On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 11:24 PM, David Kastrup <d...@gnu.org> wrote: > Patrick McCarty <pnor...@gmail.com> writes: > >> On 2009-11-16, David Kastrup wrote: >>> >>> It still suffers from not doing short-circuit evaluation. For >>> readability and efficiency, I'd really prefer replacing >>> '(apply functional-or' with '(any' >> >> It looks like Neil removed the "is-harmonic" binding from this >> procedure a couple of days ago, since it was unused. >> >> So, nothing really needs to be changed after all. :-) > > Still I feel more comfortable with this patch in place. I am not > entirely sure whether it would not be simpler to just scratch both > functional-or and functional-and altogether since they are basically > only useful in situations where one would better use a different mapping > function with short-circuit evaluation.
Oh, I didn't realize you wanted to change the `functional-or' itself. I don't think we should remove the two procedures entirely, because users might have written Scheme extension code that uses them. Can you send a formal patch so I can see how you want these procedures implemented? Thanks, Patrick _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
