On 26/05/13 20:01, David Kastrup wrote:
James writes:
David,
On 26/05/13 17:39, David Kastrup wrote:
Hi, I get a segfault within Ghostscript on a current Ubuntu system when
I do
lilypond -dpreview input/regression/toc.ly
Appended. Anybody else who sees this problem? Or is it only my
ee if we get similar problems).
James
On 27 May 2013 09:02, David Kastrup wrote:
> philehol...@googlemail.com writes:
>
> > File
> "/home/patchy/lilypond-extra/patches/compile_lilypond_test/__init__.py",
> line 328, in build
> > issue
On 27 May 2013 09:47, David Kastrup wrote:
> James writes:
>
> > My patchy is also now running and, as far as I could tell, pushed
> > Keith's changes with no issues, I then see that Phil did some stuff on
> > his side and also pushed to staging afterwards, I a
Hello,
On 27 May 2013 10:44, David Kastrup wrote:
> Jan Nieuwenhuizen writes:
>
> > David Kastrup writes:
> >
> >> James writes:
> >> Not all that much. I was talking about the situation you have in Raring
> >> Ringtail after
> >>
> &
David,
On 27 May 2013 11:12, David Kastrup wrote:
> James writes:
>
> > Ok, that's one data point for "amd64" architecture. Which is one
> > consolation.
> >
> > I am using the i386 package myself, and uname -i returns i686
> &
David,
On 27 May 2013 12:17, James wrote:
> David,
>
>
> On 27 May 2013 11:12, David Kastrup wrote:
>
>> James writes:
>>
>> > Ok, that's one data point for "amd64" architecture. Which is one
>> > consolation.
>> &
hello,
On 27 May 2013 12:20, James wrote:
> David,
>
>
> On 27 May 2013 12:17, James wrote:
>
>> David,
>>
>>
>> On 27 May 2013 11:12, David Kastrup wrote:
>>
>>> James writes:
>>>
>>> > Ok, that
Patch: Fix
merging-multi-measure-rests-in-a-polyphonic-part.ly snippet
James
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
nstance cannot program, but can help with managing
any patches you want to submit for reveiw/testing etc.).
James
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
nd that the snapshot/rollback and clone features of VirtualBox
(compared to VMware Player) very useful. Also VirtualBox has a good
community and is updated more than VMware Player. I think many of the
lilydev users tend to use VBox too so that always helps if you run into
issues there.
James
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
ve all tablature related settings to TabStaff
2948<http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=2948&q=label%3APatch-review&sort=patch&colspec=ID%20Type%20Status%20Stars%20Owner%20Patch%20Needs%20Summary%20Modified>
Enhancement
m...@hohlart.de review Patch: Applies sc
indentation according to
the GNU guidelines
3383<http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=3383&q=label%3APatch-review&sort=patch&colspec=ID%20Type%20Status%20Stars%20Owner%20Patch%20Needs%20Summary%20Modified>
Defect
Keith O'Hara countdown o
*Patches moved to 'Needs Work' this countdown*
3383
<http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=3383&q=label%3APatch-review&sort=patch&colspec=ID%20Type%20Status%20St
triggered by the \override above it - which isn't
explained in the doc in context of this example - and if I remove that
instead I get no compilation error and the \override seems to make no
spacial difference I can see.
So is this specific example bad/poor/broken or is something else going on
wi
lpful entry.
> See, for example, ambitus. Indexing has been discussed
> several types in the past (search devel for index
> funindex for a selection), but always deferred until
> (a) the manuals were in a better shape and (b) the
> syntax had stabilised. Maybe one day ...
>
>
ht
ich then updated my git.
That worked for me
--
--
James
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
7; is not defined
jlowe@jlowe-lilybuntu2:~/Desktop$
--snip--
If that is helpful?
--
--
James
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
latter stops with the error
> message given below. Extract_texi_filename is the last thing that runs
> correctly and then make tries to copy a file from the build dir instead of
> the source dir. Does anybody else experience this?
>
No. I've just done a full doc bui
Hello,
Just to let you know I will be 'away' until tomorrow (Thursday)
afternoon/evening (UK time) so I won't be able to (re)test any patches
until then - in case any are urgent.
Regards
--
--
James
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
en I need to make a change or
push it.
That way I work on many small patches by editing/amending and resetting and
saving the updated patch file.
I find that much easier to understand conceptually :)
--
--
James
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
David et al.
On 3 December 2011 13:59, David Kastrup wrote:
>
> We have the following patch in staging (and likely soon in master)
>
> commit d11e23cca2df1267b25c86d96a4dcffa957a7a55
> Author: James Lowe
> Date: Sat Dec 3 09:42:02 2011 +
>
>Doc:
David,
I've not read through your response thoroughly as I have to go out now but
I defer to your knowledge and have reverted the check-in in staging.
As I said, there was nothing sinister and my intentions were honourable.
I'll read the thread when I get back later.
Regards
J
howing the relevance of this issue (typically what
> a lambda user would encounter).
>
>
>
> \version "2.15.20"
>
> \score {
> <<
>\new Staff \with {
> instrumentName = #"OK"
>} {
> c'1
>}
>\
Hello,
On 4 December 2011 07:57, David Kastrup wrote:
>
>
> > Overall lesson: it seems that we should have reviews for more doc
> > items than we did previously, since neither James nor I are
> > qualified to deal with advanced lilypond concepts.
>
> It is somew
nothing else
but lilydev and virtual box to compile and patch LP these last couple of years.
James
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
Hello,
On 10 December 2011 14:44, Jonathan Kulp wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 10, 2011 at 12:53 AM, James wrote:
> >
> > and if you need someone to test it let me know. I've been using nothing
> else but lilydev and virtual box to compile and patch LP these last couple
> of ye
Hello,
On 10 December 2011 23:27, Jonathan Kulp wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 10, 2011 at 5:06 PM, James wrote:
> >>
> >> Thanks for testing, James. :)
> >
> >
> > Downloading now. My Internet connection is not that fast, so I'll leave
> it
> >
Hello (again)..
On 11 December 2011 11:49, James wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On 10 December 2011 23:27, Jonathan Kulp wrote:
>
>> On Sat, Dec 10, 2011 at 5:06 PM, James wrote:
>> >>
>> >> Thanks for testing, James. :)
>> >
>> >
>> &
Hello,
On 11 December 2011 11:52, Graham Percival wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 11, 2011 at 11:49:51AM +0000, James wrote:
> >--snip--
> >james@james-OptiPlex-990:~/Downloads$ md5sum
> >ubuntu-lilydev-remix-2.0.iso ubuntu-lilydev-remix-2.0.iso.md5
> >b394c
Jonathan, Graham et al.
On 11 December 2011 12:16, Jonathan Kulp wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 11, 2011 at 5:57 AM, James wrote:
> >> >was expecting 11.04 (or whichever 11.x I thought we were planning).
> >>
> >> We are using 10.04 again; we're just updating t
<< { e'1 } \\ { e1 } >> | }
{ << { e1 } \\ { e'1 } >> | }
I don't understand why the notes are not aligned in all cases.
Is this expected engraving/LP behaviour?
Attached png showing output.
--
--
James
<>___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
Xavier,
On 11 December 2011 15:00, Xavier Scheuer wrote:
> On 11 December 2011 15:56, James wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > \version "2.14.1"
> >
> > { << { e'1 } \\ { e'''1 } >> | }
> > { << { e'
David,
On 11 December 2011 15:05, David Kastrup wrote:
>
> James writes:
>
> > Hello,
> >
> >
> > \version "2.14.1"
> >
> > { << { e'1 } \\ { e'''1 } >> | }
> > { << { e'''1 } \\
decided to make a single patch for two issues to save
having to review two Rietvelds for relatively small changes. At least
that was the theory.
However I'll add this edit request to the 'other' issue and make a new patch
Thanks for reviewing.
--
--
James
___
ated doc process for things like
Appendixes and the IR work by 'having a go'.
--
--
James
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
Hello,
On 17 December 2011 22:18, James wrote:
> Hello,
>
> As part of a tracker issue and for my own education I'm trying to
> understand the 'types' (if that is the correct term - from Wikipedia
> of Scheme I'm wondering of they are 'Identity predicate
Hello,
2011/12/20 Alberto Simões :
>
>
> On 12/20/11 18:54 , James wrote:
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>> 2011/12/20 Alberto Simões:
>>>
>>> Hello
>>>
>>> I am using lion and having some trouble with Lilypond.
>>
>>
>&g
lydev
Actually I still use LilyDev in VirtualBox, but on a Linux Machine :)
I prefer to keep my LilyPond Dev environment separate from my real
machine (as I can also use snapshots in VirtualBox so if I make a huge
mistake I can roll back in seconds).
Regards
--
--
James
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
for you.
Anyway the offer is there - I cannot help with the 'web code' as that
is not in my knowledge :/
Regards
--
--
James
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
Hello,
2011/12/21 Alberto Simões :
> Hello
>
> This patch includes
...
Created
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=2134&thanks=2134
Thanks
--
--
James
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://
Alberto
2011/12/22 Alberto Simões :
> Thank you, James.
>
> On 12/22/11 10:13 , James wrote:
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>> 2011/12/21 Alberto Simões:
>>>
>>> Hello
>>>
>>> This patch includes
>>
>>
>> ...
>>
>
Alberto
2011/12/22 Alberto Simões :
> Hey, James
>
>
> On 12/22/11 11:42 , James wrote:
>>
>> Do you need me to upload the patch for review to Rietveld for you?
>
>
> Forgot about it.
> What is Rietveld? :$
>
> Probably if you point me to it I can do it
uild then ran
../configure to be sure but got the same problem when I ran make
I know this is staging and everything, but I thought someone might be
(not that) interested.
regards
--
--
James
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
ges are seen (I get the emails and the note
on savannah itself).
Is there some 'three strikes and you're out' setting that locks out an account?
Here are the relevant files/information:
--snip--
james@jameslilydev2:~/lilypond-git$ git pull --verbose
Permission denied (publickey
ontributing", but what I was doing is "extending".
> Something is missing e.g. in
> <http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.15/Documentation/extending/callback-functions>
> And maybe in the documentation of the pure callbacks themselves.
>
Is this stuff you gave me for
http
e it to write sheet music for my band- we'd love to get
> started again!
Also, see
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2011-12/msg00443.html
and follow the thread.
It gets a bit convoluted, but we have a few MacOS X Lion users who
have managed to g
Phil, thanks...
On 26 December 2011 11:59, Phil Holmes wrote:
> - Original Message - From: "James"
...
>>
>> Here are the relevant files/information:
>>
>> --snip--
>>
>> james@jameslilydev2:~/lilypond-git$ git pull --verbose
>>
Graham,
On 26 December 2011 18:30, Graham Percival wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 26, 2011 at 06:21:35PM +0000, James wrote:
>> debug1: Next authentication method: publickey
>> debug1: Offering public key: /home/james/.ssh/id_rsa
>
> shouldn't that be id_rsa.pub ?
>
>&g
Graham,
On 26 December 2011 18:42, Graham Percival wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 26, 2011 at 06:33:20PM +0000, James wrote:
>> james@jameslilydev2:~/lilypond-git$ ls -al /home/james/.ssh/
>> total 20
>> drwx-- 2 james james 4096 2011-12-26 18:17 .
>> drwxr-xr-x 37 james
Hello,
On 25 December 2011 16:44, wrote:
> LGTM, please push to staging.
>
> http://codereview.appspot.com/5489119/
Mon, 26 Dec 2011 23:12:13 + (23:12 +)
commit a215b4735924927c97e992bc80cda8e1a91d4879
--
--
James
___
lilyp
Hello,
On 26 December 2011 18:54, Graham Percival wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 26, 2011 at 06:50:11PM +0000, James wrote:
>> Well that was the first thing I thought. I have copied this from the
>> terminal and when that didn't work I deleted my whole /.ssh dir,
>> deleted the
lin (sounds like a great title for a Kid's TV show!).
Regards
--
--
James
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
lly nil now, unless a user or dev asks for
some second verification.
My question to David, because I am not getting where the 'ire' is
coming from, why do you care if we release dev after dev release vs
stable?
--
--
James
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
er issue code uploaded to Rietveld gets missed and so
slows down the eventual pushing of this.
>
> Anything I can do to help this to get live?
Well, the patch has been changed to 'countdown' see:
http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.15/Documentation/contributor-big-page#su
> properly to staging? From what i see, it got ID
> 9f24e79a945ec4ab000d3e09ff2d2ac8208e2246.
>
> thanks,
> Janek
LGTM
http://git.savannah.gnu.org/gitweb/?p=lilypond.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/staging
--
--
James
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
Hello,
On 3 January 2012 20:49, Graham Percival wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 03, 2012 at 02:57:24PM +0100, David Kastrup wrote:
>> James writes:
>>
>> > My question to David, because I am not getting where the 'ire' is
>> > coming from, why do you care if we r
ut also: anticipating future
>> stability problems, constantly improving end user documentation and the
>> quality of source code (reduce complexity, comment code and so on). By now
>> there is a huge work to be done and Lilypond needs someone who will form
>> guidelines and priorities.
yeah, blah blah ... some of us already know and some of us are getting on with
it instead of complaining.
James
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
I can push it for you, else I can download the diff from Rietveld.
--
--
James
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
e).
3. As 2 but use a new boot disk but also add an addition storage
device and again point to the old vdi file, as if it were an addition
separate piece of disk.
>
> Alternatively, if that doesn't work, does anyone know how to recover files
> from a virtual hard driv
On 4 January 2012 18:55, James wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On 4 January 2012 18:32, Vaylor Trucks wrote:
>> I have been using lilypond for years for my own projects and have recently
>> introduced it to a friend of mine. He is a drum instructor and has been
>> reading
>
v work then I am
happy to handle this patch for you, but I'd prefer a git formatted
patch if possible or at the very least a 'diff' file that I can then
post for review on your behalf.
This email seems to have just put the diffs inline (at least on my
email reader).
--
--
James
David
On 5 January 2012 06:58, David Kastrup wrote:
> James writes:
>
>> However if you do not intend to do more LilyPond dev work then I am
>> happy to handle this patch for you, but I'd prefer a git formatted
>> patch if possible or at the very least a 'diff
markup-facility-defs)
scheme module...
Is your culprit (possibly) :)
Regards
--
--
James
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
; \relative c' <<
> { \voiceOne c'8 r } \\
> { \voiceThree c,8.[ c'16] }
> >>
>
> Am I missing something or is this a real bug?
Is this a 'valid' (i.e using voice 1 and 3 only) comparison?
2.14.1 output attached
--
--
James
<>_
voice2 and voice4 (2.14.1)
--
--
James
<>___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
#x27;t
cause this, nor does one two AND three.
If this is really two voices then why would you use stems in the same direction?
Else I'd argue this is in the same category as ties and slurs in different
voices not terminating.
>
>> 2.14.1 output attached
>
> Well, I woul
Pavel,
On 7 January 2012 03:23, Pavel Roskin wrote:
> On Thu, 5 Jan 2012 07:04:22 +
> James wrote:
>
>> Thanks, I figured it was something like that, but the gmail web client
>> doesn't seem to let me save this off separately (i've not worked out
>>
, edit your document and then repeat
> make doc, it will usually only remake the stuff that's been changed - with
> no need to touch any files. This is because of the work Julien did late
> last year.
>
If that really is true (hooray) then we ought to
Felix,
On 6 January 2012 14:51, Felix Kugel wrote:
> Is there any documentation about the pdf output format details?
More specifically?
We have
http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.15/Documentation/internals/index.html
which may be what you are looking for.
--
--
Ja
Start here:
http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.15/Documentation/contributor/summary-for-experienced-developers
Else:
http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.15/Documentation/contributor/help-us
> If no, is there a person (several people?) that
> could answer such questions?
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
--
--
James
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
...
>
> GPL Ghostscript 8.71 (2010-02-10)
Are you using LilyDev2.0?
--
--
James
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
Hello,
On 8 January 2012 13:07, James wrote:
> Mike
>
> On 8 January 2012 12:48, m...@apollinemike.com wrote:
>> Hey all,
>>
>> On my lilybuntu box, I am consistently getting a doc fail from current
>> master on this file. The problem is the embedded post
was doing with the
early itteration of whatever script was on your
https://github.com/gperciva/lilypond-extra site.
I'm not able to do any python tweaking but I can run stuff and check
things like I used to do.
Let me know and if there are any specific instructions I need to set up.
-
..
I can run lilypond on this file
bar-chords-notation-for-guitar--with-text-spanner.ly directly
with no problems after building from current master.
I'll kick off a make doc but that will take this machine I have a good
45 minutes or so.
--
--
James
__
Graham,
On 8 January 2012 13:55, Graham Percival wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 08, 2012 at 01:46:44PM +0000, James wrote:
>> > If somebody else could
>> > take over Patchy -- even if only the staging stuff, not the new
>> > patches -- that would free up time I could spend
ting this. My make doc is still going but it's gone past
the point of where I would expect this error to occur.
James
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
Xavier,
On 8 January 2012 21:08, Xavier Scheuer wrote:
> Hi James,
>
> Currently we have snippets about DynamicTextSpanner both in
> NR 1.3.1 Expressive marks attached to notes > Dynamics and in
> NR 1.8.1 Writing text > Text spanners .
>
> It would be more consiste
s it also touches all the translated files too.
Maybe on the next dev release?
Regards
--
--
James
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
he tracker, apply it and give it back for you to apply on your
patch?
--
--
James
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
maybe it shouldn't say so?
>
> What on earth are you talking about? bug-lilypond is the place
> for users to report matters that are of interest to developers.
> Aurélien reported it there. James will hopefully be acting on his
> report. This is working exactly
On 13 January 2012 08:42, wrote:
> Some of these changes are already pushed. I could kiss myself.
can I kiss someone?
Hey perhaps we need a Kissmeister... any takers? Janek?
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org
report it (sorry).
Opened as:
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=2224
--
--
James
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
are to the responsability of a due translator who willl send
> his updated native po file to the FTP.
Should we mention this in the Contributor Guide somewhere -
Documentation Translation didn't seem the appropriate place?
Regards
--
--
James
_
,
>
> Stefan Weil
>
I'd offer to manage these but I guess it is better handled by someone
who understands the translation branches?
--
--
James
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
ew' yourself (if you know how to do
that) or you can attach any corrected patches to the code.google
issues and I can re-submit them.
The process is documented here:
http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.15/Documentation/contributor/summary-for-experienced-developers
(start at 'reviews' in this case
nd pushed to our staging branch. It will be merged
in to the master branch soon.
Thanks for the patch.
The other I am leaving the other for a more thorough review
--
--
James
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
x27; this - apologies if not.
Also @carl, could we make lilygit-tcl (not this patch) with a text
area I can *paste* into (and/or ctrl-v) as I cannot do that with the
current iteration, I can only type into it.
--
--
James
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
crawl for
>> me.
>
> If it is really usage of swap: getting more memory will be by far the
> cheapest method of speeding up your computer much more than buying a
> faster CPU ever could.
>
getting an SSD will also help if you ha
have electricity
24/7, Internet connection probably about 20/7) and have already
offered (and been trying) to run patchy but with limited success this
week.
I haven't bothered Graham as he is on limited time now, which can be
better spent I am sure that walking me through python scripts.
However
: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs
>>
>> - Graham
>
I don't use patchy but checking out staging just now, I run
./configure ; make -j8 CPU_COUNT=8 ;
This was all fine.
When I ran make doc (make -j8 CPU_COUNT=8 doc) it 'nearly' completed.
The last lot of lo
David,
On 29 January 2012 08:48, David Kastrup wrote:
> James writes:
>
>> --snip--
>> james@jameslilydev2:~/Desktop/patchy$ ./run-lilypond-staging.sh
>> remote: Counting objects: 83, done.
>> remote: Compressing objects: 100% (57/57), done.
>> remote: To
vior any more.
>
So we need to make any tweaks to the NR since
"...There is no longer any relation of
the implementation to \relative..."
http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.14/Documentation/notation/single-voice#chord-repetition
an @warning or @knownissue?
Regards
--
--
James
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
ing a space after the comma makes any difference.
>>>
>>> I can't understand the reason of this weird behaviour.
>>> Can you please explain what's happening?
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Federico
>
>
> Greetings, Federico and list member
256. Any
> idea why it's testing 2263 instead?
Not sure why 'instead', but 2263 is the only current patch-new Tracker
issue. Listed.
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/list?can=2&q=Patch%3Dnew+&sort=patch&colspec=ID+Type+Status+Stars+Owner+
>> On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 01:47:52PM -, Phil Holmes wrote:
>>>
>>> There you go. That seemed to work.
>>
>>
>> Yep, looks good.
>>
>>> I assume all I need to do is run patchy-staging daily?
>>
>>
>> Yes and no. Running
Hello,
On 2 February 2012 17:11, Phil Holmes wrote:
> - Original Message - From: "David Kastrup"
> To: "Phil Holmes"
>
>>
>>> I believe James indicated his big machine was on 24x7 - hence my
>>> instructions if he has some time t
is before.
I assume this is expected if not nice behaviour. I'm curious only
because I am wondering how a '}' would be a variable and why it isn't
ignored or just signalled (if that is the right term) as a close of
the previous open brace?
Regards
--
--
James
__
ce can give rise to strange
errors, it is advisable to always insert whitespace before and after
every syntactic element, for example, before and after every curly
brace.'
Hooray!
James
--
--
James
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
;
> \lilypond
>
> %%END
>
> Files attached.
>
I like the lilypad and flowers 'icon', but with the typography (and
maybe it's just me) all I can see are 'buttocks'
;)
--
--
James
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
g. Are any of you in the area? If so, it'd be
> great to meet up for coffee!
Maybe, but I might be busy 'rolling out my barrel', 'repairing my
pearly coat' or 'warming up my beer'.
London is a 'big'
701 - 800 of 2329 matches
Mail list logo