On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 11:12 AM, Angelos Tzotsos <gcpp.kal...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi all, > > In order to resolve the Jupyter mess, this is my new proposal: > > 1. Accept the pull request from Massimo > https://github.com/OSGeo/OSGeoLive-Notebooks/pull/5 > This way his work will be acknowledged, the same way as previous Notebook > work done by Brian. > > 2. Since we are too close to release and there are concerns about the > publication quality of the Notebooks, I propose we do not link Jupyter to > our main docs, so the visibility is low for new users. > > This way we avoid going into a dead-end discussion about which notebooks to > select etc. > > 3. We reconsider the Notebook git organization towards a proper inclusion > for release 10.0. > > Starting with my +1
+1 I think we should also involve more people. Most of our quickstarts have also been written by different people. Eg the grass maintainers should check the grass quickstart etc. _______________________________________________ Live-demo mailing list Live-demo@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/live-demo http://live.osgeo.org http://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/Live_GIS_Disc
