Go cast iron. You can use it over an open fire in the tundra and it makes a
decent self-defense weapon against rampaging moose. :)
Avi
On Tue, Sep 8, 2020 at 12:48 PM Robert J. Hansen
wrote:
> > A. Yes, you can still anonymously register for almost anything.
>
> > It's not
On Friday, May 6, 2016, Werner Koch wrote:
>
>
> Not my quote; I can't remember its origin, though.
>
Takeoff of Monty Python & Spanish Inquisition, perhaps?
Avi
--
Sent from Gmail Mobile
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg
I still find it much easier to use off of a USB key than 2.x, and so
continue to use it, FWIW. The 2.x version doesn't work with the (non-FLOSS)
shell I use either, but that isn't a reason to keep it mentioned.
Avi
User:Avraham
pub 3072D/F80E29F9 1/30/2009 Avi (Wikimedia-r
Ran across this which may help in allegories/examples: <
http://www.mul-t-lockusa.com/res/USA/Keying_Options/OneWayCylinder_Concept_Sheet.pdf>.
It can handle keys which only lock, only unlock, or both.
Avi
User:Avraham
pub 3072D/F80E29F9 1/30/2009 Avi (Wikimedia-related key)
P
and come to
his own measured opinion.
Avi
Avi
User:Avraham
pub 3072D/F80E29F9 1/30/2009 Avi (Wikimedia-related key)
Primary key fingerprint: 167C 063F 7981 A1F6 71EC ABAA 0D62 B019 F80E
29F9
On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 11:57 PM, Doug Barton
wrote:
> It's quite disingenuous t
426859/shameful-security-startcom-charges-people-to-revoke-ssl-certs-vulnerable-to-heartbleed.shtml
>
etc.
Avi
User:Avraham
pub 3072D/F80E29F9 1/30/2009 Avi (Wikimedia-related key)
Primary key fingerprint: 167C 063F 7981 A1F6 71EC ABAA 0D62 B019 F80E
29F9
On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 7
Understood, Werner and Rob, thank you for the clarification. I'll try to
install a minimal version of GnuPG 2.1 and see how that works.
As always, the work of the GnuPG developers, maintainers, and supporters is
greatly appreciated!
Avi
User:Avraham
pub 3072D/F80E29F9 1/30/200
Good morning/afternoon/evening.
I know that this has been discussed previously, but now that GnuPG modern
has been released with ECC support, is there the intention to add that
support to the classic build in the near-to-internediate future?
Thank you,
Avi
User:Avraham
pub 3072D/F80E29F9
YIxo
=i+me
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
User:Avraham
pub 3072D/F80E29F9 1/30/2009 Avi (Wikimedia-related key)
Primary key fingerprint: 167C 063F 7981 A1F6 71EC ABAA 0D62 B019 F80E 29F9
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
So what is the "KEY" field then (see the wikipedia link you brought and
this <http://www6.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/vcarddav/current/msg01849.html
>).
Thanks,
Avi
User:Avraham
pub 3072D/F80E29F9 1/30/2009 Avi (Wikimedia-related key)
Primary key fingerprint: 167C 063
Would having the e-mail address and name in the QR code adversely affect
compatibility with monkeysign?
For example, see the attached code which is similar to what I was playing
with for key-signing purposes, although I was going to print them on
mailing labels.
[image: Inline image 2]
Avi
Perhaps printing your fingerprint and e-mail address as a QR code. I've
done it on a piece of paper, but never a business card.
Avi
User:Avraham
pub 3072D/F80E29F9 1/30/2009 Avi (Wikimedia-related key)
Primary key fingerprint: 167C 063F 7981 A1F6 71EC ABAA 0D62 B019 F80E
29F9
O
On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 12:41 PM, Matt D wrote:
>
> >
> How can I find whats on my list?
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
You can see what is in your list with the 'showpref' command
whilst in the key editing menu.
Avi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE---
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
OK, Robert. You're on the hook for at least €100. :)
Thank you for the reminder, and thank you, Werner and your team,
for the decades of work and toil whose fruits you have donated
to the world at large.
Avi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Ve
t a matter of price. Send me an offer. :-)
>
--Avi
User:Avraham
pub 3072D/F80E29F9 1/30/2009 Avi (Wikimedia-related key)
Primary key fingerprint: 167C 063F 7981 A1F6 71EC ABAA 0D62 B019 F80E
29F9
On Mon, Sep 9, 2013 at 9:38 AM, Werner Koch wrote:
> On Mon, 9 Sep 2013 09:55, laurent
-handedly supports and gives to us for free :-)
--Avi
Please excuse any spelling or grammar errors as this was sent from a Nexus
7 tablet. Thank you.
On Sep 9, 2013 4:01 AM, "Laurent Jumet" wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: RIPEMD160
>
>
> Hello Chris !
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
As must I. Robert has one of the clearest modes of exposition from
which I have ever been fortunate to benefit.
- --Avi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2.0.21 (MingW32)
Comment: Most recent key: Click show in box @ http://is.gd/4xJrs
does provide a front-end to gpgconf (at least on
expert mode) but I cannot find those values, whereas in GPG 1.x I
could simply have a gpg.cof file with entries like:
s2k-digest-algo SHA512
s2k-cipher-algo AES
cert-digest-algo SHA512
verbose
compress-level 9
bzip2-compress-level 9
Thank you,
universal topic?
I will be accepting donations of projectile fermented vegetables for a
limited time.
User:Avraham
pub 3072D/F80E29F9 1/30/2009 Avi (Wikimedia-related key)
Primary key fingerprint: 167C 063F 7981 A1F6 71EC ABAA 0D62 B019 F80E
29F9
On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 10:27 AM
ss, right?)
>
>
> Michael
Well, a revocation certificate should be sufficient to kill the key
even if you forget the passphrase.
User:Avraham
pub 3072D/F80E29F9 1/30/2009 Avi (Wikimedia-related key)
Primary key fingerprint: 167C 063F 7981 A1F6 71EC ABAA 0D62 B019 F80E 29F9
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
A512
verbose
compress-level 9
bzip2-compress-level 9
User:Avraham
pub 3072D/F80E29F9 1/30/2009 Avi (Wikimedia-related key)
Primary key fingerprint: 167C 063F 7981 A1F6 71EC ABAA 0D62 B019 F80E
29F9
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
Linux only? Fascinating how my Linux box has all these Msoft issues than :D
User:Avraham
pub 3072D/F80E29F9 1/30/2009 Avi (Wikimedia-related key)
Primary key fingerprint: 167C 063F 7981 A1F6 71EC ABAA 0D62 B019 F80E 29F9
On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 10:16 PM, Robert J. Hansen wrote:
> Gn
Would it make sense to amend that to add SHA-3?
--Avi
On 1/30/13, Michel Messerschmidt wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 06:36:25PM -0600, John Clizbe wrote:
>> ved...@nym.hush.com wrote:
>> > if so, would this fall under the open-pgp RFC, or would it have to go
>> > t
p://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0743264169/#reader_0743264169>
--Avi
User:Avraham
pub 3072D/F80E29F9 1/30/2009 Avi (Wikimedia-related key)
Primary key fingerprint: 167C 063F 7981 A1F6 71EC ABAA 0D62 B019 F80E
29F9
On Tue, Jan 8, 2013 at 12:49 PM, wrote:
inPT, GPA, Etc.) which could do everything as easily and
completely.
Thank you,
- --Avi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (MingW32) - GPGshell v3.78
Comment: Most recent key: Click show in box @ http://is.gd/4xJrs
iL4EAREKAGYFAlCXyLV
ing
the settings I set when I installed GnuPG 1.4.12, as it seems to share
that information somehow)? Does GPA have an option to set word-wrap
width? It doesn't seem so.
Thanks,
Avi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (MingW32)
Comment: Most recent key: Click show in box @
have an option to minimize
to the tray; not as big a deal obviously. Note that this email is
signed with GnuPG 2.0.x and GPA, so at least I have something working
:)
Avi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (MingW32)
Comment: Most recent key: Click show in box @ http://is.gd/4xJrs
plain-old edit). For example, I see no way to
disable a key using GPA (let alone GnuPGShell which cannot read my
keys), but it is the simple matter of two clicks in the other program.
Perhaps there are options of which I am unaware, but I could not find
them.
Thank you,
--Avi
User:Avraham
rhaps GnuPGShell has all of these properties as well, I
guess I can try GnuPG 2.0.x and see, but until such time as a
portable installation of GnuPG 2.0.x for Windows exists, I'll
likely stay with the working combination of 1.4.12 + GPGShell.
More information can be found here:
<http:/
961), is freeware but closed-source.
GnuPGShell is FOSS (I do not know who the coder(s) are, sorry.
If I remember correctly, Werner prefers that this list restrict
itself to the discussion of FOSS only, although I must admit I
find myself using GPGShell in preference to all other GUIs.
Avi
-
it? I suspect
> Werner doesn't have the time. If he wants, I would be happy to take a
> stab at writing it.
Didn't you already write a pretty good one one, Robert?
<http://sixdemonbag.org/cryptofaq.xhtml>
--Avi
User:Avraham
pub 3072D/F80E29F9 1/30/2009 Avi (Wikimedia-re
rectory (iirc, we only need an "etc").
That would be great! To close the loop, could the installer be
modified to ask if the current install is portable and then create
that file before the rest of the install to make it seamless?
--Avi
User:Avraham
pub 3072D/F80E29F9 1/30/2009 A
Outlook and Explorer extensions would not be
installed in such a situation. In my current 1.4.12 install, for
example, I do not have shell integration or plugins to other programs,
which is fine, as who is to say that a program on trusted computer A
is installed on trusted computer B.
Once again, tha
missing something simple?
Thank you,
Avi
User:Avraham
pub 3072D/F80E29F9 1/30/2009 Avi (Wikimedia-related key)
Primary key fingerprint: 167C 063F 7981 A1F6 71EC ABAA 0D62 B019 F80E 29F9
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http:/
by a long
shot, and this would so far out of my league as to be
functionally impossible, so I cannot volunteer to do anything,
unfortunately; merely piggyback off of the expertise of others,
I am afraid.
Thank you,
Avi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (MingW32) - GPGshell v3.7
m sorry, but when someone drops Wittgenstein—on topic—on a
list about cryptography, there needs to be some recognition of
that.
Well done, sir.
- --Avi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (MingW32) - GPGshell v3.78
Comment: Most recent key: Click show in box @ http://is.gd/4xJrs
i
GPG
signature. Granted, very little utility, but still greater than
zero 8-).
- --Avi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (MingW32) - GPGshell v3.78
Comment: Most recent key: Click show in box @ http://is.gd/4xJrs
iL4EAREKAGYFAk8oSc1fGGh0dHA6Ly9rZXlz
#x27;t give the bitsize of the keys, just the
number of combinations, but it is still representative.
<http://www.lockdown.co.uk/?pg=combi>
Some other interesting, but likely outdated, discussions:
<http://news.electricalchemy.net/2009/10/password-cracking-in-
cloud-part-5.html>
e who
knew what they were doing did it. I still have nightmares from
the time I built an ATLAS BLAS and then used it to compile
Rblas.dll under windows. Probably took me over two weeks to get
it right :}
- --Avi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (MingW32) - GPGshell v3.77
Comment:
9rdXA/
b3A9Z2V0JnNlYXJjaD0weEY4MEUyOUY5AAoJEA1isBn4Din5shMA/3cWQTSh6UVw
RHzz2haPMRa9Vlc146PjyJLYZbRg//DiAQCLr8aJHrlGMLW7DaNKdnTx+n0YPM7k
HKuiahyASXxncQ==
=BuQ4
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
User:Avraham
pub 3072D/F80E29F9 1/30/2009 Avi (Wikimedia-related key)
Primary key fingerprint: 167C 063F 7981 A1F6 71EC ABAA 0D62
uk/?pg=combi&s=articles>
--Avi
User:Avraham
pub 3072D/F80E29F9 1/30/2009 Avi (Wikimedia-related key)
Primary key fingerprint: 167C 063F 7981 A1F6 71EC ABAA 0D62 B019 F80E
29F9
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://li
Thank you for the explanations, everone.
--Avi
On 3/11/11, David Shaw wrote:
> On Mar 11, 2011, at 2:01 PM, Avi wrote:
>
>> Thanks, everyone.
>>
>> So we can see the algorithm, but can not be able to see the compression
>> level used, correct?
>
> Not dire
Thanks, everyone.
So we can see the algorithm, but can not be able to see the compression
level used, correct?
Thanks,
--Avi
User:Avraham
pub 3072D/F80E29F9 1/30/2009 Avi (Wikimedia-related key)
Primary key fingerprint: 167C 063F 7981 A1F6 71EC ABAA 0D62 B019 F80E
29F9
On Fri, Mar
e, if possible.
Thanks,
Avi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (MingW32) - GPGshell v3.77
Comment: Most recent key: Click show in box @ http://is.gd/4xJrs
iJgEAREKAEAFAk16YNE5GGh0dHA6Ly9wZ3AubmljLmFkLmpwL3Brcy9sb29rdXA/
b3A9Z2V0JnNlYXJjaD0weEY4MEUyOUY5AAoJEA1isBn4Din5uvUA/2qqX7J
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Nothing a simple on-line search won't rectify.
- --Avi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (MingW32) - GPGshell v3.77
Comment: Most recent key: Click show in box @ http://is.gd/
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
As usual, Robert explains it clearly and succinctly.
- --Avi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (MingW32) - GPGshell v3.77
Comment: Most recent key: Click show in box @ http://is.gd/4xJrs
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Why? Inline is simple and effective. I'm curious as to why you
feel MIME is so much better.
- --Avi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (MingW32) - GPGshell v3.77
Comment: Most recent key: Click show in box @ http://is.gd/
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
For those of us who use webmail, inline signatures are rather
useful.
- -- Avi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (MingW32) - GPGshell v3.77
Comment: Most recent key: Click show in box @ http://is.gd/4xJrs
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
I believe Werner had mentioned that the 1.x version would
continue to be supported due to its enhanced portability, but I
could be misremembering. Can someone "official" comment as to
the viability of the 1.x trunk, please?
- --Avi
As someone who uses GnuPG on a USB stick under Windows, I sincerely hope
that elliptical curves get added to the 1.4 trunk.
--Avi
User:Avraham
pub 3072D/F80E29F9 1/30/2009 Avi (Wikimedia-related key)
Primary key fingerprint: 167C 063F 7981 A1F6 71EC ABAA 0D62 B019 F80E
29F9
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
I believe our very own Rob discusses that here:
<http://sixdemonbag.org/cryptofaq.xhtml#entropy>
- --Avi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (MingW32) - GPGshell v3.76
Comment: Most recent key: Click show in box @ http:/
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
As someone who has been lurking on this list for years, I'd just
like to thank everyone for their patience and detailed
explanations. Ben is not the only one who has learned (or been
re-taught) quite a bit from this conversation. Thanks!
-
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Have you looked at Peazip? <http://www.peazip.org/index.html>
- --Avi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (MingW32) - GPGshell v3.76
Comment: Most recent key: Click show in box @ http://is.gd
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
No. It has a program, GPGTray, that sits in the system tray and
can be used to access the interfaces, but it is not integrated
into windows explorer. You can find its website at:
<http://www.jumaros.de/rsoft/index.html>
- --Avi
-BEG
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
I use GPGshell and GnuPG 1.4.11 on Windows, and it works fine
for me.
- --Avi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (MingW32) - GPGshell v3.76
Comment: Most recent key: Click show in box @ http://is.gd/4xJrs
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
For those of us without ACM access, these papers are freely
available at:
1) http://simson.net/ref/2004/chi2005_smime_submitted.pdf
2) http://www.soe.ucsc.edu/classes/cmps223/Spring09/Gaw%2006.pdf
Avi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
If I recall correctly, when generating the revocation
certificate, you have an option to choose why the certificate is
being generated, and one choice is "key compromised".
- --Avi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.
will
> > undercut you. You can get really, really close to truly random
> > numbers, but you can't get there.
>
> See http://www.fourmilab.ch/hotbits/ for a random number generator using
> radioactive decay.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
That
On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 10:34 PM, Robert J. Hansen wrote:
> Avi wrote:
> > Yes, Robert, that is possible. However, IIRC, signatures come with a
> > time stamp.
>
> The OpenPGP time stamp is not a trusted timestamp and should not be
> relied upon for any truste
resorting to that level of duplicity is both
uncommon and will likely have other prevaricatory methods as well.
--Avi
On 1/13/09, Robert J. Hansen wrote:
> Avi wrote:
>> For example, given the possibility of a piece of an e-mail being
>> quoted out of context, signing my messag
RIPEMD160
Far be it from me to argue with Rob, who likely has forgotten
more about cryptography than I will ever learn, let alone know
now, but while signing messages cannot prove that an unsigned
message is false, it can prove that signed messages are true.
For example, given the possibility o
2psnji3du+eYl681DeLNDssbFIacZQ2g=
> =SqOP
> -END PGP SIGNATURE-
>
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
It may remove it from the copy sent, but it won't remove it from
copy stored on keyservers. Goodness knows I've tried to clean my
key a bu
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
Sorry. I try to, but gmail's web interface hides the subject of
a reply as the defualt, and I do forget.
Thanks,
- --Avi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (MingW32) - GPGshell v3.64
iEYEAREDAAYFAkhYSysACg
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
For what its worth, I recall getting the gpg icon when I
recently installed 7z as well.
Avi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (MingW32) - GPGshell v3.64
iEYEAREDAAYFAkhXyekACgkQy6A/Rnheoik/swCfcEVbQ+c+5C2BROYDagIpnHlU
0
Removing the 3D characters after the penultimate "=" and before
the final equals sign should fix it, I think.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (MingW32) - GPGshell v3.64
iEYEAREDAAYFAkgrXQEACgkQy6A/RnheoikodQCdH5n1wZxh6eeXHCitz9NrhUu0
IhEAnj6el7UO1oo8roVZ0WXESFk7HVcR
=tAGO
,
- --Avi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.8 (MingW32) - GPGshell v3.64
iEYEAREDAAYFAkfMLSoACgkQy6A/RnheoilMIQCdFAq1i1ALaLYrmz8VDG0jwjc2
KNEAn3LMcbkmiMMh8ycp0v/Lsi6kgxrw
=6wUh
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
--
en:User:Avraham
pub 1024D/785EA229 3/6/2007 Avi (Wikipedia-related
Hi there,
I just started with PGP and GPG.
My question is: how can I identify GPG files not by their name (e.g. extension)
but by their first bytes or file header.
For example – zip file starts with 'PK' (ASCII).
Although searching the web and reading the GPG documentation couldn't find
anything
67 matches
Mail list logo
