Apart from my comment LGTM
https://codereview.appspot.com/118350043/diff/1/Documentation/web/introduction.itexi File Documentation/web/introduction.itexi (right): https://codereview.appspot.com/118350043/diff/1/Documentation/web/introduction.itexi#newcode1221 Documentation/web/introduction.itexi:1221: features added and enhanced particularly for LilyPond. It is easy to use Do you think it is relevant (today) that Frescobaldi has a LilyKDE history? And actually it is not _developed_ from LilyKDE: Frescobaldi 2 is a replacement for Frescobaldi 1, which was renamed from LilyKDE, which (IIRC) was either an extension or a development from Kite. https://codereview.appspot.com/118350043/ _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
