Am 18.07.2010 um 13:51 schrieb Vincent van Ravesteijn:

> Op 18-7-2010 13:49, uwesto...@lyx.org schreef:
>> Author: uwestoehr
>> Date: Sun Jul 18 13:49:34 2010
>> New Revision: 34969
>> URL: http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/34969
>> 
>> Log:
>> GuiWorkArea.cpp: make it compilable
>> 
>> Stephan, please check if this is correct
>> 
>> Modified:
>>    lyx-devel/trunk/src/frontends/qt4/GuiWorkArea.cpp
>> 
>> Modified: lyx-devel/trunk/src/frontends/qt4/GuiWorkArea.cpp
>> ==============================================================================
>> --- lyx-devel/trunk/src/frontends/qt4/GuiWorkArea.cpp        Sun Jul 18 
>> 12:32:54 2010        (r34968)
>> +++ lyx-devel/trunk/src/frontends/qt4/GuiWorkArea.cpp        Sun Jul 18 
>> 13:49:34 2010        (r34969)
>> @@ -820,16 +820,16 @@
>>      bool zoom = false;
>>      switch (lyxrc.scroll_whell_zoom) {
>>      case LyXRC::SCROLL_WHEEL_ZOOM_CTRL:
>> -            zoom = ev->modifiers()&  Qt::ControlModifier;
>> -            zoom&= !(ev->modifiers()&  (Qt::ShiftModifier || 
>> Qt::AltModifier));
>> +            zoom = ev->modifiers()&&  Qt::ControlModifier;
>> +            zoom&= !(ev->modifiers()&&  (Qt::ShiftModifier || 
>> Qt::AltModifier));
>>              break;
>>      case LyXRC::SCROLL_WHEEL_ZOOM_SHIFT:
>> -            zoom = ev->modifiers()&  Qt::ShiftModifier;
>> -            zoom&= !(ev->modifiers()&  (Qt::ControlModifier || 
>> Qt::AltModifier));
>> +            zoom = ev->modifiers()&&  Qt::ShiftModifier;
>> +            zoom&= !(ev->modifiers()&&  (Qt::ControlModifier || 
>> Qt::AltModifier));
>>              break;
>>      case LyXRC::SCROLL_WHEEL_ZOOM_ALT:
>> -            zoom = ev->modifiers()&  Qt::AltModifier;
>> -            zoom&= !(ev->modifiers()&  (Qt::ShiftModifier || 
>> Qt::ControlModifier));
>> +            zoom = ev->modifiers()&&  Qt::AltModifier;
>> +            zoom&= !(ev->modifiers()&&  (Qt::ShiftModifier || 
>> Qt::ControlModifier));
>>              break;
>>      case LyXRC::SCROLL_WHEEL_ZOOM_OFF:
>>              break;
>>   
> 
> This is not correct for sure.

Sorry. I answered to fast. Of course I meant - it worked before.
I don't know why it does not compile for you, Uwe.
Here my version was ok. Now, Vincent is right, it is not correct anymore.

Stephan

Reply via email to