On Fri, Nov 9, 2012 at 7:56 PM, Marc Hohl wrote:
> Well, I don't feel a *conflict* situation here, but that may be
> founded in me born in the "wrong" piece of earth ;-)
>
> If there really *is* a conflict/misunderstanding here, the
> concerning parties *should* try to solve it: via private mail,
Am 09.11.2012 14:55, schrieb Janek Warchoł:
Hi friends,
On Thu, Nov 8, 2012 at 8:54 AM, David Kastrup wrote:
Janek wrote:
Imagine that next month David receives 10 times the money
he usually gets: we'd have David covered for next ~10 months,
More like the next 6 months. [snip explanation]
o
David Kastrup writes:
> It is not really "almost",
Okay..at what % of David are we, then?
> and I am not easily interchangeable as there are some things I am
> pretty good at, and some things I am pretty bad at.
Good :-)
> So if there was enough money to go around, I'd
> recommend not getting
Hi friends,
On Thu, Nov 8, 2012 at 8:54 AM, David Kastrup wrote:
>Janek wrote:
>> Imagine that next month David receives 10 times the money
>> he usually gets: we'd have David covered for next ~10 months,
>
> More like the next 6 months. [snip explanation]
ok, i'm fine with that.
And i definitel
Jan Nieuwenhuizen writes:
> Werner LEMBERG writes:
>
>>> And it is not like there is 100% approval on the stuff I do.
>>
>> I think that there is 100% approval that you *do* such a huge amount
>> of work. And you should be payed for that IMHO.
>
> From my pov, I very much see David==global cause
Werner LEMBERG writes:
>> And it is not like there is 100% approval on the stuff I do.
>
> I think that there is 100% approval that you *do* such a huge amount
> of work. And you should be payed for that IMHO.
From my pov, I very much see David==global cause. With David, LilyPond
has one full t
Werner LEMBERG writes:
>> And it is not like there is 100% approval on the stuff I do.
>
> I think that there is 100% approval that you *do* such a huge amount
> of work. And you should be payed for that IMHO.
Uh, no? If I "should" be paid for my work on LilyPond, so should be
everybody else,
On Thu, Nov 08, 2012 at 01:30:58PM -0800, Jim Long wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 08, 2012 at 08:25:56PM +0100, Werner LEMBERG wrote:
> > I think that there is 100% approval that you *do* such a huge amount
> > of work. And you should be payed for that IMHO.
I agree with the first sentence. I have problem
>> As for making it easy, it is actually quite easy already. 1. Log in
>> to PayPal. Don't have a PayPal account? Sign up.
>
> PayPal... :(
>
> You should use Bitcoin instead!
Mhmm. Never used it, so I can't comment [and I'm quite sure that it
should rather not be discussed on lilypond-user].
Il 08/11/2012 22:30, Jim Long ha scritto:
As for making it easy, it is actually quite easy already. 1. Log in to
PayPal. Don't have a PayPal account? Sign up.
PayPal... :(
You should use Bitcoin instead!
Bye,
Carlo
--
.-. | Registered Linux User #443882| .''`.
o
On Thu, Nov 08, 2012 at 08:25:56PM +0100, Werner LEMBERG wrote:
>
> > And it is not like there is 100% approval on the stuff I do.
>
> I think that there is 100% approval that you *do* such a huge amount
> of work. And you should be payed for that IMHO.
I was going to word that slightly differe
Ok. Sorry about that. Just trying to help.
I'm a huge proponent for free software (free in as freedom, not free beer)
and once I found LilyPond, I was so happy with how my scores looked once
printed. Maybe in the future there can be a need for a global donation
process for this great software.
> And it is not like there is 100% approval on the stuff I do.
I think that there is 100% approval that you *do* such a huge amount
of work. And you should be payed for that IMHO.
Werner
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https
soundsfromsound writes:
> I didn't mean to open a can of worms or anything. :)
>
> But yes, in my opinion, perhaps a change would help?
>
> As an aside:
> When I first visited the LilyPond website, way back when, it took a moment
> to absorb what was going on with the "sponsor" page. I got the
I didn't mean to open a can of worms or anything. :)
But yes, in my opinion, perhaps a change would help?
As an aside:
When I first visited the LilyPond website, way back when, it took a moment
to absorb what was going on with the "sponsor" page. I got the impression
that donating money was onl
On Thu, Nov 08, 2012 at 10:38:53AM +0100, David Kastrup wrote:
> Francisco Vila writes:
> > If I were the sole designer/developer of the web page, I'd put a big
> > star-shaped Donate! or Sponsor! button clearly visible on the front
> > page. Tiny, personal projects do it all the time.
>
> Ah, bu
Am 08.11.2012 10:38, schrieb David Kastrup:
Francisco Vila writes:
2012/11/8 Janek Warchoł :
...and we (Lily team) may need to rethink our strategies as well.
Ben, we have this website about sponsoring Lily development:
http://www.lilypond.org/sponsoring.html
should we make it more visible?
Jan Nieuwenhuizen writes:
> Francisco Vila writes:
>
>> I'd put a big star-shaped Donate! or Sponsor! button clearly visible
>> on the front page.
>
> +1
>
> Don't play too hard to get on this ;-)
How about having something like that (for those who are just interested
in finding this particular
2012/11/8 David Kastrup :
> Francisco Vila writes:
>
>> 2012/11/8 Janek Warchoł :
>>> ...and we (Lily team) may need to rethink our strategies as well.
>>> Ben, we have this website about sponsoring Lily development:
>>> http://www.lilypond.org/sponsoring.html
>>> should we make it more visible?
Francisco Vila writes:
> 2012/11/8 Janek Warchoł :
>> ...and we (Lily team) may need to rethink our strategies as well.
>> Ben, we have this website about sponsoring Lily development:
>> http://www.lilypond.org/sponsoring.html
>> should we make it more visible? or should we make it more clear ho
Francisco Vila writes:
> I'd put a big star-shaped Donate! or Sponsor! button clearly visible
> on the front page.
+1
Don't play too hard to get on this ;-)
Jan
--
Jan Nieuwenhuizen | GNU LilyPond http://lilypond.org
Freelance IT http://JoyofSource.com | Avatar® http://AvatarAcademy.nl
__
2012/11/8 Janek Warchoł :
> ...and we (Lily team) may need to rethink our strategies as well.
> Ben, we have this website about sponsoring Lily development:
> http://www.lilypond.org/sponsoring.html
> should we make it more visible? or should we make it more clear how it works?
If I were the sole
Janek Warchoł writes:
> On Thu, Nov 8, 2012 at 7:12 AM, David Kastrup wrote:
>> soundsfromsound writes:
>>
>>> Do you guys have a PayPal donation link or something where perhaps I
>>> could send a little something your way? I couldn't find anything on
>>> the website... :)
>>
>> Then I need to
On Thu, Nov 8, 2012 at 7:12 AM, David Kastrup wrote:
> soundsfromsound writes:
>
>> Do you guys have a PayPal donation link or something where perhaps I
>> could send a little something your way? I couldn't find anything on
>> the website... :)
>
> Then I need to rethink my strategies.
...and w
David,
you've beaten me by a few minutes with answering the same :-)
> If you still think you would also like to contribute money, it is my
> opinion that the kind of development that I do might be worth making
> more sustainable.
Supporting David financially is certainly the way to go with mo
25 matches
Mail list logo
