Hello On Sunday, 20 November 2011, Trevor Daniels <t.dani...@treda.co.uk> wrote:
>> >> If you look at accent, the two entries there are shown against a single index entry, with 2 pages in the list of references. I believe that's how the acciaccatura should appear as well - otherwise there's a tendency to miss the fact that there are two entries and only follow the one, missing important information. > > The @index and @funindex macros generate calls to > different texinfo macros. From memory the @index > macro calls @kindex and @funindex calls both > @kindex and @findex. The two types of index entries > are printed with different typefaces, so maybe this > is why they are kept separate in the pdf. > > Actually the indices in the html manuals are in a far > worse state. Entries are not only unmerged but > every @seealso generates a spurious unhelpful entry. > See, for example, ambitus. Indexing has been discussed > several types in the past (search devel for index > funindex for a selection), but always deferred until > (a) the manuals were in a better shape and (b) the > syntax had stabilised. Maybe one day ... > > http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=855 is part of this James -- -- James
_______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
