Re: Re: List of Frameworks

On Monday, November 11, 2013 02:22:43 Aleix Pol wrote: > On Sun, Nov 10, 2013 at 9:58 PM, Dominik Haumann wrote: > > Hi, > > > > currently, http://community.kde.org/Frameworks/Epics/Modularization shows > > a > > list of modules in the respective Tiers. It does not, however, show > > whether > >

Re: Having a Tier 0 for cmake and git submodules

On Sun, November 10, 2013 20:11:07 David Faure wrote: > On Sunday 10 November 2013 13:44:09 Michael Pyne wrote: > > I would highly recommend doing something similar to what was done for > > strigi when it was split into 5 git modules. > > I think you misunderstood the issue? > > A super-repo mig

Re: Review Request 113723: Fix KIO to build standalone, prepare for moving into its tier

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/113723/ --- (Updated Nov. 11, 2013, 3:23 a.m.) Review request for KDE Frameworks. Ch

Re: Review Request 113723: Fix KIO to build standalone, prepare for moving into its tier

> On Nov. 9, 2013, 12:47 a.m., David Faure wrote: > > staging/kio/CMakeLists.txt, line 30 > > > > > > already listed 6 lines above I had to add it because it's a dependency-of-a-dependency. I'll add a comment abo

Review Request 113792: Fix Build of KDNSSD with DNSSD Backend

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/113792/ --- Review request for KDE Frameworks. Repository: kdelibs Description -

Re: List of Frameworks

On Sun, Nov 10, 2013 at 9:58 PM, Dominik Haumann wrote: > Hi, > > currently, http://community.kde.org/Frameworks/Epics/Modularization shows > a > list of modules in the respective Tiers. It does not, however, show whether > it's functional, integration or a solution. > > Imo if would be good to h

Re: Review Request 113657: Fix Standalone Configuration of DNSSD

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/113657/ --- (Updated Nov. 11, 2013, 12:25 a.m.) Status -- This change has been ma

Re: Review Request 113657: Fix Standalone Configuration of DNSSD

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/113657/#review43396 --- This review has been submitted with commit 39e87ae731a0972f3db

Re: Review Request 113657: Fix Standalone Configuration of DNSSD

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/113657/ --- (Updated Nov. 11, 2013, 12:21 a.m.) Review request for KDE Frameworks, Kev

Re: Review Request 113670: Only link to Qt5::X11Extras and ${X11_LIBRARIES} if X11 was found

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/113670/#review43395 --- This review has been submitted with commit 92ae4f49927e6b2f0b6

Re: Review Request 113670: Only link to Qt5::X11Extras and ${X11_LIBRARIES} if X11 was found

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/113670/ --- (Updated Nov. 10, 2013, 11:42 p.m.) Status -- This change has been ma

Re: Review Request 113670: Only link to Qt5::X11Extras and ${X11_LIBRARIES} if X11 was found

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/113670/#review43394 --- This review has been submitted with commit b1b4d885e1e3dc30eb5

Re: Having a Tier 0 for cmake and git submodules

On Sunday 10 November 2013 17:57:00 Kevin Ottens wrote: > Hello, > > Since there's been several times discussions about having a kind of "Tier 0" > for building our frameworks containing what is right now in ECM kde-modules > directory, but the idea was never really on the table because of the ext

List of Frameworks

Hi, currently, http://community.kde.org/Frameworks/Epics/Modularization shows a list of modules in the respective Tiers. It does not, however, show whether it's functional, integration or a solution. Imo if would be good to have this as column, too. Since then a quick look allows us (for insta

Re: Having a Tier 0 for cmake and git submodules

On Sunday 10 November 2013 13:44:09 Michael Pyne wrote: > I would highly recommend doing something similar to what was done for > strigi when it was split into 5 git modules. I think you misunderstood the issue? A super-repo might help automating "building all of KF5", but it doesn't solve the

Re: Having a Tier 0 for cmake and git submodules

On Sun, November 10, 2013 17:57:00 Kevin Ottens wrote: > Now back to the submodules sha-1 update... The only thing I see to easily > overcome that for our developers, is to have a hook, which would update the > submodules for all the frameworks every time someone pushes in the tier 0 > repository.

Re: Review Request 113704: Fix EPS plugin

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/113704/#review43389 --- Ship it! tier1/kguiaddons/src/plugins/imageformats/eps.cpp

Re: Review Request 113704: Fix EPS plugin

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/113704/#review43387 --- This review has been submitted with commit 72c38260b34bf03f0f3

Re: Review Request 113704: Fix EPS plugin

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/113704/#review43388 --- This review has been submitted with commit 858b2416420e5c5e1da

Re: Review Request 113704: Fix EPS plugin

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/113704/ --- (Updated Nov. 10, 2013, 7:05 p.m.) Status -- This change has been mar

Re: Review Request 113704: Fix EPS plugin

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/113704/#review43385 --- This review has been submitted with commit b6873bb4c752e518b5d

Re: Review Request 113704: Fix EPS plugin

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/113704/#review43386 --- This review has been submitted with commit eecc95e4a8939924492

Re: Having a Tier 0 for cmake and git submodules

On Sunday 10 November 2013 19:42:46 Alexander Neundorf wrote: > this would mean that the 3 KDE* files from ecm plus the KF5 umbrella > Config.cmake file would be used within KF5 as a git submodule. > Users of KF5 can get access to it via using the installed KF5 umbrella > package, or not if they

Re: Having a Tier 0 for cmake and git submodules

On Sunday 10 November 2013 18:23:33 Sune Vuorela wrote: > DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=Debug is building with -O2 Oh wow, I always thought this was cmake's doing, but you're right, it's not. This is an historical bit from the automake/unsermake times. We had debug (-O2 -g) and debugfull (no optimization, a

Re: Having a Tier 0 for cmake and git submodules

On Sunday 10 November 2013, Sune Vuorela wrote: > On 2013-11-10, Kevin Ottens wrote: > > --===3596639883239406900== > > Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart1424144.VkBYIHTjbs"; > > micalg="pgp-sha1"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" > > > > > > --nextPart1424144.VkB

Re: Review Request 113704: Fix EPS plugin

> On Nov. 10, 2013, 6:39 p.m., David Faure wrote: > > tier1/kguiaddons/src/plugins/imageformats/eps.cpp, line 246 > > > > > > My suggestion was simply QImageReader ppmReader(io, "ppm"), to let it > > read directl

Re: Having a Tier 0 for cmake and git submodules

On Sunday 10 November 2013, David Faure wrote: > On Sunday 10 November 2013 17:57:00 Kevin Ottens wrote: > > Now back to the submodules sha-1 update... The only thing I see to easily > > overcome that for our developers, is to have a hook, which would update > > the submodules for all the framework

Re: Review Request 113704: Fix EPS plugin

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/113704/#review43380 --- Ship it! One more thing, but if this isn't possible, then ship

Re: Having a Tier 0 for cmake and git submodules

On 2013-11-10, Kevin Ottens wrote: > > --===3596639883239406900== > Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart1424144.VkBYIHTjbs"; > micalg="pgp-sha1"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" > > > --nextPart1424144.VkBYIHTjbs > Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable > Conte

Re: Review Request 113704: Fix EPS plugin

> On Nov. 10, 2013, 11:20 a.m., David Faure wrote: > > tier1/kguiaddons/src/plugins/imageformats/eps.cpp, line 300 > > > > > > isn't there a better method to call than pid()? You're right; I missed the state() me

Re: Review Request 113704: Fix EPS plugin

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/113704/ --- (Updated Nov. 10, 2013, 6:16 p.m.) Review request for KDE Frameworks. Ch

Re: Having a Tier 0 for cmake and git submodules

On Sunday 10 November 2013 17:57:00 Kevin Ottens wrote: > Now back to the submodules sha-1 update... The only thing I see to easily > overcome that for our developers, is to have a hook, which would update the > submodules for all the frameworks every time someone pushes in the tier 0 > repositor

Re: Review Request 112880: Added KColorSchemeToken class.

> On Oct. 21, 2013, 11:22 a.m., Kevin Ottens wrote: > > To get in this patch would benefit from being based on the frameworks > > branch and go into kdeclarative. > > Kevin Ottens wrote: > Any chance for an update? Yes I will finish it, when have time. There are many pre-exams in universit

Re: Having a Tier 0 for cmake and git submodules

On Sunday 10 November 2013 17:12:02 Sune Vuorela wrote: > Why move it out of e-c-m ? To make e-c-m a neutral ground again, not something purely for KDE needs. I can understand that positioning. > And if a distribution need to patch whatever is in the 'submodule', they > have a enormous useless p

Re: Review Request 113712: Add popup for window with SkipTaskbar set in kpassivepopuptest

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/113712/ --- (Updated Nov. 10, 2013, 5:23 p.m.) Status -- This change has been mar

Re: Review Request 113713: Solid UDisks2 backend: fixes to propertiesChanged signal handling

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/113713/ --- (Updated Nov. 10, 2013, 5:23 p.m.) Status -- This change has been mar

Re: Review Request 113713: Solid UDisks2 backend: fixes to propertiesChanged signal handling

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/113713/#review43373 --- This review has been submitted with commit f5c87f8fc93df462551

Re: Review Request 113712: Add popup for window with SkipTaskbar set in kpassivepopuptest

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/113712/#review43372 --- This review has been submitted with commit 7ce144ac99c3f802431

Re: Review Request 113711: Clean up API of KPassivePopup

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/113711/ --- (Updated Nov. 10, 2013, 5:23 p.m.) Status -- This change has been mar

Re: Review Request 113713: Solid UDisks2 backend: fixes to propertiesChanged signal handling

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/113713/#review43371 --- This review has been submitted with commit ece826d3495c82cdd6b

Re: Review Request 113711: Clean up API of KPassivePopup

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/113711/#review43370 --- This review has been submitted with commit f33e6dea79e3edcdd59

Re: Having a Tier 0 for cmake and git submodules

On 2013-11-10, Kevin Ottens wrote: > Since there's been several times discussions about having a kind of "Ti= > er 0"=20 > for building our frameworks containing what is right now in ECM kde-mod= > ules=20 > directory, but the idea was never really on the table because of the ex= > tra=20 > depend

Re: Review Request 113631: Allow compiling kwindowsystem on Windows

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/113631/#review43369 --- please use winsock2.h instead of winsock.h - Patrick von Reth

Re: Getting ecm files from the ECM package

On Sunday 10 November 2013 17:30:23 Alexander Neundorf wrote: > On Sunday 10 November 2013, Kevin Ottens wrote: > > Now I guess we could do it for both, but it looks tricky for something > > which would have a separate release cycle like ECM. While for the tier0 > > the release cycle would be tied

Having a Tier 0 for cmake and git submodules

Hello, Since there's been several times discussions about having a kind of "Tier 0" for building our frameworks containing what is right now in ECM kde-modules directory, but the idea was never really on the table because of the extra dependency it'd bring, I looked a bit at the git submodule o

Re: RFC Rules for installation of header files

Hello, On Wednesday 06 November 2013 08:52:29 Aurélien Gâteau wrote: > Yesterday frameworks meeting spawned a discussion regarding folders in > header files. I think there's an aspect missing in your proposal. There's the convention we want for #include and where we install. That's in the end tw

Re: Getting ecm files from the ECM package

On Sunday 10 November 2013, Kevin Ottens wrote: > On Sunday 10 November 2013 16:27:06 Alexander Neundorf wrote: > > On Sunday 10 November 2013, Alexander Neundorf wrote: > > > On Sunday 10 November 2013, David Faure wrote: > > > > On Sunday 03 November 2013 14:05:32 Alexander Neundorf wrote: > > >

Re: Review Request 113670: Only link to Qt5::X11Extras and ${X11_LIBRARIES} if X11 was found

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/113670/#review43366 --- Ship it! Ship It! - Kevin Ottens On Nov. 8, 2013, 9:04 p.m.

Re: Review Request 113708: Make kcmutils build standalone

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/113708/#review43365 --- Ship it! Ship It! - Kevin Ottens On Nov. 7, 2013, 3:36 p.m.

Re: Review Request 113696: Rename knewstuff private headers to _p.h

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/113696/#review43364 --- Ship it! Ship It! - Kevin Ottens On Nov. 6, 2013, 7:17 p.m.

Re: Review Request 113694: Fix KNewStuff standalone build

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/113694/#review43363 --- Ship it! Ship It! - Kevin Ottens On Nov. 7, 2013, 1:04 p.m.

Re: Review Request 113712: Add popup for window with SkipTaskbar set in kpassivepopuptest

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/113712/#review43362 --- Ship it! Ship It! - Kevin Ottens On Nov. 8, 2013, 12:12 p.m

Re: Review Request 113693: Fix KNotifyConfig standalone build

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/113693/#review43361 --- Ship it! After adjusting the comment it can go in indeed. - K

Re: Review Request 113695: Fix KDEWebKit standalone build

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/113695/#review43360 --- Ship it! Ship It! - Kevin Ottens On Nov. 7, 2013, 12:38 p.m

Re: Review Request 113686: Fix KParts standalone build

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/113686/#review43359 --- Ship it! Ship It! - Kevin Ottens On Nov. 7, 2013, 1:04 p.m.

Re: Review Request 113713: Solid UDisks2 backend: fixes to propertiesChanged signal handling

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/113713/#review43358 --- Ship it! Ship It! - Kevin Ottens On Nov. 7, 2013, 7:08 p.m.

Re: Review Request 113711: Clean up API of KPassivePopup

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/113711/#review43357 --- Ship it! Ship It! - Kevin Ottens On Nov. 7, 2013, 6:57 p.m.

Re: Review Request 113731: Fix kdesu standalone build.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/113731/#review43355 --- This review has been submitted with commit f75df03e8af820f23a3

Re: Review Request 113731: Fix kdesu standalone build.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/113731/ --- (Updated Nov. 10, 2013, 3:53 p.m.) Status -- This change has been mar

Re: Review Request 113730: Fix kpty standalone build

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/113730/#review43354 --- This review has been submitted with commit d51d9cfba180345af4c

Re: Review Request 113730: Fix kpty standalone build

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/113730/ --- (Updated Nov. 10, 2013, 3:53 p.m.) Status -- This change has been mar

Re: Review Request 113506: Add a sb_all target and sb_$framework targets to make it easier to build frameworks standalone

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/113506/#review43353 --- Please someone with more cmake-fu than myself look at it. It's

Re: Review Request 113657: Fix Standalone Configuration of DNSSD

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/113657/#review43351 --- Ship it! I think that's fine to keep the modules private, they

Re: Review Request 113631: Allow compiling kwindowsystem on Windows

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/113631/ --- (Updated Nov. 10, 2013, 3:46 p.m.) Review request for KDE Frameworks, Patr

Re: Review Request 112880: Added KColorSchemeToken class.

> On Oct. 21, 2013, 11:22 a.m., Kevin Ottens wrote: > > To get in this patch would benefit from being based on the frameworks > > branch and go into kdeclarative. Any chance for an update? - Kevin --- This is an automatically generated

Re: Review Request 112785: Add ki18n_wrap_ui macro to ki18nMacros

> On Sept. 23, 2013, 10:37 a.m., Kevin Ottens wrote: > > I'm surprised it doesn't use qt5_wrap_ui. It seems to reinvent it at least > > partly. > > Jeremy Whiting wrote: > well, qt5_wrap_ui wasn't around when this was created (as > kde4_add_ui_files iirc). All I did was copy it and rename

Re: Getting ecm files from the ECM package

On Sunday 10 November 2013 16:27:06 Alexander Neundorf wrote: > On Sunday 10 November 2013, Alexander Neundorf wrote: > > On Sunday 10 November 2013, David Faure wrote: > > > On Sunday 03 November 2013 14:05:32 Alexander Neundorf wrote: > > > > To build karchive itself, they would need cmake + tier

Re: Getting ecm files from the ECM package

On Sunday 10 November 2013, Alexander Neundorf wrote: > On Sunday 10 November 2013, David Faure wrote: > > On Sunday 03 November 2013 14:05:32 Alexander Neundorf wrote: > > > To build karchive itself, they would need cmake + tier0-kf5 + ECM > > > > Which is exactly what I want to avoid. > > > > Y

Re: Getting ecm files from the ECM package

On Sunday 10 November 2013, David Faure wrote: > On Sunday 03 November 2013 14:05:32 Alexander Neundorf wrote: > > To build karchive itself, they would need cmake + tier0-kf5 + ECM > > Which is exactly what I want to avoid. > > You wrote "To build software using karchive with cmake, they still ne

Re: Review Request 113670: Only link to Qt5::X11Extras and ${X11_LIBRARIES} if X11 was found

> On Nov. 10, 2013, 9:50 a.m., David Faure wrote: > > tier4/kde4support/src/CMakeLists.txt, line 293 > > > > > > Why was this line removed? > > > > Everything else looks fine to me, this remove seems unre

Re: kdesrc-build build failures

On Saturday 09 November 2013 15:18:36 Ivan Čukić wrote: > On Friday 08 November 2013 18:04:08 Stefanie Dargel wrote: > > kde-workspace fails, because it requires QImageBlitz, which is not being > > compiled. I didn't manage to add the Subversion repo to > > "kf5-qt5-build-include". Ho can I do it?

Re: kdelibs/interfaces/khexedit

On Sunday 10 November 2013 11:15:58 Dominik Haumann wrote: > On Sunday 10 November 2013 09:47:41 David Faure wrote: > > On Sunday 10 November 2013 04:32:12 Friedrich W. H. Kossebau wrote: > > > So from my point of view, especially given the idea of KF5, I see no > > > more need for interfaces/khexe

Re: the kspeech interface

On Saturday 09 November 2013 11:47:16 David Faure wrote: > On Friday 08 November 2013 22:45:33 Jeremy Whiting wrote: > > Could we move the dbus interface into > > kdeaccessibility/jovie and install it only when jovie is installed, > > This would create a compile-time dependency on kdeaccessibility

Re: Review Request 113731: Fix kdesu standalone build.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/113731/#review43344 --- Ship it! Ship It! - David Faure On Nov. 9, 2013, 11:18 a.m.

Re: Review Request 113705: Remove unused TIFF kimgio code

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/113705/ --- (Updated Nov. 10, 2013, 1:51 p.m.) Status -- This change has been mar

Re: Review Request 113705: Remove unused TIFF kimgio code

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/113705/#review43342 --- This review has been submitted with commit 387c2a9f9d105a21008

Re: Review Request 113705: Remove unused TIFF kimgio code

> On Nov. 10, 2013, 11:33 a.m., David Faure wrote: > > I trust that you compared them and they had the same features? Qt's version is better in every way, as far as I can tell. - Alex --- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To re

Re: Review Request 113730: Fix kpty standalone build

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/113730/#review43337 --- Ship it! Ship It! - David Faure On Nov. 9, 2013, 10:54 a.m.

Re: KModifierKeyInfo usage and API

Hello! It looks like keystate applet which was removed from KDE4 was(?) the user of keystate dataengine. If we bring back this applet in Plasma2 then this DataEngine will be used. And this applet is necessary for disabled people, See https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=165402 Thanks! On Sun, No

Re: Review Request 113708: Make kcmutils build standalone

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/113708/#review43336 --- Ship it! Ship It! - David Faure On Nov. 7, 2013, 3:36 p.m.,

Re: Review Request 113705: Remove unused TIFF kimgio code

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/113705/#review43335 --- Ship it! I trust that you compared them and they had the same

Re: Review Request 113704: Fix EPS plugin

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/113704/#review43334 --- tier1/kguiaddons/src/plugins/imageformats/eps.cpp

Re: Review Request 113696: Rename knewstuff private headers to _p.h

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/113696/#review43332 --- Ship it! No change was needed in CMakeLists.txt, therefore it'

Re: Review Request 113260: Port KTimeZoned to Qt5/KF5

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/113260/#review43331 --- Ship it! Ship It! - John Layt On Oct. 22, 2013, 4:49 p.m.,

Re: kdelibs/interfaces/khexedit

On Sunday 10 November 2013 09:47:41 David Faure wrote: > On Sunday 10 November 2013 04:32:12 Friedrich W. H. Kossebau wrote: > > > Input welcome. > > > > Once upon a time those interfaces were invented to enable KPilot (yes, > > those times) to be able to use the hexedit widget I did then, without

Re: Review Request 113685: New KColorSchemeManager to support changing color scheme in app

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/113685/#review43324 --- I like the overall concept and implementation. tier3/kconfigw

Re: Getting ecm files from the ECM package

On Sunday 03 November 2013 14:05:32 Alexander Neundorf wrote: > To build karchive itself, they would need cmake + tier0-kf5 + ECM Which is exactly what I want to avoid. You wrote "To build software using karchive with cmake, they still need only cmake." but this requires karchive to be installed

Re: KModifierKeyInfo usage and API

Aaron? Anyone from the plasma team? I would appreciate input on this (see precise question at the end), it's preventing KF5 from moving forward with KModifierKeyInfo. Please CC kde-frameworks-devel, I'm not on plasma-devel. On Wednesday 16 October 2013 09:56:03 David Faure wrote: > We are still

Re: Review Request 113260: Port KTimeZoned to Qt5/KF5

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/113260/#review43323 --- Ship it! OK. I only meant "don't remove existing code that mig

Re: Review Request 113723: Fix KIO to build standalone, prepare for moving into its tier

> On Nov. 9, 2013, 12:47 a.m., David Faure wrote: > > staging/kio/CMakeLists.txt, line 34 > > > > > > Why? KDED doesn't provide a library. > > Àlex Fiestas wrote: > It provides a DBus interface (.xml) that is

Re: Review Request 113670: Only link to Qt5::X11Extras and ${X11_LIBRARIES} if X11 was found

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/113670/#review43321 --- tier4/kde4support/src/CMakeLists.txt

Re: kdelibs/interfaces/khexedit

On Sunday 10 November 2013 04:32:12 Friedrich W. H. Kossebau wrote: > > Input welcome. > > Once upon a time those interfaces were invented to enable KPilot (yes, those > times) to be able to use the hexedit widget I did then, without having > these rather specific widget in kdelibs or having kdepi