gt; Ubuntu Member
>
>
> --
> loco-contacts mailing list
> loco-contacts@lists.ubuntu.com
> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/loco-contacts
>
Cristian,
You, and the Ubuntu Community in Chile will be in my thoughts.
You have the most heart-felt sympathy from the Ohio Local Co
On Fri, Mar 5, 2010 at 8:33 PM, || स्वक्ष || wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I noticed a site that scrapes most ubuntu blogs/planets at
> http://ubuntu.kelate.com.my/
>
> Since the scraper does not provide any linkbacks to the original blog
> post and claims to be a ubuntu-loco site, I wanted to raise this on
>
On Thu, Apr 1, 2010 at 4:14 PM, Ddorda wrote:
> Hello everyone!
> Just want to announce that I am the new PoC of The Israeli LoCo. if you need
> something, don't be shy to mail me!
> Good 1st April everyone (yes, i know - good timing :D)
> Dor.
> --
> loco-contacts mailing list
> loco-contacts@lis
On Sun, Apr 4, 2010 at 6:05 PM, Efrain Valles wrote:
> I would like to salute everyone out there representing Ubuntu in
> events around the globe. With this email, The Venezuelan Team seeks a
> bit of council with regards the things we go through when we decide to
> go out and promote Ubuntu in ou
re support and support for more than 4 GiB of RAM.
the PAE kernel is not half bad ;)
>
> Regards,
> --
> Sense Hofstede
> [ˈsɛn.sə ˈɦɔf.steː.də]
>
> --
> loco-contacts mailing list
> loco-contacts@lists.ubuntu.com
> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/loco-contacts
>
All the best,
Paul Tagliamonte
--
#define sizeof(x) rand()
:wq
--
loco-contacts mailing list
loco-contacts@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/loco-contacts
On Wed, Apr 7, 2010 at 11:01 AM, Alan Pope wrote:
> On 7 April 2010 15:52, David Rubin wrote:
>> They have never shipped 64bit in the past, I would still recommend
>> only shipping the 32bit because generally these CD's are to give away
>> at events and to newbie users who might not have 64bit PC
On Wed, Apr 7, 2010 at 11:15 AM, Aaron Toponce wrote:
> I find this unfortunate. By not shipping 64-bit, you're hindering 64-bit
> penetration in the market. Just as an FYI- HPUX, Solaris, Irix, AIX, and
> many "enterprise" UNIX vendors have been 64-bit for years and years. Even
> Apple recognizes
/wiki.ubuntu.com/LoCoCouncil/Agenda/20100420
[1]: http://www.ubuntu.com/community/leadership-conduct
Feedback, as always, is welcome.
Humbly,
Paul Tagliamonte, on behalf of the LoCo Council
--
#define sizeof(x) rand()
:wq
--
loco-contacts mailing list
loco-contacts@lists.ubuntu.com
https:
ly the greater
> community will only hear a blog post or two about the theft and go on
> with their lives after saying 'Oh that's too bad $LOCO_TEAM'.
Yes, but at least we have a document that we can say they breached.
Right now it is literally "Oh that's too
On Sat, May 8, 2010 at 6:06 PM, Brandon Tomlinson wrote:
> On Sat, 2010-05-08 at 16:56 -0500, Jacob Isreal wrote:
>> I see that there is no one manning the state of Texas in the South
>> Central LoCo group and I'd like to volunteer. You can set me as the
>> contact and I will perform the steps in
On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 11:20 AM, Randall Ross wrote:
> This "bad behaviour" of shipping companies is becoming quite annoying, and
> is frankly unethical.
It's not the shippers responsibility to pay import taxes. Technically
it's the receivers. Everything has been done that can be done, but
count
On Wed, May 12, 2010 at 9:35 AM, Daniel Stone
wrote:
> Well this is news to me also as I see the wiki activity started 3 years ago.
> I was confused thinking that you were referring to Texas.
> Either way this is a large region and contains many teams already in place.
> Not to say that you are no
ons.
We have broken the guide into three areas, what we would suggest teams
do on a Monthly basis, Cycle based and on a Long Term goal. This will
help you plan and set goals to work towards.
Feel free to poke any council member with questions or concerns
-Paul Tagliamonte
On behalf of the L
From #ubuntu-us-ma:
Jun 08 17:10:13Ubuntu LoCo's primary goal is to promote
ubuntu think of it as Canonical's free, community-based
advertising
Jun 08 17:10:21it's not a FLOSS group
Jun 08 17:10:26it's an ubuntu group
Jun 08 17:11:31that's like telling a chevy
Then you can start a LUG. LoCo are for Ubuntu :)
On Tue, Jun 8, 2010 at 5:20 PM, Danny Piccirillo
wrote:
> This isn't about undermining Ubuntu. If you only care about Ubuntu, and not
> about free software, sure, but i think that most of us do.
>
> On Tue, Jun 8, 2010 at 17:16, David Overcash
> w
http://pingfmmedia.s3.amazonaws.com/img/szMG036m/DV8Lu27EB4hkBW2i.jpg
Looks like a LoCo to me :)
-Paul
On Wed, Jun 9, 2010 at 9:59 AM, Alan Pope wrote:
> Hi Martin,
>
> On 9 June 2010 14:07, Martin Owens wrote:
>> Clarification on the current state of the Massachusetts LoCo team and
>> the tar
As a KDE user ( on a few boxes, but not all of 'em ;) ) I'm really
stoked to see this.
Thanks for this work, Dave :)
-Paul
On Wed, Jun 9, 2010 at 9:13 PM, David Wonderly wrote:
> Greetings:
>
> My name is David Wonderly and I am working with the Kubuntu-devel team trying
> to start a small cont
s a lot of teams, so please double check.
Find your team on the list here[1], and check.
Thanks,
Paul Tagliamonte
On Behalf of the LoCo Council
[1]: https://launchpad.net/~locoteams-approved/+members#active
--
#define sizeof(x) rand()
:wq
--
loco-contacts mailing list
loco-contacts@lists.ubuntu
Reapproval info can be found at
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/LoCoCouncil/LoCoTeamReApproval
Thanks!
Paul
On Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 7:58 AM, Khairul Aizat Kamarudzzaman
wrote:
> how do i contact Christophe Sauthier (huats) ? Because he is the contact
> person for the Malaysia Team. We (Ubuntu-my) jus
Hey Contacts,
Don't worry! This email is nice and routine. No one is going to expire
from Launchpad ;)
Meeting logs and minutes have been posted. somewhere around here[1].
Read the cliff-notes up on the top.
Thanks, guys ( and gals! )!
:-Paul
[1]: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/LoCoCouncil/Agenda/201
Unless a bunny is being shot every time someone posts #locoteams on
twitter, I don't think it's a big deal. More then anything else, Free
software is about providing alternatives. Let's not be draconian in
our policy.
Let's also drop the F/OSS vs Commercial debate. Yes, nonfree filth
sucks, but th
Just FYI via debian-mentors ;)
http://twitter.com/about/opensource
OK. Let's get back on topic. Use the hashtag no matter what platform
you are on when you tweet loco stuff.
Thanks guys, you all rock :)
-Tag
On Wed, Jun 23, 2010 at 11:28 AM, Michael wrote:
> Gwibber is nice enough to group d
Already forwarded, thanks a ton Chaz :)
We'll get back to you, Bilal
-Paul
On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 4:44 PM, wrote:
> You need to bring your concerns to the loco-council mailing list.
> loco-councillists.ubuntu.com
>
> You can also talk to them in their IRC channel.
>
> You can find specific p
Not every message sent to this list is moderated, that basically means
that anyone with an email could post to this list ( in theory ).
The spam-filter takes care of damn near 100% of the spam.
The spam-filters in Debian reject 95% of incoming mail. Not incoming
spam mail, but incoming mail.
Tha
On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 8:30 PM, Martin Owens wrote:
> Hey everyone,
>
> A followup from my last email about the status of the Massachusetts
> team.
>
> A few people were upset about my honesty with the loco council with
> regards to the activities of the LoCo team and felt that I was trying to
>
Fixed :)
BTW, for future teams -- since this issue had effected 90% of the
teams or so, feel free to instead email the loco-council mailing list,
or myself
Thanks!
-Paul
On Fri, Jul 23, 2010 at 6:12 PM, Indigo196 wrote:
> Hello all:
>
> The expiration date and re-approval date of New York State
On Fri, Jul 23, 2010 at 11:29 AM, Neil Coetzer wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> This is possibly not the right place to ask, so forgive me if this is
> the case.
Bah, just ask! :)
>
> I'm doing a "review" of LoCo Team members who have joined up on our
> Launchpad page, but haven't been active or visible sin
there an email address for contact.
>
> Thanks.
>
> [0]https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-lococouncil
>
> On Fri, 23 Jul 2010, Paul Tagliamonte wrote:
>
>> Fixed :)
>>
>> BTW, for future teams -- since this issue had effected 90% of the
>> teams or so, feel
Please keep the subject the same as the email thread, this looks like
a new thread.
2010/7/24 Daniel Van‵Stone :
> To:loco-contacts@lists.ubuntu.com>
> Dear loco-contacts and other subscribers to this list,
>
> In the end it boils down to the view of the Council.
>
> While we may each have our bel
On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 10:30 AM, Martin Owens wrote:
> Dear LoCo Council,
>
> Monthly reports would be much better automatically generated by a
> combination of the event organiser on the loco directory and a simple
> blog system that did not have to be manually tied into the greater blog
> netwo
Looks great
-Paul
2010/8/9 László Torma :
> Hi!
> Ubuntu Maverick Meerkat is on the corner but there is still a lot to do:
> there are still many strings to translate, many bugs to triage and solve,
> and many apps to be packaged. The Ubuntu Global Jam is a great opportunity
> to work togethe
Heyya LoCo Teams,
Please donate a few minutes of your time to translate classbot[1], so
we can start having a truly global way to hold classes! There are
about 25 short strings, you do more then that in an email!
It would be great if each loco ( who speaks a language other then
English ) to revie
>>
>> Message: 1
>> Date: Thu, 12 Aug 2010 20:49:37 +0800
>> From: Aron Xu
>> Subject: Re: We need your help!
>> To: "Ubuntu local community team (LoCo) contacts"
>>
>> Message-ID:
>>
>> Content-Type: t
I'm on my android, please excuse its handling of emails.
On Aug 14, 2010 10:00 PM, "Nathan Haines" wrote:
> On 08/14/2010 06:53 PM, Paul Tagliamonte wrote:
>> Also, don't respond to the mailing list if you receive a digest, it
>> creates a new thread.
>
Hey Contacts,
I'd like to kick off a discussion, if I could.
Bug #392986[1] was filed a while ago. I just closed it, and figured we
can actually, well, follow through with this.
The bug is about how LoCos are not Local enough. I closed the bug with
the note that we would adopt a best practices l
local teams hobbles our marketing efforts,
> our visibility in the community, and possibly more. Our mindshare may be
> shrinking for the first time in history...
>
> Which problem do you all feel we trying to solve?
How do you feel about my tweek?
>
> Cheers,
> Randall
&
ountry level.
How it breaks up ( county / city / lat & lon ) is really up to the
team it's self IMHO.
>
> Cheers,
> Randall.
>
> --
>
>
> On 10-08-23 06:35 PM, Paul Tagliamonte wrote:
>> On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 9:30 PM, Randall Ross wrote:
>>
>>
Ah, are you talking about UDS Sponsorship?
That's for a single person to attend UDS, not a conference pack request :)
conference packs are still unavailable, we'll update this list when
you can start ordering again
Thanks, Dirk,
Paul
On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 7:38 AM, Maria Randazzo
wrote:
> I w
Hey all, I'm going to pop the conversation stack, then push back out :)
On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 5:10 AM, Valorie Zimmerman
wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 5:35 PM, Paul Tagliamonte wrote:
>> Hey Contacts,
>>
>> I'd like to kick off a discussion, if I could.
&
On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 12:52 PM, Darcy Casselman wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 5:10 AM, Valorie Zimmerman
> wrote:
>> Hey Paul, we are dealing with these issues while trying to kick-start
>> Washington LoCo into life again. It was originally registered by the
>> official Contact who lives in
So ( wiping the thread of back text )
Can anyone think of reasons that creating a standard that dictates
that LoCo teams must foster growth at the lowest granularity possible
for their region?
Can someone draft up a basic standard and post it here for revision,
for eventual adoption?
-Paul
--
On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 12:54 PM, Nathan Haines wrote:
> On Thu, 2010-08-26 at 07:42 -0400, Paul Tagliamonte wrote:
>> Can anyone think of reasons that creating a standard that dictates
>> that LoCo teams must foster growth at the lowest granularity possible
>> for their
On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 1:22 PM, Randall Ross wrote:
> On 10-08-26 10:13 AM, Paul Tagliamonte wrote:
>> Can anyone think of reasons against creating this standard *
>
> I can.
>
> We still don't have consensus on a problem statement, yet we seem to be
> proposing wor
On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 1:34 PM, Elizabeth Krumbach wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 10:13 AM, Paul Tagliamonte wrote:
>> Does anyone disagree with coming to the conclusion that we need to
>> make sure a LoCo focuses on a whole state and not just one city in a
>> state? --
extension the broader Ubuntu community and
> Canonical."
Looks fantastic and 100% on target to me.
+1
>
> Can we seek consensus that this is indeed the problem that this thread
> is trying to solve.
>
> Either vote +1, -1 ?
>
> Cheers,
> Randall
>
>
> On 10
Hey Contacts,
We'll be working on a new project ( which I'd like to call 'Operation:
Wiki-Dekruft' in a hopeless effort to make it sound like something fun
) to ensure the Wiki is up-to-date.
There's a lot out there, and we're migrating over to the LoCo
Directory[1], just in case you've not figur
On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 3:49 PM, Nathan Haines wrote:
> On Thu, 2010-08-26 at 13:13 -0400, Paul Tagliamonte wrote:
>> I'd think this issue would hit close to home -- California had some
>> rough times regarding not focusing on the whole state a while back.
>
> I wouldn&#
On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 3:47 PM, Ralph Janke wrote:
> Something that could be part of the Global Jam this weekend?
That's the idea! ( You forgot the spice-words ( Sha-zam! ) )
>
> Ralph (txwikinger)
>
> On 08/26/2010 02:42 PM, Paul Tagliamonte wrote:
>> Hey Contacts,
&
Filing a launchpad answers might be the best way -- I think only the
registry can do it
-Paul
On Tue, Oct 19, 2010 at 2:01 AM, abgalphabet
wrote:
> I have created wiki, irc, forum, mailing list, etc.. resources according
> to Ubuntu LoCo HowTo guidelines.
> I also create a loco team (named hongk
On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 12:40 PM, Belinda Lopez
wrote:
> I know many of you have helped organize weekend conferences. I just
> started working Shaun McCance of the GNOME project and Anne Gentle from
> the OLPC project, to help organize an event aimed at documentation in
> FLOSS. We're targeting
Congrats, Sense!
I know you'll do great! Thanks to Dennis for his hard work!
Viva La Ubuntu!
-Paul
On Sat, Oct 30, 2010 at 11:36 AM, Sense Hofstede wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Because the previous contact, Dennis Kaarsemaker, found himself in a
> situation in which he didn't have time to spend on Ubunt
Good luck, and congrats!
-Paul
On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 3:45 PM, Nizar Kerkeni wrote:
> Salam/Hello
> I am pleased to announce that Zied Alaya was elected to be the new LoCo
> Contact for the Tunisian LoCo team!
> Zied was one of the founders of our LoCo and actively participated to our
> approva
y
* Michael Gilbert
Paul Tagliamonte,
Contact Emeritus, Ubuntu Ohio
[1]: https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-us-ohio-council
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
iEYEARECAAYFAkz38p4ACgkQ9+vujreYIyl5ZQCePBtyOQZL+snz9TPAhT+9IRVn
p9oAn1HKnTVUH0Kzwfu4Jp9zrPFjjttp
=SYtl
--
Hello, World!
I've come to announce that the LD now has the release party global
event soundly in place. You can find it awaiting your local party on
it's LD page[1].
Whatcha waiting for! Release is coming up, let's celebrate!
Fondly,
Your friendly LoCo Council
[1]: http://loco.ubuntu.com/even
Hello LoCo Contacts,
lp:~locoteams and lp:~locoteams-approved have been changed to a
`Delegated' mode.
What this means for LoCo Teams:
This basically reverts the change to Launchpad that disallows subteams
of restricted teams to be Open. You may now reset your LoCo Teams to
have a `Open' member
On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 11:58 AM, Nathan Haines wrote:
> On Wed, 2011-04-06 at 12:43 +0300, Ddorda wrote:
>> I believe that after that, the criteria for get approved should be
>> easier to achieve, since it has more weight.
>
> One might as easily say that because the distinction has more weight,
>
we can't wait to see it! :)
Let's get those apps in!
Keep rocking!
Paul Tagliamonte
On Behalf of the LoCo Council
P.S.
No extensions. We mean it!
--
All programmers are playwrights, and all computers are lousy actors.
#define sizeof(x) rand()
:wq
--
loco-contacts mailing list
loc
oCoCouncil/LoCoTeamReApproval
On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 1:33 PM, Paul Tagliamonte wrote:
> Good time of day, LoCo Teams!
>
> It's the time of year again! Re-approval time, so it's time dust off
> the team photos and fire out some wiki edits!
>
> We have a *ton* of teams to re
On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 2:52 PM, Chuck Frain wrote:
> Any chance we could get a link to the application that you mention in
> here so those that need to deal with this can have their lives made just
> a bit easier?
> `
Hi, Chuck,
What application? You (as approved LoCo Teams who expire this cycl
On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 4:00 PM, Søren Bredlund Caspersen
wrote:
> On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 8:18 PM, Paul Tagliamonte wrote:
>> Forgot to mention this (Thanks, Lyz!)
>>
>> If you need more information regarding the re-approval process, it's
>> mostly outlined on t
On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 4:43 PM, Paul Tagliamonte wrote:
> On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 4:00 PM, Søren Bredlund Caspersen
> wrote:
>> On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 8:18 PM, Paul Tagliamonte wrote:
>>> Forgot to mention this (Thanks, Lyz!)
>>>
>>> If you need mor
On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 4:51 PM, Nathan Haines wrote:
> On Wed, 2011-05-18 at 16:43 -0400, Paul Tagliamonte wrote:
>> On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 4:00 PM, Søren Bredlund Caspersen
>> wrote:
>> > Is the launchpad bug the LoCo councils way of contacting the team, or
>>
On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 1:24 AM, Marcus Moeller wrote:
> Hi all.
>
>
> If you need more information regarding the re-approval process, it's
> mostly outlined on the wiki[1]. If you need moreinfo or anything like
> that, please don't think twice about letting us know how we can help
On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 1:31 AM, Marcus Moeller wrote:
> On 05/19/2011 07:25 AM, Paul Tagliamonte wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 1:24 AM, Marcus Moeller
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi all.
>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>&g
Howdy,
First off, I don't disagree. They're really kludg-ey to do, and the
wiki lags out all the time. I agree the wiki is sub-optimal.
On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 4:56 PM, Nigel Babu wrote:
> On Sat, May 21, 2011 at 2:11 AM, Stas Sușcov wrote:
>> În data de Mi, 18-05-2011 l
On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 6:03 PM, Stas Sușcov wrote:
> În data de Vi, 20-05-2011 la 17:36 -0400, Paul Tagliamonte a scris:
>> The issue is not about team reports, it's about the process.
>
> Sorry If i put this in a different form, but that's what I meant.
No problems at
On Sun, May 22, 2011 at 11:24 PM, Martin Owens wrote:
> Hey guys,
Hi, M-O / US-MA
>
> I seek advice from the greater 'Local Community' Community about what to
> do with the Massachusetts Team and in effect what to do with it as it's
> the only team in New England that has ever been active enough
Done and done.
Rock on!
Paul
On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 9:13 PM, Mackenzie Morgan wrote:
> When your interaction with other Ubuntu users is entirely made up of
> developers talking about bugs they need to fix and users seeking
> support (IRC, forums, bug reports), your perspective changes. It's
>
On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 1:11 PM, Marcus Moeller wrote:
> Hi all.
>
>>> Hmm, could we as the LoCo members perhaps declare the demand in a
>>> different form?
>>
>> no, but we could grab the source and get on with it :)
>>
>> https://dev.launchpad.net/
>> https://dev.launchpad.net/Getting
>> https:/
>
> This was not meant for technical discussion, just to get a feeling of what I
> can expect from the LoCo council based on one of the statements:
>
If you need LoCo Council input, please send mail to the loco-council
mailing list. This has gone a bit too far IMHO.
> * To provide input and feedb
Proposed-By: Paul Tagliamonte ;
LoCo Council
Scope: All LoCo Teams, Worldwide
Status: Draft
Rational: loco.ubuntu.com looks inconsistent and sloppy
Howdy, LoCo Contacts,
The LoCo Council has drafted up a proposal to standardize the display
name of all LoCo teams to help un-uglyfy the LoCo
Hi, Dmitry,
This will be the subject of an upcoming LEP / RFC Mail, let's just
focus on "true" LoCos, first
All the best,
Paul
On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 5:32 PM, Dmitry Agafonov
wrote:
> What about language-based loco teams?
>
> --
> Dmitry Agafonov ~ http://agafonov.pp.ru/
>
> --
> loco-contacts
On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 5:54 PM, Alan Bell
wrote:
> interesting example to pick.
> The ISO country code for the United Kingdom is GB. We have an exceptional
> reservation on "UK" which means no new country can claim it, but the code is
> GB. On Freenode #ubuntu-gb redirects to #ubuntu-uk as I thin
On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 7:12 PM, Elizabeth Krumbach wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 2:54 PM, Alan Bell
> wrote:
>> http://loco.ubuntu.com/teams isn't ideal for a number of reasons. My
>> expectation on clicking the map on the front page of loco.ubuntu.com is that
>> when I click europe it should
> First let me say that I fully support the development of a respectful
> and logically consistent way to name LoCo teams. I am positive that as a
> group we can arrive at such a solution. Given that I do see some issues
> with the current suggestion put forth in the original email.
Awesome. That'
Currently we use something like:
ubuntu-us-ny
This is the state's namespace, so anything beyond this is "theirs", so:
ubuntu-us-ny-ny
would actually be OK :)
Let's just worry about display names at the moment :)
On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 9:25 PM, Mark Cox wrote:
> On 06
OK, So, let's clarify and get back on track:
Objection #1: Branding has the display name in it, so it's too much of
a bother to change.
Objection #2: LoCo Directory only serves LoCos, why should a LoCo
change it's name to suit the LoCo Directory?
Ways to move forward:
Solution #1: We all agree t
On Sat, Jul 2, 2011 at 9:05 PM, Valorie Zimmerman
wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 2, 2011 at 2:52 PM, Alan Bell wrote:
>> On 30/06/11 17:48, Paul Tagliamonte wrote:
>>>
>>> OK, So, let's clarify and get back on track:
>>
>> good idea
>>>
>>> Wh
On Sun, Jul 3, 2011 at 1:03 AM, Lisander Taveras
wrote:
>
> We just notice that our loco team, for the dominican republic its no
> longer listed on loco-teams pages. Can Anyone inform us why?
I was just digging through -- was it ever on the loco.ubuntu page?
On[1], I see that they're invited to
Hello, TCs,
If your team is not up for re-approval, please ignore this message.
This is a friendly reminder to please file your re-approval
applications on the wiki, and comment on your team's bug. If you don't
have access to your bug, please let me know.
If your team expired from locoteams-app
2011/7/27 Rubén Romero y Cordero :
> 2011/7/19 Leandro Gómez :
>> On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 8:29 AM, Chris Johnston
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> 2011/7/19 Leandro Gómez :
>>
>>>
>>> I
>>> can't see why that isn't utilized by the entire Spanish community
>>> across the planet. Maybe whoever runs the Spanish res
On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 10:07 AM, Laura Czajkowski
wrote:
>
>>
>> Indeed. I was for a long time advocating for cross-polinization and
>> cooperation work for all Spanish speaking LoCo teams within the
>> Launchpad Framework. We had meetings with most Spanish speaking LoCo
>> contacts and key commu
On Mon, Aug 8, 2011 at 9:31 AM, Greg Grossmeier wrote:
> In short: I am stepping down from the leadership of the Michigan LoCo
> and Craig Maloney is now the new leader of the Michigan LoCo. Craig has
> been a very active member and organizer with the team and I am not the
> least bit worried that
2011/8/25 David :
> On 08/25/2011 03:57 PM, Amir Eldor wrote:
>> oh no! wrong mailinst list! sorry :)
>>
>> 2011/8/25 Martin Owens
>>
>>> Please try and keep messages in English, or translated into English by a
>>> translation service so the majority of LoCo contacts can read your
>>> messages.
>>
2011/8/26 Ahmed Shams :
> RE: Off-Topic
> Hello,
> @Amir: please find my replies in line...
>
> 2011/8/26 Amir Eldor
>>
>> Off topic:
>> @Ahmed,
>> It's "Eldor" :)
>
> Oh! sorry it must be a typo, yeah, I was lazy to copy-n-paste your name into
> the message body, instead I typed it :D
>>
>> Thou
On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 10:36 AM, Amber Graner wrote:
> Congratulations to Mike Holstein for recently becoming an Ubuntu
> Member. Mike continues to play a vital role on the North Carolina
> LoCo team. Mike has gracious agreed to step up to take the Team
> Contact Role. I have already added Mik
Howdy, Contacts,
I see some teams have created events for SFD - so Mike Hall suggested
that we create a global event. Since a global event is for just this
sort of thing, It's been created[0] :)
Software freedom day[1] (to quote the web page) is:
"a yearly celebration for Software Freedom! Every
Guys, can we take this off the list or on IRC?
My phone's going nuts.
On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 10:25 AM, Darcy Casselman wrote:
> I got the same book in a conference pack a year ago. Although
> according to this, there might not be any left:
> http://www.lczajkowski.com/2010/08/24/new-conference
Howdy, l-cs --
I've transferred ownership of ubuntu-us-ma from the loco-council (to
which it was assigned the team after it's un-approval) to
~ahathaway21. LoCo leadership, contact and mad-dope super propz are
now entirely in ~ahathaway21's hands.
I applaud the new-found leadership, and I look fo
On Tue, Nov 1, 2011 at 10:59 AM, wrote:
>
> During the Oneiric cycle the Ubuntu LoCo Council reviewed many teams and
> dealt with team issues, this post is to explain what the council has done
> during this cycle and to let people know how they can approach us if needs
> be.
> Firstly we had a la
On Wed, Nov 2, 2011 at 10:13 AM, Tomo Popovic wrote:
> I like the term "Supported" rather than unapproved. :)
See, I don't disagree - however:
I'd hate new teams to get the wrong impression - the way that'd make
sense if "approved" (currently approved) teams become "supported"
(e.g. funded to a
On Tue, Nov 8, 2011 at 10:53 AM, YoBoY wrote:
> Le 02/11/2011 11:31, Laura Czajkowski a écrit :
>>
>> Aloha,
>>
>> It's been rather quiet here, usually teams post when they got their cds,
>> if any APPROVED LoCo has not received their cds could you MAIL ME OFF
>> LIST please and I will follow up
92 matches
Mail list logo
