On Tue, 28 Jun 2016 12:19:28 -0400, John Eells <ee...@us.ibm.com> wrote:
>What is the *smallest* volume size everyone sees in general use? > >For example, will we create any problems if we assume that "everyone" >has or can define at least a 3390-9 size volume these days? What if we >chose 3390-27? > I know if you assumed 3390-27 was available, it would be a problem for some, shops I know of. 3390-9 would have been a problem a few years ago for some of those shops, but I'm pretty sure everyone has 3390-9 available now. Best regards, Mark -- Mark Zelden - Zelden Consulting Services - z/OS, OS/390 and MVS ITIL v3 Foundation Certified mailto:m...@mzelden.com Mark's MVS Utilities: http://www.mzelden.com/mvsutil.html Systems Programming expert at http://search390.techtarget.com/ateExperts/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
