On 11/21/09 11:49 PM, "David Kastrup" <d...@gnu.org> wrote: > Carl Sorensen <c_soren...@byu.edu> writes: > >> And if you have the source tree in a git repository, then it's trivial to >> make branches, and checkout the appropriate branch. That way you don't have >> to worry about overwrites (and if you do have overwrite problems, then you >> just reset the head). >> >> It's no problem at all, if you do it that way. > > Hello merge conflict, my old friend, I've come to talk with you again... > > If you have ever worked in a project with a central ChangeLog file, you > know the permanent hassle with switching branches when some changes > require entries in a central file. It's never caused me a problem, and I've worked with a lot of changes in the .scm files. Carl _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
- Re: Code review/discussion time again. David Kastrup
- Re: Code review/discussion time again. Neil Puttock
- Re: Code review/discussion time again. David Kastrup
- Re: Code review/discussion time again. Neil Puttock
- Re: Code review/discussion time a... David Kastrup
- Re: Code review/discussion ti... Reinhold Kainhofer
- Re: Code review/discussion ti... Neil Puttock
- Re: Code review/discussion ti... David Kastrup
- Re: Code review/discussion ti... Carl Sorensen
- Re: Code review/discussion ti... David Kastrup
- Re: Code review/discussion ti... Carl Sorensen
- Re: Code review/discussion ti... Han-Wen Nienhuys
- Re: Code review/discussion ti... David Kastrup
- Re: Code review/discussion ti... Reinhold Kainhofer
- Re: Code review/discussion ti... Reinhold Kainhofer
- Re: Code review/discussion ti... David Kastrup
- Re: Code review/discussion ti... Han-Wen Nienhuys
- Re: Code review/discussion time again. Han-Wen Nienhuys
- Re: Code review/discussion time again. David Kastrup
- Re: Code review/discussion time again. Han-Wen Nienhuys
- Re: Code review/discussion time again. David Kastrup