Han-Wen Nienhuys writes:
> On Sun, Nov 22, 2009 at 4:49 AM, David Kastrup wrote:
>>> It's no problem at all, if you do it that way.
>>
>> Hello merge conflict, my old friend, I've come to talk with you again...
>>
>> If you have ever worked in a project with a central ChangeLog file, you
>> know
Patrick McCarty writes:
> On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 11:24 PM, David Kastrup wrote:
>> Patrick McCarty writes:
>>
>>> On 2009-11-16, David Kastrup wrote:
It still suffers from not doing short-circuit evaluation. For
readability and efficiency, I'd really prefer replacing
'(app
Han-Wen Nienhuys writes:
> On Sat, Nov 21, 2009 at 8:42 PM, David Kastrup wrote:
>>> I'll make one last suggestion, which you are free to ignore.
>>>
>>> I'd suggest a message to -devel and to Han-Wen and Jan, with a simple
>>> subject requesting push access, and no extra baggage.
>
>> I have no
Han-Wen Nienhuys writes:
> On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 10:20 PM, David Kastrup wrote:
>>
>> I have no idea what I am doing here. In particular not with the
>> \override, and the set-object-property!. Can somebody explain to me
>> just what data structures I happen to manipulate, and how a user is
On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 10:25 AM, David Kastrup wrote:
> Kieren MacMillan writes:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>>> Could it be an option to make 4*8 do the obvious thing?
>>> Or even { 4 }*8 ?
>>> That would be so much more natural. The first already does something,
>>> but not something which I would call usefu
On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 3:44 PM, David Kastrup wrote:
> Hi, I am currently turning to the problem of typesetting chords for
> accordion. Basically I want to detect the chord/bass input like
> ChordNames does, and then do my own translation into bass notes and
> chords. Chord and bass note names
On Sat, Nov 21, 2009 at 8:42 PM, David Kastrup wrote:
>> I'll make one last suggestion, which you are free to ignore.
>>
>> I'd suggest a message to -devel and to Han-Wen and Jan, with a simple
>> subject requesting push access, and no extra baggage.
> I have no idea whether they'll grant it, but
On Sat, Nov 21, 2009 at 10:17 PM, David Kastrup wrote:
>>> Modifying Lilypond, then recompiling and reinstalling. That's not the
>>> most hack-friendly way. I am still finding my way around.
>>
>> You're only modifying .scm files, so there shouldn't be any
>> recompiling/reinstalling involved.
>
On Sun, Nov 22, 2009 at 4:49 AM, David Kastrup wrote:
>> It's no problem at all, if you do it that way.
>
> Hello merge conflict, my old friend, I've come to talk with you again...
>
> If you have ever worked in a project with a central ChangeLog file, you
> know the permanent hassle with switchin
Hi,
On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 10:20 PM, David Kastrup wrote:
>
> I have no idea what I am doing here. In particular not with the
> \override, and the set-object-property!. Can somebody explain to me
> just what data structures I happen to manipulate, and how a user is
> actually _supposed_ to be
On 11/22/09 10:50 AM, "Nicolas Sceaux" wrote:
> Le 22 nov. 2009 à 17:10, Graham Percival a écrit :
>
>> On Sun, Nov 22, 2009 at 3:37 PM, wrote:
>>> As I'm not (obviously) a native English speaker, comments on style are
>>> most welcome.
>>
>> Whenever I try to publish my comments, I get a
LGTM
On Sun, Nov 22, 2009 at 10:03 PM, David Kastrup wrote:
> ---
> scm/define-markup-commands.scm | 3 +--
> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> This patch series makes the syntax of builtin markup
> commands upwards compatible with the user level ones.
>
> diff --git a/scm/
On Sun, Nov 22, 2009 at 3:04 PM, Graham Percival
wrote:
> Valentin: could you check if LSR has an example like this, and if
> not, add wilhelmus to LSR?
Done: http://lsr.dsi.unimi.it/LSR/Item?id=648
Cheers,
Valentin
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
li
On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 11:24 PM, David Kastrup wrote:
> Patrick McCarty writes:
>
>> On 2009-11-16, David Kastrup wrote:
>>>
>>> It still suffers from not doing short-circuit evaluation. For
>>> readability and efficiency, I'd really prefer replacing
>>> '(apply functional-or' with '(any'
>>
>>
On Sun, Nov 22, 2009 at 7:05 PM, David Pounder wrote:
> Very small point, but the phrase "Frogs are simple LilyPond users" would be
> better expressed as "Frogs are simply LilyPond users" as the former has an
> undesired implication, at least in UK English.
Hehe. It never occurred to me, but no
The specification of category and properties makes the *-builtin-*
variants diverge syntactically from the user specified markup. Moving
those specifications into keyword arguments makes the builtin defining
macros upwards compatible with the user specified ones.
---
scm/define-markup-commands.sc
All markup commands defined with these macros must be adapted to the
new syntax.
---
scm/define-markup-commands.scm | 449
scm/fret-diagrams.scm | 18 +-
scm/harp-pedals.scm|8 +-
scm/tablature.scm |3 +-
4 files
---
scm/define-markup-commands.scm |3 +--
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
This patch series makes the syntax of builtin markup
commands upwards compatible with the user level ones.
diff --git a/scm/define-markup-commands.scm b/scm/define-markup-commands.scm
index 449f3c7..0
The already outcommented problematic \harp-pedal-verbose markup is
removed completely. Inlining make-harp-pedal makes it possible to use
the property binding mechanism of define-builtin-markup-command in
order to minimize inconsistencies between documentation and behavior.
---
scm/harp-pedals.scm
On Sun, Nov 22, 2009 at 11:02 AM, Graham Percival
wrote:
> I'm vaguely aware of some discussion about a memory leak. Would
> anybody mind if we release 2.13.8 now?
>
> A few tests are in the usual place:
> http://lilypond.org/~graham/
The darwin-x86 build checks out fine on Leopard (can't test
2009/11/22 Graham Percival :
> I'm vaguely aware of some discussion about a memory leak. Would
> anybody mind if we release 2.13.8 now?
>
> A few tests are in the usual place:
> http://lilypond.org/~graham/
The mingw binary works fine under Wine.
>
> The regtests look good, other than chords-fu
Anthony W. Youngman wrote Sunday, November 22, 2009 8:06 PM
In message
,
Frédéric Bron writes
create a mount point:
$ mkdir /mnt/Share
then add the following line to /etc/fstab:
Share /mnt/Share vboxsf defaults 0 0
Hmm. Is there any way to have this pre-configured? i.e. tell
uses to creat
Just a heads up for those who are thinking about hosting part of the
distributed LilyPond server vision.
I created a Java servlet based service for LilyPond for the purposes of
Google Wave.
It runs on a virtual private server with 256MB RAM (running Ubuntu
Linux, Tomcat, a database and nothing m
In message
, Frédéric
Bron writes
create a mount point:
$ mkdir /mnt/Share
then add the following line to /etc/fstab:
Share /mnt/Share vboxsf defaults 0 0
Hmm. Is there any way to have this pre-configured? i.e. tell
uses to create
C:\lilybuntu-share\
in windows (or create i
On Sun, Nov 22, 2009 at 03:19:00PM +, Ian Hulin wrote:
> Graham Percival wrote:
>> I've made a first draft of the "help us" page:
>> http://kainhofer.com/~lilypond/Documentation/web/help-us.html
>
> "To get the source code, see Starting with git."
> I've got problems with this here and in the C
>> create a mount point:
>> $ mkdir /mnt/Share
>> then add the following line to /etc/fstab:
>> Share /mnt/Share vboxsf defaults 0 0
>
> Hmm. Is there any way to have this pre-configured? i.e. tell
> uses to create
> C:\lilybuntu-share\
> in windows (or create it for them), and h
I'm vaguely aware of some discussion about a memory leak. Would
anybody mind if we release 2.13.8 now?
A few tests are in the usual place:
http://lilypond.org/~graham/
The regtests look good, other than chords-funky-ignatzek showing
something complicated instead of C^10, but I assume that's
de
> --- Original Message ---
> From: David Kastrup
> To: lilypond-devel@gnu.org
> Sent: 22.11.09, 18:27:02
> Subject: Re: help wanted page
>
> Graham Percival writes:
>
> > On Sun, Nov 22, 2009 at 06:05:45PM -, David Pounder wrote:
> >>
> >> Very small point, but the phrase "Frogs
Graham Percival writes:
> On Sun, Nov 22, 2009 at 06:05:45PM -, David Pounder wrote:
>>
>> Very small point, but the phrase "Frogs are simple LilyPond
>> users" would be better expressed as "Frogs are simply LilyPond
>> users" as the former has an undesired implication, at least in
>> UK Eng
On Sun, Nov 22, 2009 at 06:44:38PM +0100, Frédéric Bron wrote:
> > The only two problems I've yet to resolve are how to share files
> > with my Windows host
>
> Create a directory in windows for that, let's say d:\Share
> Then you go in VirtualBox, click on the virtual machine name and in
> the me
On Sun, Nov 22, 2009 at 06:05:45PM -, David Pounder wrote:
>
> Very small point, but the phrase "Frogs are simple LilyPond
> users" would be better expressed as "Frogs are simply LilyPond
> users" as the former has an undesired implication, at least in
> UK English.
LOL! I took that paragrap
> --- Original Message ---
> From: Graham Percival
> To: lilypond-devel@gnu.org
> Sent: 22.11.09, 14:07:12
> Subject: help wanted page
>
> I've made a first draft of the "help us" page:
> http://kainhofer.com/~lilypond/Documentation/web/help-us.html
>
> I'm not very happy with the resu
2009/11/22 Trevor Daniels :
> The only two problems I've yet to resolve are how to share files
> with my Windows host
I usually open the Places menu and choose 'connect to a host', this
opens a file browser on the host if you know its IP and select a
proper protocol. Sorry for not giving more det
Le 22 nov. 2009 à 17:10, Graham Percival a écrit :
> On Sun, Nov 22, 2009 at 3:37 PM, wrote:
>> As I'm not (obviously) a native English speaker, comments on style are
>> most welcome.
>
> Whenever I try to publish my comments, I get a 500 server error. :(
> I'll summarize them below:
> - use @
> The only two problems I've yet to resolve are how to share files
> with my Windows host
Create a directory in windows for that, let's say d:\Share
Then you go in VirtualBox, click on the virtual machine name and in
the menu "Machine/Preferences".
Here you find shared directories where you can ad
Nicolas,
I'm now having similar problems on Rietveld as Graham.
First five lines of your docstring in scm/markup.scm in the
property-bind macro should say:
"Search properties in `props', and bind each property symbol to a
corresponding value, or to a default if a value is not found.
props: a
Thank you Ian for the careful review.
Nicolas
http://codereview.appspot.com/157133/diff/1/2
File Documentation/extending/programming-interface.itely (right):
http://codereview.appspot.com/157133/diff/1/2#newcode1045
Documentation/extending/programming-interface.itely:1045: The
@code{layout} a
Jonathan Kulp wrote Friday, June 12, 2009 8:59 PM
The .iso is finished uploading and is ready for testing by whoever
wants to
try it. Download here:
http://prodet.hu/bert/lilydev/lilybuntu.iso
It's 716 MB, so it won't fit on a CD. If you're using a virtual
machine you
don't have to worry ab
Nicolas,
These are mainly stylistic changes. Please double-check to ensure I
haven't changed the meaning of what you intended.
Cheers,
Ian
http://codereview.appspot.com/157133/diff/1/2
File Documentation/extending/programming-interface.itely (right):
http://codereview.appspot.com/157133/diff/
On Sun, Nov 22, 2009 at 3:37 PM, wrote:
> As I'm not (obviously) a native English speaker, comments on style are
> most welcome.
Whenever I try to publish my comments, I get a 500 server error. :(
I'll summarize them below:
- use @var{foo} for variable names. This applies to both the .itely
fi
Reviewers: ,
Message:
Hi,
This patch improves (as I hope) the documentation on markup command
definition, by using more complete examples. It also tries to address
an issue that was raised on -devel, concerning the different syntax
between built-in and user-defined markup command definition.
A
Graham Percival wrote:
I've made a first draft of the "help us" page:
http://kainhofer.com/~lilypond/Documentation/web/help-us.html
I'm not very happy with the result, but I can't put my finger on
precisely why. Maybe it's that I've forgotten some ways that
people can help, without source code,
On 11/22/09 2:47 AM, "Nicolas Sceaux" wrote:
>
>> It is not a "little inconvenience" if internals are defined in a
>> different, undocumented way that apparently only a single developer
>> understands and realizes.
>
> This comment would have been valid a few hours before, but it's not
> any
On 11/21/09 7:41 PM, "Carl Sorensen" wrote:
>
>
>
>
> On 11/21/09 4:48 PM, "David Kastrup" wrote:
>
>> Graham Percival writes:
>>
>>> You're welcome to write up documentation about the current
>>> architecture; you're probably one of the top 10 people in the
>>> world when it comes to
On 11/21/09 11:49 PM, "David Kastrup" wrote:
> Carl Sorensen writes:
>
>> And if you have the source tree in a git repository, then it's trivial to
>> make branches, and checkout the appropriate branch. That way you don't have
>> to worry about overwrites (and if you do have overwrite probl
On Sun, Nov 22, 2009 at 03:27:52PM +0100, David Kastrup wrote:
> "Mailist support: we have many users asking for him" is utterly
> incomprehensible. Probably you mean something like
Oops, s/him/help/
Cheers,
- Graham
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
l
Graham Percival wrote:
I've made a first draft of the "help us" page:
http://kainhofer.com/~lilypond/Documentation/web/help-us.html
I'm not very happy with the result, but I can't put my finger on
precisely why. Maybe it's that I've forgotten some ways that
people can help, without source code,
Graham Percival writes:
> I've made a first draft of the "help us" page:
> http://kainhofer.com/~lilypond/Documentation/web/help-us.html
>
> I'm not very happy with the result, but I can't put my finger on
> precisely why. Maybe it's that I've forgotten some ways that
> people can help, without
I've made a first draft of the "help us" page:
http://kainhofer.com/~lilypond/Documentation/web/help-us.html
I'm not very happy with the result, but I can't put my finger on
precisely why. Maybe it's that I've forgotten some ways that
people can help, without source code, or without compiling
stu
On Sun, Nov 22, 2009 at 12:41:08PM +0100, Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote:
> What if someone wants to set a hymn (wilhelmus)
We have SATB templates, we have a gregorian template, etc. The
only odd thing about wilhelmus is the huge horizontal space to the
left and right of the notes.
Valentin: could you
Op zaterdag 21-11-2009 om 17:46 uur [tijdzone +], schreef Graham
Percival:
> Remember, this discussion is about whether or not these files
> should be restored as part of the developer-only regtests. We've
> already decided that they're not worth being added to the Examples
> or Snippets.
Is
Nicolas Sceaux writes:
> Le 22 nov. 2009 à 00:00, David Kastrup a écrit :
>>
>>> I'd be insterested to see an implementation of a single
>>> `define-markup-command' for builtin and user defined markups, where
>>> user defined commands do not pollute the (lily) module, and still are
>>> available
Le 22 nov. 2009 à 00:00, David Kastrup a écrit :
>
>> I'd be insterested to see an implementation of a single
>> `define-markup-command' for builtin and user defined markups, where
>> user defined commands do not pollute the (lily) module, and still are
>> available across file includes.
>
> Ther
53 matches
Mail list logo
