David Kastrup writes: > It is not really "almost",
Okay..at what % of David are we, then? > and I am not easily interchangeable as there are some things I am > pretty good at, and some things I am pretty bad at. Good :-) > So if there was enough money to go around, I'd > recommend not getting another David for it but rather looking for > someone with a different skill (and deficiency) set. Agree, that would be nice. > Let's worry about that when the situation arises. I don't see that > happening without finding a fundamentally different source of financing. Possibly, however, you never know. Especially given the fact that sponsoring/donating to a global LilyPond effort is apparently not being advertised sufficiently. > With the current model I don't see cost/benefit distributed in a really > satisfactory way. Not really sure what you mean here...who is is that finds things dissatisfactory, and what would she like to change? > Well, "cannot even barely sustain two developers" does not sound like a > huge step forward in sustainability. So one step after the other. :-) Jan -- Jan Nieuwenhuizen <jann...@gnu.org> | GNU LilyPond http://lilypond.org Freelance IT http://JoyofSource.com | Avatar® http://AvatarAcademy.nl _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
