Re: Fix issue 4355 -- broken beam subdivision (issue 226700043 by carl.d.soren...@gmail.com)

2015-04-26 Thread lilyliska
On 2015/04/26 02:35:34, Carl wrote: baseMoment does have another use. It is used to define the major beaming groups for automatic beaming. ... And this use of baseMoment is important for subdivision; subdivision is only possible at units of baseMoment. Thanks, Carl OK, so I "wi

Re: Fix issue 4355 -- broken beam subdivision (issue 226700043 by carl.d.soren...@gmail.com)

2015-04-25 Thread lilyliska
I have now checked the code for my interface idea, and it seems to work. In short, I did the following: - assign the subdivideBeams context property to base_moment - set subdivide_beams_ to true or false, depending on the value of base_moment_ - change to predicate of subdivideBeams to ly:moment?

Re: Fix issue 4355 -- broken beam subdivision (issue 226700043 by carl.d.soren...@gmail.com)

2015-04-25 Thread lilyliska
On 2015/04/25 22:58:56, Carl wrote: On 2015/04/25 11:54:01, benko.pal wrote: > 2015-04-25 10:20 GMT+02:00 : > > Thank you for picking this up. It is certainly an improvement already. > > > > However: In an example where 8 32th notes are subdivided by 16th note

Re: Fix issue 4355 -- broken beam subdivision (issue 226700043 by carl.d.soren...@gmail.com)

2015-04-25 Thread lilyliska
On 2015/04/25 08:20:52, uliska wrote: Thank you for picking this up. It is certainly an improvement already. However: In an example where 8 32th notes are subdivided by 16th notes ony the first and third subdivision should have two beams, the second one only one beam. Put differently: wh

Re: Fix issue 4355 -- broken beam subdivision (issue 226700043 by carl.d.soren...@gmail.com)

2015-04-25 Thread lilyliska
Thank you for picking this up. It is certainly an improvement already. However: In an example where 8 32th notes are subdivided by 16th notes ony the first and third subdivision should have two beams, the second one only one beam. Put differently: when there is following a total of an eighth not

web: productions: Update Aurélien's Rosenkavalier (issue 212330044 by lilyli...@googlemail.com)

2015-03-18 Thread lilyliska
Reviewers: , Message: It would be a pity to miss out on the opportunity to mention the famous commissioniers of this project. Description: web: productions: Update Aurélien's Rosenkavalier Please review this at https://codereview.appspot.com/212330044/ Affected files (+11, -7 lines): M Docum

Remove redundant (and) in ly/init.ly (issue 209320043 by lilyli...@googlemail.com)

2015-03-06 Thread lilyliska
Reviewers: , Message: See discussion here: http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2015-03/msg00180.html Description: Remove redundant (and) in ly/init.ly This (and) construct is redundant because the first expression is explicitly #t. Please review this at https://codereview.appspot.c

Issue 4254: Fix typo in NR example (vocal music) (issue 189520044 by lilyli...@googlemail.com)

2015-01-09 Thread lilyliska
Reviewers: , Description: Issue 4254: Fix typo in NR example (vocal music) Please review this at https://codereview.appspot.com/189520044/ Affected files (+1, -1 lines): M Documentation/notation/vocal.itely Index: Documentation/notation/vocal.itely diff --git a/Documentation/notation/vocal.

Re: Issue 461: LilyPond should accept a tie between notes which are enharmonically identical (issue 159050043 by d...@gnu.org)

2014-10-18 Thread lilyliska
LGTM too. Of course this doesn't look right out-of-the-box (maybe it would be good to let the Tie being printed as a Slur instead). But as one can use \shape it's at least possible to use that as a working and semantically correct solution. It even works with cross-staff ties (although I suspect

Re: Add original-breaks.ly commands (issue 150670043 by lilyli...@googlemail.com)

2014-10-09 Thread lilyliska
https://codereview.appspot.com/150670043/diff/1/Documentation/notation/spacing.itely File Documentation/notation/spacing.itely (right): https://codereview.appspot.com/150670043/diff/1/Documentation/notation/spacing.itely#newcode1857 Documentation/notation/spacing.itely:1857: @end lilypond On 201

Re: Implement -dtags-to-keep and -dtags-to-remove commandline options (issue 149650043 by d...@gnu.org)

2014-10-09 Thread lilyliska
The patch works as expected. However, it has to be noted that by default (that is, running without the option) *keeps* the tags. When I define a command and encapsulate it in a tag this command is executed unless explicitly switched off with -dtags-to-remove. https://codereview.appspot.com/14965

Add original-breaks.ly commands (issue 150670043 by lilyli...@googlemail.com)

2014-10-07 Thread lilyliska
Reviewers: , Description: Add original-breaks.ly commands The commands defined in this patch allow the user to insert breaks (line and page) from the original manuscript that are conditionally respected or discarded. This is very useful for entering and proof-reading music from larger scores. A

Allow changing of notation fonts (issue 115590043 by lilyli...@googlemail.com)

2014-08-02 Thread lilyliska
Reviewers: , Message: This is the current state of Abraham's approach to make music fonts switchable. The patch is incomplete in a few senses, but Abraham wants an official review for that current state: - there's no documentation -> We'll take care of that once the user interface has bee

Re: DOC: minor revisions to Easier Editing (issue 118350043 by colinpkcampb...@gmail.com)

2014-07-28 Thread lilyliska
Thanks, LTGM now https://codereview.appspot.com/118350043/ ___ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel

Re: DOC: minor revisions to Easier Editing (issue 118350043 by colinpkcampb...@gmail.com)

2014-07-27 Thread lilyliska
Apart from my comment LGTM https://codereview.appspot.com/118350043/diff/1/Documentation/web/introduction.itexi File Documentation/web/introduction.itexi (right): https://codereview.appspot.com/118350043/diff/1/Documentation/web/introduction.itexi#newcode1221 Documentation/web/introduction.itex

CG: Fix typo (issue 109140043 by lilyli...@googlemail.com)

2014-06-22 Thread lilyliska
Reviewers: , Message: I will push that as soon as it passes the tests Description: CG: Fix typo Reported by Pierre Perol-Schneider http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-lilypond/2014-06/msg00044.html Please review this at https://codereview.appspot.com/109140043/ Affected files (+1, -1 lines)

Remove ponding about Berne conference (issue 102150044)

2014-06-03 Thread lilyliska
Reviewers: , Message: As discussed last time I uploaded this "ponding" patch for review. But as it doesn't need any review I'll push to staging as soon as the patch passes the tests Description: Remove ponding about Berne conference Please review this at https://codereview.appspot.com/102150044

Re: Reposition voiced rests (Issue 3902) (issue 101720045)

2014-05-27 Thread lilyliska
On 2014/05/27 10:00:53, lemzwerg wrote: LGTM. What about making this configurable? I can imagine that for some special situations a higher default position of rests is desirable (e.g., fugues and the like). +1. Maybe with my suggested \oneVoice behaviour as the default? https://coderev

Re: Reposition voiced rests (Issue 3902) (issue 101720045)

2014-05-27 Thread lilyliska
On 2014/05/27 09:38:11, PhilEHolmes wrote: Please review According to the comparison images in https://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=3902#c5 this is definitely an improvement. (I had looked for that issue myself, but I have to admit that I have to stop when entering the C++ area .

Re: Issue 3918: Add \alternatingTimeSignatures (issue 97110045)

2014-05-16 Thread lilyliska
It took a while because in the meantime Peter Bjuhr joined efforts, and we implemented the option of printing hyphens between the time signatures. While I don't like this and wouldn't use it personally, it's explicitly suggested by Gould. Additional changes: - change to \fractionList that only re

Re: Issue 3917: Add \alternatingTimeSignatures (issue 97110045)

2014-05-12 Thread lilyliska
This notation _may_ make a score harder to read than typing all meter changes explicitly. But the intention of this patch is not to provide a better notation but to better support an existing notation. https://codereview.appspot.com/97110045/diff/80001/ly/music-functions-init.ly File ly/music-fu

Re: Issue 3917: Add \alternatingTimeSignatures (issue 97110045)

2014-05-10 Thread lilyliska
https://codereview.appspot.com/97110045/diff/80001/ly/music-functions-init.ly File ly/music-functions-init.ly (right): https://codereview.appspot.com/97110045/diff/80001/ly/music-functions-init.ly#newcode144 ly/music-functions-init.ly:144: #{ \once\override Staff.TimeSignature.stencil = On 2014/

Re: Issue 3917: Add \alternatingTimeSignatures (issue 97110045)

2014-05-10 Thread lilyliska
https://codereview.appspot.com/97110045/diff/60001/Documentation/notation/rhythms.itely File Documentation/notation/rhythms.itely (right): https://codereview.appspot.com/97110045/diff/60001/Documentation/notation/rhythms.itely#newcode1754 Documentation/notation/rhythms.itely:1754: aren't printed

Re: Issue 3917: Add \alternatingTimeSignatures (issue 97110045)

2014-05-10 Thread lilyliska
This is the right one, hopefully better understandable https://codereview.appspot.com/97110045/ ___ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel

Re: Issue 3917: Add \alternatingTimeSignatures (issue 97110045)

2014-05-10 Thread lilyliska
On 2014/05/10 08:33:44, uliska wrote: rewording doc section Oops? This Patch set is invalid ... https://codereview.appspot.com/97110045/ ___ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel

Re: Issue 3917: Add \alternatingTimeSignatures (issue 97110045)

2014-05-09 Thread lilyliska
On 2014/05/09 09:02:44, uliska wrote: Fixing doc error I think I found the issue (no new line after end of lilypond example). I'm very sorry that I currently can't test make doc due to an installation issue with dblatex. But I can't imagine any other spot here that could cause make doc to fail.

Issue 3917: Add \alternatingTimeSignatures (issue 97110045)

2014-05-08 Thread lilyliska
Reviewers: , Description: Issue 3916: Add \alternatingTimeSignatures A function to print a group of time signatures indicating a section of music with (irregularly) changing meters. Takes a list of lists, each sublist representing one time signature. The first of the time signatures will be used

Re: New ponding: Urs Liska Berne lectures (issue 94960043)

2014-05-02 Thread lilyliska
Updated patch, now applied to master. Originally I had chained two sequential patches to one branch. https://codereview.appspot.com/94960043/ ___ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel

New ponding: Urs Liska Berne lectures (issue 94960043)

2014-05-02 Thread lilyliska
Reviewers: , Description: New ponding: Urs Liska Berne lectures Please review this at https://codereview.appspot.com/94960043/ Affected files (+7, -0 lines): M Documentation/web/server/tweets.xml Index: Documentation/web/server/tweets.xml diff --git a/Documentation/web/server/tweets.xml b

Two minor fixes in existing pondings (issue 94070043)

2014-05-02 Thread lilyliska
Reviewers: , Description: Two minor fixes in existing pondings 1) Indentation fix in ponding 2) Fix typo in ponding Please review this at https://codereview.appspot.com/94070043/ Affected files (+3, -3 lines): M Documentation/web/server/tweets.xml Index: Documentation/web/server/tweets.xml

Re: Doc: Clarify grace note synchronisation workaround (issue 90270044)

2014-04-22 Thread lilyliska
https://codereview.appspot.com/90270044/diff/1/Documentation/notation/rhythms.itely File Documentation/notation/rhythms.itely (right): https://codereview.appspot.com/90270044/diff/1/Documentation/notation/rhythms.itely#newcode3514 Documentation/notation/rhythms.itely:3514: Please make sure that

Doc: Clarify grace note synchronisation workaround (issue 90270044)

2014-04-22 Thread lilyliska
Reviewers: , Description: Doc: Clarify grace note synchronisation workaround As pointed out in the thread http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2014-04/msg00540.html it is necessary to use \grace for the old grace note sync issue. This commit makes that explicit in the known issues sec

Add dodecaphonic-first accidental style (issue 79680044)

2014-03-25 Thread lilyliska
Reviewers: , Description: Add dodecaphonic-first accidental style This accidental style assigns accidentals to _all_ pitches (just as dodecaphonic does) but remembers them throughout a whole measure. This style is useful for different styles of contemporary notation that want to make use of the

CG: Add hints about using/adding images (issue 61540043)

2014-02-10 Thread lilyliska
Reviewers: , Description: CG: Add hints about using/adding images This is somewhat sketchy, but I can't afford to make this more thorouh ATM. Please review this at https://codereview.appspot.com/61540043/ Affected files (+25, -0 lines): M Documentation/contributor/doc-work.itexi M Document

Re: Add documentation for dodecaphonic-no-repeat (issue 61510043)

2014-02-10 Thread lilyliska
On 2014/02/10 12:50:27, J_lowe wrote: Thanks Urs. Some minor points. https://codereview.appspot.com/61510043/diff/1/Documentation/notation/pitches.itely File Documentation/notation/pitches.itely (right): https://codereview.appspot.com/61510043/diff/1/Documentation/notation/pitches.itely

Add documentation for dodecaphonic-no-repeat (issue 61510043)

2014-02-10 Thread lilyliska
Reviewers: , Message: This is an addition that David Nalesnik provided upon my request. I consider this a commonly used accidental style in contemporary music. Description: Add documentation for dodecaphonic-no-repeat Add dodecaphonic-no-repeat accidentalStyle This adds an accidental style th

Re: Add "Editing" page/node (issue 60530047)

2014-02-07 Thread lilyliska
On 2014/02/07 15:33:19, uliska wrote: Add pictures, fix whitespace errors As said earlier, I don't know how the colors of menu items are managed. So without more input I can't do anything about that. https://codereview.appspot.com/60530047/ ___ lily

Re: Add "Editing" page/node (issue 60530047)

2014-02-07 Thread lilyliska
On 2014/02/07 14:29:15, PhilEHolmes wrote: An initial comment: https://codereview.appspot.com/60530047/diff/1/Documentation/web/introduction.itexi File Documentation/web/introduction.itexi (left): https://codereview.appspot.com/60530047/diff/1/Documentation/web/introduction.itexi#oldcode78

Add "Editing" page/node (issue 60530047)

2014-02-07 Thread lilyliska
Reviewers: , Message: This has been waiting for some time, but is in line with stuff I did earlier and was also discussed earlier. A new page/node making the relation between input file, _any_ editor and _dedicated_ editor more explicit, hopefully being a step to reduce confusion for potential n

Re: Web: Text-input: make LM reference more friendly. (issue 51460043)

2014-01-18 Thread lilyliska
https://codereview.appspot.com/51460043/diff/1/Documentation/web/introduction.itexi File Documentation/web/introduction.itexi (right): https://codereview.appspot.com/51460043/diff/1/Documentation/web/introduction.itexi#newcode1138 Documentation/web/introduction.itexi:1138: before they come up! O

Web: Text-input: make LM reference more friendly. (issue 51460043)

2014-01-13 Thread lilyliska
Reviewers: , Message: How about that? It doesn't include David's latest suggestions (because I was already ready with it). This suggestion is merely a kind of "in-place" rewrite, but of course I'd also incorporate the more verbose suggestion (particularly as I will be working on this Text input

Web:Background: Reword introductory paragraph (issue 48360044)

2014-01-07 Thread lilyliska
Reviewers: , Description: Web:Background: Reword introductory paragraph I've always found this page confusing because I didn't understand why there is this "placeholder" page. This commit addresses this by making the "manual" issue explicit. Additionally I consider it more useful to _first_ tel

Web:Productions: Add title box (issue 38560044)

2014-01-07 Thread lilyliska
Reviewers: , Description: Web:Productions: Add title box As stated in https://codereview.appspot.com/48450044/ I think the Introduction pages should have a title box giving the user a first idea about the page. In this case the visitor (currently) would reach the page, doesn't see a heading and

Web:Examples: Enclose in box (issue 48450044)

2014-01-07 Thread lilyliska
Reviewers: , Description: Web:Examples: Enclose in box I think the pages below Introduction (and probably Community too) should consistently start with a box and a subheading, because there is no eye-catching page heading. This is _one_ option to do that for the Examples page. Others would be:

Re: Web:Introduction: Rename "Our Goal" box (issue 48430043)

2014-01-07 Thread lilyliska
https://codereview.appspot.com/48430043/diff/1/Documentation/web/introduction.itexi File Documentation/web/introduction.itexi (right): https://codereview.appspot.com/48430043/diff/1/Documentation/web/introduction.itexi#newcode14 Documentation/web/introduction.itexi:14: @subheading Our Mission On

Web:Introduction: Rename "Our Goal" box (issue 48430043)

2014-01-07 Thread lilyliska
Reviewers: , Description: Web:Introduction: Rename "Our Goal" box The content of this box was somewhat confusing and inconsistent. See http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-devel/2014-01/msg00011.html This commit tries to incorporate the suggestions made in this thread as far as I consider

Re: Website: rewrite Features page (issue 42770043)

2013-12-20 Thread lilyliska
https://codereview.appspot.com/42770043/diff/1/Documentation/web/introduction.itexi File Documentation/web/introduction.itexi (right): https://codereview.appspot.com/42770043/diff/1/Documentation/web/introduction.itexi#newcode119 Documentation/web/introduction.itexi:119: @divClass{color2} On 201

Website: rewrite Features page (issue 42770043)

2013-12-16 Thread lilyliska
Reviewers: , Message: This is much like the page I presented earlier at (http://openlilylib.org/lilyweb/features.html), with some minor modifications, and within the existing navigational structure Description: This is a rewrite of the Features page in order to make the structure of this page cl

Re: Web: Download: Add introductory text (issue 40510046)

2013-12-14 Thread lilyliska
https://codereview.appspot.com/40510046/diff/40001/Documentation/web/download.itexi File Documentation/web/download.itexi (left): https://codereview.appspot.com/40510046/diff/40001/Documentation/web/download.itexi#oldcode35 Documentation/web/download.itexi:35: @warningTextBased On 2013/12/14 03:

Re: Web: Download: Add introductory text (issue 40510046)

2013-12-13 Thread lilyliska
Incorporated most of the comments. Will upload new patch set in a minute https://codereview.appspot.com/40510046/diff/20001/Documentation/web/download.itexi File Documentation/web/download.itexi (right): https://codereview.appspot.com/40510046/diff/20001/Documentation/web/download.itexi#newcode

Web: Download: Add introductory text (issue 40510046)

2013-12-12 Thread lilyliska
Reviewers: , Description: Web: Download: Add introductory text This addresses the initial issue discussed on lilypond-user: too many people don't understand what they download and get stuck on not being able to "open the LilyPond program". Add a text that explains the compiled approach and make

Re: CG: Add comment about git-cl editor (issue 41310043)

2013-12-12 Thread lilyliska
On 2013/12/12 11:11:45, uliska wrote: Describing the solution for my problem when using git-cl for the first time Actually I'm not sure if @var is the right one here? https://codereview.appspot.com/41310043/ ___ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-

Web: Reword contactUsAbout macro (issue 40860046)

2013-12-12 Thread lilyliska
Reviewers: , Message: As suggested here http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-devel/2013-12/msg00183.html a first small patch for the website Description: Web: Reword contactUsAbout macro Providing information on new reviews/productions etc. should be possible by simply writing an email t

CG: Add comment about git-cl editor (issue 41310043)

2013-12-12 Thread lilyliska
Reviewers: , Message: Describing the solution for my problem when using git-cl for the first time Description: CG: Add comment about git-cl editor git-cl fires either the editor specified by the EDITOR environment variable or vi if EDITOR isn't defined. Commit mentions this in the CG Please re