tboeghk commented on pull request #159:
URL: https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/159#issuecomment-853617796
I came across an edge case that I want to consider: In the distributed
environment we should only ignore the `appends` section if we do not change the
handler during the distributed
tboeghk commented on pull request #159:
URL: https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/159#issuecomment-853605016
Whoopsie, my bad, ran the `gradlew check` with
`-Pvalidation.git.failOnModified=false`. Added license header in the last commit
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git
David Smiley created SOLR-15452:
---
Summary: TracingUpdateProcessor for distributed tracing
Key: SOLR-15452
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-15452
Project: Solr
Issue Type: Improve
noblepaul opened a new pull request #160:
URL: https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/160
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
For queries about this service, ple
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-15337?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17356135#comment-17356135
]
Noble Paul commented on SOLR-15337:
---
It is in 8.9 and the lucene-solr repo has it.
The
MarcusSorealheis commented on a change in pull request #42:
URL: https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/42#discussion_r644427250
##
File path: solr/webapp/web/js/angular/app.js
##
@@ -430,7 +436,11 @@ solrAdminApp.config([
$location.path('/login');
}
} else {
MarcusSorealheis edited a comment on pull request #42:
URL: https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/42#issuecomment-853527455
there's also a few security exceptions that if thrown in the wrong corporate
org could start problematic conversations running SOLR. Everything is under
scrutiny right
MarcusSorealheis commented on pull request #42:
URL: https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/42#issuecomment-853527455
there's also a few security exceptions that if thrown in the wrong corporate
org could start problematic conversations running SOLR. Everything is under
scrutiny right now giv
MarcusSorealheis commented on pull request #42:
URL: https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/42#issuecomment-853507516
Schema Designer should not simply throw generic errors that do no help the
user. For instance, when a user tries to create a field that already exists,
there is just an error
magibney commented on a change in pull request #158:
URL: https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/158#discussion_r644435044
##
File path:
solr/core/src/test/org/apache/solr/search/TestExtendedDismaxParser.java
##
@@ -415,19 +415,7 @@ public void testFocusQueryParser() {
asser
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-11646?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17356066#comment-17356066
]
David Eric Pugh commented on SOLR-11646:
okay, schema-api.adoc is done!
> Ref G
epugh commented on pull request #91:
URL: https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/91#issuecomment-853490514
Okay, I think I'm done with the schema-api.adoc page.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL abo
wrunderwood commented on a change in pull request #96:
URL: https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/96#discussion_r644391283
##
File path:
solr/core/src/java/org/apache/solr/util/circuitbreaker/CircuitBreakerManager.java
##
@@ -40,12 +41,15 @@
* solution. There will be a follow
wrunderwood commented on pull request #96:
URL: https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/96#issuecomment-853452250
I apologize for the personal comment.
The documentation and name describe a CPU utilization circuit breaker. The
implementation is a load average metric. Load average is not
janhoy commented on a change in pull request #96:
URL: https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/96#discussion_r644375943
##
File path:
solr/core/src/java/org/apache/solr/util/circuitbreaker/CircuitBreaker.java
##
@@ -66,14 +66,19 @@ protected boolean isEnabled() {
private fina
janhoy commented on pull request #96:
URL: https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/96#issuecomment-853442218
> Whoever implemented this did not understand how the load average metric
works.
Please keep the discussion factual and about the code, not the people.
I think the chosen p
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-15385?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17355997#comment-17355997
]
ASF subversion and git services commented on SOLR-15385:
Commit c
madrob merged pull request #107:
URL: https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/107
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
For queries about this service, please conta
wrunderwood commented on pull request #96:
URL: https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/96#issuecomment-853410595
Anyone running this on a multi-CPU machine should disable it immediately.
The documentation says it will reject traffic when total CPU usage reaches a
limit, but it will real
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-14672?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Joel Bernstein updated SOLR-14672:
--
Fix Version/s: 8.9
> Make timeouts configurable for the Streaming Expression SolrClientCache
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-14672?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17355983#comment-17355983
]
Joel Bernstein commented on SOLR-14672:
---
This looks it's in 8.9.
> Make timeouts c
magibney commented on a change in pull request #158:
URL: https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/158#discussion_r644340081
##
File path: solr/core/src/java/org/apache/solr/parser/SolrQueryParserBase.java
##
@@ -1159,8 +1160,11 @@ protected Query getFieldQuery(String field, List
q
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-14672?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17355970#comment-17355970
]
Joel Bernstein commented on SOLR-14672:
---
Yes this is finished. Let's see what relea
magibney commented on a change in pull request #158:
URL: https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/158#discussion_r644332142
##
File path: solr/core/src/java/org/apache/solr/parser/SolrQueryParserBase.java
##
@@ -1149,7 +1150,7 @@ protected Query getFieldQuery(String field, List
qu
dsmiley commented on a change in pull request #147:
URL: https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/147#discussion_r644329238
##
File path:
solr/core/src/java/org/apache/solr/core/TransientSolrCoreCacheDefault.java
##
@@ -124,38 +142,29 @@ public SolrCore addCore(String name, SolrCor
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-11646?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17355961#comment-17355961
]
David Eric Pugh commented on SOLR-11646:
Actually, I think schema-api.adoc is hal
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-14672?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17355960#comment-17355960
]
Cassandra Targett commented on SOLR-14672:
--
[~jbernste], this is finished, right
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-11646?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17355953#comment-17355953
]
David Eric Pugh commented on SOLR-11646:
I've picked this work back up. I've go
magibney commented on pull request #129:
URL: https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/129#issuecomment-853380214
> ** Current Incorrect Behaviour **
> If I query a "StrField" type or a text field type Keyword Tokenized, I get
two different behaviours :
> sow=false -> it splits on whitespa
magibney commented on a change in pull request #129:
URL: https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/129#discussion_r644299691
##
File path:
solr/core/src/test/org/apache/solr/search/TestExtendedDismaxParser.java
##
@@ -1771,6 +1775,35 @@ public void testSplitOnWhitespace_Basic() thr
magibney commented on a change in pull request #129:
URL: https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/129#discussion_r644298892
##
File path:
solr/core/src/test/org/apache/solr/search/TestExtendedDismaxParser.java
##
@@ -1771,6 +1775,35 @@ public void testSplitOnWhitespace_Basic() thr
atris commented on pull request #96:
URL: https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/96#issuecomment-853358369
Hi Christine,
Yes, merging the two circuit breakers makes sense as long as we separate out
the configurations distinctly.
Alternative is to have the common code (and test co
wrunderwood commented on pull request #96:
URL: https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/96#issuecomment-853347376
That is what this patch does, move the existing behavior to a load average
circuit breaker and create a new CPU usage circuit breaker.
Combining the two has a problem. The ra
cpoerschke commented on pull request #152:
URL: https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/152#issuecomment-85462
Maybe also update the
https://solr.apache.org/guide/8_8/collection-management.html#modifycollection
to mention the (now supported) `async` parameter.
--
This is an automated me
thelabdude opened a new issue #274:
URL: https://github.com/apache/solr-operator/issues/274
The `security.json` that the Solr operator creates during security
boostrapping when using:
```
spec:
...
solrSecurity:
authenticationType: Basic
```
Grants the `all` per
cpoerschke commented on pull request #156:
URL: https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/156#issuecomment-853331275
> Not directly related to the PR, but is there a reason for using
ZooKeeper.multi when only issuing 1 command?
Interesting question! From a quick look at the ZooKeeper docs
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-15337?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17355934#comment-17355934
]
Cassandra Targett commented on SOLR-15337:
--
This is in the CHANGES.txt for 8.9 i
cpoerschke commented on pull request #96:
URL: https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/96#issuecomment-853328967
So one possibility is to change the implementation of the existing
`CPUCircuitBreaker` class and to add a new `LoadAverageCircuitBreaker` class
which has the same behaviour as the e
Timothy Potter created SOLR-15451:
-
Summary: SQL endpoint returns the wrong error when authenticated
user doesn't have read access /admin/luke
Key: SOLR-15451
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-15451
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-15118?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Cassandra Targett updated SOLR-15118:
-
Fix Version/s: 8.9
> Make /v2/collections APIs annotation-based
> ---
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-15146?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17355901#comment-17355901
]
David Smiley commented on SOLR-15146:
-
I don't believe Ilan's change is related to th
dsmiley commented on a change in pull request #129:
URL: https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/129#discussion_r644187229
##
File path: solr/core/src/java/org/apache/solr/parser/SolrQueryParserBase.java
##
@@ -1149,18 +1151,21 @@ protected Query getFieldQuery(String field,
List q
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-12697?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17355884#comment-17355884
]
Tom Gilke commented on SOLR-12697:
--
Hi [~cpoerschke],
here is the link to the ticket:
h
Tom Gilke created SOLR-15450:
Summary: Create possibility to prefetch stored fields needed for
FieldValueFeatures
Key: SOLR-15450
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-15450
Project: Solr
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-15146?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17355839#comment-17355839
]
Mike Drob commented on SOLR-15146:
--
Maybe something in your commit changed the usage of
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-15406?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17355837#comment-17355837
]
Mike Drob commented on SOLR-15406:
--
{{CA8ECC56E40D0FE3}} is another failing seed.
> Rel
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-15449?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17355831#comment-17355831
]
David Smiley commented on SOLR-15449:
-
Thanks. Ultimately I think this is good nit-p
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-15449?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17355811#comment-17355811
]
Alessandro Benedetti edited comment on SOLR-15449 at 6/2/21, 3:50 PM:
-
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-15449?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17355811#comment-17355811
]
Alessandro Benedetti commented on SOLR-15449:
-
I agree [~dsmiley], I changed
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-15449?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Alessandro Benedetti updated SOLR-15449:
Description:
h1. Intro
in multi-field search where the text analysis per field prod
dsmiley commented on a change in pull request #158:
URL: https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/158#discussion_r644079174
##
File path:
solr/core/src/test/org/apache/solr/search/TestExtendedDismaxParser.java
##
@@ -1776,6 +1764,36 @@ private static String getParsedQuery(SolrQuery
epugh commented on pull request #159:
URL: https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/159#issuecomment-853111093
Did you see the precommit failure on missing license header @tboeghk ?
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-15449?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17355786#comment-17355786
]
David Smiley commented on SOLR-15449:
-
>From your description (as I read this; may ev
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10059?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17355779#comment-17355779
]
Torsten Bøgh Köster commented on SOLR-10059:
I added another Github Pull Requ
alessandrobenedetti commented on a change in pull request #158:
URL: https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/158#discussion_r644028793
##
File path:
solr/core/src/test/org/apache/solr/search/TestExtendedDismaxParser.java
##
@@ -1776,6 +1764,36 @@ private static String getParsedQue
tboeghk opened a new pull request #159:
URL: https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/159
# Description
In distributed requests, the `appends` section of a `RequestHandler` is
evaluated not only on the non-distributed coordinator requests but also during
the distributed requests. This mi
alessandrobenedetti commented on a change in pull request #158:
URL: https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/158#discussion_r644026887
##
File path:
solr/core/src/test/org/apache/solr/search/TestExtendedDismaxParser.java
##
@@ -1776,6 +1764,36 @@ private static String getParsedQue
alessandrobenedetti commented on a change in pull request #158:
URL: https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/158#discussion_r644026748
##
File path: solr/core/src/java/org/apache/solr/parser/SolrQueryParserBase.java
##
@@ -1159,8 +1160,13 @@ protected Query getFieldQuery(String fie
dsmiley commented on pull request #152:
URL: https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/152#issuecomment-853076846
Can you please add a CHANGES.txt entry? Please add an 8.10 section.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub
dsmiley commented on pull request #107:
URL: https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/107#issuecomment-853062851
"Redundant suppression". AFAICT you can't restrict to particular
suppressions, and be aware it's decisions may disagree with Gradle and thus we
must adhere to Gradle. Many rawtypes
dsmiley commented on a change in pull request #158:
URL: https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/158#discussion_r643958682
##
File path:
solr/core/src/test/org/apache/solr/search/TestExtendedDismaxParser.java
##
@@ -1776,6 +1764,36 @@ private static String getParsedQuery(SolrQuery
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-15090?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jason Gerlowski reopened SOLR-15090:
Reopening this temporarily to reflect a bug fix I'm currently working on.
The backport of this
madrob commented on pull request #107:
URL: https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/107#issuecomment-852982397
What is the IntelliJ inspection called? I tried to find it but couldn’t. :(
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to G
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-15316?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17355677#comment-17355677
]
Cassandra Targett commented on SOLR-15316:
--
Thank you very much, Jan, for pickin
alessandrobenedetti commented on pull request #129:
URL: https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/129#issuecomment-852936901
Pull Request has been cleaned, only the fix related with the Jira issue is
now present.
i'll summarize it again.
**Index Time**
Configuring a field to be "Str
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-15449?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Alessandro Benedetti updated SOLR-15449:
Description:
h1. Intro
in multi-field search with different analysis per field
sow
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-15407?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17355637#comment-17355637
]
Alessandro Benedetti commented on SOLR-15407:
-
Sister issue and PR has been a
alessandrobenedetti commented on pull request #129:
URL: https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/129#issuecomment-852925576
Sister issue and PR has been added:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-15449
https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/158
I am going now to clean this PR ju
alessandrobenedetti commented on pull request #158:
URL: https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/158#issuecomment-852925108
@dsmiley @janhoy @madrob @munendrasn @romseygeek @sarowe , the issue with
sow and mm found in: https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/129 has been isolated
here and it's rea
alessandrobenedetti opened a new pull request #158:
URL: https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/158
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-15449
# Description
When a field text analysis is incompatible with the query text, mm is not
fully respected:
```
sow = false
m
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-15449?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Alessandro Benedetti updated SOLR-15449:
Description:
h1. Intro
in multi-field search with different analysis per field
sow
Alessandro Benedetti created SOLR-15449:
---
Summary: edimax sow causes issues with minimum should match in
case of multi field with different analysis
Key: SOLR-15449
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse
NazerkeBS commented on a change in pull request #152:
URL: https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/152#discussion_r643776555
##
File path:
solr/core/src/test/org/apache/solr/cloud/OverseerModifyCollectionTest.java
##
@@ -42,29 +39,27 @@ public static void setupCluster() throws Exc
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-15316?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17355572#comment-17355572
]
Jan Høydahl commented on SOLR-15316:
There have been at least 9 test-runs in Jenkins
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-15433?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17355564#comment-17355564
]
Bruno Roustant commented on SOLR-15433:
---
I'm going to merge it in two days.
> Repl
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-9887?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Tobias Kässmann resolved SOLR-9887.
---
Resolution: Won't Fix
outdated
> Add KeepWordFilter, StemmerOverrideFilter, StopFilterFactory
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-9888?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Tobias Kässmann resolved SOLR-9888.
---
Resolution: Won't Fix
outdated
> Add a boosting dismax query parser (bmax)
>
77 matches
Mail list logo
