On Thu, Nov 08, 2012 at 01:30:58PM -0800, Jim Long wrote: > On Thu, Nov 08, 2012 at 08:25:56PM +0100, Werner LEMBERG wrote: > > I think that there is 100% approval that you *do* such a huge amount > > of work. And you should be payed for that IMHO.
I agree with the first sentence. I have problems with the second sentence -- nothing personal, just a general reluctance to support any statement of the form "X should be paid for Y" without further qualifications. I definitely agree with "X should be paid in accordance with an agreement to exchange work or time for money". I cannot agree with "X should be paid for Y" without specifying exactly who should be doing the paying. > I think that there is 100% agreement that David should continue > to work on LilyPond. With my previous paragraph in mind, I disagree; thus there is not 100\% agreement. - Graham _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
