Re: [OSGeoLive] Proposal: Move OSGeo-Live meeting time (due to daylight saving changes)

2018-03-31 Thread Johan Van de Wauw
11:30 AM, Angelos Tzotsos > wrote: > >> +1 >> Angelos >> >> On Wed, Mar 28, 2018 at 11:45 AM, massimo di stefano < >> massimodisa...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> +1 , 20 UTC works for me. >>> >>> >

Re: [OSGeoLive] Proposal: Move OSGeo-Live meeting time (due to daylight saving changes)

2018-03-28 Thread Johan Van de Wauw
+1 On Wed, Mar 28, 2018 at 6:58 AM, Nicolas Roelandt wrote: > Hi > > +1, 20:00 UTC works for me :) > > Nicolas > > 2018-03-28 6:46 GMT+02:00 Astrid Emde (OSGeo) : > >> +1 >> --- >> Astrid Emde >> >> - >> Astrid Emde >> OSGeo Board Membe

Re: [OSGeoLive] contribute to OSGeoLive

2018-03-26 Thread Johan Van de Wauw
Dirk, Thanks for you contributions. I have also accepted your pull request to the contributors file. Kind Regards, Johan On Sat, Mar 24, 2018 at 7:33 PM, Dirk Frigne wrote: > Hi all, I'd like to contribute some changes to the website documentation > to OSGeoLive. I confirm that my contribution

Re: [OSGeoLive] [OSGeo-Discuss] SARbian: The free and open SAR software suite

2018-03-12 Thread Johan Van de Wauw
Hello Sergio, You should really get in touch with the OSGeo live team ( live-demo@lists.osgeo.org ), who build a live image containing a number of geospatial tools. Kind Regards, Johan On Wed, Feb 7, 2018 at 4:11 PM, SERGIO ACOSTAYLARA < sergio.acostayl...@mtop.gub.uy> wrote: > SARbian: The fre

Re: [OSGeoLive] OSGeo Live For INSPIRE

2018-02-20 Thread Johan Van de Wauw
Dirk, Did you already choose particular days? I would like to come as well, but unfortunately have too much work to come the whole codesprint. Kind Regards, Johan On Tue, Feb 20, 2018 at 5:35 PM, Dirk Frigne wrote: > Astrid, > > A question about OSGeo Live and the code sprint in Bonn. > > I wa

Re: [OSGeoLive] Motion 1+2: Appoint Astrid Emde as connecting person to the Marketing Committee and USB manager

2017-11-20 Thread Johan Van de Wauw
+1 for both On Tue, Nov 21, 2017 at 3:51 AM, Cameron Shorter wrote: > +1 to both motions. Thanks Astrid. > > > On 21/11/17 10:07 am, Nicolas Roelandt wrote: > > +1 for both motions. > > Thanks Astrid :) > > Le 20 nov. 2017 23:31, "massimo di stefano" a > écrit : >> >> +1 for both motions. >> >>

Re: [Live-demo] OSGeoLive we could change the listinfo to the new spelling

2017-11-07 Thread Johan Van de Wauw
Is it possible to rename the list? Op 7 nov. 2017 10:52 p.m. schreef "Jorge Sanz" : > I'll change mailing list and Nabble descriptions > > 👍 > -- > Jorge Sanz > https://jorgesanz.net > > Sent from my phone, excuse my brevity and typos > > El 7 nov. 2017 21:16, "Astrid Emde (OSGeo)" > escribió: >

Re: [Live-demo] boot ko

2017-11-03 Thread Johan Van de Wauw
Eugenio, Have you changed any setting in your bios to boot from usb? At boot, you could try to make sure that your pc tries to boot from the harddisk. If I'm correct, for HP, you should be able to choose where to boot from by pressing F9 during boot. If you manage to boot this way, try updating

Re: [Live-demo] [OSGeo-UK] Help needed to get info. on OSGeoLive 11.0 artwork?

2017-10-25 Thread Johan Van de Wauw
Suchith, I am actually not a fan of putting OSGeo live on a dvd. The performance is very poor for todays standards, and many pc's don't have a dvd anymore. Has anyone actually tried running OSGeo live 11 from dvd? I would definitely try this with some common applications before printing a large n

Re: [Live-demo] Motion: That we set up an OSGeo-Live Translators email list

2017-10-20 Thread Johan Van de Wauw
+0 same reason On Fri, Oct 20, 2017 at 11:23 AM, Jakob Miksch wrote: > +0 > > I also think there is not too much traffic in the main mailing list yet. > That's why I do not really see the necessity to create another mailing list. > But I don't mind having this translation-list if some of us find

Re: [Live-demo] MOTION: Migrate OSGeo-Live issues to another Trac instance

2017-10-12 Thread Johan Van de Wauw
I think we should really consider using a system integrated with our version control, so gitlab or github issues. If we don't reach consensus over that +1 on moving to a different trac instance, it makes no sense to have the issues mixed. On Thu, Oct 12, 2017 at 10:43 PM, Angelos Tzotsos wrote:

Re: [Live-demo] Change IRC meeting start time to 19:30 UTC?

2017-10-09 Thread Johan Van de Wauw
+1 for me as well On Mon, Oct 9, 2017 at 1:41 PM, Jakob Miksch wrote: > Great. I am planning to join later. > > Just to avoid any confusion: > Could you send the "new" time as link to the mailing list? > (and maybe update it in the wiki as well https://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/Li > ve_GIS_Disc#Contac

Re: [Live-demo] [live-demo] MOTION: Retire GMT from OSGeo-Live 11.0

2017-07-13 Thread Johan Van de Wauw
me too On Thu, Jul 13, 2017 at 9:24 AM, Nicolas Roelandt wrote: > Hi, > > I agree with the withdraw. > > Nicolas > > Le 13 juil. 2017 01:23, "Vicky Vergara" a écrit : >> >> I agree on the withdraw >> >> regards >> Vicky >> >> On Wed, Jul 12, 2017 at 5:42 PM, Angelos Tzotsos >> wrote: >>> >>> Hi

Re: [Live-demo] [live-demo] MOTION: Retire MB-System from OSGeo-Live 11.0

2017-07-12 Thread Johan Van de Wauw
+1 On Tue, Jul 11, 2017 at 8:27 AM, Astrid Emde (OSGeo) wrote: > +1 > > All projects can come back with the next release > > > Am 2017-07-11 00:31, schrieb Angelos Tzotsos: >> >> Based on a previous IRC meeting logs [1], we had a veto vote (-1) on >> removing MB-System from the disk. >> Given the

Re: [Live-demo] [live-demo] MOTION: Retire PyWPS from OSGeo-Live 11.0

2017-07-11 Thread Johan Van de Wauw
+1 - hope it can get fixed soon. I wonder what exactly is not working - as we have this package in debian as well. On Tue, Jul 11, 2017 at 8:28 AM, Astrid Emde (OSGeo) wrote: > +1 > > All projects can come back with the next release > > > Am 2017-07-11 00:36, schrieb Angelos Tzotsos: >> >> Based

Re: [Live-demo] [live-demo] MOTION: Retire GMT from OSGeo-Live 11.0

2017-07-11 Thread Johan Van de Wauw
Note that MB-system relies on GMT. If we decide to ditch GMT, MB-system should go as well. +1 on removing the documentation 0 on removing the application - it has a good installer and does not take up a lot of place - no conflicts with other packages Kind Regards, Johan On Tue, Jul 11, 2017 at 8

Re: [Live-demo] OSGeo live - new candidate: Halestudio

2017-07-10 Thread Johan Van de Wauw
On Sun, Jul 9, 2017 at 8:02 PM, Dirk Frigne wrote: > Thorsten, > > I am afraid that the deadline is already passed. > The deadlines for the next release are not yet set, but I think it will > be around November, if there will be a 11.05 release. > Please don't wait for the next deadline to work o

Re: [Live-demo] OSGeo live - new candidate: Halestudio

2017-05-16 Thread Johan Van de Wauw
I've proposed Hale in the past https://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/live-demo/2013-December/008557.html So +1 here if we have a suitable install and enough space. Technically speaking the current linux binaries include the jre and the resulting package is definitely too large. It should use the open

Re: [Live-demo] Motion: Invite Nicolas Roelandt (baka niko) to join OSGeo-Live Project Management Committee

2017-03-19 Thread Johan Van de Wauw
tps://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/Live_GIS_Disc#Project_Management _Committee_.28PMC.29 Current Members: Angelos_Tzotsos (Chair) Brian M Hamlin Cameron Shorter Alex Mandel Johan Van de Wauw Sebastian Couwenburg Massimo De Stefano Astrid Emde -- Cameron Short

Re: [Live-demo] Motion: Invite Ben Caradoc-Davies to join OSGeo-Live PMC

2017-03-17 Thread Johan Van de Wauw
od >> ideas. >> >> I've approached Ben and he is open to the idea. >> >> +1 from me, Cameron >> >> [1] >> >> https://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/Live_GIS_Disc#Project_Management_Committee_.28PMC.29 >> >> Current Members: >> >

[Live-demo] latest presentation

2017-03-16 Thread Johan Van de Wauw
Hi all, I'm looking at the presentation (will give one later today at begeo[1]). The last version still says new features of 9.5. Am I looking in the wrong location (osgeolive-docs git). Kind Regards, Johan [1] http://www.begeo.be/ ___ Live-demo mail

Re: [Live-demo] OSGeoLive hits Distrowatch

2017-02-20 Thread Johan Van de Wauw
If we want to climb up in the ranking we could add the distrowatch script, though I'm not really convinced we should do that. On Mon, Feb 20, 2017 at 9:52 PM, Angelos Tzotsos wrote: > This is great news! > > > On 02/20/2017 10:50 PM, Pieter du Plooy wrote: > > Hi guys > > Distrowatch has just add

Re: [Live-demo] ISO not isohybrid, lacks UEFI support

2016-12-06 Thread Johan Van de Wauw
If a version is ready, I can test it on a few devices. On Tue, Dec 6, 2016 at 4:45 PM, Brian M Hamlin wrote: > > Hi All > > this line of build steps looks promising .. my own small investigations > into the UEFI boot process raised more questions than answers, so I am > grateful to see a ne

Re: [Live-demo] Should OSGeo-Live drop from 2 to 1 release per year?

2016-11-02 Thread Johan Van de Wauw
On Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at 12:44 AM, Cameron Shorter wrote: > > Extending impromptu IRC discussion today ... > > With the increased maturity and stability of OSGeo-Live we are considering > reducing the OSGeo-Live release cycle to once a year, releasing just before > the global FOSS4G. (Previously we

Re: [Live-demo] Fwd: Re: [Incubator] requiring CLA signing

2016-08-28 Thread Johan Van de Wauw
On Sun, Aug 28, 2016 at 1:24 PM, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote: > ... > By submitting a PR or sending patches to the mailinglist, the license is > implicitly the same as the project. Unless code from another project (with > a different license) is used, not specific extra steps should be required.

[Live-demo] OSGeo live cursor issue

2016-08-27 Thread Johan Van de Wauw
Hi all, During the workshops at FOSS4G we noticed a problem when the laptops were locked or suspended. The mouse cursor is not longer visible when you return. A workaround if you end up in this situation is doing CTRL+F1 (you will get a command line, no need to enter anything here) and CTRL+F7. T

Re: [Live-demo] MOTION: Pull request #134 Workshop installers

2016-06-29 Thread Johan Van de Wauw
On Wed, Jun 29, 2016 at 2:24 PM, Angelos Tzotsos wrote: > On 06/29/2016 12:41 PM, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote: > >> >>> Is there demand for this? >> >> If the workshop installers are actively maintained it can be beneficial, >> but I fear that after the initial creation they will quickly become >

Re: [Live-demo] Inviting new members for the OSGeo-Live Project Management Committee

2016-06-07 Thread Johan Van de Wauw
On Mon, Jun 6, 2016 at 7:06 PM, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote: > On 06/06/2016 11:40 AM, Angelos Tzotsos wrote: >> I would like to nominate Astrid Emde for the OSGeoLive PSC. >> Astrid has been heavily involved in OSGeoLive development (MapBender >> maintainer), various presentations in conferences,

Re: [Live-demo] Chair for Project Management Committee for OSGeo-Live

2016-06-07 Thread Johan Van de Wauw
+1 I agree it is a logical choice! On Tue, Jun 7, 2016 at 1:52 PM, massimo di stefano wrote: > +1 Massimo > > @Angelos, thnx for the hard work! > > On Jun 7, 2016, at 5:49 AM, Cameron Shorter > wrote: > > We haven't had any PSC members vote on this. > > To make things official, could we please

Re: [Live-demo] R Studio on OSGeo Live

2016-06-07 Thread Johan Van de Wauw
On Tue, Jun 7, 2016 at 8:16 AM, Alex Mandel wrote: > It's a really simple install. It does not have much of a developer > community though, dev is basically done by one company that makes a > competing paid version. Quickstart would basically be the R quickstart, > as it's an IDE for R. > Are th

[Live-demo] OSGeo live presentation at Geospatial World Forum and State of the Map

2016-05-22 Thread Johan Van de Wauw
Hi all, Next week, on tuesday I will be presenting OSGeo live during the geospatial world forum in Rotterdam[1]. I've also submitted a presentation for State of the Map [2] (the openstreetmap conference) later this year in Brussels. Should any other contributors of OSGeo live be present on one o

Re: [Live-demo] PyWPS application

2016-05-13 Thread Johan Van de Wauw
On Fri, May 13, 2016 at 1:29 PM, Tom Kralidis wrote: > Hi Cameron: thanks for the info. Comments: > > - PyWPS does not require test data as part of its install. If anything we > will > use the data already shipped with OSGeo Live > - GUI: we can put together a simple request/response GUI (like

Re: [Live-demo] netCDF4 libs

2016-05-10 Thread Johan Van de Wauw
On Wed, May 11, 2016 at 7:52 AM, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote: > On 05/11/2016 05:50 AM, Brian M Hamlin wrote: >> How can I check the versions of the netCDF stack as things progress ? > Brian, As a non-netCDF user, I wonder if the changes to the netCDF stack are interesting enough to port to ub

Re: [Live-demo] Xenial and Snap

2016-04-27 Thread Johan Van de Wauw
On Sat, Apr 23, 2016 at 3:03 AM, Brian M Hamlin wrote: > Hi All, > > > > I have two Xenial machines setup for the last month or so.. doing some > experiments here and there.. > > One thing I did *not* see was the Ubuntu "Snap" packaging format [0].. > > > > well, this blog post [1] shows how S

[Live-demo] OSGeo live at FOSS4G in Bonn

2016-03-21 Thread Johan Van de Wauw
Hi all, Did anyone submit a presentation or workshop on OSGeo live for FOSS4G in Bonn? The call for participation is closing *today*. I'm ready to present if necessary, but I'm sure others will be present who have been more active than me recently. Kind Regards, Johan ___

Re: [Live-demo] Motion: merge GSoC-2015 PR

2016-03-10 Thread Johan Van de Wauw
On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 11:37 PM, Johan Van de Wauw wrote: > This being said, the few notebooks I ran (GDAL, GDAL python and OSSIM) > were very nice and in their current shape a good addition to OSGeo > live. I'm +1 on adding them as a project on the live DVD. After checking the o

Re: [Live-demo] Motion: Include Jupyter as beta in 9.5 release

2016-03-10 Thread Johan Van de Wauw
On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 11:12 AM, Angelos Tzotsos wrote: > Hi all, > > In order to resolve the Jupyter mess, this is my new proposal: > > 1. Accept the pull request from Massimo > https://github.com/OSGeo/OSGeoLive-Notebooks/pull/5 > This way his work will be acknowledged, the same way as previous

Re: [Live-demo] Motion: merge GSoC-2015 PR

2016-03-10 Thread Johan Van de Wauw
First of all, I want to thank both Massimo and Cameron for their work on these notebooks (and OSGeo live in general). They are a nice introduction to many of the tools on OSGeo live. I've started reading through some of the notebooks (and I proposed some fixes and improvements [1]).I really think

Re: [Live-demo] Retiring GPS-Drive from OSGeo-Live

2016-02-08 Thread Johan Van de Wauw
On Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 11:09 AM, Cameron Shorter wrote: > As raised in the last few OSGeo Live weekly meetings, we are proposing that > GPS-Drive should be retired and not included in the next OSGeo-Live release. > > This is based upon: > 1. GPS Drive has outstanding issues resulting in it not bei

Re: [Live-demo] Use of the osgeo live nightly ppa

2016-01-05 Thread Johan Van de Wauw
Yes On Wed, Jan 6, 2016 at 7:57 AM, Pieter du Plooy wrote: > Hi guys > > I am testing something on my kubuntu setup and was wondering if the osgeo > live ppa can be used without ubuntugis unstable? > > Sorry for the dumbass question. > > Pieter > > > __

Re: [Live-demo] Postgres 9.5 on Live 9.0

2016-01-05 Thread Johan Van de Wauw
On Tue, Jan 5, 2016 at 3:34 PM, Pieter du Plooy wrote: > Hi guys, and happy new year. > > Are there any plans to make Postgres 9.5 available as a package after the > 9.0 release, and have a postgis package compiled agains it as well? > > Postgres 9.5 will be release soon (has been stamped), and I

Re: [Live-demo] Torrents - was build process

2015-12-02 Thread Johan Van de Wauw
On Wed, Dec 2, 2015 at 11:34 PM, Brian M Hamlin wrote: > hi Hrvoje - > > > > this comes up with some regularity.. basically, torrents work well when > there are many simultaneous downloads. > > The frequency and volume of OSGeo-Live downloads is not a good fit to the > Torrent model.. > An advan

Re: [Live-demo] Starting the build process for OSGeo-Live 9.5

2015-11-28 Thread Johan Van de Wauw
On Sat, Nov 28, 2015 at 3:23 PM, Angelos Tzotsos wrote: > Hi Pieter, > > We follow the excellent documentation from Debian and Ubuntu packager > guides: > https://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/maint-guide/ > https://wiki.debian.org/IntroDebianPackaging > http://packaging.ubuntu.com/html/ > If packag

Re: [Live-demo] Starting the build process for OSGeo-Live 9.5

2015-11-28 Thread Johan Van de Wauw
On Sat, Nov 28, 2015 at 2:30 PM, Pieter du Plooy wrote: > Hi guys > > I have been following the development of this project for a couple of years > now, and was especially happy to see a 64 bit version, as one of my most > used applications is Opticks, as that is only available as 64 bit. > > I pe

Re: [Live-demo] Upcoming 2016 FOSS4G events? - and OSGeo-Live draft press release and schedule

2015-11-19 Thread Johan Van de Wauw
On Thu, Nov 19, 2015 at 10:08 AM, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote: > On 19-11-15 09:54, Johan Van de Wauw wrote: >> gdal (1.11.2+dfsg-3ubuntu1) wily; urgency=medium >> >> * Merge with Debian; remaining changes: >> - Cherry-pick upstream patch to fix compatiblity wi

Re: [Live-demo] Upcoming 2016 FOSS4G events? - and OSGeo-Live draft press release and schedule

2015-11-19 Thread Johan Van de Wauw
On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 2:32 PM, Angelos Tzotsos wrote: > On 11/18/2015 11:33 AM, Johan Van de Wauw wrote: >> >> Perhaps we should compile a list of which packages are not yet >> supporting GDAL 2.x to ease discussion? >> Packages relying only on the C API don't

Re: [Live-demo] Upcoming 2016 FOSS4G events? - and OSGeo-Live draft press release and schedule

2015-11-19 Thread Johan Van de Wauw
1.11.2 is also the version in wily. @Bas: gdal (1.11.2+dfsg-3ubuntu1) wily; urgency=medium * Merge with Debian; remaining changes: - Cherry-pick upstream patch to fix compatiblity with poppler ≥ 0.31. Do you know if this patch is included in 1.11.3? Kind Regards, Johan On Wed, Nov 18,

Re: [Live-demo] Upcoming 2016 FOSS4G events? - and OSGeo-Live draft press release and schedule

2015-11-18 Thread Johan Van de Wauw
On Tue, Nov 17, 2015 at 11:17 PM, Angelos Tzotsos wrote: >> >> Another important choice to make early in the release cycle is whether >> we switch to gdal 2 or not. Most packages already support gdal 2 [1], >> but the ones using install scripts have to be checked again. >> >> I'm in favor of swit

Re: [Live-demo] Upcoming 2016 FOSS4G events? - and OSGeo-Live draft press release and schedule

2015-11-16 Thread Johan Van de Wauw
On Sat, Nov 14, 2015 at 11:27 PM, Cameron Shorter wrote: > Hi, > I've drafted a press release for the start of OSGeo-Live 9.5 build cycle: > https://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/Live_GIS_Disc_Press_Release_62 > > Of note, it seems that the big 2016 conference events which previously were > running in March

Re: [Live-demo] [Ica-osgeo-labs] Ideas/inputs for having a cloud service that runs the OSGeo-Live VM

2015-10-19 Thread Johan Van de Wauw
I believe it should be rather straighforward to convert our vmdk to a vhd and add a vhd of OSGeo live to the VM-depot of MS Azure: https://vmdepot.msopentech.com/List/Index Then anyone interested can start up a VM using that base image. This can be done using trial accounts. Kind Regards, Johan

Re: [Live-demo] Running OSGeo-Live in Apache VCL

2015-10-05 Thread Johan Van de Wauw
We can probably fix many errors by having everything added under the user dir also under /etc/skel. If a new user is created, it copies that data. For your setup: take care that user has sudo rights. I am not sure this is what you want. Kind Regards, Johan On Mon, Oct 5, 2015 at 4:28 PM, Vaclav

Re: [Live-demo] MOTION: OSGeoLive 9.0 web site and docs

2015-09-15 Thread Johan Van de Wauw
+1 On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 3:22 PM, massimo di stefano wrote: > +1 > > thank you so much for all the hard work you all put in releasing 9.0! +1 ___ Live-demo mailing list Live-demo@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/live-demo http:/

Re: [Live-demo] R Studio on OSGeo Live

2015-08-23 Thread Johan Van de Wauw
On Sun, Aug 23, 2015 at 10:36 PM, Cameron Shorter wrote: > Hi Ned, > > Our policy to date has been to accept projects with OSI approved licenses. > http://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/Live_GIS_Disc_Apply > AGPL v3 is approved by OSI, so I see no problem with including RStudio > based on license. > > FYI:

Re: [Live-demo] R Studio on OSGeo Live

2015-08-22 Thread Johan Van de Wauw
On Sat, Aug 22, 2015 at 11:47 PM, Robin Lovelace wrote: > > Hi Cameron (cc all) > > Many thanks for the fast reply - I'll check that out and try to do it through > the formal channels, perhaps with some pointers from Barry :-) > > To reply to your question, yes the R Project Overview and Quicksta

Re: [Live-demo] GRASS and QGIS versions on OSGeo-Live?

2015-08-04 Thread Johan Van de Wauw
On Tue, Aug 4, 2015 at 11:25 PM, Cameron Shorter wrote: > Based on that reasoning, we should be selecting Grass 6, and avoid breaking > QGIS 2.8. Cameron, an update to grass7 does not break QGis 2.8. It breaks functionality of one plugin (the grass plugin). I don't believe we should keep an old

Re: [Live-demo] Packages postgres plus

2015-07-21 Thread Johan Van de Wauw
On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 7:34 AM, Brian M Hamlin wrote: > I noticed the following today.. but also, it raises the question of, where > does this bug report belong? > the failure lines at end are related to a binary size comparison of expected > and actual ? > the request that triggered this was f

Re: [Live-demo] Which version of gpsprune should be installed on OSGeo-Live 9.0?

2015-07-16 Thread Johan Van de Wauw
I've update the packages for josm, jmapviewer, gpsprune and libmetadataextractor. I tested and have now copied them to the nightly repository. KInd Regards, Johan On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 7:41 AM, Johan Van de Wauw wrote: > Cameron, activityworkshop, > > The side-effects are not t

Re: [Live-demo] Which version of gpsprune should be installed on OSGeo-Live 9.0?

2015-07-14 Thread Johan Van de Wauw
Cameron, activityworkshop, The side-effects are not that tricky, we just have to bring not only gpsprune but also jmapviewer and josm to a newer version. I believe we should do that anyway, as the current versions of those packages are old, and may even not function well anymore (eg bing maps sup

Re: [Live-demo] Should we write up a Sextante Project Overview on OSGeo-Live

2015-07-14 Thread Johan Van de Wauw
On Mon, Jul 13, 2015 at 11:25 PM, Cameron Shorter wrote: > Thanks for responses. > Based on feedback, I've stopped tracking Sextante in our OSGeo-Live status > spreadsheet. It would be useful to keep it in the spreadsheet to test whether integration works well. Last release we had some issues wit

Re: [Live-demo] Report 6 - Integration of geospatial OSS in educational notebooks

2015-07-06 Thread Johan Van de Wauw
On Mon, Jul 6, 2015 at 2:37 AM, epi wrote: > Are there any blocking issue? > > The debian packaging and the build of the new development environment has > been a very time (and resources) consuming task. ... It has been a very > stressful week but hopefully I left the main obstacles behind. > Hell

Re: [Live-demo] Report 5 - Integration of geospatial OSS in educational notebooks

2015-06-30 Thread Johan Van de Wauw
On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 6:32 AM, epi wrote: > Integration of geospatial OSS in educational notebooks > > Week 5 report > > What have I completed this week? > > working on introductive notebook (note the hyperlink doesn't work on git, > they are supposed to work inside the live as they point to rel

Re: [Live-demo] compressing images with pngquant

2015-06-08 Thread Johan Van de Wauw
On Sat, Jun 6, 2015 at 2:16 AM, Angelos Tzotsos wrote: > On 06/05/2015 10:25 PM, Johan Van de Wauw wrote: >> >> On Thu, Jun 4, 2015 at 8:33 PM, Johan Van de Wauw >> wrote: >>> >>> Hi all, >>> >>> I've been experimenting wit

Re: [Live-demo] compressing images with pngquant

2015-06-05 Thread Johan Van de Wauw
On Thu, Jun 4, 2015 at 8:33 PM, Johan Van de Wauw wrote: > Hi all, > > I've been experimenting with pngquant [1] to reduce the size of our > png images in the documentation. This implements a lossy compression > method, but all images I tried came out just fine. > In tot

[Live-demo] compressing images with pngquant

2015-06-04 Thread Johan Van de Wauw
Hi all, I've been experimenting with pngquant [1] to reduce the size of our png images in the documentation. This implements a lossy compression method, but all images I tried came out just fine. In total, we could save about 36Mb by using this compression on all files. I believe this is significa

Re: [Live-demo] OSGeoLive 9.0 status: nightly

2015-06-04 Thread Johan Van de Wauw
On Thu, Jun 4, 2015 at 9:02 AM, Luca Delucchi wrote: > On 3 June 2015 at 21:40, Johan Van de Wauw wrote: >> On Wed, Jun 3, 2015 at 5:41 PM, Angelos Tzotsos >> wrote: >>> >>> We also need to address this issue with the image links: >>> https://

Re: [Live-demo] OSGeoLive 9.0 status: nightly

2015-06-03 Thread Johan Van de Wauw
On Wed, Jun 3, 2015 at 5:41 PM, Angelos Tzotsos wrote: > > We also need to address this issue with the image links: > https://github.com/OSGeo/OSGeoLive/blob/master/bin/install_docs.sh#L56 > > Basically we need to move all patches from install_docs.sh into our > packaging. Yes. Currently the prod

Re: [Live-demo] OSGeoLive 9.0 status: nightly

2015-06-03 Thread Johan Van de Wauw
On Tue, Jun 2, 2015 at 6:44 AM, Angelos Tzotsos wrote: >. We need to start thinking the new build process for our > documentation (debian package vs building during iso creation). I'm pro building it seperately as a package: * documentation can be updated * faster build, build failures for docume

Re: [Live-demo] [SoC] Report 1 - Integration of geospatial OSS in educational notebooks

2015-06-01 Thread Johan Van de Wauw
On Mon, Jun 1, 2015 at 11:08 AM, Suchith Anand wrote: > Thanks Massimo. To give you some background. Few years back, i had some > initial discussions with folks in the Raspberry Pi Foundation (before they > became famous :)) to explore ideas on how we can use Raspberry Pi > https://www.raspbe

Re: [Live-demo] Starting build cycle for OSGeo-Live 9.0

2015-05-22 Thread Johan Van de Wauw
On Fri, May 22, 2015 at 9:26 PM, wrote: > But if I look at the "gpsprune" package, I can see version 15.1 in Trusty, > 17.1 in Vivid, 17.2 in Debian stable-backports, but only 10.1 in > ubuntugis-unstable (unless I'm reading it wrong). So does that mean for > gpsprune, OSGeoLive will continue t

Re: [Live-demo] qgis 2.6.1 pluging for grass7

2015-05-21 Thread Johan Van de Wauw
The QGIS plugin does not support grass 7 yet. There is a crowdfunding initiative to develop this: http://www.gissula.eu/qgis-grass-plugin-crowdfunding/ Kind regards, Johan On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 3:49 PM, Giuseppe Amatulli wrote: > Hi, > we are close to use the OSGeo-Live 8.5 for several worksho

Re: [Live-demo] Problem with mounting shared folder in OsgeoLive 8.5

2015-05-18 Thread Johan Van de Wauw
On Thu, May 14, 2015 at 1:11 AM, Alex Mandel wrote: > Slight update, I think Johan's method works now because virtualbox is > distributed differently. > > There used to be a Community Edition (Open Source) and a free for > private/academic use version. > > Now the main program is Open Source GPLv2

Re: [Live-demo] present OSGeo live at Foss4G

2015-04-24 Thread Johan Van de Wauw
Luca, I won't be present, so please submit ! On Fri, Apr 24, 2015 at 2:11 PM, Angelos Tzotsos wrote: > On 04/24/2015 03:07 PM, Luca Delucchi wrote: >> >> On 24 April 2015 at 13:56, Angelos Tzotsos wrote: >> >> Hi Angelos, >> >>> +1 >>> >> do you want appear as coauthor? >> >> I'm going to submi

Re: [Live-demo] [live-demo] Migration to git

2015-04-23 Thread Johan Van de Wauw
Pro moving to git for documentation, but I would suggest moving to git also for the scripts. I see some value in being able to branch (eg osgeolive for debian). We could give more users rights to push to the master branch. Johan On Thu, Apr 23, 2015 at 3:22 PM, Angelos Tzotsos wrote: > On 04/23

Re: [Live-demo] 64bit version

2015-04-23 Thread Johan Van de Wauw
On Thu, Apr 23, 2015 at 2:46 PM, Angelos Tzotsos wrote: > Hi, > > This is a good time to start thinking about the 64 bit support. > In my opinion we do not have enough regular testers to support dual arch for > our releases. How much work would it be to have one build in 64 bit so we can identify

Re: [Live-demo] Problem with mounting shared folder in OsgeoLive 8.5

2015-04-22 Thread Johan Van de Wauw
On Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 5:27 PM, Alex Mandel wrote: >> For the VBOXADDITIONS part I think we should consider installing these >> by default, so the instructions would not be needed anymore! I'll >> raise this at the beginning of our next release cycle. >> > > We have discussed this many times in t

Re: [Live-demo] Problem with mounting shared folder in OsgeoLive 8.5

2015-04-22 Thread Johan Van de Wauw
On Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 12:52 PM, Elena Mezzini wrote: > I would also suggest to upgrade the OSGeo-Live Quickstart for Running in > a Virtual Machine, because a lot of little things are outdated: e.g. > the name of packages, screenshots of Virtual Box "Virtual Hard Disk" > and of VM settings "Gen

Re: [Live-demo] Problem with mounting shared folder in OsgeoLive 8.5

2015-04-21 Thread Johan Van de Wauw
Elena, I have actually tried this with a fresh machine. What I advice is running: sudo apt-get update (makes sure you have the most recent sources) sudo apt-get install virtualbox-guest-x11 virtualbox-guest-dkms virtualbox-guest-utils This will install X11 support, which means that your display w

Re: [Live-demo] Problem with mounting shared folder in OsgeoLive 8.5

2015-04-21 Thread Johan Van de Wauw
On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 5:23 PM, Johan Van de Wauw wrote: > I'd recommend installing the kernel modules from the repositories: > sudo apt-get install virtualbox-ose-addtitions-modules > > Reboot and try again. Correcting myself: sudo apt-get install virtualbox-guest-x11 virtu

Re: [Live-demo] Problem with mounting shared folder in OsgeoLive 8.5

2015-04-21 Thread Johan Van de Wauw
I'd recommend installing the kernel modules from the repositories: sudo apt-get install virtualbox-ose-addtitions-modules Reboot and try again. On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 4:53 PM, Elena Mezzini wrote: > Dear all, > > I've just installed new versions of both Virtual Box (version > 4.3.26_98988) and

[Live-demo] present OSGeo live at Foss4G

2015-04-20 Thread Johan Van de Wauw
Hello, Has anyone submitted a presentation on OSGeo live for Foss4G (Korea)? I'm not going myself but I would like to remind anyone going to submit a proposal (and perhaps inform this list). For FOSS4G Europe there is no presentation as probably everyone thought someone else would file a proposal

Re: [Live-demo] Invitation for OSGeo-Live workshop at FOSS4G Europe

2015-03-17 Thread Johan Van de Wauw
On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 11:17 PM, Cameron Shorter wrote: > OSGeo-Live team, and OSGeo Education community, > > As per below, OSGeo-Live has been invited to put together an OSGeo-Live > workshop at FOSS4G-EU. > I see this as a good opportunity to build workshop material that can be used > by multip

Re: [Live-demo] Retire MapTiler from OSGeo-Live

2015-02-14 Thread Johan Van de Wauw
On Sat, Feb 14, 2015 at 1:46 PM, Even Rouault wrote: > Le samedi 14 février 2015 13:24:42, Activity Workshop a écrit : >> If anyone would like to help with this, we now have a wiki page (thanks, >> Angelos!) >> https://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/MapSlicer >> > > There's another project named MapSlice

Re: [Live-demo] Retire MapTiler from OSGeo-Live

2015-02-09 Thread Johan Van de Wauw
Hi all, First of all I would like to thank Petr for his work on Maptiler. He has actually spent a lot of unpaid time to develop a tool which is useful for many users. Earning a living from open-source is hard - as most people who have tried will be able to tell you. Second I would like to point o

Re: [Live-demo] Who will be at FOSDEM?

2015-01-19 Thread Johan Van de Wauw
On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 2:38 PM, Francesco P. Lovergine wrote: > On Mon, Dec 01, 2014 at 10:21:40PM +0100, Johan Van de Wauw wrote: >> Hello, >> >> I know that at least Bas (Couwenberg) and I will be going to FOSDEM[1] >> 31 january-1 february in Brussels (Belgium). Si

Re: [Live-demo] Request for - Live GIS Add Project (Cesium)

2014-12-20 Thread Johan Van de Wauw
+1 On Sat, Dec 20, 2014 at 8:26 PM, Cameron Shorter wrote: > Thank you Bala and Patrick, > I'm delighted to see Cesium applying to join OSGeo-Live. I've been hearing > great things about Cesium, and with regards to your project description > below, you have addressed all the requirements that a

Re: [Live-demo] [OSGeo] #1428: Include GeoPandas on Live 8.5

2014-12-14 Thread Johan Van de Wauw
Installation can be easy: There is a geopandas package already in our repositories. Johan On Sun, Dec 14, 2014 at 8:26 PM, Cameron Shorter wrote: > Hi Brian, > I'd be interested to hear you expand on your thoughts about adding GeoPandas > to OSGeoLive. (I don't know anything about the project).

[Live-demo] Who will be at FOSDEM?

2014-12-01 Thread Johan Van de Wauw
Hello, I know that at least Bas (Couwenberg) and I will be going to FOSDEM[1] 31 january-1 february in Brussels (Belgium). Since this year there will be both a geospatial devroom [1] and a distributions devroom [2], it may be an ideal timing for having a Debian GIS - OSGeo live meeting. I have al

[Live-demo] Adding istSOS to OSGeo live

2014-11-23 Thread Johan Van de Wauw
Hello Massimiliano, OSGeo live [1] is a self-contained bootable DVD, USB thumb drive or Virtual Machine based on Lubuntu. It allows you to try a wide variety of open source geospatial software without installing anything. It is composed entirely of free software, allowing it to be freely distribut

Re: [Live-demo] Problem with spatialite-gui

2014-11-22 Thread Johan Van de Wauw
On Sat, Nov 22, 2014 at 9:10 PM, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote: > On 11/22/2014 08:38 PM, Micha Silver wrote: >> Since the OSGeo Live policy is to stick with apt-getable packages as much as >> possible, I guess the best is to wait till the debian fix filters down to >> ubuntugis. > > Why wait? You

Re: [Live-demo] OSGeoLive 8.5 status: Nightly

2014-11-21 Thread Johan Van de Wauw
Hello Angelos, I suggest using gdal 1.11.1 rather than 1.11.0. The package is already available in debian experimental. I can add it also, but I would like to coordinate first :-) Johan On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 9:41 PM, Angelos Tzotsos wrote: > Hi all, > > Since we have officially started our de

Re: [Live-demo] problem with shared folder

2014-11-04 Thread Johan Van de Wauw
On Tue, Nov 4, 2014 at 10:59 PM, Alex Mandel wrote: > On 11/04/2014 12:59 PM, Margherita Di Leo wrote: > > That said, I believe this is either a Virtualbox or Fedora bug. I agree, this does not seem to have a connection with the osgeo live dvd. This being said: there is not really a good reason

Re: [Live-demo] Post-Foss4g 2014 - new projects

2014-09-21 Thread Johan Van de Wauw
Some other projects I thought would be nice: istsos: https://geoservice.ist.supsi.ch/projects/istsos/index.php/Welcome_to_istSOS_project mapmint: http://mapmint.com/ mapbox gl: https://www.mapbox.com/blog/mapbox-gl/ whitebox gat: http://www.uoguelph.ca/~hydrogeo/Whitebox/ topojson: https://git

[Live-demo] packaging pycsw

2014-09-21 Thread Johan Van de Wauw
> On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 11:14:02AM +0300, Angelos Tzotsos wrote: >> >> +1. I already plan to upload all the packages I did initially to UbuntuGIS. > > So it is *really* short time to do this if you want to reach the next > stable Debian release. Please let us know if you need any help to > real

Re: [Live-demo] [Board] OSGeo-Live as an official OSGeo project

2014-09-20 Thread Johan Van de Wauw
I'm in favor of having OSGeo live as an OSGeo project. Especially I think we need a way to decide on proposals of changing some of the things we do (eg add quickstarts for libraries of move to git). Now these discussion usually end undecided. Johan On Sat, Sep 20, 2014 at 9:36 AM, Cameron Shorte

[Live-demo] Let's bring the OSGeo live packages to debian!

2014-09-10 Thread Johan Van de Wauw
Hello everyone, One of the goals for OSGeo live 8 was having more programs packaged as deb files. Although we are still far from installing everything from deb at least some programs were packaged, and this actually helped the build process a lot. With OSGeo live version 8 released, perhaps now i

Re: [Live-demo] Saga Quickstart

2014-08-29 Thread Johan Van de Wauw
Hamish, I guess the mount helens demo will stay. In the end of the quickstart there are some pointers to other things one could try. Seems these were still referring to files from the region of Barcelona Seems I read over that part when testing the quickstart :-) Siki, I think we have some p

Re: [Live-demo] pywps to osgeo-live

2014-08-04 Thread Johan Van de Wauw
I agree with Ian. To avoid confusion I think we should perhaps update our overview and split up web services [1]. Now it reads: "publishing spatial data to the internet". That does not cover all services, nor is the list very understandable. I suggest split it up in data publishing services, meta

Re: [Live-demo] pywps to osgeo-live

2014-07-18 Thread Johan Van de Wauw
Jachym, Thanks for your work. our sourcecode is under svn (yes, we're old fashioned): https://svn.osgeo.org/osgeo/livedvd/gisvm/trunk Not sure if you did this, but in general, we ask you to anser these questions when applying for a new project: http://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/Live_GIS_Disc_Apply Spec

Re: [Live-demo] presentation for FOSS4G Europe

2014-07-09 Thread Johan Van de Wauw
Some notes on the presentation: I had the opportunity to do two presentations last year where Osgeo live played an important role. Rather than showing each and every project I put emphasis on the quickstarts (the website live.osgeo.org is useful on its own eg for people on windows, and how one can

Re: [Live-demo] creating an osgeolive VM from an ISO?

2014-06-24 Thread Johan Van de Wauw
You could boot up the iso in a virtual machine. On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 10:46 AM, Cameron Shorter wrote: > Hi Angelos and others on OSGeo-Live. > Tim asks the following: > > On 24/06/2014 4:21 pm, Tim-Hinnerk Heuer wrote: > >> Hi Cameron, Is there an easy way I can get the current latest versio

  1   2   >