Robert,
whether this is CBU or OOCoD, you cannot DECREASE the subcapacity model as part
of the activation.
In other words you cannot go from 5xx to 4xx, only from 4xx to 5xx.
Did you actually mean 402 to 507?
Geoff Rousell
IBM z Systems SE
-
Excellent point. Capacity on Demand options e.g CBU or On/Off Capacity on
Demand do not allow to DECREASE the permanent capacity setting of the systeem.
These options are for increasing permanent capacity temporarily only.
Additional details in the Redbook - IBM System z10 Capacity on Demand -
>> Are you using shared-common?
>That is the intent. My goal is something "like ECSA, only bigger." Am I
not
>on the right track?
I think you're not grasping what I asked, but perhaps my terminology is
not clear. By "shared-common" I meant REQUEST=GETSHARED (to be used
subsequently with REQUE
I came across this paper titled "SELF-LEARNING PREDICTION SYSTEM FOR
OPTIMISATION OF WORKLOAD MANAGEMENT IN A MAINFRAME OPERATING SYSTEM"
As I was learning the basics of ML, this is the exact application that came to
mind, being a zOS guy.
I guess you can say I'm curious to find out where this r
Thanks. My objective is to DECREASE from 407 to 502 during overnight batch
window, then INCREASE from 502 to 407 for prime time.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Parwez Hamid
Sent: Tuesday, June 28, 2016 6:06 AM
To: IBM
(sorry for omitting the "F" from the subject line previously)
It is confirmed that in order to DETACH a 64-bit memory object you must
specify
AFFINITY=SYSTEM,V64COMMON=YES
(otherwise the request fails)
This is certainly not obvious, but it is what it is, and likely cannot be
changed compatibl
IBM capacity is defined as the maximum usage over a 4 hour rolling
period. If you have a temporary high usage period exceeding your
capacity that isn't too high and not too long, you aren't impacted.
You go too long or too high and the processor starts to slow down so
the total usage does not exc
Hi,
I created a new directory with 755 permission and the directory should have
the group and owner as same as the previous one, as like owner should be
TSMMEV and and group should be TSMHXC.
Old one:-
#file: /products/test/DB2/db10534/
*#owner: TSMMEV
#group: TSMHXC
user::rwx
group::rwx
other:
W dniu 2016-06-28 o 14:49, McElhaney, Robert pisze:
Thanks. My objective is to DECREASE from 407 to 502 during overnight batch
window, then INCREASE from 502 to 407 for prime time.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Par
Lookup the "find " command with exec. You should be able to recursively
find and chown all files and directories.
Rob Schramm
Ps a simple Google of "Unix find user chown" will give a variety of answers
On Tue, Jun 28, 2016, 10:01 AM zos reader wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I created a new directory with 7
All,
I know there's a RACF list, but I have a weird issue. I am seeing a RACF
rtncd 8 SAF rtncd 8 and RACF reason code 0 , I have never seen a 'incorrect
function code', I have digging through manuals, anyone else seen this one
or have a hint on how I find out what is causing it ?
My apologies a
Thanks. Will do.
I don't see any great need to change the macro itself. It's not the only
macro in MVS where you need to specify something that could possibly be
inferred instead. There is something to be said for consistent defaults,
even when the default for X= could have been made dependent on
What RACF function are you invoking?
Regards,
Lou
--
Artificial Intelligence is no match for Natural Stupidity
- Unknown
On Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 9:35 AM, Scott Ford wrote:
> All,
>
> I know there's a RACF list, but I have a weird issue. I am seeing a RACF
> rtncd 8 SAF rtncd 8 and RACF reas
Lou,
We are seeing all RACF commands failing using r_admin from a STC, but we
invoke an ID with SPECIAL, but I noticed the STC ID has Trusted=no...
Scott
On Tuesday, June 28, 2016, Lou Losee wrote:
> What RACF function are you invoking?
>
> Regards,
> Lou
>
> --
> Artificial Intelligence is no
Scott,
What is the function code(s) you are passing in the plist? Are you using a
reference to the function code in the plist and not the function code
itself?
Regards,
Lou
--
Artificial Intelligence is no match for Natural Stupidity
- Unknown
On Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 9:50 AM, Scott Ford wrot
We pass the RACF command image, i.e.; adduser name(x)
dfltgrp(x) password(x) and its length
Scott
On Tuesday, June 28, 2016, Lou Losee wrote:
> Scott,
> What is the function code(s) you are passing in the plist? Are you using a
> reference to the function code in the plist an
Has EZANS been customized for z/OS 2.2?
Bob
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
I am working on a software upgrade install of zos 2.2 and have a question about
what catalog to use in the 'ALIAS TO CATALOG' cpp install panel. After the
install is complete I'd like to continue to us my current master catalog for
zos 2.2. So do I create a new temporary user catalog as the zos
I believed they stopped at z/OS v1.13. See
http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg24029203
On Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 11:31 AM Richards, Robert B. <
robert.richa...@opm.gov> wrote:
> Has EZANS been customized for z/OS 2.2?
>
> Bob
>
> --
My last conversations with IBM on this is - not supported. It was a tool
developed by an IBMer that retired and the Communication Server Team preferred
not to continue with it.
So I am thinking NO.
But I have been wrong before. So who knows. I am not aware of an alternate at
this time.
You mi
BTW, since EZANS is a TCPIP tool, you should post to the IBMTCP-L mailing
list.
On Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 11:31 AM Richards, Robert B. <
robert.richa...@opm.gov> wrote:
> Has EZANS been customized for z/OS 2.2?
>
> Bob
>
> --
> For
How do you intend to handle the DSNs that are common when the datasets are
not, e.g., SYS1.LINKLIB?
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
> Behalf Of Dazzo, Matt
> Sent: Tuesday, June 28, 2016 8:41 AM
> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
New dsn's go down as SSA.SYS1.LINKLIB. Then later get renamed to SYS1.LINKLIB
on the new res volume without updating the catalog? That would leave the
indirect catalog entry for SYS1.LINKLIB pointing to the new res volume at IPL.
Then there is a cleanup of SSA.* dsn's. Where am I going wrong? T
What is the *smallest* volume size everyone sees in general use?
For example, will we create any problems if we assume that "everyone"
has or can define at least a 3390-9 size volume these days? What if we
chose 3390-27?
--
John Eells
IBM Poughkeepsie
ee...@us.ibm.com
--
Are you using the Full System Replacement or Software Upgrade
installation path? If the latter, did you use your prior saved
configuration to model the new one after?
Dazzo, Matt wrote:
I am working on a software upgrade install of zos 2.2 and have a question about
what catalog to use in the
Custom volumes at 100 cylinders and at 1113 cylinders
I would hope your second statement is true, but there are always outliers! :-)
Bob
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of John Eells
Sent: Tuesday, June 28, 2016 12:19 PM
I have 3390 mod3s running around still.
Lizette
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
> Behalf Of Richards, Robert B.
> Sent: Tuesday, June 28, 2016 9:24 AM
> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> Subject: Re: Minimum Volume Sizes in the
We are actively eliminating mod-3's and mod-9's from our environment. Next
DASD refresh will only have 27's and 54's.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of John Eells
Sent: Tuesday, June 28, 2016 10:19 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LIS
Sadly we still have some 3380's defined. Don't gasp...
Original Message
From: Chuck Kreiter
Sent: Tuesday, 28 June 2016 17:52
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Reply To: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
Subject: Re: Minimum Volume Sizes in the Wild
-- This email has reached the Bank via an external so
General use is -9 and -27. -3 are in use but vanishing. No -54 yet.
David
On Tuesday, June 28, 2016 John Eells wrote:
What is the *smallest* volume size everyone sees in general use?
For example, will we create any problems if we assume that "everyone"
has or can define at least a 3390-9
From "man chown"
chown [-fhR] owner[:group] pathname ...
put the owner in followed by a ":" then the group name.
Al Nims
Systems Admin/Programmer 3
UFIT
University of Florida
(352) 273-1298
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behal
Nims,Alva John (Al) wrote:
From "man chown"
There's also the "chgrp" command in Unix to CHange GRouP
--
Jack J. Woehr # Science is more than a body of knowledge. It's a way of
www.well.com/~jax # thinking, a way of skeptically interrogating the universe
www.softwoehr.com # with a fine un
The answer to that is what I call IBM Standard Answer #2 - It depends !
In our shop we still have some uses of smaller than Mod 9 but I'd say as a
general rule our smallest "Standard Volume;" would be a Mod 9. To create new
"smaller than Mod 9" would be an effort.
Jerry Whitteridge
Manager Mai
Software upgrade, the previous install was not used as a model.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of John Eells
Sent: Tuesday, June 28, 2016 12:14 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: ZOS 2.2 Install - Alias to Catal
Thanks All, it worked.
Have a good day.
Samat
On Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 11:04 PM, Jack J. Woehr wrote:
> Nims,Alva John (Al) wrote:
>
>> From "man chown"
>>
>>
> There's also the "chgrp" command in Unix to CHange GRouP
>
> --
> Jack J. Woehr # Science is more than a body of knowledge. It's
Mostly Mod-3s, some smaller and mostly special uses. Enough Mod-9 and Mod-27 to
do Serverpac.
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU]
> On Behalf Of John Eells
> Sent: Tuesday, June 28, 2016 9:19 AM
> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> Subj
Primarily -3 and -9, nothing larger, a few smaller @ 503 CYLs
>
CIT | Ken Porowski | VP Mainframe Engineering | Information Technology | +1 973
740 5459 (tel) | ken.porow...@cit.com
This email message and any accompanying materials may contain proprietary,
privileged and confidential inform
One addition for the archives for this thread:
SMF 6 records written by PRINTWAY/INFOPRINT BASIC Mode contain
JCTJOBID='PSnn'.
(which could be confused with type 6 records written by PSF, which contain
PSFn).
Barry
Merrilly yours,
Herbert W. Barry Merrill, PhD
President-Programmer
Dazzo, Matt wrote:
Software upgrade, the previous install was not used as a model.
Software Upgrade is really intended to be used only when you will keep
things on the same relative target volumes. That is, the same data sets
that are on the first volume on your existing system will still be
On Tue, 28 Jun 2016 23:41:34 +0530, zos reader wrote:
>Thanks All, it worked.
>
Protip: "chmod g+s groupname ." on the parent directory will cause files
created under it to inherit its group name. (Maybe not for NFS.)
I would not use "chmod -R g+s groupname .", but
"chmod g+s groupname . */. *
Hi
Would anyone know if you can capture TSO TEST
Output into clist variables using SYSOUTTRAP
And SYSOUTLINE
Thanks
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with
Thanks again Sri, your new version also worked as long as I changed the OUTFIL
DD name.
Another colleague came to me with this one today. How could we handle
variable-length count data in a trailer? For example (RECFM=VB file):
,This is a header
0100,data record 1
0100,data record 2
Etc.
Peter,
It is quite simple to verify the variable length. You just need to use UFF
( Unsigned free format ) instead of ZD which will automatically format the
variable value by ignoring any thing other than a numeric and pad it with
zeros.
Example :
//SYSINDD *
OPTION COPY
INREC IFTHE
Yep. 100 for JES2 checkpoints. 500+ for catalog volumes. Some mod
3s for ML1 and Mobius datasets due to large number of small datasets.
Mod 9s for most volumes. Storage groups are 1TB+ so new space is Mod
27s (due to IPL volumes). z/OS 2.2 installer wants Mod 40s, don't
have uncarved space. S
We have Mod9's and Mod54's only. We had INFOPAC on Mod54s - huge
vtoc/vtocix/vvds!
BobL
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Mike Schwab
Sent: Tuesday, June 28, 2016 3:03 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re
[Default] On 28 Jun 2016 11:31:30 -0700, in bit.listserv.ibm-main
gib...@wsu.edu (Gibney, Dave) wrote:
>Mostly Mod-3s, some smaller and mostly special uses. Enough Mod-9 and Mod-27
>to do Serverpac.
Given that my netbook has a 320 GB drive, most notebook solid state
drives are over 100 GB, the s
On Tue, 28 Jun 2016 12:19:28 -0400, John Eells wrote:
>What is the *smallest* volume size everyone sees in general use?
>
>For example, will we create any problems if we assume that "everyone"
>has or can define at least a 3390-9 size volume these days? What if we
>chose 3390-27?
>
I know if yo
We are on the third EMC RAID array since SLED days. First one with PAV. Looking
at 4th array next year.
We've always migrated to like size volumes and added on to the end. Added some
mod 9's from 1 to 2 and mod 27's from 2 to 3. Mostly for System work.
Mod 3's have always been fine for applicat
A Rewarding z/VSE Community
Fans focus on participation and knowledge sharing
http://destinationz.org/Mainframe-Solution/Trends/A-Rewarding-z-VSE-Community.aspx
http://tinyurl.com/he7wosp
--
Gabriel Goldberg, Computers and Publishing, inc.g...@gabegold.com
3401 Silver Maple Place, Falls Chur
Many thanks once more Sri for your generous help. UFF was indeed the key
factor.
For the archives, one small correction:
INCLUDE=(16,4,CH,EQ,X'0999',AND,$ TRL RECORD
Should be:
INCLUDE=(16,4,CH,EQ,C'0999',AND,$ TRL RECORD
(C'0999" for the trailer, not X'09
Would there be much support for an RFE like this? (Would
it be a duplicate -- the idea seems obvious?) Any
suggested changes or paraphrases or clearer terminology?
Enhance OMVS "cp" and other utilities to employ ISPF-like
member-level serialization. This would allow OMVS to update
PDS libraries
Peter,
My apologies for the typo about not changing the hex notation to character
notation for the Trailer include statement. I just modified the control
cards to suit your new requirement and forgot to change it in all place.
My Bad.
Thanks,
Kolusu
DFSORT Development
IBM Corporation
From:
It's not at all difficult to keep it working. Update the initialization section
of the EZANS REXX from around line 180-ish on. I don't think there have been
any changes to the netstat command syntax since z/OS 1.13.
Ant.
/**/
I use 3390-27 for z/OS and other software installation, but I also use other
sizes (3390-1, 3390-3, 3390-9, 3390-54) for operational and user datasets.
Al Loeffler
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of John Eells
Sent: Tues
The smallest I've seen is a MOD3. And that is just because it had a CAT on it
Steve
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Al Loeffler
Sent: Tuesday, June 28, 2016 8:32 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Minimum
John,
I'm not sure what you mean by "general use."
For HDS Business Continuity Manager software some customers will allocate a
small volume for the command devices (let's say 10 cyls), often using the odd
cyls left over on a Parity Group after formatting a bunch of common sized
volumes (-3, -9
When I was with IBM Education, we used to run class labs on minimal z/OS
(OS/390, MVS/...) systems as VM guests. The volumes were VM mini volumes just
as large as needed. If VM is still the base for those labs, I'm pretty sure
there still are volumes of various small sizes.
Not sure however if
57 matches
Mail list logo
