Il 25/05/2012 07:53, Pete Farmer ha scritto:
I'm will try to extend your work on bend.ly to include a few new cases. I'm
in the process of laying out some material by The Hellecasters and as you
can imagine I'm encountering many instances which require rather exotic
representations of bending tec
On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 5:20 AM, J Ruiz wrote:
> I wish to manually override the position of a beam, but Lily insists on
> flipping the direction of a notehead.
> Any ideas on how to avoid this?
You may explicitely allow such kneed beams:
\override Beam #'auto-knee-gap = #1
hth,
Janek
_
On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 8:14 AM, Keith OHara wrote:
> Colin Hall gmail.com> writes:
>> Have you had a chance to try your Lilypond source with an official binary
>> release yet?
>
> So far, Eluze tried to reproduce the problem with some released builds,
> and saw no error message.
>
> I've tried t
Jeff Barnes yahoo.com> writes:
> The following music doesn't compile on the mac and causes a segfault on Linux.
>
It causes Lilypond 2.14 to crash on Windows as well, but the development
version (2.15.36, getting close to 2.16) does fine. So this seems to be
an already-fixed bug. Nevertheles
On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 2:07 AM, Thomas Morley
wrote:
> This is a long discussion. We had similar ones in the past. That's useless.
> I followed the development of 2.15. in every detail, that I understood
> and I want to say that due to David's engagement and skill-ranks
> LilyPond has improved in
Colin Hall gmail.com> writes:
>
> On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 01:40:04AM +0100, Colin Hall wrote:
> > On Sun, May 20, 2012 at 12:08:44PM -0300, Marcos da Silva Sampaio wrote:
> > >
> > > I'm using a tremolo in a full bar. I used the code below, but it fails
> > > and I got this error message:
> >
>
Hi Marc,
I'm will try to extend your work on bend.ly to include a few new cases. I'm
in the process of laying out some material by The Hellecasters and as you
can imagine I'm encountering many instances which require rather exotic
representations of bending techniques; double-stops, behind-the-
Jeff Barnes writes:
> I don't think that's necessarily applicable to Lily. The end product
> being distributed is paper (or perhaps a pdf file). I don't think the
> GPL extends to that, does it?
Of course copyright extends to paper, but not to programmatic output.
It would extend to embedded fon
Mogens Lemvig Hansen writes:
> Just some thoughts, sadly no solution. Why don't we find some
> billionaire who can just hire David to do what David does best?
You'll find that billionaires tend to be a bit hard to approach since
there are millions of people with ideas that they could or should
On 25/05/12 13:20, J Ruiz wrote:
I wish to manually override the position of a beam, but Lily insists
on flipping the direction of a notehead.
Any ideas on how to avoid this?
Thx, Javier
\version "2.14.2"
\score {
\new Staff
\relative c'{
\once \override Beam #'po
I wish to manually override the position of a beam, but Lily insists on
flipping the direction of a notehead.
Any ideas on how to avoid this?
Thx, Javier
\version "2.14.2"
\score {
\new Staff
\relative c'{
\once \override Beam #'positions = #'(-0.9 . -1.6 )
c
On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 7:26 PM, Nick Payne wrote:
> With more than one voice, using Timing.measurePosition for partial bars
> results in spurious barcheck errors and also causes problems with automatic
> beaming:
>
...
> c c c c c c |
> \set Timing.measurePosition = #(ly:mak
On 25/05/12 12:26, Nick Payne wrote:
With more than one voice, using Timing.measurePosition for partial
bars results in spurious barcheck errors and also causes problems with
automatic beaming...
Sorry, I should have mentioned that this is with 2.15.39.
Nick
_
With more than one voice, using Timing.measurePosition for partial bars
results in spurious barcheck errors and also causes problems with
automatic beaming:
\relative c'' {
\time 3/4
<<
{
\partial 4.
c4. |
c8 c c c c c |
c c c c c c |
On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 05:13:55PM +1000, Nick Payne wrote:
> In 2.14.2, the output for the second bar beams all five eighth notes
> together, as I would expect. In 2.15.39, the first eighth note is
> not beamed with the others:
>
> \relative c'' {
> \time 3/4
> c8 c c c c c
> r c c c
This is a long discussion. We had similar ones in the past. That's useless.
I followed the development of 2.15. in every detail, that I understood
and I want to say that due to David's engagement and skill-ranks
LilyPond has improved in a way that I hardly can believe.
If David isn't payed for his
Hi Marcos,
On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 01:40:04AM +0100, Colin Hall wrote:
> On Sun, May 20, 2012 at 12:08:44PM -0300, Marcos da Silva Sampaio wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I'm using a tremolo in a full bar. I used the code below, but it fails
> > and I got this error message:
>
> An official Lilypond
Tim McNamara wrote;
> On May 24, 2012, at 1:00 PM, Jeff Barnes wrote:
>>
>> Wouldn't your time be more wisely spent trying to get corporate sponsors? I
>> see a lot more success stories in the open source world where a corporation
>> donates developers to projects the company have an interest i
On May 24, 2012, at 1:00 PM, Jeff Barnes wrote:
>
> Wouldn't your time be more wisely spent trying to get corporate sponsors? I
> see a lot more success stories in the open source world where a corporation
> donates developers to projects the company have an interest in.
Hmm. OpenOffice for ex
On May 24, 2012, at 1:46 PM, David Kastrup wrote:
> Let me first tell you that a _separate_ and unannounced mail copy of
> something _also_ sent to a mailing list is considered quite rude since
> it more often than not forces the recipient to answer the same mail
> twice.
This in unfortunately mor
On 2012-05-24, at 12:56 PM, Jeff Barnes wrote:
>
>> And actually, releasing source for free but binaries for fee makes
>
>> some sense.
>
> Agreed. Especially on platforms where build environments aren't free
But if I had to pay to update from 2.14 to 2.16, I just wouldn't, and never
m
On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 02:42:17PM +, Jeff wrote:
> I'm trying to post a crash report.
>
> It seems all my messages are getting bounced from the list server.
>
> ??
I see your post to lilypond-user, Jeff.
Cheers,
Colin.
--
Colin Hall
___
lily
> I suppose the situation might be as follows: source code is freely
> available (on website, github or whatever), but the binaries are not.
> Anyone tech-savvy enough to serve himself doesn't have to pay, but
> "simple users" do have. I think that if the price was low (say, 5$)
> nobody might be
Janek Warchoł writes:
> On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 9:37 PM, David Kastrup wrote:
>> Jeff Barnes writes:
>>> Just curious. If there wasn't a free as in beer version of a GPL
>>> software package, wouldn't one logically expect a fork? How does GNU
>>> address that?
>>
>> You can't fork what has not
On 25/05/12 02:47, Tim Roberts wrote:
Nick Payne wrote:
In the following, to look correctly positioned, the final A in the bar
needs to be moved slightly to the right relative to the notes in the
other voice each side of it.
Boy, that's a tough situation. Personally, I would not call your
exam
On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 9:37 PM, David Kastrup wrote:
> Jeff Barnes writes:
>> Just curious. If there wasn't a free as in beer version of a GPL
>> software package, wouldn't one logically expect a fork? How does GNU
>> address that?
>
> You can't fork what has not been written yet.
I suppose the
Jeff Barnes writes:
>> Let me first tell you that a _separate_ and unannounced mail copy of
>
>> something _also_ sent to a mailing list is considered quite rude since
>> it more often than not forces the recipient to answer the same mail
>> twice.
>
> Point taken. Won't happen again.
>
>> Please
> Let me first tell you that a _separate_ and unannounced mail copy of
> something _also_ sent to a mailing list is considered quite rude since
> it more often than not forces the recipient to answer the same mail
> twice.
Point taken. Won't happen again.
> Please read
> http://www.gnu.org/licen
Hi Jeff,
On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 9:40 PM, Jeff Barnes wrote:
> Do I send crash reports to this list?
Not quite. They /usually/ should go to bug-lilyp...@gnu.org .
On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 10:03 PM, Jeff Barnes wrote:
> Ok, I checked the archives and saw another crash report on \shape,
That's
Tim Roberts writes:
> Janek Warchoł wrote:
>> Unfortunately, that's not going to happen soon. Even small, local
>> publishers (i've asked some not long ago) are not interested in
>> anything else than Finale/Sibelius. I predict that it will take 3-5
>> years before any major publisher begins us
On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 5:56 PM, Phil Holmes wrote:
> Looks to me like a bug in 2.14.2. Beaming 5 quavers together doesn't give
> much clue to the beat pattern?
+1, 2.14 behavior seems wrong to me.
BTW, Ted Ross says "in 3/4, [...] notes on the second beat can be
beamed with notes on the third b
Jonas Olson writes:
> Some messages seem to drop out and never reach me, but I understand the
> following was written by David Kastrup:
>> > You propose a system with a guarantee that I will not get any payment at
>> > all unless a minimum is met, meaning that I have to finance the whole
>> > mon
Let me first tell you that a _separate_ and unannounced mail copy of
something _also_ sent to a mailing list is considered quite rude since
it more often than not forces the recipient to answer the same mail
twice.
I'll not repeat the points I made in private communication, but for the
sake of ot
> It tends to feel like the classical case of "Somebody Else's Problem",
> and I am somewhat at a loss of how to deal with that without getting
> cynical to a degree that those who do support me don't deserve.
Man, I feel ya.
I started playing around with LilyPond recently. I like it. As someone
On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 8:23 PM, Tim Roberts wrote:
> Janek Warchoł wrote:
>> Unfortunately, that's not going to happen soon. Even small, local
>> publishers (i've asked some not long ago) are not interested in
>> anything else than Finale/Sibelius. I predict that it will take 3-5
>> years befor
On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 8:23 PM, Marek Klein wrote:
> Maybe it is proportional notation what you are looking for?
I don't think so. using proportional notation doesn't fix the "lack
of optical spacing between notes in different voices" issue. The a is
still visually closer to c on the left - it
Hi Jiri,
On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 8:15 PM, FireTight wrote:
> my name is Jiri "FireTight" Szabo and I would like to introduce program
> ly2video to you. This program can generate videos from your LilyPond
> projects that contains moving music staff, which is synchronized to music
Cool!
Having vis
Marek Klein
0918 610 720
http://gregoriana.sk
2012/5/24 Nick Payne
> In the following, to look correctly positioned, the final A in the bar
> needs to be moved slightly to the right relative to the notes in the other
> voice each side of it. I tried moving the note to the right using \override
Janek Warchoł wrote:
> Unfortunately, that's not going to happen soon. Even small, local
> publishers (i've asked some not long ago) are not interested in
> anything else than Finale/Sibelius. I predict that it will take 3-5
> years before any major publisher begins using LilyPond, let alone
> sw
On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 8:00 PM, Jeff Barnes wrote:
> Wouldn't your time be more wisely spent trying to get corporate sponsors?
> I see a lot more success stories in the open source world where a corporation
> donates developers to projects the company have an interest in.
> As in, 1) convince a l
On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 9:48 AM, Nick Payne wrote:
> In the following, to look correctly positioned, the final A in the bar needs
> to be moved slightly to the right relative to the notes in the other voice
> each side of it. I tried moving the note to the right using \override
> NoteColumn #'forc
Hi Jonas,
On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 7:38 PM, Jonas Olson wrote:
> Some messages seem to drop out and never reach me, but I understand the
> following was written by David Kastrup:
>> > You propose a system with a guarantee that I will not get any payment at
>> > all unless a minimum is met, meaning
Some messages seem to drop out and never reach me, but I understand the
following was written by David Kastrup:
> > You propose a system with a guarantee that I will not get any payment at
> > all unless a minimum is met, meaning that I have to finance the whole
> > month on my own. This is not ex
2012/5/23 Jeff Barnes :
> Ok, I checked the archives and saw another crash report on \shape, so I'll
> post my details here.
>
> Environments:
> Ubuntu 12.04
> Mac OSX Lion
>
> Versions:
> 2.14.2 on ubu
> 2.14.2-1 on mac
>
>
> Command on ubu:
> jbarnes@jbarnes-OptiPlex-780:~/mac/Documents/apc/music
Hi,
On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 10:57 AM, Colin Hall wrote:
> How about Urs, Susan, you and I collaborating on a one-page score
> via github as a way of confirming our understanding, and demonstrating
> how it can be done? Even a few staves would be enough to confirm a suitable
> workflow.
Good ide
Janek Warchoł writes:
> On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 1:17 PM, David Kastrup wrote:
>> Jonas Olson writes:
>>> When donating, is there any mechanism in place by which funds will be
>>> donated only if some target level is reached by all donations
>>> together? I'm speculating people might be more co
There are page breaks, too.
But they are not often, in the videos at least.
Nils
On Thu, 24 May 2012 18:05:11 +0200
Urs Liska wrote:
> This is great!
>
> one question: How did you manage to create that endless, one-system layout?
>
> Best
> Urs
>
> Am 23.05.2012 20:15, schrieb FireTight:
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Looks great! A few notes — almost all negative, so I should say that
aside from these, it seems a really excellent start.
1) In the download, the Python script isn’t executable. See if you
can make it so within the zip file.
[I have some package de
Nick Payne wrote:
> In the following, to look correctly positioned, the final A in the bar
> needs to be moved slightly to the right relative to the notes in the
> other voice each side of it.
Boy, that's a tough situation. Personally, I would not call your
example "ugly". The note heads, for
This is great!
one question: How did you manage to create that endless, one-system layout?
Best
Urs
Am 23.05.2012 20:15, schrieb FireTight:
Hello,
my name is Jiri "FireTight" Szabo and I would like to introduce program
ly2video to you. This program can generate videos from your LilyPond
projec
On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 1:17 PM, David Kastrup wrote:
> Jonas Olson writes:
>> When donating, is there any mechanism in place by which funds will be
>> donated only if some target level is reached by all donations
>> together? I'm speculating people might be more comfortable when they
>> know th
- Original Message -
From:
To: "Urs Liska"
Cc:
Sent: Thursday, May 24, 2012 12:19 PM
Subject: Re: Beaming regression 2.15.39 compared to 2.14.2
On 24 mai 2012, at 12:04, Urs Liska wrote:
Am 24.05.2012 11:57, schrieb Toine Schreurs:
On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 05:13:55PM +1000, Nick
- Original Message -
From:
To: "Urs Liska"
Cc:
Sent: Thursday, May 24, 2012 12:19 PM
Subject: Re: Beaming regression 2.15.39 compared to 2.14.2
On 24 mai 2012, at 12:04, Urs Liska wrote:
Am 24.05.2012 11:57, schrieb Toine Schreurs:
On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 05:13:55PM +1000, Nick P
I'm trying to post a crash report.
It seems all my messages are getting bounced from the list server.
??
Jeff
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
The following music doesn't compile on the mac and causes a segfault on Linux.
Environments:
Mac OSX Lion
Ubuntu 12.04
LilyPond Versions
2.14.2-1 (mac)
2.14.2-2 (ubu from apt-get)
Command from ubu:
jbarnes@jbarnes-OptiPlex-780:~/mac/Documents/apc/music$ lilypond
WhenILookIntoYourHoliness.ly
GN
Do I send crash reports to this list?___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Hello,
my name is Jiri "FireTight" Szabo and I would like to introduce program
ly2video to you. This program can generate videos from your LilyPond
projects that contains moving music staff, which is synchronized to music (
http://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PL444F0513202699C4&feature=view_all
e
On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 4:45 PM, Jonghyun Kim wrote:
> Thanks Janek!
>
> I'm Apple User. Is it right?
>
> /Applications/LilyPond.app/Contents/Resources/share/lilypond/current/scm/autochange.scm
i guess so... i don't have a Mac, but this looks plausible.
cheers,
Janek
__
I thank you very much for your nice help Thomas.
2012/5/24 Thomas Morley
> 2012/5/24 Pierre Perol-Schneider :
> >> I'm not aware I gave you any instructions. :)
> >
> > I just ment that I've change the beam-thickness in the graceSettings
> file.
> > Sorry for the missunderstanding and for my poo
On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 01:19:29PM +0200, m...@apollinemike.com wrote:
> On 24 mai 2012, at 12:04, Urs Liska wrote:
> > A regression is something that doesn't work in a later version and that has
> > _deliberately_ worked in a previous version. I.e. something that has once
> > been fixed to work
Thanks Janek!
I'm Apple User. Is it right?
/Applications/LilyPond.app/Contents/Resources/share/lilypond/current/scm/autochange.scm
Best,
Jong
On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 10:44 PM, Janek Warchoł wrote:
> On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 6:48 PM, Jonghyun Kim
> wrote:
> > Is there no way to do modify the \
On 24/05/12 22:17, Urs Liska wrote:
Am 24.05.2012 14:14, schrieb Nick Payne:
On 24/05/12 21:19, m...@apollinemike.com wrote:
On 24 mai 2012, at 12:04, Urs Liska wrote:
Am 24.05.2012 11:57, schrieb Toine Schreurs:
On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 05:13:55PM +1000, Nick Payne wrote:
In 2.14.2, the out
2012/5/24 Pierre Perol-Schneider :
>> I'm not aware I gave you any instructions. :)
>
> I just ment that I've change the beam-thickness in the graceSettings file.
> Sorry for the missunderstanding and for my poor english. :S
>
> Pierre
>
>
> 2012/5/23 Thomas Morley
>>
>> 2012/5/23 Pierre Perol-Sch
2012/5/24 Xavier Scheuer :
> Hi Pierre, Thomas, dear LilyPond users,
>
> Could you please make sure you do not cross-post your messages to the
> French users mailing list (lilypond-user-fr)?
Hi Xavier,
sorry, I answered to all, not investigating the adresses. Will do in future.
-Harm
__
Am 24.05.2012 14:14, schrieb Nick Payne:
On 24/05/12 21:19, m...@apollinemike.com wrote:
On 24 mai 2012, at 12:04, Urs Liska wrote:
Am 24.05.2012 11:57, schrieb Toine Schreurs:
On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 05:13:55PM +1000, Nick Payne wrote:
In 2.14.2, the output for the second bar beams all five
On 24/05/12 21:19, m...@apollinemike.com wrote:
On 24 mai 2012, at 12:04, Urs Liska wrote:
Am 24.05.2012 11:57, schrieb Toine Schreurs:
On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 05:13:55PM +1000, Nick Payne wrote:
In 2.14.2, the output for the second bar beams all five eighth notes
together, as I would expect.
On 24 mai 2012, at 12:04, Urs Liska wrote:
> Am 24.05.2012 11:57, schrieb Toine Schreurs:
>> On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 05:13:55PM +1000, Nick Payne wrote:
>>> In 2.14.2, the output for the second bar beams all five eighth notes
>>> together, as I would expect. In 2.15.39, the first eighth note is no
Jonas Olson writes:
> tor 2012-05-24 klockan 11:28 +0200 skrev David Kastrup:
>> I mention funding problems for my work at the end of the talk. It turns
>> out that this month has dropped so far in one-time monetary
>> contributions compared to the rather slow uptake of regular
>> contributions
2012/5/24 Nick Payne :
> In the following, to look correctly positioned, the final A in the bar needs
> to be moved slightly to the right relative to the notes in the other voice
> each side of it. I tried moving the note to the right using \override
> NoteColumn #'force-hshift, but that didn't mov
Hi David,
thanks for your fantastic work for the Lilypond project!
On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 11:28 AM, David Kastrup wrote:
> I mention funding problems for my work at the end of the talk. It turns
> out that this month has dropped so far in one-time monetary
> contributions compared to the rathe
tor 2012-05-24 klockan 11:28 +0200 skrev David Kastrup:
> I mention funding problems for my work at the end of the talk. It turns
> out that this month has dropped so far in one-time monetary
> contributions compared to the rather slow uptake of regular
> contributions that the minimal amount for
Am 24.05.2012 11:57, schrieb Toine Schreurs:
On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 05:13:55PM +1000, Nick Payne wrote:
In 2.14.2, the output for the second bar beams all five eighth notes
together, as I would expect. In 2.15.39, the first eighth note is not
beamed with the others:
\relative c'' {
\time
Count me in on the repository test. It's not urgent for me, so take your
time :-)
Susan
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 05:13:55PM +1000, Nick Payne wrote:
> In 2.14.2, the output for the second bar beams all five eighth notes
> together, as I would expect. In 2.15.39, the first eighth note is not
> beamed with the others:
>
> \relative c'' {
> \time 3/4
> c8 c c c c c
> r c c
Am 24.05.2012 10:57, schrieb Colin Hall:
On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 01:24:11PM +0800, James Harkins wrote:
Not sure if this was already discussed (I've been following the thread
somewhat loosely), but it seems to me that git makes it a whole lot
easier to handle a "build token" by virtue of the rep
On 24 May 2012 10:39, Pierre Perol-Schneider
wrote:
>
> I just ment that I've change the beam-thickness in the graceSettings file.
> Sorry for the missunderstanding and for my poor english. :S
Hi Pierre, Thomas, dear LilyPond users,
Could you please make sure you do not cross-post your messages
David Kastrup writes:
> For those who are interested in my talk about LilyPond at the recent
> event in Chemnitz, the slides are at
> http://chemnitzer.linux-tage.de/2012/vortraege/900>.
>
> Since my talks tend to do more than just reading off the slides, the
> impression may be rather sketchy.
On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 01:24:11PM +0800, James Harkins wrote:
> Not sure if this was already discussed (I've been following the thread
> somewhat loosely), but it seems to me that git makes it a whole lot
> easier to handle a "build token" by virtue of the repositories being
> decentralized.
Yes
> I'm not aware I gave you any instructions. :)
I just ment that I've change the beam-thickness in the graceSettings file.
Sorry for the missunderstanding and for my poor english. :S
Pierre
2012/5/23 Thomas Morley
> 2012/5/23 Pierre Perol-Schneider :
> > Dear Thomas,
> >
> > I've followed your
In the following, to look correctly positioned, the final A in the bar
needs to be moved slightly to the right relative to the notes in the
other voice each side of it. I tried moving the note to the right using
\override NoteColumn #'force-hshift, but that didn't move the note. What
can I use?
In 2.14.2, the output for the second bar beams all five eighth notes
together, as I would expect. In 2.15.39, the first eighth note is not
beamed with the others:
\relative c'' {
\time 3/4
c8 c c c c c
r c c c c c
}
<><>___
lilypond-user m
On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 9:00 AM, David Kastrup wrote:
> Janek Warchoł writes:
>
>> On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 12:39 AM, David Kastrup wrote:
>>
>>> Writing good docs is lots of hard work. Adapting it to a new input
>>> syntax, in contrast, dead easy. Most of the work will likely even be
>>> done
Janek Warchoł writes:
> On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 12:39 AM, David Kastrup wrote:
>
>> Writing good docs is lots of hard work. Adapting it to a new input
>> syntax, in contrast, dead easy. Most of the work will likely even be
>> done by convert-ly.
>
> As long as GLISS changes only the /naming/ o
83 matches
Mail list logo
