Am Sonntag 18 Juli 2010 schrieb Peter Kümmel: > Kornel Benko wrote: > > Am Sonntag 18 Juli 2010 schrieb Peter Kümmel: > >> Kornel Benko wrote: > > ... > > > >>> Even if LYX_NLS were set? > >> > >> Ah, shouldn't we then include CPack only when LYX_NLS is set? > > > > After a second thought, I think that having LYX_CPACK option is ok. > > > > This would _imply_ LYX_INSTALL , not the other way. > > This sound good. > > > We could then also conditionally set the target translations to "ALL" > > again. As of now, translations would not be done, even if LYX_NLS were > > set. But they are needed for the package. > > Why is NLS not enough? But if all it's clear to you please change it. > > Peter
Because I removed the top-level target property from translations. But I have
to do translations for
package at least, not only for update_po_files, and there is no way yet to
create
the correct dependency, because the target "package" is not known at this
position. Sigh.
Kornel
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
