Ricardo Wurmus writes:
> ng0 writes:
>
>> * gnu/packages/gnunet.scm (gnunet-gtk)[inputs]: Add
>> gsettings-desktop-schemas.
>> ---
>> gnu/packages/gnunet.scm | 1 +
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/gnu/packages/gnunet.scm b/g
ng0 writes:
> * gnu/packages/gnunet.scm (gnunet-gtk)[inputs]: Add gsettings-desktop-schemas.
> ---
> gnu/packages/gnunet.scm | 1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> diff --git a/gnu/packages/gnunet.scm b/gnu/packages/gnunet.scm
> index e4fd95e..a75d1ad 100644
* gnu/packages/gnunet.scm (gnunet-gtk)[inputs]: Add gsettings-desktop-schemas.
---
gnu/packages/gnunet.scm | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/gnu/packages/gnunet.scm b/gnu/packages/gnunet.scm
index e4fd95e..a75d1ad 100644
--- a/gnu/packages/gnunet.scm
+++ b/gnu/packages
Hi,
Catonano writes:
> 2016-08-20 14:04 GMT+02:00 ng0
>
>
>
>> Reported at https://gnunet.org/bugs/view.php?id=4619
>>
>>
> Christian Grothoff replied that he would like you to extract a stacktrace
> from a core dump.
>
> Did you notice ?
>
> I would attempt that myself but admittedly I don't k
2016-08-20 14:04 GMT+02:00 ng0
> Reported at https://gnunet.org/bugs/view.php?id=4619
>
>
Christian Grothoff replied that he would like you to extract a stacktrace
from a core dump.
Did you notice ?
I would attempt that myself but admittedly I don't know how to obtain a
core dump
Development of these -svn packages has been moved into guixpkgs, which
currently is a repository in early stages will be fixed up soon, created
for packages around psyced and ultimately the secushare development
prototypes.
This repository will also see some of the ebuild->guix package
transition I
On Mon, Aug 22, 2016 at 11:21:54PM +, ng0 wrote:
> In the commit message, is the ending "in gnunet-gtk" unnecessary? It
> almost feels like it.
Yes, I think it's unnecessary, so I removed it.
> Subject: [PATCH] gnu: gnunet-gtk: Add libunique support in gnunet-
In the commit message, is the ending "in gnunet-gtk" unnecessary? It
almost feels like it.
Thanks for merging the libunique patch.
>From 71c7fa15df9793827e93823eb37c35b4357626cc Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: ng0
Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2016 23:13:03 +
Subject: [PATCH] gnu: gn
ng0 writes:
> In case you are interested here is current (37742):
>
>
> Testsuite summary for gnunet 0.10.1
>
> # TOTAL: 63
> # PASS: 55
> # S
In case you are interested here is current (37742):
Testsuite summary for gnunet 0.10.1
# TOTAL: 63
# PASS: 55
# SKIP: 4
# XFAIL: 0
# FAIL: 4
Alex Kost writes:
> ng0 (2016-08-07 11:21 +0300) wrote:
>
> [...]
>> + (arguments
>> + '(#:configure-flags
>> + (list (string-append "--with-nssdir=" %output "/lib"))
>> + #:parallel-tests? #f ; parallel building is not functional
>> + #:tests? #f ; FAIL: test_t
ng0 (2016-08-07 11:21 +0300) wrote:
[...]
> + (arguments
> + '(#:configure-flags
> + (list (string-append "--with-nssdir=" %output "/lib"))
> + #:parallel-tests? #f ; parallel building is not functional
> + #:tests? #f ; FAIL: test_testbed_logger_api
> +
next days.
>> >
>> > Appended is the failing tests output (for me as a backup) and the
>> > combined gnunet-svn + gnunet-gtk-svn patch. As we discussed this will
>> > not be in guix at the moment and is intended as a test package to get
>> > the next re
failing tests output (for me as a backup) and the
> > combined gnunet-svn + gnunet-gtk-svn patch. As we discussed this will
> > not be in guix at the moment and is intended as a test package to get
> > the next release of gnunet to build on guix when it is released.
> >
> &g
ng0 writes:
> The next 2.5 days will be unpleasant for me and probably difficult to
> focus, but I know how to fix the 3 failing tests for us.
> I'll have this fixed in thex next days.
>
> Appended is the failing tests output (for me as a backup) and the
> combined gnun
The next 2.5 days will be unpleasant for me and probably difficult to
focus, but I know how to fix the 3 failing tests for us.
I'll have this fixed in thex next days.
Appended is the failing tests output (for me as a backup) and the
combined gnunet-svn + gnunet-gtk-svn patch. As we discussed
Andreas Enge writes:
> Hello,
>
> On Wed, Aug 03, 2016 at 11:45:56AM +, ng0 wrote:
>> I think the costs of maintaining a -svn of gnunet are too high at the
>> moment. I'm using these two packages as a base for debugging gnunet in
>> addition to gentoo to help work with upstream.
>>
>> A revi
Hello,
On Wed, Aug 03, 2016 at 11:45:56AM +, ng0 wrote:
> I think the costs of maintaining a -svn of gnunet are too high at the
> moment. I'm using these two packages as a base for debugging gnunet in
> addition to gentoo to help work with upstream.
>
> A revision-less svn package does not wo
2016-08-03 13:45 GMT+02:00 ng0 :
> I think the costs of maintaining a -svn of gnunet are too high at the
> moment. I'm using these two packages as a base for debugging gnunet in
> addition to gentoo to help work with upstream.
>
> A revision-less svn package does not work (unlike in gentoo), so my
I think the costs of maintaining a -svn of gnunet are too high at the
moment. I'm using these two packages as a base for debugging gnunet in
addition to gentoo to help work with upstream.
A revision-less svn package does not work (unlike in gentoo), so my
focus is at the moment to help to push tow
Catonano writes:
> 2016-08-02 16:09 GMT+02:00 ng0 :
>
>>
>> Recent change -> 0.10.2 will be out soon™.
>>
>>
>> For the collaborative Gentoo overlay I share work with, many packages
>> I contributed either originate there or got their first year of practice
>> and debugging there and when I start
2016-08-02 16:09 GMT+02:00 ng0 :
>
> Recent change -> 0.10.2 will be out soon™.
>
>
> For the collaborative Gentoo overlay I share work with, many packages
> I contributed either originate there or got their first year of practice
> and debugging there and when I started to contribute to Guix, the
Catonano writes:
> 2016-08-02 12:30 GMT+02:00 ng0 :
>
>>
>> Development is a bad example, but for the current state, not considering
>> "0.10.2 will be out soon", the existence of -svn on a system was more
>> than just for development.
>>
>
> In fact, for what it matters, I'd like to be able to p
2016-08-02 12:30 GMT+02:00 ng0 :
>
> Development is a bad example, but for the current state, not considering
> "0.10.2 will be out soon", the existence of -svn on a system was more
> than just for development.
>
In fact, for what it matters, I'd like to be able to play with Gnunet.
Installing a
ng0 writes:
> Andreas Enge writes:
>
>> On Sun, Jul 31, 2016 at 01:08:54PM +, ng0 wrote:
>>> This was another failing test, someone before me reported it and
>>> therefore I have no bugreport to point to. I consider it superfluous
>>> work to fix 0.10.1 (the (define-public gnunet)) now that
Andreas Enge writes:
> On Sun, Jul 31, 2016 at 01:08:54PM +, ng0 wrote:
>> This was another failing test, someone before me reported it and
>> therefore I have no bugreport to point to. I consider it superfluous
>> work to fix 0.10.1 (the (define-public gnunet)) now that work towards
>> 0.10.
On Sun, Jul 31, 2016 at 01:08:54PM +, ng0 wrote:
> This was another failing test, someone before me reported it and
> therefore I have no bugreport to point to. I consider it superfluous
> work to fix 0.10.1 (the (define-public gnunet)) now that work towards
> 0.10.2 release happens. Tests migh
Catonano writes:
> 2016-08-01 16:34 GMT+02:00 ng0 :
>
>
>
>> "The refactoring of the gnunet code is going on like a thunderstorm."
>>
>
> I can't see this sentence in the gnunet irc log, neither on the mailing
> list archive
>
> Where did you get it ?
Somewhere else, just a comment which I see f
2016-08-01 16:34 GMT+02:00 ng0 :
> "The refactoring of the gnunet code is going on like a thunderstorm."
>
I can't see this sentence in the gnunet irc log, neither on the mailing
list archive
Where did you get it ?
ng0 writes:
> ng0 writes:
>
>> This is functional, but it suffers the same bug as the gnunet-0.10.1
>> package. I will write a gnunet-service for guix which will fix all
>> versions.
>> The expected behavior for installing gnunet is: create gnunet user with
>> gnunet group, create gnunet-dns gro
ng0 writes:
> This is functional, but it suffers the same bug as the gnunet-0.10.1
> package. I will write a gnunet-service for guix which will fix all
> versions.
> The expected behavior for installing gnunet is: create gnunet user with
> gnunet group, create gnunet-dns group, build, install, co
ng0 writes:
> ng0 writes:
>
>> This is functional, but it suffers the same bug as the gnunet-0.10.1
>> package. I will write a gnunet-service for guix which will fix all
>> versions.
>> The expected behavior for installing gnunet is: create gnunet user with
>> gnunet group, create gnunet-dns gro
ng0 writes:
> This is functional, but it suffers the same bug as the gnunet-0.10.1
> package. I will write a gnunet-service for guix which will fix all
> versions.
> The expected behavior for installing gnunet is: create gnunet user with
> gnunet group, create gnunet-dns group, build, install, co
bin"
+ (synopsis "Secure, decentralized, peer-to-peer networking framework")
+ (description
+ "GNUnet is a framework for secure peer-to-peer networking. The
+high-level goal is to provide a strong foundation of free software for a
+global, distributed ne
ng0 writes:
> Graphically, this was not run. From my packaging experience with gnunet
> and with the succesfull build which just ran, it should just work.
Applied, thanks!
ng0 writes:
> From 182c90f6c339c1af919a0885794cb23c1518c227 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: ng0
> Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2016 17:45:25 +
> Subject: [PATCH] gnu: gnunet-gtk: Configure with gnunet path.
>
> * gnun/packages/gnunet.scm (gnunet-gtk)[arguments]: Add '--with-g
>From 182c90f6c339c1af919a0885794cb23c1518c227 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: ng0
Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2016 17:45:25 +
Subject: [PATCH] gnu: gnunet-gtk: Configure with gnunet path.
* gnun/packages/gnunet.scm (gnunet-gtk)[arguments]: Add '--with-gnunet'
to #:configure-flags.
---
l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
> Nils Gillmann skribis:
>
>> l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
>>
>>> Nils Gillmann skribis:
>>>
l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
> Nils Gillmann skribis:
>
>> Leo Famulari writes:
>
> [...]
>
+ (de
Nils Gillmann skribis:
> l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
>
>> Nils Gillmann skribis:
>>
>>> l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
>>>
Nils Gillmann skribis:
> Leo Famulari writes:
[...]
>>> + (description "GNUnet is a framework for secure, distributed
l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
> Nils Gillmann skribis:
>
>> l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
>>
>>> Nils Gillmann skribis:
>>>
Leo Famulari writes:
>>>
>>> [...]
>>>
>> + (description "GNUnet is a framework for secure, distributed,
>> peer-to-peer
>> +networki
Nils Gillmann skribis:
> l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
>
>> Nils Gillmann skribis:
>>
>>> Leo Famulari writes:
>>
>> [...]
>>
> + (description "GNUnet is a framework for secure, distributed,
> peer-to-peer
> +networking. The high-level goal is to provide a strong founda
On Thu, Mar 31, 2016 at 12:48:54AM +0200, Nils Gillmann wrote:
> Leo Famulari writes:
>
> > On Mon, Mar 28, 2016 at 07:49:48PM +0200, Nils Gillmann wrote:
> >> Leo Famulari writes:
> >
> > [...]
> >
> >> >> +(native-inputs
> >> >> + `(("pkg-config" ,pkg-config)
> >> >> + ("autoconf
to it. I
> can rename the two packages to -next, but it might give the
> impression of a different software if the added description is
> not included.
>
> Compare the opinion of someone who has never touched gnunet about
> "gnunet and gnunet-svn" vs "gnunet and gnun
Addressed comments I got so far, fixed by excluding home-page
again and changing commit message.
>From dbf39289e906076a69465a9ff30cd0b18691dc50 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Nils Gillmann
Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2016 01:58:33 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] gnu: gnunet-gtk: Add build-input.
* gnu/packa
This patch: tested, builds without errors, line length issue
fixed.
>From 17c55d2d896d7aaca810a9f41c58694a6adadb9d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Nils Gillmann
Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2016 01:30:19 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] gnu: gnurl: Build with ca path.
* gnu/packages/gnunet.scm (gnurl)[configure-flags
t; for “guile-next”? This would make it clear that it’s a development
> snapshot. (Sorry for not coming up with that idea earlier.)
I am used to -git, -svn, -vcs naming but I am not fixed to it. I
can rename the two packages to -next, but it might give the
impression of a different
Leo Famulari writes:
> On Mon, Mar 28, 2016 at 07:49:48PM +0200, Nils Gillmann wrote:
>> Leo Famulari writes:
>
> [...]
>
>> >> +(native-inputs
>> >> + `(("pkg-config" ,pkg-config)
>> >> + ("autoconf" ,autoconf)
>> >> + ("automake" ,automake)
>> >> + ("gettext" ,gnu-get
Leo Famulari writes:
> On Mon, Mar 28, 2016 at 06:17:05PM +0200, Nils Gillmann wrote:
>> From 4633dc3484390fa6e399084336e73879066b1760 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
>> From: Nils Gillmann
>> Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2016 18:10:12 +0200
>> Subject: [PATCH] gnu: Add gnunet-gtk
Nils Gillmann skribis:
> Leo Famulari writes:
[...]
>>> + (description "GNUnet is a framework for secure, distributed,
>>> peer-to-peer
>>> +networking. The high-level goal is to provide a strong foundation of free
>>> +software for a global, distributed network which provides security and
gt;> Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2016 17:49:27 +0200
> >> Subject: [PATCH] gnu: gnunet-gtk: Add build-input and home-page.
> >
> > Can you split this into two patches?
>
> I can, but why should I? Because it's two kinds of changes? I see
> different grouped changes everywhe
On Mon, Mar 28, 2016 at 07:49:48PM +0200, Nils Gillmann wrote:
> Leo Famulari writes:
[...]
> >> +(native-inputs
> >> + `(("pkg-config" ,pkg-config)
> >> + ("autoconf" ,autoconf)
> >> + ("automake" ,automake)
> >> + ("gettext" ,gnu-gettext)
> >> + ("libtool" ,libt
Efraim Flashner writes:
> On Mon, 28 Mar 2016 12:45:35 -0400
> Leo Famulari wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Mar 28, 2016 at 06:17:05PM +0200, Nils Gillmann wrote:
>> [...]
>>
>> s/traced/tracked
>>
>> [...]
>>
>> Same question as before about the length of the SVN identifier.
>>
>> > + (file
On Mon, 28 Mar 2016 12:45:35 -0400
Leo Famulari wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 28, 2016 at 06:17:05PM +0200, Nils Gillmann wrote:
> [...]
>
> s/traced/tracked
>
> [...]
>
> Same question as before about the length of the SVN identifier.
>
> > + (file-name (string-append name "-" version "-c
On Mon, 28 Mar 2016 17:57:50 +0200
Nils Gillmann wrote:
> From ee326257b613449ca5c0834f7e8f6b8d0840d486 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Nils Gillmann
> Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2016 17:49:27 +0200
> Subject: [PATCH] gnu: gnunet-gtk: Add build-input and home-page.
>
> * gnu/p
Jookia <166...@gmail.com> writes:
> On Mon, Mar 28, 2016 at 07:49:48PM +0200, Nils Gillmann wrote:
>> >> +;; We provide SVN in addition to the older 0.10.1 version,
>> >> +;; protocol and API compatibility will be broken when GNUnet bug #4165
>> >> +;; is fixed.
>> >> +(define-public gnunet-svn
>>
On Mon, Mar 28, 2016 at 07:49:48PM +0200, Nils Gillmann wrote:
> >> +;; We provide SVN in addition to the older 0.10.1 version,
> >> +;; protocol and API compatibility will be broken when GNUnet bug #4165
> >> +;; is fixed.
> >> +(define-public gnunet-svn
> >> + (package
> >> +(name "gnunet-sv
Leo Famulari writes:
> On Mon, Mar 28, 2016 at 06:07:24PM +0200, Nils Gillmann wrote:
>> From 27eb23709f79a5383c66526e25f5cdf26b645793 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
>> From: Nils Gillmann
>> Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2016 18:00:27 +0200
>> Subject: [PATCH] gnu: gnunet: Add gnunet-svn.
>>
>> * gnu/packages/g
Leo Famulari writes:
> On Mon, Mar 28, 2016 at 05:57:50PM +0200, Nils Gillmann wrote:
>> From ee326257b613449ca5c0834f7e8f6b8d0840d486 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
>> From: Nils Gillmann
>> Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2016 17:49:27 +0200
>> Subject: [PATCH] gnu: gnunet-gtk: Ad
Leo Famulari writes:
> On Mon, Mar 28, 2016 at 06:07:24PM +0200, Nils Gillmann wrote:
>> From 27eb23709f79a5383c66526e25f5cdf26b645793 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
>> From: Nils Gillmann
>> Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2016 18:00:27 +0200
>> Subject: [PATCH] gnu: gnunet: Add gnunet-svn.
>>
>> * gnu/packages/g
Leo Famulari writes:
> On Mon, Mar 28, 2016 at 05:43:52PM +0200, Nils Gillmann wrote:
>> rewrite of description, will soon be reflected on gnunet.org
>>
>
>> From 651d137ff4efff1a57fa23a4de524fabc3f6c911 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
>> From: Nils Gillmann
>> Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2016 17:34:34 +0200
>>
Leo Famulari writes:
> On Mon, Mar 28, 2016 at 05:23:45PM +0200, Nils Gillmann wrote:
>> As mentioned on irc:
>>
>> To splitup this patch set, I'll send in various smaller patches
>> now which are based on current master.
>
> Thank you! This is much easier to read.
>
>> From 3c86172695714d84f278
On Mon, Mar 28, 2016 at 05:43:52PM +0200, Nils Gillmann wrote:
> rewrite of description, will soon be reflected on gnunet.org
>
> From 651d137ff4efff1a57fa23a4de524fabc3f6c911 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Nils Gillmann
> Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2016 17:34:34 +0200
> Subject: [PATCH] gnu: gnunet: r
On Mon, Mar 28, 2016 at 06:17:05PM +0200, Nils Gillmann wrote:
> From 4633dc3484390fa6e399084336e73879066b1760 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Nils Gillmann
> Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2016 18:10:12 +0200
> Subject: [PATCH] gnu: Add gnunet-gtk-svn.
>
> * gnu/packages/gnunet.scm (gn
On Mon, Mar 28, 2016 at 06:07:24PM +0200, Nils Gillmann wrote:
> From 27eb23709f79a5383c66526e25f5cdf26b645793 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Nils Gillmann
> Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2016 18:00:27 +0200
> Subject: [PATCH] gnu: gnunet: Add gnunet-svn.
>
> * gnu/packages/gnunet.scm (gnunet-svn): New var
On Mon, Mar 28, 2016 at 05:57:50PM +0200, Nils Gillmann wrote:
> From ee326257b613449ca5c0834f7e8f6b8d0840d486 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Nils Gillmann
> Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2016 17:49:27 +0200
> Subject: [PATCH] gnu: gnunet-gtk: Add build-input and home-page.
Can you split t
On Mon, Mar 28, 2016 at 05:23:45PM +0200, Nils Gillmann wrote:
> As mentioned on irc:
>
> To splitup this patch set, I'll send in various smaller patches
> now which are based on current master.
Thank you! This is much easier to read.
> From 3c86172695714d84f27886a9a34c4a13d1b9c06d Mon Sep 17 00
>From 4633dc3484390fa6e399084336e73879066b1760 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Nils Gillmann
Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2016 18:10:12 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] gnu: Add gnunet-gtk-svn.
* gnu/packages/gnunet.scm (gnunet-gtk-svn): New variable.
Coauthored by Jookia.
---
gnu/packages/gnunet.scm |
>From 27eb23709f79a5383c66526e25f5cdf26b645793 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Nils Gillmann
Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2016 18:00:27 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] gnu: gnunet: Add gnunet-svn.
* gnu/packages/gnunet.scm (gnunet-svn): New variable.
Coauthored by Jookia.
---
gnu/packages/gnunet.scm | 88 +++
>From ee326257b613449ca5c0834f7e8f6b8d0840d486 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Nils Gillmann
Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2016 17:49:27 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] gnu: gnunet-gtk: Add build-input and home-page.
* gnu/packages/gnunet.scm (gnunet-gtk)[configure-flags]: Add build-input gnunet.
[home-page]:
rewrite of description, will soon be reflected on gnunet.org
>From 651d137ff4efff1a57fa23a4de524fabc3f6c911 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Nils Gillmann
Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2016 17:34:34 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] gnu: gnunet: rewrite description
* gnu/packages/gnunet.scm (description): Rewrite to ref
As mentioned on irc:
To splitup this patch set, I'll send in various smaller patches
now which are based on current master.
>From 3c86172695714d84f27886a9a34c4a13d1b9c06d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Nils Gillmann
Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2016 17:11:46 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] gnu: gnurl: Build with ca
Could someone either:
- test this patchset,
- tell me they are on their watchlist,
- or tell me that I should resubmit all of them individually
because that's easier / quicker to test?
--
ng
personal contact: http://krosos.sdf.org
EDN: https://wiki.c3d2.de/EDN
Forwarded because nntp+email in my Gnus apparently splits
threads. Seems like I have to switch back to email for guix-devel
if I CC people.
From: Jookia <166...@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] gnunet.scm -> various changes (description update, adds
gnunet-svn, gnunet-gtk-svn, gnurl)
This is a post to bump this thread into attention again.
If it is on anyones test list or if anyone new wants to test and
report, please contribute to this thread.
Jookia had test results, so I CC you and hope you can contribute
the results.
--
ng
personal contact: http://krosos.sdf.org
EDN: htt
l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
> Nils Gillmann skribis:
>
>> In this case I have to disagree.
>> I would if I could, but I had a conversation with Christian about
>> it*. The most useable GNUnet right now for us is the SVN
>
> [...]
>
>> From my perspective I want people to have a good ex
Nils Gillmann skribis:
> In this case I have to disagree.
> I would if I could, but I had a conversation with Christian about
> it*. The most useable GNUnet right now for us is the SVN
[...]
> From my perspective I want people to have a good experience of
> trying out (that's the way you should
Nils Gillmann writes:
> Then there's the recent patch for gnunet-gtk 0.10.1, a short
> message exchange with Christian Grothoff, Jookia, and myself
> today leads to the following conclusion which will be further
> explained in a new patch series coming either today or on sund
In this case I have to disagree.
I would if I could, but I had a conversation with Christian about
it*. The most useable GNUnet right now for us is the SVN
checkout.
See this thread for more, iirc I explained it there:
6.6k│O │=> gmane.comp.gnu.guix.║ ● addresses: works around gnunet-gtk
Nils Gillmann skribis:
> +gnunet-0.10.1 is the last stable release candidate, however for
> +development purposes and keeping up with latest changes, the SVN version
> +might be preferable until a new version is released.")
[...]
> +;; We provide SVN in addition to the older 0.10.1 version,
> +
2016 17:08:26 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] gnu: gnunet (Various Changes)
* gnu/packages/gnunet.scm:
Add gnunet-svn (New Variable)
Add gnunet-gtk-svn (Likewise)
gnunet-gtk: (#configure-flags: add --with-gnunet)
gnurl: (#configure-flags: add --with-ca-path)
above co-authored by Jookia
gnunet: Up
a useable experience of an still in development
> >> > network, what do we suggest? I would not replace gnunet and
> >> > gnunet-gtk, I would just make gnunet-svn the default (gnunet will
> >> > default to gnunet-svn) and gnunet-0.10.1 will have to be
> >> &g
I would not replace gnunet and
>> > gnunet-gtk, I would just make gnunet-svn the default (gnunet will
>> > default to gnunet-svn) and gnunet-0.10.1 will have to be
>> > installed explicitly.
>> The reply to my bug report said something similar. If version 0.10.1 is
>&
On Tue, Mar 08, 2016 at 06:22:23PM +0100, Ricardo Wurmus wrote:
> > Guix should provide a stable experience, but if stable means too
> > old to deliver a useable experience of an still in development
> > network, what do we suggest? I would not replace gnunet and
> > gnune
html/guix-devel/2016-03/msg00244.html
if you still spot issues, try to search the thread for a newer
one without issues as indeed, the threading became bad,
and this one for powwow, fixes all issues:
https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/2016-03/msg00282.html
Then there's the recent
able means too
>> old to deliver a useable experience of an still in development
>> network, what do we suggest? I would not replace gnunet and
>> gnunet-gtk, I would just make gnunet-svn the default (gnunet will
>> default to gnunet-svn) and gnunet-0.10.1 will have to be
>
n development
> network, what do we suggest? I would not replace gnunet and
> gnunet-gtk, I would just make gnunet-svn the default (gnunet will
> default to gnunet-svn) and gnunet-0.10.1 will have to be
> installed explicitly.
> There are only a few open bugs until the next GNUnet r
On Tue, Mar 08, 2016 at 03:48:03PM +0100, Nils Gillmann wrote:
> Following later this week:
>
> gnunet + gnunet-gtk SVN, co-authored work with Jookia.
>
> I'll ask on gnunet-dev about this, but it might be that we have
> to decide wether to default to some svn of gnunet
Following later this week:
gnunet + gnunet-gtk SVN, co-authored work with Jookia.
I'll ask on gnunet-dev about this, but it might be that we have
to decide wether to default to some svn of gnunet, as 0.10.1 is
really old. Stable, but old.. Which possibly could affect the
experience for p
This should fix the problem we Ricardo reported to gnunet-devel
in [GNUNET-developers] gnunet-gtk segfaults and other issues or
at least fix part of the problem.
It should add a reference to GNUnet to our gnunet-gtk
(--with-gnunet= ...), but still does not fix:
"checking for Glade core... -
Ludovic Courtès writes:
>> From 29708ddfff95b06ae2e7076d1e2fd13d93b782b9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
>> From: Ni* Gillmann
>> Date: Wed, 13 Jan 2016 18:36:31 +0100
>> Subject: [PATCH 2/2] gnu: Add gnunet-gtk.
>>
>> * gnu/packages/gnunet.scm (gnunet-gtk)
Ricardo Wurmus skribis:
> the attached patches make for a buildable gnunet-gtk package, but it
> doesn’t seem fully functional. I see a segfault when switching tabs
> in “gnunet-setup” after first interacting with the URL dropdown.
>
> In “gnunet-gtk” I also don’t see anythin
Hi,
the attached patches make for a buildable gnunet-gtk package, but it
doesn’t seem fully functional. I see a segfault when switching tabs
in “gnunet-setup” after first interacting with the URL dropdown.
In “gnunet-gtk” I also don’t see anything more than the images. There
should be more
Something currently looks like lines are broken, so I attach the .patch itself.
>From 41a4b5b4f7c3cfc4bd2afedc0da9b256eca7b16b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Ni* Gillmann
Date: Wed, 13 Jan 2016 18:36:31 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] gnu/packages/gnunet gnunet-gtk added
This is the most recent, almost build
Leo Famulari skribis:
> On Thu, Dec 17, 2015 at 04:10:15PM +0100, anonymiss wrote:
>> The current state is:
>> gnunet-gtk would theoretically build, but glade3-3.18.x (3.18.3 in this
>> case) is not building correctly, it fails at where I tried to include
>> documentat
anonymiss skribis:
> I wasn't sure if GNU commit/coding style requires to add names to
> headers of files.
It’s not GNU, just Guix practice and copyright practice in general.
> If it does and it is okay to just use what I used in the commit
> message / id, please add those.
> If it isn't okay,
On Fri, 18 Dec 2015 12:44:08 -0500
Leo Famulari wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 17, 2015 at 04:10:15PM +0100, anonymiss wrote:
> > The current state is:
> > gnunet-gtk would theoretically build, but glade3-3.18.x (3.18.3 in
> > this case) is not building correctly, it fails at where I
On Thu, Dec 17, 2015 at 04:10:15PM +0100, anonymiss wrote:
> The current state is:
> gnunet-gtk would theoretically build, but glade3-3.18.x (3.18.3 in this
> case) is not building correctly, it fails at where I tried to include
> documentation. glade3 with libgladeui is a dependenc
I wasn't sure if GNU commit/coding style requires to add names to
headers of files.
If it does and it is okay to just use what I used in the commit
message / id, please add those.
If it isn't okay, I can provide my legal name or shortened legal name,
I don't feel that it should matter though.
--
I feel like the amount of things I am learning and working on at the
same time doesn't give me enough time to debug the 2 recipes I have for
gnunet-gtk now with the same quality I would want to see in patches I
want to release.
Because I feel it needs to be released and I think there are
Original Message
Subject: Re: gnunet-gtk
Local Time: December 6 2015 10:43 pm
UTC Time: December 6 2015 9:43 pm
From: mista.ta...@gmx.net
To: guix-devel@gnu.org
On 12/06/2015 02:05 PM, anonymiss wrote:
>
> I wonder if somebody is working on gnunet-gtk or if this is a p
1 - 100 of 102 matches
Mail list logo
