Am 18.07.2010 um 22:53 schrieb Peter Kümmel:
> Am Sonntag, den 18.07.2010, 22:43 +0200 schrieb Pavel Sanda:
>> Peter Kümmel wrote:
>>>
cd lyx-build/lyx-cmake && cmake ../../lyx-devel/development/cmake -G
"Xcode" -Dquiet=1 -Dmerge=0\
-DLYX_DEBUG=ON -DLYX_RELEASE=OFF -DLYX_ASPELL=O
There is a misconfiguration in cmake.
On start the installed lyx searches for files like lyx1.6.mo, but in the
created files
are named lyx16.mo.
The correcting patch (tested!) is attached. Not commiting now, as Pavel
requested.
Kornel
Index: development/cmake/po/CMakeLists.txt
Am Montag 19 Juli 2010 schrieb BH:
> On Sun, Jul 18, 2010 at 5:16 PM, Kornel Benko wrote:
> > Am Sonntag 18 Juli 2010 schrieb Peter Kümmel:
> >> Am Sonntag, den 18.07.2010, 22:33 +0200 schrieb Stephan Witt:
> >> > Am 18.07.2010 um 22:21 schrieb Peter Kümmel:
> >> > > Seems I've lost the fight agai
Pavel Sanda wrote:
> sa...@lyx.org wrote:
> > Author: sanda
> > Date: Mon Jul 19 02:31:30 2010
> > New Revision: 34985
> > URL: http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/34985
> >
> > Log:
> > Cut and paste err
> >
> >Deleted:
> > lyx-devel/tags/lyx_2_0_0beta2/
> > lyx-devel/trunk/
>
> ouch ouch ouch
sa...@lyx.org wrote:
> Author: sanda
> Date: Mon Jul 19 02:31:30 2010
> New Revision: 34985
> URL: http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/34985
>
> Log:
> Cut and paste err
>
>Deleted:
> lyx-devel/tags/lyx_2_0_0beta2/
> lyx-devel/trunk/
ouch ouch ouch ouch
the second commandline edit was far worse
On Sun, Jul 18, 2010 at 5:16 PM, Kornel Benko wrote:
> Am Sonntag 18 Juli 2010 schrieb Peter Kümmel:
>> Am Sonntag, den 18.07.2010, 22:33 +0200 schrieb Stephan Witt:
>> > Am 18.07.2010 um 22:21 schrieb Peter Kümmel:
>> > > Seems I've lost the fight against the default ON of LYX_INSTALL.
>> > >
>>
Am Sonntag, den 18.07.2010, 15:08 +0200 schrieb Kornel Benko:
> Am Sonntag 18 Juli 2010 schrieb Kornel Benko:
> > There are errors like this:
>
> Still more errors. Nobody sees it?
On a other Ubuntu machine I see the same errors,
and there is a fix but it was not enabled.
Peter
Am Sonntag 18 Juli 2010 schrieb Peter Kümmel:
> Am Sonntag, den 18.07.2010, 22:33 +0200 schrieb Stephan Witt:
> > Am 18.07.2010 um 22:21 schrieb Peter Kümmel:
> > > Seems I've lost the fight against the default ON of LYX_INSTALL.
> > >
> > > Peter
> >
> > Now I cannot create the CMake project any
Am Sonntag, den 18.07.2010, 22:43 +0200 schrieb Pavel Sanda:
> Peter Kümmel wrote:
> >
> > > cd lyx-build/lyx-cmake && cmake ../../lyx-devel/development/cmake -G
> > > "Xcode" -Dquiet=1 -Dmerge=0\
> > >-DLYX_DEBUG=ON -DLYX_RELEASE=OFF -DLYX_ASPELL=OFF
> > > -DLYX_PACKAGE_SUFFIX=OFF -DLYX_PRO
Peter Kümmel wrote:
>
> > cd lyx-build/lyx-cmake && cmake ../../lyx-devel/development/cmake -G
> > "Xcode" -Dquiet=1 -Dmerge=0\
> >-DLYX_DEBUG=ON -DLYX_RELEASE=OFF -DLYX_ASPELL=OFF
> > -DLYX_PACKAGE_SUFFIX=OFF -DLYX_PROGRAM_SUFFIX=OFF # -Dno_aspell=1 -Dnls=1
>
> The option -Dquiet=1 -Dmerge
Am Sonntag, den 18.07.2010, 22:33 +0200 schrieb Stephan Witt:
> Am 18.07.2010 um 22:21 schrieb Peter Kümmel:
>
> > Seems I've lost the fight against the default ON of LYX_INSTALL.
> >
> > Peter
>
> Now I cannot create the CMake project anymore because of missing
> AIKSAURUSLIB...
Same here. Y
Am 18.07.2010 um 22:33 schrieb Stephan Witt:
> Am 18.07.2010 um 22:21 schrieb Peter Kümmel:
>
>> Seems I've lost the fight against the default ON of LYX_INSTALL.
>>
>> Peter
>
> Now I cannot create the CMake project anymore because of missing
> AIKSAURUSLIB...
To be more verbose:
% sh mkcm
> cd lyx-build/lyx-cmake && cmake ../../lyx-devel/development/cmake -G "Xcode"
> -Dquiet=1 -Dmerge=0\
>-DLYX_DEBUG=ON -DLYX_RELEASE=OFF -DLYX_ASPELL=OFF -DLYX_PACKAGE_SUFFIX=OFF
> -DLYX_PROGRAM_SUFFIX=OFF # -Dno_aspell=1 -Dnls=1
The option -Dquiet=1 -Dmerge=0 are obsolete, now we only have
Am Sonntag, den 18.07.2010, 14:25 +0200 schrieb Stephan Witt:
> Currently here it is broken completely now. I have no clue what happens. But
> it may very well be my local problem.
> :-( The development/cmake tree is in sync with svn. Since this morning I
> could generate the project...
Sorry fo
Am 18.07.2010 um 22:21 schrieb Peter Kümmel:
> Seems I've lost the fight against the default ON of LYX_INSTALL.
>
> Peter
Now I cannot create the CMake project anymore because of missing AIKSAURUSLIB...
Stephan
Seems I've lost the fight against the default ON of LYX_INSTALL.
Peter
Am Sonntag, den 18.07.2010, 19:43 +0200 schrieb Kornel Benko:
> Am Sonntag 18 Juli 2010 schrieb Richard Heck:
> > On 07/18/2010 09:08 AM, Kornel Benko wrote:
> > > Am Sonntag 18 Juli 2010 schrieb Kornel Benko:
> > >
> > >
> > >> There are errors like this:
> > >>
> > >>
> > > Still more e
Am Sonntag, den 18.07.2010, 13:21 +0200 schrieb Kornel Benko:
> Am Sonntag 18 Juli 2010 schrieb Peter Kümmel:
> > Is it possible to move all package/install code
> > into a single block within the cmake file? We should
> > really try to cleanup this file.
> >
> > Peter
>
> I like the install comm
Am Sonntag 18 Juli 2010 schrieb Richard Heck:
> On 07/18/2010 09:08 AM, Kornel Benko wrote:
> > Am Sonntag 18 Juli 2010 schrieb Kornel Benko:
> >
> >
> >> There are errors like this:
> >>
> >>
> > Still more errors. Nobody sees it?
> >
> >
>
> Nothing like this using autotools, anywa
On 07/18/2010 09:08 AM, Kornel Benko wrote:
Am Sonntag 18 Juli 2010 schrieb Kornel Benko:
There are errors like this:
Still more errors. Nobody sees it?
Nothing like this using autotools, anyway. And we do have:
/// Compare a docstring with a C string of ASCII characters
bool op
hi,
from now on please commit to trunk only fixes, no new tweaks.
i will freeze the tree tonight and release a5 tarball.
please give the current codebase 5min testing for your favourite
usecases to prevent most embarassing bugs...
thanks,
pavel
Pavel Sanda wrote:
> > Log:
> > By default, overwrite the main file on export, but allow changing default
> > behavior through the environment variable LYX_FORCE_OVERWRITE.
>
> Juergen?
Fine with me.
Jürgen
On Sun, Jul 18, 2010 at 10:30:30AM +0200, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
> On 17/07/2010 19:23, Pavel Sanda wrote:
> >Peter Kümmel wrote:
> >>>until we have embdedded .lyx format i would personally stay with gpg
> >>>encrypted
> >>>tgz archive... when you have all the master/child/figures etc plainly
Am 18.07.2010 um 14:31 schrieb Kornel Benko:
> Am Sonntag 18 Juli 2010 schrieb Stephan Witt:
>> CMake Error at modules/FindICONV.cmake:72 (check_function_exists):
>> Unknown CMake command "check_function_exists".
>> Call Stack (most recent call first):
>> CMakeLists.txt:249 (find_package)
>
> Y
Am Sonntag 18 Juli 2010 schrieb Kornel Benko:
> There are errors like this:
Still more errors. Nobody sees it?
...
In file included from
/usr/BUILD/BuildLyx/src/frontends/qt4/_allinone_const.C:108:
/usr/src/lyx/lyx-devel/src/frontends/qt4/GuiHyperlink.cpp: In member function
‘void lyx::frontend:
Am Sonntag 18 Juli 2010 schrieb Stephan Witt:
> CMake Error at modules/FindICONV.cmake:72 (check_function_exists):
> Unknown CMake command "check_function_exists".
> Call Stack (most recent call first):
> CMakeLists.txt:249 (find_package)
Yes, this function is not defined yet
For the time bei
Am 18.07.2010 um 12:12 schrieb Peter Kümmel:
> Stephan Witt wrote:
>> Am 18.07.2010 um 11:44 schrieb Pavel Sanda:
>>
>>> Stephan Witt wrote:
scroll_whell_zoom =
SCROLL_WHEEL_ZOOM_SHIFT;
- else if (tmp == "option")
-
Am 18.07.2010 um 14:11 schrieb Richard Heck:
> On 07/18/2010 07:51 AM, Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote:
>> Op 18-7-2010 13:49, uwesto...@lyx.org schreef:
>>> Author: uwestoehr
>>> Date: Sun Jul 18 13:49:34 2010
>>> New Revision: 34969
>>> URL: http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/34969
>>>
>>> Log:
>>>
On 07/18/2010 08:11 AM, Richard Heck wrote:
On 07/18/2010 07:51 AM, Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote:
Op 18-7-2010 13:49, uwesto...@lyx.org schreef:
Author: uwestoehr
Date: Sun Jul 18 13:49:34 2010
New Revision: 34969
URL: http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/34969
Log:
GuiWorkArea.cpp: make it compi
On 07/18/2010 07:51 AM, Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote:
Op 18-7-2010 13:49, uwesto...@lyx.org schreef:
Author: uwestoehr
Date: Sun Jul 18 13:49:34 2010
New Revision: 34969
URL: http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/34969
Log:
GuiWorkArea.cpp: make it compilable
Stephan, please check if this is corre
Am 18.07.2010 um 13:51 schrieb Vincent van Ravesteijn:
> Op 18-7-2010 13:49, uwesto...@lyx.org schreef:
>> Author: uwestoehr
>> Date: Sun Jul 18 13:49:34 2010
>> New Revision: 34969
>> URL: http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/34969
>>
>> Log:
>> GuiWorkArea.cpp: make it compilable
>>
>> Stephan, p
Are you sure you want this hardcoded format number ? To load this
file, we now need to run layout2layout, which might not be possible
(e.g. if python is not installed). Then we crash.
OK, I took care of this and the other issues you noticed. That said,
aren't there lots of things that fail i
Am 18.07.2010 um 13:51 schrieb Vincent van Ravesteijn:
> Op 18-7-2010 13:49, uwesto...@lyx.org schreef:
>> Author: uwestoehr
>> Date: Sun Jul 18 13:49:34 2010
>> New Revision: 34969
>> URL: http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/34969
>>
>> Log:
>> GuiWorkArea.cpp: make it compilable
>>
>> Stephan, p
On 07/17/2010 01:14 PM, Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote:
Richard,
Author: rgheck
Date: Wed Apr 7 18:15:26 2010
New Revision: 34080
URL: http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/34080
Log:
Fix bug #6611. This also gives us a more robust fall-back in case we are
completely unable to load a text class. At
Op 18-7-2010 13:49, uwesto...@lyx.org schreef:
Author: uwestoehr
Date: Sun Jul 18 13:49:34 2010
New Revision: 34969
URL: http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/34969
Log:
GuiWorkArea.cpp: make it compilable
Stephan, please check if this is correct
Modified:
lyx-devel/trunk/src/frontends/qt4/Gui
On 07/18/2010 06:15 AM, Uwe Stöhr wrote:
Am 17.07.2010 20:09, schrieb Richard Heck:
I see the warnings here. But the problem is that you're mixing up the
i's and j's. I've fixed it,
tested, and committed.
Thanks for fixing my mistake, but the problem that thw lyxl2yxl
warnings are not outpu
Am Sonntag 18 Juli 2010 schrieb Peter Kümmel:
> Is it possible to move all package/install code
> into a single block within the cmake file? We should
> really try to cleanup this file.
>
> Peter
I like the install commands at the same place, as are the create defintions :(
But yes, it is not con
Am Sonntag 18 Juli 2010 schrieb Peter Kümmel:
> Kornel Benko wrote:
> > Am Sonntag 18 Juli 2010 schrieb Peter Kümmel:
> >> Kornel Benko wrote:
> > ...
> >
> >>> Even if LYX_NLS were set?
> >>
> >> Ah, shouldn't we then include CPack only when LYX_NLS is set?
> >
> > After a second thought, I thi
Am 17.07.2010 20:09, schrieb Richard Heck:
I see the warnings here. But the problem is that you're mixing up the i's and
j's. I've fixed it,
tested, and committed.
Thanks for fixing my mistake, but the problem that thw lyxl2yxl warnings are not output in
conversion routines remain. José?
r
Stephan Witt wrote:
> Am 18.07.2010 um 11:44 schrieb Pavel Sanda:
>
>> Stephan Witt wrote:
>>> scroll_whell_zoom =
>>> SCROLL_WHEEL_ZOOM_SHIFT;
>>> - else if (tmp == "option")
>>> - scroll_whell_zoom =
Am 18.07.2010 um 11:44 schrieb Pavel Sanda:
> Stephan Witt wrote:
>> scroll_whell_zoom =
>> SCROLL_WHEEL_ZOOM_SHIFT;
>> -else if (tmp == "option")
>> -scroll_whell_zoom =
>> SCROLL_WHEEL_ZOOM_OPT
Uwe Stöhr wrote:
> Hello Stephan,
>
> your new code does not compile, neither with CMake nor SCons:
Patch attached, but I don't know if it's correct.
Peter
>
> D:\LyXSVN\lyx-devel\src\frontends\qt4\GuiWorkArea.cpp(824) : error C2666:
> 'QFlag
> s::operator &' : 3 overloads have similar conver
Hello Stephan,
your new code does not compile, neither with CMake nor SCons:
D:\LyXSVN\lyx-devel\src\frontends\qt4\GuiWorkArea.cpp(824) : error C2666: 'QFlag
s::operator &' : 3 overloads have similar conversions
with
[
Enum=Qt::KeyboardModifier
]
d:\qt
Stephan Witt wrote:
> scroll_whell_zoom =
> SCROLL_WHEEL_ZOOM_SHIFT;
> - else if (tmp == "option")
> - scroll_whell_zoom =
> SCROLL_WHEEL_ZOOM_OPTION;
> + else if (tmp
Peter Kümmel wrote:
> Kornel Benko wrote:
>> Am Sonntag 18 Juli 2010 schrieb Peter Kümmel:
>>> Kornel Benko wrote:
>> ...
Even if LYX_NLS were set?
>>> Ah, shouldn't we then include CPack only when LYX_NLS is set?
>>>
>> After a second thought, I think that having LYX_CPACK option is ok.
>>
>>
for...@lyx.org wrote:
> Author: forenr
> Date: Sat Jul 17 19:55:46 2010
> New Revision: 34946
> URL: http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/34946
>
> Log:
> By default, overwrite the main file on export, but allow changing default
> behavior through the environment variable LYX_FORCE_OVERWRITE.
Juerge
Am 18.07.2010 um 08:34 schrieb Enrico Forestieri:
> On Sun, Jul 18, 2010 at 12:29:43AM +0200, sw...@lyx.org wrote:
>
>> Author: switt
>> Date: Sun Jul 18 00:29:42 2010
>> New Revision: 34955
>> URL: http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/34955
>>
>> Log:
>> make mouse scroll wheel zoom configurable
>
Peter Kümmel wrote:
> Do we have a function to pack all needed files into one zip file in the
> meantime?
> I only could remember there were long discussions on the list.
> Then we could pack before.
iirc there was some python script crafted by Enrico to pack all things. but its
not stepping ston
Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
> On 17/07/2010 19:23, Pavel Sanda wrote:
>> Peter Kümmel wrote:
>>
until we have embdedded .lyx format i would personally stay with gpg
encrypted
tgz archive... when you have all the master/child/figures etc plainly
around
this kind of encry
On 18/07/2010 07:47, Peter Kümmel wrote:
if its question of just one routine we could include it and get rid
of openssh dependence...
Don't know how isolated the openssl code is. And there is another function which
generates the key from the pwd.
AES encoding and decoding code is re
- "Richard Heck" a écrit :
>
> I think the proposal on the table at the moment is something like:
> Support both for 2.0, and declare prettyref...not degraded,
deprecated ?
> > This is really a mess, rewiting cha as chap via lyx2lyx and
> redefining
> > accordingly the prettyref command
On 17/07/2010 19:23, Pavel Sanda wrote:
Peter Kümmel wrote:
until we have embdedded .lyx format i would personally stay with gpg encrypted
tgz archive... when you have all the master/child/figures etc plainly around
this kind of encryption is somewhat disputable... but tastes may differ ;)
Is it possible to move all package/install code
into a single block within the cmake file? We should
really try to cleanup this file.
Peter
Kornel Benko wrote:
> Am Sonntag 18 Juli 2010 schrieb Peter Kümmel:
>> Kornel Benko wrote:
> ...
>>> Even if LYX_NLS were set?
>> Ah, shouldn't we then include CPack only when LYX_NLS is set?
>>
>
> After a second thought, I think that having LYX_CPACK option is ok.
>
> This would _imply_ LYX_INS
>
> ...
> /usr/src/lyx/branch-1.6/src/frontends/qt4/GuiSpellchecker.cpp: In member
> function ‘virtual bool lyx::frontend::GuiSpellchecker::eventFilter(QObject*,
> QEvent*)’:
> /usr/src/lyx/branch-1.6/src/frontends/qt4/GuiSpellchecker.cpp:95: error:
> expected unqualified-id before numeric cons
Am Sonntag 18 Juli 2010 schrieb Peter Kümmel:
> Kornel Benko wrote:
...
> > Even if LYX_NLS were set?
>
> Ah, shouldn't we then include CPack only when LYX_NLS is set?
>
After a second thought, I think that having LYX_CPACK option is ok.
This would _imply_ LYX_INSTALL , not the other way.
We c
On Sun, Jul 18, 2010 at 08:44:48AM +0200, Peter Kümmel wrote:
> Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> >> But we could have made a copy of the output for the terminal. If this is
> >> the only remaining issue, then your time was not lost.
> >
> > I think the issue is now fixed.
> >
>
> Ver good, reading yo
On Sun, Jul 18, 2010 at 09:04:03AM +0200, Peter Kümmel wrote:
> Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> > On Sat, Jul 17, 2010 at 07:23:33PM +0200, Pavel Sanda wrote:
> >
> >> Peter Kümmel wrote:
> until we have embdedded .lyx format i would personally stay with gpg
> encrypted
> tgz archive..
Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 17, 2010 at 07:23:33PM +0200, Pavel Sanda wrote:
>
>> Peter Kümmel wrote:
until we have embdedded .lyx format i would personally stay with gpg
encrypted
tgz archive... when you have all the master/child/figures etc plainly
around
t
59 matches
Mail list logo
