On 5/2/22 10:48, Aere Greenway wrote:
All:
I notice that every time I open the file browser (using detailed-list
view), the horizontal space available for filenames is insufficient,
so I have to move its border to the right, and the file type is way
more than I need, so I have to move its rig
All:
I notice that every time I open the file browser (using detailed-list
view), the horizontal space available for filenames is insufficient, so
I have to move its border to the right, and the file type is way more
than I need, so I have to move its right border to the left.
In the prefere
On Thu, Apr 25, 2019 at 10:28 PM Walter Lapchynski wrote:
> I would argue that if you polled people, you'd find that few people use
> it. That was more of my point.
>
> Furthermore, when's the last time you saw it as the shortcut in the Edit
> menu of a program?
>
I agree. I worded my first post
On Fri, Apr 26, 2019 at 08:52:07AM +0200, Liam Proven wrote:
> On Fri, 26 Apr 2019 at 05:53, Walter Lapchynski wrote:
> > > On Wed, 24 Apr 2019 at 22:01, Walter Lapchynski wrote:
> > > > Heh, shift-insert is not popular among ANY users but it's never used by
> > > > Windows AFAIK.
> It is used in
On Fri, 26 Apr 2019 at 05:53, Walter Lapchynski wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 25, 2019 at 10:04:57AM +0200, Liam Proven wrote:
> > Wrong. It's the original standard shortcut. Shift-Del = Cut, Shift-Ins =
> > Paste.
>
> I would argue that if you polled people, you'd find that few people use
> it. That was
On Thu, Apr 25, 2019 at 10:04:57AM +0200, Liam Proven wrote:
> On Wed, 24 Apr 2019 at 22:01, Walter Lapchynski wrote:
> > Heh, shift-insert is not popular among ANY users but it's never used by
> > Windows AFAIK.
> Wrong. It's the original standard shortcut. Shift-Del = Cut, Shift-Ins =
> Paste.
On Wed, 24 Apr 2019 at 22:01, Walter Lapchynski wrote:
> Heh, shift-insert is not popular among ANY users but it's never used by
> Windows AFAIK.
Wrong. It's the original standard shortcut. Shift-Del = Cut, Shift-Ins = Paste.
It's part of the CUA spec. It's what dictates how all modern GUIs
wor
On 2019-04-24 19:01, Mark F wrote:
> Something else I'm noticing: I have the habit of using shift-insert to
> paste things.
> I'm noticing that Featherpad will change to type-over mode from insert
> mode (as if I pressed the insert key to toggle that mode).
That's a bug, but one that's fixed in t
ht be
just Featherpad, not LXQt.
I thought I would mention this because I think shift-insert is popular
among Windows users? They might be frustrated if forced to do ctrl-v (on
top of all the other frustrations of changing to a new environment). It
could be an impediment to adoption. (I honestly
: 鹿目圆香Gesendet: Donnerstag, 16. November 2017 11:18An: lubuntu-usersBetreff: [lubuntu-users] lxqt的下载地址在哪里，听说都是你们开发的，Lxqt download address where？据说lxde的开发者跟一个其他的项目合并，然后做了一个lxqt，可是我在中国的百度找不到任何下载地址，就算是官方网站，我找了半天也没有看到基于ubantu的套壳系统，你们的lxqt
lxde??lxqtubantu??lxqt
It is said that the developers of lxde with one of the other projects combined,
and then made a lxqt, but I can't
On Aug 16, 2016 1:06 AM, "Narcis Garcia" wrote:
> About Qt:
> Could somebody explain the exact point about reason for transition?
This is ultimately a question for the upstream developers, who now produce
both a GTK and a Qt version. However, most of the focus is on Qt. They have
insisted both wi
ube.
About Qt:
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/9441127/gui-development-qt-vs-gtk
Could somebody explain the exact point about reason for transition?
El 13/08/16 a les 21:20, Simon Quigley ha escrit:
> For those of you who are curious about our LXQt transition, I recently
> wrote a blog post about
Hi Simon,
On 13 August 2016 at 20:20, Simon Quigley wrote:
> For those of you who are curious about our LXQt transition, I recently
> wrote a blog post about it. Here is a link:
> http://tsimonq2.net/blog/2016/08/13/
>
> Let me know what you think.
>
As requested, I read your
For those of you who are curious about our LXQt transition, I recently
wrote a blog post about it. Here is a link:
http://tsimonq2.net/blog/2016/08/13/
Let me know what you think.
--
Simon Quigley
tsimo...@lubuntu.me
tsimonq2 on freenode and OFTC
--
Lubuntu-users mailing list
Lubuntu-users
Oy, sorry about that last email:
I tried out lxqt with i3, and the i3 workstations work with the default
lxqt panel as you probably already know.
Not only that, but the application buttons work too.
Thank you and goodbye.
Looks amazing.
Taylor
On Tue, Aug 9, 2016 at 12:40 AM, Taylor
I humbly suggest a look at the cost and benefits of making i3 easily
incorporated into the LXQT desktop.
This would require programming a plugin for the LXQT toolbar.
Here is this version of a plugin that incorporates into XFCE and Xubuntu:
https://launchpad.net/~aacebedo/+archive/ubuntu/xfce4
o play
> > around with though, to help out that team.
> >
> Do we have any ETA about this migration ? That could be quite
> different if we talk about weeks or years :-)
>
> Also, regarding the documentation of LXQt, IMO no need to rush to
> write some. LXQt may still ch
Hi Boss,
as much as for this reason, having the LXQt wiki area 'sandboxed' in its
own area, away from our LTS's, point releases and standard releases just
makes sense. Our task page[1] is a large enough beast as it is, without
adding a duality which 16.10, 17.04 etc LXQt will brin
rting the Ubuntu Wiki to
> MediaWiki. So while your motivation is greatly appreciated, in my honest
> opinion, we should concentrate our efforts. It would be fun to play
> around with though, to help out that team.
>
Do we have any ETA about this migration ? That could be quite
differen
But let's not assume anything yet. You never know. :)
--
Simon Quigley
tsimo...@ubuntu.com
tsimonq2 on Freenode
--
Lubuntu-users mailing list
Lubuntu-users@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/lubuntu-users
But let's not assume anything yet. You never know. :)
--
Simon Quigley
tsimo...@ubuntu.com
tsimonq2 on Freenode
--
Lubuntu-users mailing list
Lubuntu-users@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/lubuntu-users
It seems that the finer phrasing is irrelevent... 2 votes for moin and
everyone else voting for a fresh, new look.
But, of course, there may be a late rally of moin supporters I've never
run a poll before, it's quite exilerating
Regards,
Phill.
On 10 May 2016 at 06:03, Walter Lapchynsk
Also, this *is* how you use Doodle:
https://doodle.com/poll-maker
On May 9, 2016 8:08 PM, "Simon Quigley" wrote:
> Fine, but that's not how you use Doodle. :)
>
> --
> Simon Quigley
> tsimo...@ubuntu.com
> tsimonq2 on Freenode
>
>
--
Lubuntu-users mailing list
Lubuntu-users@lists.ubuntu.com
Modi
Fb areas and G+ posted it will be very interesting to see how many
people actually give a shit and can be bothered to move a couple of fingers
and make a vote.
I can't recall if we have actually done this since the users voted for a
new drupal theme for lubuntu.net which Mario refused to accep
It works.
On May 9, 2016 8:08 PM, "Simon Quigley" wrote:
> Fine, but that's not how you use Doodle. :)
>
> --
> Simon Quigley
> tsimo...@ubuntu.com
> tsimonq2 on Freenode
>
>
--
Lubuntu-users mailing list
Lubuntu-users@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
https://lists.ubuntu.com
> it.
>>
>> The question:
>> Hi follks, As lubutnu moves from GTK (current) to Qt (LXQt) I propose
>> that we also move our wiki system to MediaWiki and have the moinmoin wiki
>> for the GTK variants.
>> +1 is for us setting up the new wiki area for Qt
>&g
Fine, but that's not how you use Doodle. :)
--
Simon Quigley
tsimo...@ubuntu.com
tsimonq2 on Freenode
--
Lubuntu-users mailing list
Lubuntu-users@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/lubuntu-users
That is unfortunate as I'm pasting doodle to all our social media areas.
Phill.
On 10 May 2016 at 04:03, Simon Quigley wrote:
> Doodle is not an online community. It's a polling spot.
>
> And either way, I think Walter misspoke. Doodle is for scheduling, not
> polling.
>
> I've just given up an
gt;> 7,769 members
>>> <https://www.facebook.com/groups/lubuntu.official/members/>(102 new)
>>> <https://www.facebook.com/groups/lubuntu.official/#>
>>>
>>> just under 8,000 people.. let the vote go for 24 hours and we will
>>> accept it.
>&g
Doodle is not an online community. It's a polling spot.
And either way, I think Walter misspoke. Doodle is for scheduling, not
polling.
I've just given up and used Google Forms: http://goo.gl/forms/l5LjivGYUJ
--
Simon Quigley
tsimo...@ubuntu.com
tsimonq2 on Freenode
--
Lubuntu-users mailing l
le.. let the vote go for 24 hours and we will accept
>> it.
>>
>> The question:
>> Hi follks, As lubutnu moves from GTK (current) to Qt (LXQt) I propose
>> that we also move our wiki system to MediaWiki and have the moinmoin wiki
>> for the GTK variants.
>> +1 is fo
e question:
> Hi follks, As lubutnu moves from GTK (current) to Qt (LXQt) I
> propose that we also move our wiki system to MediaWiki and have the
> moinmoin wiki for the GTK variants.
> +1 is for us setting up the new wiki area for Qt
> -1 is for us keep using moin
Poll or MediaWiki? Because the latter would be a waste of time and effort
because we haven't decided on anything yet.
--
Simon Quigley
tsimo...@ubuntu.com
tsimonq2 on Freenode
--
Lubuntu-users mailing list
Lubuntu-users@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
https://lists.ubuntu.
I was not aware it was a vote let me set one up for everyone to be
aware of.
Phillw
On 10 May 2016 at 03:22, Walter Lapchynski wrote:
> So what I hear is, on the proposal of making a separate wiki server for
> LXQt, the voting is as follows:
>
> In favor: 1
> Against:
So what I hear is, on the proposal of making a separate wiki server for
LXQt, the voting is as follows:
In favor: 1
Against: 2
How does everyone else vote?
On May 9, 2016 7:18 PM, "Phill. Whiteside" wrote:
> Hi Walter,
>
> we have exactly ONE page for LXQt How is h
Hi Walter,
we have exactly ONE page for LXQt How is having two operating systems
running side by side a better case of having two wiki areas? We are
committed to Qt and it appears Ubuntu are committed to moving from Moinmoin
to MediaWiki. Have a look at
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Lubuntu
n
> Fedora guys is foolish. They posted their notes up so as to help others
> facing the nightmare.
>
> But, as the two of you are 100% against everything I suggest, I'll just go
> 'meh' and work with debian-lxqt which you may find is the upstream
> requirements
with
MediaWiki is foolish. Any one who thinks Canonical IS are smarter than
Fedora guys is foolish. They posted their notes up so as to help others
facing the nightmare.
But, as the two of you are 100% against everything I suggest, I'll just go
'meh' and work with debian-lxqt which you may
Greetings,
On 05/09/16 20:14, Walter Lapchynski wrote:
> I'm up for what the boss, i.e. the team, agrees on, too. My vote is to
> continue to use Moin. Ubuntu is done with it and are working on fixing
> the scripts so they can move entirely over to MediaWiki. Everything
> already on Moin will get
I'm up for what the boss, i.e. the team, agrees on, too. My vote is to
continue to use Moin. Ubuntu is done with it and are working on fixing the
scripts so they can move entirely over to MediaWiki. Everything already on
Moin will get magically converted. If we make our own thing, we have
administr
Well,
it is vote time. I'm for not the fact that even fedora devs had a makeshift
script to convert things from moin to mediawiki[1] Any one wanting to make
a new project under moinmoin is making for more work in the future. But,
I'm up for what the boss says.
https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/MoinM
IMHO we should write everything in MoinMoin then wait for the conversion so
people can still view the wiki now and continue to hack on it but when the
conversion runs, we have everything already available and set in place.
--
Simon Quigley
tsimo...@ubuntu.com
tsimonq2 on Freenode
--
Lubuntu-
So, simon... have LXQt under moin and await transfer to MediaWiki, or make
it MediaWiki from the outset?
IMHO, we go for for MediaWiki from the 1st page.
Phill.
On 10 May 2016 at 01:41, Simon Quigley wrote:
> Phill,
>
> On 05/09/16 19:06, Phill. Whiteside wrote:
> > As part of
Phill,
On 05/09/16 19:06, Phill. Whiteside wrote:
> As part of this testing, I will be making a server available for
> Mediawiki just the same as a WordPress one looks after our lubuntu site
> [2] We have tried to make moin 'sexy'[3] but let us not be under any
> illusion, moin wiki looks like a d
u themselves are now considering a change. This would be a complete
nightmare for existing wiki pages to be moved., But we have a chance to
switch out LXQt to MediaWiki, this supports a downloadable e-book and
translations as is shown on this site[1].
As part of this testing, I will be making a server ava
That's not good enough. Plus, we need something relatively stable for the time
being. Hence my PPA was created.
--
Simon Quigley
tsimo...@ubuntu.com
tsimonq2 on Freenode
--
Lubuntu-users mailing list
Lubuntu-users@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/m
Hence the big red warning message that was at
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/phillw/LXQt#Installing_LXQt_on_fresh_system
:D
Phill.
On 25 April 2016 at 18:36, Simon Quigley wrote:
> This was what I was trying to say,
>
> --
> Simon Quigley
> tsimo...@ubuntu.com
> tsimonq2 on Freenod
This was what I was trying to say,
--
Simon Quigley
tsimo...@ubuntu.com
tsimonq2 on Freenode
--
Lubuntu-users mailing list
Lubuntu-users@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/lubuntu-users
I'll try to check this week. In the meantime, please try to apply this :
If people want stable LXQt, don't use the daily PPA, upgrade to Xenial and
use official repository. Most people should use this, and there is a LXQt
metapackage.
If people want dev version of LXQt (git snapshot
Well that is what the instructions are doing. Are you implying saying
basically, "tl;dr install the package and you are good"?
--
Simon Quigley
tsimo...@ubuntu.com
tsimonq2 on Freenode
--
Lubuntu-users mailing list
Lubuntu-users@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
https://lists.u
Perhaps it would be good to explain that this metapackage does in one step
what the directions proceeding do?
On Apr 24, 2016 21:48, "Simon Quigley" wrote:
> I've modified the wiki page[1] to state:
>
> "At this time, we are waiting for the LXQt metapackage t
I've modified the wiki page[1] to state:
"At this time, we are waiting for the LXQt metapackage to be included in the
Ubuntu repositories. For now, use the ppa:tsimonq2/lxqt-meta PPA for an
up-to-date metapackage. The purpose of this PPA is to simplify installing the
packages require
wiki page for example and me posting this
> thread because the use of this meta (for a new install and upgrade)
> resulted in both cases in an inferior result as if I used the Daily
> Build.
>
> I guess my point is , both seems to be as " *not* wise at all to
> recommend it in *any
Greetings,
This was a simple issue on my part, that was easily solved. His PPA has a lot
more things to worry about. Also, my package is relatively stable. If you wish
to grab the source and take a look for yourself, go right ahead.
--
Simon Quigley
tsimo...@ubuntu.com
tsimonq2 on Freenode
-
nferior result as if I used the Daily
Build.
I guess my point is , both seems to be as " *not* wise at all to
recommend it in *any* *way* to people wanting to try out LXQt. "
I guess it gives some sort of choice. And people can *risk* either of
the two PPA I guess...
As for me, objectiv
Thank you Simon,
I do not have system to upgrade anymore so I won't have a chance to
test. But If I find some time I'll try to do a fresh install in a VM.
On Sun, Apr 24, 2016 at 8:35 PM, Simon Quigley wrote:
> Greetings,
>
> I found out what the problem was and I have adjusted the wiki pag
unt of packages compiled by hand and thrown into a PPA
when we already have packages in the repositories, especially when the PPA
breaks every so often just isn't worth it to use. I think the reason why the
packages are in there(I could be wrong) was because we were waiting for LXQt
packages
eeness, but when faced with "it doesn't work" I ran
> https://wiki.ubuntu.com/phillw/LXQt#Installing_LXQt_on_fresh_system
>
> and it worked. My reasoning is therefore that we should stick to a proven
> working system that will, after all, be what Julien pushes forward for
>
ate the keeness, but when faced with "it doesn't work" I ran
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/phillw/LXQt#Installing_LXQt_on_fresh_system
and it worked. My reasoning is therefore that we should stick to a proven
working system that will, after all, be what Julien pushes forward for
adoption.
hi,
I do appreciate the keeness, but when faced with "it doesn't work" I ran
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/phillw/LXQt#Installing_LXQt_on_fresh_system
and it worked. My reasoning is therefore that we should stick to a proven
working system that will, after all, be what Julien pus
Do you know what steps, if any, have been taken to resolve this in the
daily PPA? If not, we should make that a priority to have fixed.
On Apr 24, 2016 13:17, "Simon Quigley" wrote:
> The Lubuntu PPA has the metapackage, but it has other packages that in my
> experience have caused conflicts. The
The Lubuntu PPA has the metapackage, but it has other packages that in my
experience have caused conflicts. The PPA is just a single, clean instance that
takes packages from Ubuntu.
--
Simon Quigley
tsimo...@ubuntu.com
tsimonq2 on Freenode
--
Lubuntu-users mailing list
Lubuntu-users@lists.ub
e lubuntu
> ppa which is more recognisable than a single person's ppa
>
> I followed
> https://wiki.ubuntu.com/phillw/LXQt#Installing_LXQt_on_fresh_system last
> night (an earlier edition of the page) and it worked fine.
>
> Regards.
>
> Phill.
>
> On 24 April 2016 at
Hi Simon,
in that case, would you revert the instructions back to using the lubuntu
ppa which is more recognisable than a single person's ppa
I followed
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/phillw/LXQt#Installing_LXQt_on_fresh_system last
night (an earlier edition of the page) and it worked fine.
Re
Greetings,
I found out what the problem was and I have adjusted the wiki page.
The difference from the daily PPA and my PPA is that my PPA is *just* the
metapackage and the daily PPA has more than that.
--
Simon Quigley
tsimo...@ubuntu.com
tsimonq2 on Freenode
--
Lubuntu-users mailing list
Hello
Please, check the attached log.txt. There is log for Russian locale but it
is common dependency issue.
Also, I Installed the latest ubuntu and it works fine.
Thanks,
2016-04-23 17:05 GMT+03:00 Simon Quigley :
> Greetings,
>
> Do you have the exact dep errors and commands you ran? I would
@Simon .Thank you but like I said I found the issue. one or all of
these 3 were missing after installing the metapackage . libkf5screen6
and/or libkf5screen-dev and/or libkf5screen-bin.
As far as the command I ran they were simple copy and paste from the wiki page.
After that I started to trouble
Could you possibly translate that for us? Seems there's an error with
configuring pkgsel, though. Did you look into that?
On Apr 23, 2016 12:02, "Илья Куделин" wrote:
> Hello
>
> Please, check the attached log.txt. There is log for Russian locale but it
> is common dependency issue.
>
> Also, I I
Greetings,
Do you have the exact dep errors and commands you ran? I would be able to
assist if you had that.
--
Simon Quigley
tsimo...@ubuntu.com
tsimonq2 on Freenode
--
Lubuntu-users mailing list
Lubuntu-users@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mai
So usually I use this repo to do my installs
https://launchpad.net/~lubuntu-dev/+archive/ubuntu/lubuntu-daily
But as expected for a dev daily build it can break. So for more
comfort I went to the wiki :
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Lubuntu/LXQt
Witch has a nice easy to read howto . I upgraded to
Le 10 mars 2016 12:24 AM, "Walter Lapchynski" a écrit :
>
> As I hope you know, we're planning on having [LXQt][1] be the default
desktop in the 16.10 (Y-Cycle) version.
To be more realistic, we are planning to have a LXQt version of Lubuntu
available for 16.10. For the
As I hope you know, we're planning on having [LXQt][1] be the default
desktop in the 16.10 (Y-Cycle) version. Much progress has been made towards
getting LXQt in the Xenial repos and easily installable for testing
purposes (if you want more info on the development here, make sure to watc
Hi,
Just a notice that I'm currently working on the Lubuntu daily PPA to
improve the maintenance of the builds, for now only for LXQt packages
(I'll work eventually on the LXDE ones later). For any users, it
should be pretty invisible (I try ...), but there is some details :
- The d
f you are sure it's an upstream issue, you can report it on
https://github.com/LXDE/lxqt/issues (you can chat with LXQt people on
IRC to check) But I advise you to report it first to Launchpad if you
are unsure.
Thanks in advance for your help on testing.
Regards,
Julien Lavergne
--
Lub
gt;
> Regards,
> Julien Lavergne
>
> 2015-08-31 20:27 GMT+02:00 rcmn73 :
> > I think this message is mostly a question for Julien (gilir). So I have
> been
> > using mini install + lxqt for about a year an a half or more on my main
> > machine.And it works, but it does tak
o I have been
> using mini install + lxqt for about a year an a half or more on my main
> machine.And it works, but it does take more than the usual 20min of a plain
> iso install. I wish I could just benefit from your effort with the ISO build
> .Unfortunately it's a 32bit build .
much
time and I simply install lubuntu and added LXQT repo. I though it was
a little silly since I had no difficulties previously.
Anyway I know that (gilir) has a 32bit iso being built \ rebuilt
regularly and I thought maybe someone had the same with a 64bit.
It's fine. I'll wait for an offi
your part.
On 09/22/2015 12:40 PM, rcmn73 wrote:
> Anyone on this ?
>
> On Mon, Aug 31, 2015 at 2:27 PM, rcmn73 wrote:
>> I think this message is mostly a question for Julien (gilir). So I have been
>> using mini install + lxqt for about a year an a half or more on my main
&g
Anyone on this ?
On Mon, Aug 31, 2015 at 2:27 PM, rcmn73 wrote:
> I think this message is mostly a question for Julien (gilir). So I have been
> using mini install + lxqt for about a year an a half or more on my main
> machine.And it works, but it does take more than the usual 20min o
I think this message is mostly a question for Julien (gilir). So I have
been using mini install + lxqt for about a year an a half or more on my
main machine.And it works, but it does take more than the usual 20min of a
plain iso install. I wish I could just benefit from your effort with the
ISO
On Sat, May 9, 2015 at 7:34 AM, Walter Lapchynski wrote:
> LXQt is still relatively early in development. Things will improve.
>
> However, the future of LXDE on any distro doesn't look good. Upstream
> development has transitioned almost entirely to LXQt.
>
Not really.
Deve
LXQt is still relatively early in development. Things will improve.
However, the future of LXDE on any distro doesn't look good. Upstream
development has transitioned almost entirely to LXQt.
Patches welcome and all, though. :)
@wxl | http://polka.bike
Lubuntu Release Manager, Head of QA
U
Hello!
Walter Lapchynski has written on Monday, 4 May, at 15:45:
>Our [Show and Tell session for LXQt][1] at the Ubuntu Online Session
>will be at 1800 UTC Thursday 7 May 2015. It was originally the day
>before but we pushed it out to the last day of the session to allow us
>a
Andrej N. Gritsenko schreef op 5-5-2015 om 01:57:
Hello!
Just as from point of view from someone who sometimes install Lubuntu on
users machines, especially for those users who migrate from Windows. If
you plan to set Lubuntu to lxqt and abandon lxde then I would say, that
is very early
Our [Show and Tell session for LXQt][1] at the Ubuntu Online Session
will be at 1800 UTC Thursday 7 May 2015. It was originally the day
before but we pushed it out to the last day of the session to allow us
a little extra time to get a new ISO spun up.
Please come join and ask questions, whether
First, this is probably best for the lubuntu-qa list which I have
cc'd. Secondly it's hard to fix problems if we know only that there
are problems. Knowing the specific nature of the problem is essential,
so we need some more detail.
Henk Terhell wrote:
>> - vivid vervet with
Henk Terhell schreef op 22-12-2014 om 16:01:
Recent updates received had some impacts.
Here all my current partitions with Lubuntu on 2 PC's:
PC #1 - 32 bit:
- vivid vervet with LXQt was OK but crashed two days ago during
updating and is no longer bootable not even in recovery mode
-
Recent updates received had some impacts.
Here all my current partitions with Lubuntu on 2 PC's:
PC #1 - 32 bit:
- vivid vervet with LXQt was OK but crashed two days ago during updating
and is no longer bootable not even in recovery mode
- vivid vervet is OK. I tried now to install
Cannot help you as I had no trouble installing this ISO on disk and I
don't use (never do) the live CD.
For me it is more fun to watch how LXQt is developing on Lubuntu 15.04
Vivid Vervet, though it brings along some duplicate menu entries and
updating needs some care (I learned not t
Hi,
RE: https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/lubuntu-users/2014-October/008662.html
I tried to use your .iso prototype a couple of days ago. I wasn't able
to get it to install. I was given the message:
(GDBus.ERROR:org.freedesktop.DBUS.Error.ServiceUnknown:
The Name org.freedesktop.PolicyKit1 w
Hi,
thanks for your thoughts on this, I've posted it upstream to the dev area
so that they can add it to the massive TODO list of what we use on LXQt.
As you are interested in testing things, please make contact with wxl[1],
who is TL for testing.
Regards,
Phill.
1. https://wiki.ubuntu.co
Have now newly installed on disk Lubuntu 15.04 daily build with LXQt.
This works fine so far, though there are of course still LXQt issues to
be solved and there are some double menu entries. An earlier
installation of L.14.10 with LXQt worked as well but LXQt failed after
trying to upgrade
Am Samstag, 8. November 2014 16:55:05 CEST schrieb Julien Lavergne:
2014-11-05 13:04 GMT+01:00 Jörn Schönyan :
Hello Julien and everyone else!
Am Dienstag, 4. November 2014 23:29:13 CEST schrieb Julien Lavergne:
2014-10-28 10:43 GMT+01:00 Julien Lavergne :
Just an updates for the ISO. The las
2014-11-05 13:04 GMT+01:00 Jörn Schönyan :
> Hello Julien and everyone else!
>
> Am Dienstag, 4. November 2014 23:29:13 CEST schrieb Julien Lavergne:
>>
>> 2014-10-28 10:43 GMT+01:00 Julien Lavergne :
>>
>> Just an updates for the ISO. The last one is Qt5 only, and KDE free,
>> which make it quite
Ian:
I marked this bug as affecting me too, and posted additional information
that might be helpful in solving it.
It is particularly troubling that 14.10 aborts loading the system on
getting a render from the internal Intel graphics card - even though it
is disabled in the BIOS setup.
It
Hi,
About Aere's problems...
I have some old Dell Optiplex desktop PCs with Intel i810 chipsets in them.
I don't want to throw them away. I am working on chasing down the problem
and finding a fix to it. I'm good with C, rusty with x86 assembler and
don't know much about Linux Device driver progr
, but no way to test anything. I'll
have to wait until an iso is available, not enough skilz to compile a
system from "scratch" and test . . . but, it's looking like the
AmigaOne guys will have to pick up the hammer on testing LXQT for PPC
. . . .
Fritz:
I have a low-e
ve to wait until an iso is
available, not enough skilz to compile a system from "scratch" and test . .
. but, it's looking like the AmigaOne guys will have to pick up the hammer
on testing LXQT for PPC . . . .
F
--
Lubuntu-users mailing list
Lubuntu-users@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/lubuntu-users
Am Mittwoch, 5. November 2014 18:05:44 CEST schrieb Fritz Hudnut:
Question, I went to the LXQT site yesterday to see what the
buzz is about . . . assuming that it is not available for PPC .
. . what will the minimum system requirements be???
Hi Fritz,
that is a valid question, but one
1 - 100 of 159 matches
Mail list logo
