On Sun, Jul 31, 2016 at 01:08:54PM +0000, ng0 wrote: > This was another failing test, someone before me reported it and > therefore I have no bugreport to point to. I consider it superfluous > work to fix 0.10.1 (the (define-public gnunet)) now that work towards > 0.10.2 release happens. Tests might or might not change, so the svn > version is more logical to fix and report bugs on.
So maybe it may make sense to wait for 0.10.2 instead of adding packages based on unreleased commits? In the meantime, you could work with upstream to iron out test failures, and when 0.10.2 comes out, you might have a working gnunet package. Andreas
