On 2015/04/25 22:58:56, Carl wrote:
On 2015/04/25 11:54:01, benko.pal wrote: > 2015-04-25 10:20 GMT+02:00 <mailto:lilyli...@googlemail.com>: > > Thank you for picking this up. It is certainly an improvement
already.
> > > > However: In an example where 8 32th notes are subdivided by 16th
notes
> > ony the first and third subdivision should have two beams, the
second
> > one only one beam. > > > > Put differently: when there is following a total of an eighth
note's
> > worth there should be only one beam, even when that total is
itself
> > subdivided into two sixteenth notes. (Presumably that logic should
be
> > propagated to the situation of (nested shorter notes): when 16
64th
> > notes are subdivided by 32ths the divisions should should have the > > following number of beams: 3-2-3-1-3-2-3. > > could you formulate this more generally? > e.g. what to do with 12 32th notes? > > p
If we have a baseMoment of 1/16, the 12 32nd notes will occur in 6
pairs with 3
beams.
The 1st and 2nd pairs will be joined with a double beam, as will the
3rd and
4th, and the 5th and 6th.
The beam between the 2nd and 3rd pair will be a single beam, as will
the beam
between the 4th and 5th.
LGTM. I don't understand the code, but the regression tests (and my own files) produce the correct result now. https://codereview.appspot.com/226700043/ _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
