Stefan, On 21 January 2012 07:23, Stefan Weil <s...@weilnetz.de> wrote: > Am 21.01.2012 00:10, schrieb Pavel Roskin: >> >> On Fri, 20 Jan 2012 17:58:47 +0100 >> Stefan Weil<s...@weilnetz.de> wrote: >>> >>> Hi, >>> tre >>> >>> my last two patches were sent inline (with git send-email), >>> but I just learned that they should have been appended instead. >>> >>> So here are both patches again. Both fix some spelling issues. >> >> By the way, somebody please run codespell on the Lilypond sources: >> http://git.profusion.mobi/cgit.cgi/lucas/codespell/ > > > Hi Pavel, > > that's what I did. I started with three patches, but as soon as > I know that they are accepted, more will follow.
Your two patches have been opened as http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=2237 http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=2238 The code is uploaded for review and comment to http://codereview.appspot.com/5562043 and http://codereview.appspot.com/5561053 I 'own' these issues but if you get reqests for changes you can just upload the changes to 'codereview' yourself (if you know how to do that) or you can attach any corrected patches to the code.google issues and I can re-submit them. The process is documented here: http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.15/Documentation/contributor/summary-for-experienced-developers (start at 'reviews' in this case) -- -- James _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
