Werner LEMBERG <w...@gnu.org> writes: >> And it is not like there is 100% approval on the stuff I do. > > I think that there is 100% approval that you *do* such a huge amount > of work. And you should be payed for that IMHO.
Uh, no? If I "should" be paid for my work on LilyPond, so should be everybody else, in proportion to their contribution. I may at the time be the largest single contributor, but that does not mean that I do the majority of work. It is just that _my_ work depends on getting paid. Money is not a reward here (and if the kind of work I do was not rewarding in itself, I would not be doing it), it is just the means to keep me going. That's not fair, but I hope it is a good deal. Now for one thing this is an all-or-nothing deal since I am not really able to focus on more than one endeavor at the same time. But for another, it turns out that not just the amount of stuff I can do profits from that deal, but also the depth of the stuff I can deal with, and if things in LilyPond annoy me, I have no distractions in between that would make it easier for me to accept things as they are. -- David Kastrup _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
