I have 3390 mod3s running around still. Lizette
> -----Original Message----- > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On > Behalf Of Richards, Robert B. > Sent: Tuesday, June 28, 2016 9:24 AM > To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU > Subject: Re: Minimum Volume Sizes in the Wild > > Custom volumes at 100 cylinders and at 1113 cylinders > > I would hope your second statement is true, but there are always outliers! :-) > > Bob > > -----Original Message----- > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On > Behalf Of John Eells > Sent: Tuesday, June 28, 2016 12:19 PM > To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU > Subject: Minimum Volume Sizes in the Wild > > What is the *smallest* volume size everyone sees in general use? > > For example, will we create any problems if we assume that "everyone" > has or can define at least a 3390-9 size volume these days? What if we chose > 3390-27? > > -- > John Eells > IBM Poughkeepsie > ee...@us.ibm.com ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
