented its use for that purpose?
> 
> Nowhere. I consider using xfontsel to learn about a system's font common
> knowledge.

I contend that this is not the case, especially for people mainly
using gnome or kde.

Jules

Reply via email to