Han-Wen Nienhuys <hanw...@gmail.com> writes: > On Sat, Nov 21, 2009 at 8:42 PM, David Kastrup <d...@gnu.org> wrote: >>> I'll make one last suggestion, which you are free to ignore. >>> >>> I'd suggest a message to -devel and to Han-Wen and Jan, with a simple >>> subject requesting push access, and no extra baggage. > >> I have no idea whether they'll grant it, but I don't think that I would >> do more damage than good. Which is the metric that counts in the long >> run. > > We generally grant access to people who have sent us lots of patches > that demonstrate that they know what they are doing. I think this > code needs some more rounds of revision before it qualifies as one.
Oh, I was not thinking of pushing _this_ in the current state. As long as I have no clue what I am doing, I would not think of that. But in order to get a clue, I need time and effort, and it is more efficient if I don't waste my and the spare reviewers' time and energy on _those_ patches I _know_ to be good because they are well in my comfort zone. The accordion code is not there yet. -- David Kastrup _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
