I'll leave it, as you do not understand what I'm saying... the lubuntu ppa will be the one used by julien... So, we should be using that one for testers.....
But?... meh :D Phill. On 24 April 2016 at 21:27, Walter Lapchynski <w...@ubuntu.com> wrote: > Yeah the problem from the OP is the daily PPA. Simon's causes no such > problems. Thus, while you're thinking is not wrong, it's not relevant. If > anything, we should warn people not to use the daily PPA. > On Apr 24, 2016 1:22 PM, "Phill. Whiteside" <phill...@gmail.com> wrote: > > hi, > > I do appreciate the keeness, but when faced with "it doesn't work" I ran > https://wiki.ubuntu.com/phillw/LXQt#Installing_LXQt_on_fresh_system > > and it worked. My reasoning is therefore that we should stick to a proven > working system that will, after all, be what Julien pushes forward for > adoption. Asking for updates to that PPA should be a concentration, not > trying to run a system that will not be the one that goes forward for > adoption. > > Just my 2 cents worth. > > Regards, > > Phill. > > On 24 April 2016 at 21:17, Simon Quigley <tsimo...@ubuntu.com> wrote: > >> The Lubuntu PPA has the metapackage, but it has other packages that in my >> experience have caused conflicts. The PPA is just a single, clean instance >> that takes packages from Ubuntu. >> >> -- >> Simon Quigley >> tsimo...@ubuntu.com >> tsimonq2 on Freenode >> >> >
-- Lubuntu-users mailing list Lubuntu-users@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/lubuntu-users
