On Sunday 10 November 2013 11:15:58 Dominik Haumann wrote: > On Sunday 10 November 2013 09:47:41 David Faure wrote: > > On Sunday 10 November 2013 04:32:12 Friedrich W. H. Kossebau wrote: > > > So from my point of view, especially given the idea of KF5, I see no > > > more need for interfaces/khexedit. Rather do I see the Okteta libs > > > themselves (the core ones for simple widget things) one day being added > > > to KF5, now that things are modular :) > > > > Yep, makes sense. > > > > I'll just delete interfaces/khexedit then, thanks for the input. > > Btw, this is basically the same solution as we take with KTextEditor: The > KTextEditor interfaces are not part of some other module anymore. Instead > they are directly shipped with Kate Part for KF5. This makes sense for the > simple reason that there is no other KTextEditor implementation than Kate > Part (for 10 years now). From this perspective. The same basically holds for > Okteta imo: If you need a hex editor component, just state that as > dependency at compile time and all is fine. > > So as I see it, removing interfaces/khexedit is the right way to go :-)
Actually that's probably the way to go for the other interfaces too... Like the kspeech one. Cheers. -- Kévin Ottens, http://ervin.ipsquad.net KDAB - proud supporter of KDE, http://www.kdab.com
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Kde-frameworks-devel mailing list Kde-frameworks-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-frameworks-devel
