Nils Gillmann <niaster...@grrlz.net> writes: > I'll ask on gnunet-dev about this, but it might be that we have > to decide wether to default to some svn of gnunet, as 0.10.1 is > really old. Stable, but old.. Which possibly could affect the > experience for people who try to use gnunet now, before any > applications like secushare are running on it. plus you need -svn > if you want to hack on or testrun application which develop on > top of / inside gnunet. > > Guix should provide a stable experience, but if stable means too > old to deliver a useable experience of an still in development > network, what do we suggest? I would not replace gnunet and > gnunet-gtk, I would just make gnunet-svn the default (gnunet will > default to gnunet-svn) and gnunet-0.10.1 will have to be > installed explicitly. > There are only a few open bugs until the next GNUnet release will > be done, but 0.10.1 is just terribly old.
The reply to my bug report said something similar. If version 0.10.1 is so old that upstream suggest taking the latest from SVN I suppose we should do this too. I do hope there will be a new release soon, though, as I don’t like to use some arbitrary SVN checkout. ~~ Ricardo
