Andreas Enge <andr...@enge.fr> writes: > On Tue, Mar 08, 2016 at 06:22:23PM +0100, Ricardo Wurmus wrote: >> > Guix should provide a stable experience, but if stable means too >> > old to deliver a useable experience of an still in development >> > network, what do we suggest? I would not replace gnunet and >> > gnunet-gtk, I would just make gnunet-svn the default (gnunet will >> > default to gnunet-svn) and gnunet-0.10.1 will have to be >> > installed explicitly. >> The reply to my bug report said something similar. If version 0.10.1 is >> so old that upstream suggest taking the latest from SVN I suppose we >> should do this too. > > I would argue that if upstream cannot be bothered to make a stable release > every once in a while, this is not our business, unless there are dependent > packages that stop working. > > On the other hand, as I fear that the number of users of the current gnunet > is very limited, it probably does not hurt to update it with the version > number 0.10.1-1-xxx for some svn checkout xxx.
I am currently working on it, see also my latest Email to guix-devel including the whys and tl;drs. > Andreas > > > -- ng personal contact: http://krosos.sdf.org EDN: https://wiki.c3d2.de/Echt_Dezentrales_Netz/en
