On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 8:14 AM, Keith OHara <k-ohara5...@oco.net> wrote: > Colin Hall <colinghall <at> gmail.com> writes: >> Have you had a chance to try your Lilypond source with an official binary >> release yet? > > So far, Eluze tried to reproduce the problem with some released builds, > and saw no error message. > > I've tried to reproduce the problem in the current build, compiled with > debugging turned on. (I also looked a bit at likely sources for this > error and didn't find any trouble.) So unless we hear more there seems > to be nothing to worry about.
On Sun, May 20, 2012 at 11:16 PM, David Kastrup <d...@gnu.org> wrote: > The only wrong thing I can detect is not reporting this to the > lilypond-bug list, but it would seem like you can easily fix that. Actually the address is bug-lilyp...@gnu.org. I don't know why on Earth this one has reversed order of words... Marcos, did you send anything to lilypond-...@gnu.org? If so, it couldn't have reached us, and we kindly ask to resend to to bug-lilyp...@gnu.org. We apologize for inconvenience. best, Janek _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
