On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 01:24:11PM +0800, James Harkins wrote: > Not sure if this was already discussed (I've been following the thread > somewhat loosely), but it seems to me that git makes it a whole lot > easier to handle a "build token" by virtue of the repositories being > decentralized.
Yes, it does, especially if there are clear boundaries between the responsibilities of the contributors. This seems to be the case for Urs, and probably a lot of lilypond projects, and my introduction of the build token idea was not a useful contribution. Sorry for that. > Git is really awesome. Agreed. How about Urs, Susan, you and I collaborating on a one-page score via github as a way of confirming our understanding, and demonstrating how it can be done? Even a few staves would be enough to confirm a suitable workflow. Keep it very simple. Something that any of us could write in thirty minutes, say, on our own, but share the work via git. Cheers, Colin. -- Colin Hall South Mains West Linton EH46 7AY Scotland Tel: 01968 661994 Mob: 07786 677582 _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
